Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Can You Afford to Adjunct?

June 15, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

“May you live in contingent times…” –recent adjunct proverb

We live in engaging, if not interesting economic times; of that, there is little doubt. Diversifying one’s revenue stream becomes more than a business model — it becomes a necessity. So, as you realize that tenure-track jobs aren't materializing, and you consider taking on adjunct positions next academic year, keep this one thing in mind: can you afford it?

The first consideration when considering becoming an adjunct should not be the pay. If so, you should immediately reconsider your decision, as there is little to no pay involved in adjuncting, especially when you correlate the time spent. Once grading comes into the mix, it waters down your per-hour rate (for a sample, please see/take my poll here). According to my blog-based poll, only 44 percent of respondents report earning at least $15 an hour. Think long and hard about this decision. There are decent paying gigs, but they are hard to find and few.

That said, you also should give consideration to the “adjunct hit.” Merely by taking the position as a contingent faculty, you are relegating yourself to: lower pay, lower prestige and a disposable status. You will not, on average, be asked to serve on department committees. You will not be groomed for tenure status as the tenure-trackers are, and you will not have the relative security of teaching a class for more than a semester at a time.

Don’t consider using adjuncting as a “back door” into a specific department. You are the academic equivalent of a fry cook. You will not be moved into district manager very easily. Perhaps your department grows their own. Ask. How many tenured, tenure-track profs started out as an adjunct? Take your answer as policy. Adjuncts are seldom promoted. You may, especially in smaller or community colleges, be able to enter by attrition, but this happens rarely and should be considered along the lines of winning the lottery. Think very carefully of your overall plan, especially if you have a family or dependents.

There are ways to mitigate the adjunct hit: teach at throwaway colleges (you consider them a nice place to visit, but wouldn’t want to retire there), string together a set of colleges (two classes here, three classes there, one online, etc.), work part time as you complete your degree, article, presentation, novel, study, etc.

To the first, you are contingent faculty, so too can be your colleges. If you are considered temporary, consider your departments temporary as well — a partially paid mentorship of sorts. If you have your sights set on a dream school, investigate the hiring practices there. If departments do not hire from within, you will not be the exception. You may, though, be comfortable teaching for your dream school at any level.

I didn’t mind teaching for Suffolk University as an adjunct, because I liked working at Suffolk. Work to make this a conscious decision, not a happenstance. If you have no intention of working for an institution long-term, adjuncting is a great way to experience a department with minimal obligations. If you have just a master’s and wish to determine if teaching is right for you, by all means grab an adjunct position if you are able. There is nothing like road-testing a career to see if it fits. Keep in mind, though, that there is no back door, and you will most likely have to experience a type of teaching that is, although increasing in frequency, not the norm.

To the second point, I have heard the term “freeway teaching” to describe driving from one campus to another as the adjunct fills out a teaching load. But I live in a mostly rural area, so I prefer the term “highway teaching.” It sounds a lot like highway robbery, which seems to fit. Since you will need to make some semblance of a living wage, stringing together multiple institutions might be the only way to pay your bills. I have not met a department that requires its instructors to sign a non-compete, so feel free to peddle your wares where you are able.

When you do so, keep in mind that the commute costs go against your bottom line. It also helps to regiment strict organization on your materials. There is nothing so embarrassing as handing out materials with the wrong college’s logo, or making an announcement for a campus activity for the place across town. The students pick up on your state, your status and your embarrassment. It is awkward.

Online teaching is a great option for adding on the courses, but do not consider online to be any less of a time commitment. The online format, you may find, may very well take longer to meet the same level of interaction with your students. You will have materials to compile, chat rooms to monitor, assignments to interact with, e-mails, instant messages, etc. And you will be, unless you were born after Kurt Cobain, at a digital native disadvantage. Ramp into it, acknowledging your learning curve against your commitments. Remember, too, that institutions have to monitor you somehow, and online they will do it through your log-in ID. All of the platforms (BlackBoard/Web CT, Moodle, etc.) have the ability to track each ID’s time and location, right down to the last click. Know this before your sign up for five online classes that use three different platforms.

Finally, consider adjuncting as a stepping stone or way station as you work to complete something larger: your dissertation, book, study, etc. However, the adjunct hit extends not only to your status, but to your time as well. Since you will need to find more sections to fill out a teaching load (see the per hour rate above), you will be taking on more commitments, which means less time for your professional advancement. Throw in some family obligations, some personal time, and you are quickly out of time. Proceed along this course carefully. Good luck.

