Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

The Not So Usual Suspects

April 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A number of colleges and universities are aggressively recruiting professionals from outside academe for various administrative roles. Many of these professionals come to our campuses from substantial corporate careers, with excellent aptitude for the job at hand, and are generally wonderful additions to our staffs. The test we often face as managers is to give these new staff members basic knowledge of what professionals in their fields – in my case, registrars and enrollment managers -- really “do.” Although very talented, many of the professionals from outside academe have little knowledge about the nature, culture and structure of higher education.

One of the first career counseling issues we face with new staff is to help them comprehend our work as a vocation. Many people who work in higher education still utilize the word “vocation” instead of “job.” They correctly view their responsibilities as having a much more profound impact on the world then a regular “job” would.

This is a new line of logic for scores of professionals. Often, being drawn to a vocation is already in their heart. In fact, I have discovered this is the primary reason why so many talented professionals leave the business world and join us in higher education. However, the expression of that vocation is still important for them to visualize and verbalize. Regular "touch base" sessions with staff can help facilitate the expression of such ideas and get them to open up. Such an expression leads to a far more dedicated and fulfilled staff member.

People new to the profession require specialized training to comprehend exactly who and what the registrar originally was at a university. The short answer is they were faculty members. The registrar's profession is an ancient one that dates to the medieval university. Medieval registrars were regarded as an academic officer from the faculty ranks who proclaimed messages, maintained records and executed the mandates of the university authorities. Understanding the raison d'être for the registrar is a critical comprehension for new staff.

As collegiate enrollments grew in the 19th century, a swift change came to the registrar profession. By 1880, 10 percent of the institutions of higher learning had full-time registrars, 42 percent by 1900, 76 percent by 1910, and over 90 percent by 1920. If staff members grasp how the profession originated, they have a much better opportunity to cultivate services and grown their career.

Training for such staff often has more to do with the function and philosophy of a college or university on the whole, rather than the specific operational mechanics of a position. Most professional staff are equipped to quickly deal with the operational challenges in an efficient manner. Often, it is the nature, culture and structure of higher education that perplexes them.

The culture of higher education is very different from the corporate world. I came from a corporate background to work at a university. That first year was quite a learning experience. When I was working in the corporate world, money was the sole decision making instrument. Professionals coming from the corporate world have lived within an apparatus where the only question to ask was, “Does this increase revenue?” Treating fellow employees or subordinates with disrespect was simply not a concern in the corporate world.

In higher education, most folks have little tolerance for treating people with disrespect. Whereas in private industry it is perfectly acceptable to dress a person down in public on multiple occasions, higher education has a different set of standards. One really must pick and choose very precise times to fight public battles. Staff members who do not hold the respect of their peers often have a challenging time succeeding. Actually, on balance this is one of the most attractive aspects of higher education to the outside professional. They are sick of being treated poorly, are looking for a new challenge and wish to strive for the internal fulfillment that a successful vocation can bring.

Mobility can be a great marketing tool for attracting new professionals into the registrar and enrollment management profession. Even during our challenging economy, one can click on the Inside Higher Ed jobs page and find numerous openings in the field of enrollment management. If you work at a corporation, mobility is quite limited. The accounting department only wants CPAs, marketing want staff who have worked for advertising firms, I.T. departments only want folks with at least three Final Fantasy posters and a Wookie costume.(fun line.)

Such constraints on mobility are not quite so limited at a college or university. Most institutions are like mini cities unto themselves. Jobs regularly go to internal candidates first. This means a person can switch positions, often without uprooting their entire life and family.

Attrition can be what a manager makes of it. In contemporary society, people are going to hold many positions in their lifetime. I am not looking for someone who just wants to plop down into a comfortable job for the next 30 years. I want a go-getter. A person who is going to work his or her tail off, wants to earn an advanced degree and move up the institutional ladder. That type of person is going to be an incredibly productive staff member. If I can just hold onto that individual for two or three years, I consider it a success. Then, I can go out and hire a new person just as driven.

One way to reduce attrition is to hire staff from outside academe with ties to the institution. Too often we look at our graduating seniors and alumni and say, “Why would they want to work here?” Most of these former students adore their alma mater. They would do anything to support their school, including take a position at a lower income than what they might earn in the corporate world. Several of the alumni who have joined our Office of the Registrar from the private sector report vastly increased job satisfaction. This allows for a dramatic increase in productivity and efficiency for the institution, and a decrease in attrition.