Piss Poor Prof is the pseudonym of the blogger Burnt-Out Adjunct. His adjuncting numbers: 11 years, 9 institutions, almost 100 classes, 3 platforms, every conceivable course structure (lecture, online, hybrid, etc.), many, many students.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Can You Afford to Adjunct?

  • Depressing but necessary public service message
  • Posted by Former Adjunct on June 15, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • Thanks. I so wish this level of openness about adjunct teaching had existed even five years ago; it seems we're all coming to public grips with reality in the last year or so, and while this is extremely depressing, people really need to know what they're getting into if they choose this professional course.

    Like most of my mentors, I was operating under a decades-old and now-illusory vision of higher ed when I started adjunct-teaching in '04. At this point, I think there's a pretty compelling argument that working as an adjunct hurts more than it helps, if a tenure track job is the goal: even the teaching experience acquired is stained by what you call the 'fry-cook' perception on the part of potential employers.

    Pay, in the Northeast where money for education is said to flow freely, was either $2,300 or $2,700 per class (before taking out taxes and fees). Teaching English and writing - a subject for which there are no grading shortcuts unless you really screw the students - I averaged 110 hours a week, all told, at something under 5$ an hour: significantly less than my students made at no-skill jobs, significantly less than minimum wage, significantly less than a single-income home needs for mortgage, bills, the gas involved in working in three states a day, etc..

    Now that I've gotten more publication status, I can earn up to double that when I come in as a 'visiting professor' (an opportunity that may come for one class a year if I'm lucky), but there are still no benefits, there's still no security, there's still nothing approaching enough to pay off the student loans. There are 300 to as many as 600 applicants for every good job teaching critical and creative writing. The general statistic I've seen most - that 1 in 4 will find a tenure track job - seems downright rosy in my field: colleagues who have managed to find secure positions have generally done it by way of writing centers or administration, not teaching.

    I don't want Thomas Benton* to be right that graduate study in the Humanities is now a hobby for the trust-funded or spouse-supported, but sadly, I think he is.

    *
    Graduate School in the Humanities: Just Don't Go
    Part One:
    http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2009/01/2009013001c.htm
    Part Two:
    http://chronicle.com/jobs/news/2009/03/2009031301c.htm

  • Are Adjuncts the majority? If so, What are we teaching?
  • Posted by Eileen McKinstra , Adjunct Instructor, English at Metropolitan Community College on June 15, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • It doesn't take much looking for anyone, however remotely familiar with many College as well as University campuses, to observe that that role of Adjuncts has changed over the years. I am relatively young (38 years old) and have far less teaching experience (10 years or so) than perhaps many other instructors, however my main consideration--and concern--when I accept a teaching assignment is not so much with the lower pay, status, etc. but rather with the very fact that I am joining a Department in which perhaps 75% (certainly at least 50% in my own observations) of the faculty are Adjunct Instructors. This makes me very uncomfortable because it makes me wonder about the integrity of the Department. It seems to me that a University would serve its own much better by adopting policies of hiring as many qualified full-time instructors as possible, and hiring fewer adjuncts. That is the way to really serve students better. Of course, this is not to imply that Adjuncts are necessarily any less qualified than Full-time instructors, but because Adjuncts do not also receive full benefits and support, it does seem to put a greater strain on those Adjunct instructors. I worry about how all of this affects the students. It seems to me that in the past, the standard procedure for hiring and maintaining faculty was to hire a main core of full-time instructors. Instructors would sometimes begin for a few years as an Adjunct and then be promoted to a Full-time status--again, because to do so was in the best interest of the employer as well as the employee.

    However, now it seems that for far too many people, Adjuncting simply becomes their career (rather than their starting point). I think there's a problem with that because it seems to be really re-shaping the whole meaning of Higher Education--creating a more water-down, "disposable" mentality among teachers as well as students. The change needs to come from the College and University administrators: they need to realize that in becoming increasingly dependant on part-time instructors, they are potentially undermining their very mission as an institution of Higher Education. It is also true that Adjunct instructors need to consider carefully their own needs as professionals in the field of education. I happen to enjoy the work that I do, and I do the best that I can with the resources I have, but I admit that I do struggle in many ways just to make ends meet and support my family. I cannot afford to work as an Adjunct. Yet I have chosen to do this work, and (in doing so) I have also chosen to accept whatever "burdens" come with it. I find that the rewards outweigh the strains and stresses of teaching. I dedicate myself full-time (in various ways) to my work as a teacher, even though I am only paid as a part-time employee. I do this because there is no other way I could really do the work that I am hired to do.

  • The value of teaching
  • Posted by Phil Loubere , asst professor, school of journalism at MTSU on June 15, 2009 at 3:15pm EDT
  • I finally landed a tenure-track job by grace of a dozen years of professional work in my field, not through the three years of adjunct teaching I had done previous to that. But I would imagine having some teaching experience played a bit to my advantage before the hiring committee, and it helped immensely in the first semester of my new position. Teaching is, after all, a skill that must be learned through experience and it is, in our system, almost entirely on-the-job training.

    As PBS' excellent documentary 'Declining by Degrees' illustrates, excellence in teaching is not a priority in our country's higher education system. So trying to work your way up as a teaching adjunct is generally not going to work. Notable achievements in your field is what hiring committees will look at. So the difficult path to tenure can benefit from a few years of adjunct teaching but must be centered around academic or professional achievement.

    As a former adjunct, I would advocate changing the system to allow for greater rewards and security for those who only want to teach, not just out of a sense of justice but so that we retain the most capable instructors. Excellence in the classroom should be valued and rewarded — this would be to the benefit of both students and institutions. But for the time being, and certainly in these economic times, adjunct teaching will continue to be uncertain and unrewarding. At my institution, it is more likely we will eliminate many adjunct positions to meet a drastically reduced budget.

  • Question: Is there a Union out there for Adjuncts?
  • Posted by Bruce Young , Adjunct Instructor, Humanities at North Country Community College on June 15, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • Thank you, Piss Poor Prof (pseudonym of the blogger Burnt-Out Adjunct). I love that.

    This article, while not entirely new to me, was enlightening in that it does pry open the coffin lid a bit wider. Some fresh air in, some horrible stench out.

    Per my question, "Is there a Union out there (willing to accept) Adjuncts?" I'd love to know that answer. I'm a political creature who listens to and reads "progressive" political discourse. When I hear or see national unions complaining about declining enrollment and lamenting that the end is nigh, I wonder why the hell they would not go on a massive recruiting campaign in a field that is ripe for the picking -- all puns intended.

    If the AFL-CIO or UAW would step forward and recruit me, I'd sign up. God knows that (A) I have a lot in common with auto workers -- the assembly line starts and stops fitfully, and the bosses don't really care whose body parts are mangled in the process -- and (B) I have yet to hear a peep in response to feelers I have put forth to my college's full-timers' union. In fact, the silence is deafening. I guess the over 66% adjunct force I work with at a small, 3 campus community college in the Adirondack mountains are just so much migrant labor. Okay -- call me a produce picker and give me my AFL-CIO card.

    Thank you for this venue; it's nice to be able to vent to those who understand. In the meantime, I look forward to seeing a new trend: From organized brawn to organized brains. -- BRY

  • Paying to Work as an Adjunct
  • Posted by Adjunct Y , Adjunct on June 15, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • The premise of the article is that adjuncts work for almost nothing. I recently had an opportunity to work as an adjunct for less than nothing. I was called by an administrator for whom I had taught some years ago and asked to teach a class at a satellite campus. It was 50 miles from my house and the class met 2 days per week. The pay was under $1800 for the course. It had gone up only a few percent over many years.

    Calculating my mileage at the federal rate of .55 per mile (this is realistic in the long run), the commuting cost would be $110 per week. That alone would eat up all but $150 of my pay during a 15 week term. Taking into account social security, medicare, and federal and state income taxes, my pay would be less than zero for about 75 hours work (I teach the course regularly elsewhere so no prep is involved - otherwise 90 hours or more). Then take into account the 5 hours per week spent commuting which would cost me a minimum of $100 (that I could bill for work at a non-profit agency) and I am paying rather than being paid to teach this course.

  • Don't forget taxes
  • Posted by Rosemary in Charlotte on June 15, 2009 at 9:15pm EDT
  • Careful reading and re-reading of the Infernal Revenue Service literature over the years has not helped adjuncts either. We're not "self-employed" so the health insurance we buy for ourselves is subject to different regulations, All the benefits of being self-employed are GONE since we have "contracts". Adjuncts often have their office in the trunk of their car but that's not deductible, nor are supplies. Mileage between teaching locations is subject to scrutiny - the list goes on.
    I plan to find the education reporter at my local newspaper - while I still have one - and bring this article to his/her attention.
    Wonder what Mrs. Biden would say. This cause needs a champion. Any ideas?