An attrition issue most institutions face with all staff members is salary. Higher education simply cannot pay what the corporate world offers. In the private sector, money is the ultimate status symbol and reason for staying with a company. Higher education pays fairly, but rarely can match the glamour of high salaries and bonuses available from major corporations.

In my experience, registrars and enrollment managers need to accentuate the excellent benefits that higher education positions typically offer. For example, our health care benefits often vastly exceed those of private corporations. Moreover, the educational benefit of taking classes at no cost or a drastically reduced cost is a major attraction. Finally, the controlled stress level of working in higher education means your odds of living a longer life significantly increase.

The point at which staff from outside academe integrate themselves into a registrar’s office varies by individual. Integration to the profession typically occurs when these individuals start making strategic decisions. Such decisions are often well thought out and nuanced at an important level. Rather than thinking solely in terms of revenue or self promotion, the staff realign their thought process to scholarship, advising, graduation rate and student-faculty satisfaction.

We now are in the educational postmodern era. New technology and financial pressures are pushing us forward. However, technologies and finances still need to be balanced with our traditional duties. Hiring well qualified staff from outside academe is an excellent way to tackle many of the contemporary issues we face in higher education.

Chuck Hurley is associate university registrar and interim director of summer session at the University of Notre Dame. He is presenting a version of this talk at the annual meeting of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers this week.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Not So Usual Suspects

  • Funny
  • Posted by Donna on April 15, 2009 at 10:15am EDT
  • In higher education, most folks have little tolerance for treating people with disrespect...

    Frankly, there could be a little more "disrespect" in the inner workings of higher education administration, as all too often incompetence is overlooked and management is woefully top-down to the point that nothing is under control. It's funny how people within higher ed see their workplace as a utopia, when instead it can actually be profoundly dysfunctional in terms of getting things done and meeting objectives. Please, don't "higher educationalize" people coming in from the outside! You need some people who don't see it as a "vocation" in order to bring the workplace in line with outside realities.

  • Posted by Joe on April 15, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • One of the more interesting experiences I had was the integration of a "for profit" school into our NFP culture. It ultimately failed and I guess the best way i could describe it would be that our side of the house was a delicate and intricate machine and their side was an industrial woodchipper.

    Everyone was afraid to even go near the woodchipper and the people who ran it were rather alien to us. I think it gave me an appreciation for two things. First, I can better understand how corporate America churns out (or imports) so much stuff so cheaply. Second, this model should never, ever, be applied to higher education.

  • Posted by Suzanne on April 15, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I came to higher education after more than 15 years in for-profit industry. I don't see much difference in how decisions are made. Higher ed is just as concerned with the bottom line as industry. I think it is a fantasy to say otherwise. I have not seen or been part of one decision made where money didn't play a sizable role in the outcome.

    Alson, unlike the for-profit world, the flatter structure of education means most decisions are based on consensus/committee, i.e. mediocrity rules, and everthing moves through the system at a snail's pace. It's the most inefficient system I've ever seen.

  • Agree with Funny
  • Posted by James Morgan , Assistant Professor, CIS on April 15, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • I tend to agree with Funny - I have and continue to witness quite a bit of dysfunctional behavior due to poor leadership at multiple colleges. Sometimes a bit of candor is the best thing you can do for a poorly perfoming employee.

  • Posted by Humanities PhD , Agreeing with Funny & Suzanne at University of Iowa on April 15, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • I am a PhD who is currently on the job market - I am looking at teaching jobs AND admin jobs - mostly because of the economy. I have been in academia for 6 years, served on multiple committees with administrators and faculty. I have sat on hiring committees and on policy committees. I have also worked for a non profit and for corporate America before deciding to go school to become a professor.

    I thought academe would be just like it was described in this article. Then I woke up.

    I have found it to be very much like the "real world" whatever that is - but have found it to be much less ethical - which is ironic. Nasty behavior is not only tolerated it is encouraged because at "good" schools - the only thing that really counts is how respected your work is - how much you publish and where you publish is what gets you respect. How "nice to people" you are does not. I have seen my tenured colleagues yell at eachother in the hallways, slam doors on eachother, insult eachother durring faculty meetings, professors try to sleep with their grad students and undergrads and so much nepotism it would make your head spin! All of these things are much less tolerated in the "real world."

    Now I realize that my experience is just that - my experience. Maybe it's different at Notre Dame but no one in my department, to my knowledge, has ever used the word vocation. They all say "jobs."

    If Notre Dame is the utopia that author presents it to be I might be looking for an admin job there! But somehow I think not. Romanticizing higher education and denying its "dark side" is doing NOTHING to advance higher ed or fix the many problems we have in academia.

  • Once again...
  • Posted by Dr. Phil , professor at Columbia U. on April 15, 2009 at 11:45pm EDT
  • Once again, I see the message board on here dominated by higher ed failures. It is so sad. Successful academics don't have time to complain like many of you failures. I think the author accurately reflects the environment at my mid-size college. Was a prof, then worked for a corporation, and now I am back in as a prof again. College life is much more fun, engaging and respectful then any single day of the 10 years I spent in the corporate world.

  • Posted by To "Once again..." on April 16, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • I'm not a higher ed failure; I'm a lowly office staff member who routinely cleans up for the lack of management ability of professors and (many) college administrators.

    Reminds me of a story my dad used to tell about the family Christmas tree. When he was a kid, and it was time to decorate the tree, he and his brothers would run around throwing tinsel at it haphazardly. But, on Christmas morning, the tree always looked splendid. It turns out that Mom was coming down at night and re-doing all their work. When my father got married and it was time for him and my mother to decorate their first tree together, he was shocked when my mother objected to his "technique." It was only just then that he realized he was not a master tree decorator and that his mother, in fact, had readjusted everything.

    You don't have to see reality - you have your heads in the academic clouds. Of course it's fun. You don't have to actually make sure anything works at ground level, like managers in the real world do.

  • Posted by James , admissions at iupui on April 16, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • We just added two people to our admissions staff who had been laid off from corporate jobs. They have had many neat ideas and really improved our outreach with creative thinking.

  • I don't know if I should laugh or cry...
  • Posted by Observer on April 16, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Wow. As someone who has worked in both academia and the corporate world, I think that the author's romantic view of higher ed is a little off.

    I also find it ironic that some commenters who support the authors arguement slam other posters with personal attacks. I mean really, was it really necesary to call others failures? Do you know the poster personally to make such a judgement? I will go out on a limb and guess "no". Your comments prove that all interactions by academics are not sunshine, rainbows and unicorns. (nevermind passing a basic civility/professionalism test)

    But back to the authors premise, many of my best friends remain in academia and back stabbing, poor management skills and unprofessional behavior are alive and well. It is a constant sense of frustration to them. One example is a Dean that refuses to attend staff meetings (with her own staff) because two tenured employees contantly argue during the meetings. The Dean is sick of it but instead of addressing the issue, the Dean is a no show. It's the most bizzare thing I've ever heard.

    Make no mistake, the corporate world has its own issues. Bottom-line thinking, climbing up the backs of others using the knives that you put there as a foothold, etc. But the best companies (not all) hold people accountable not only for the bottom line but for professionalism, managing others upward in the organization and serving our customers. If you are not in one of those companies, start your job search today because they do exist.

    I also think that for academics, tenure is a blessing and a curse. Once you are tenured, you can't easily move from one university to another so you are stuck.

    Sorry this is rambling, but the author puts forth a lot to think about.

  • Posted by Wilma Goi , assistant dean at north texas on April 17, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • Some of you may wish to read the article a second time. The writer is clearly NOT saying colleges are better than corporations. What the article is about is recruiting qualified corporate employees to work at a college. Don't take my word for it, just read the first two paragraphs. Some of you guys need to chill out and stop slamming colleges. Gee wiz, sounds like some of you are terrified of the fact those laid off from large corps are about to take your job. Others sound like no one at a college has a single shred of business sense. Neither point is accurate. The fact is, in this terrible economy there are tons of smart people who can make our colleges better available. If we are not too afraid of someone out shinning us, we should recruit them to our schools.

  • Posted by Ada , lecture at Cambridge University on April 17, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • Here in the UK, we have seen massive layoffs from large business. Some of these persons are quite peckish for jobs. Outside the occasional git, most business persons are happy to work at Cambridge.

  • Mobility
  • Posted by Terrence , admissions at Cal Poly on April 18, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Mobility is part of the reason I started working at a University. My company transferred me three times in four years. I was in Texas, then Colorado, then north of LA. When they asked me to move a fourth time I said 'no.' It was too much for my kids. Working at a University has allowed me to transfer to a new position here on campus for a pay raise and not have to move across the US again. I also I am being treated like a human being instead of piece of meat.

  • Posted by Kent is Cool , Academic Affairs Provost at Kent State on April 19, 2009 at 5:30pm EDT
  • My god, if I had some of the negative experiences you people had, I would hate higher ed as well. Be that as it may, I love higher ed.