  • Posted by PhilosopherP , Philosophy at a Minnesota Community College.. on June 15, 2009 at 9:15pm EDT
  • In response to Bruce's question, my union in the Minnesota community college system does work on behalf of adjuncts.  In fact, the contract requires any adjunct teaching 4+ hours per semester to be paid on the same pay scale as full-time folks AND to have health insurance costs pro-rated to their percentage of a full-time load.  Since this is calculated by looking at ALL colleges the adjunct teaches at, they can't get around the requirement to pay benefits by restricting teaching assignments.

  • my five cents
  • Posted by Alexander on June 15, 2009 at 9:15pm EDT
  • I feel that the adjunct pay is very arbitrary. I am having a difficulty time if my adjunct pay is fair or not since it is difficult to talk to other adjuncts as they all seem to have a "day job". Does anyone know of any source to find the average adjunct per-class pay for engineering (undergraduate and graduate) in New York metropolitan area?

  • Posted by utahprof on June 15, 2009 at 9:15pm EDT
  • I'm waking up to the reality that adjuncting may be what I'm doing in life as I work on my writing/journalism career.

    I may be headed down a non-traditional path-but I'm doing it with my eyes wide open.

    Fortunately I now live in ND with the woman I love in a state with both a low cost of living and low employment rate.

    I do enjoy teaching and I find that my non-traditional students do appreciate me.

  • Call This Job Advice ... Not Career Advice
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on June 16, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Nice perspective PPP. Teaching today is a job, not a profession. Being a student today is job training, not entry into a world of scholarship.

    Needless to say, prospective adjuncts should start by looking at the numbers ... and, by the way, if you’re interested in this topic at all, you absolutely must read ...

    http://www.aftface.org/storage/face/documents/reversing_course.pdf

    and be sure to check out Chart 4 on page 4. A little extrapolation describes the future.

    First, and rounding off a bit, the number of adjunct faculty in higher education in the U.S. has grown from approximately 22% of the total in 1970 to about 48% in 2005. In 2005, there were roughly 625,000 full-time (but not necessarily tenured or tenure-track) faculty and 575,000 part-timers or adjuncts.

    http://www.newamerica.net/blog/higher-ed-watch/2008/adjunct-faculty-grow-how-are-students-know-3405

    Given those numbers, you will not be surprised to learn that “contingent faculty members teach 49 percent of the more than 1.5 million undergraduate classes taught each term at U.S. public colleges and universities.” Let’s see, that’s ...

    (0.49) x (3 million classes) = 1,470,000 classes per academic year

    taught by adjuncts.

    A little division will tell you the average academic-year course load for adjuncts is approximately 2.6 classes ... although those who are trying to make a living as adjuncts – and isn’t that laughable -- teach many more classes than that.

    We also know that “across all institutional types, the average part-time/adjunct faculty member earned an annual base “salary” of $9,745 in 2003-04, or $2,758 per course ... although, in many instances, the pay per course is considerably less than that. In comparison, full-time faculty members earned an average annual salary of $58,306, or $11,051 per course.”

    http://www.aftface.org/storage/face/documents/reversing_course.pdf

    All of this may be a problem (if you’re an adjunct) or good economic policy (if you’re a college or university administrator with the ethical standards of Bernie Madoff). If you think it’s a problem, read “Here’s a Win-Win-Win-Win Solution” in ...

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/12/09/adjuncts

    P.S. The numbers above are not “comparable” because they come from different sources. They are all, however, superb “ballpark” figures.

  • To Bruce, re: unions for adjuncts
  • Posted by Steve on June 16, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • For the moment, unions for adjuncts are all local--usually organized and run by AAUP or AFT. You need to have a local organization. There is a national organization called The New Faculty Majority, that wants to create a national union, or at least coalition, but it could never replace a local organization that can speak to the direct needs and concerns of adjuncts in a particular situation. Organizing is difficult--I know, I've spent the last year plus organizing a union at my own school, and we're in the process of balloting right now to certify our organization as the legal bargaining agent.

    http://thenewfacultymajority.blogspot.com/2009/03/press-release-new-faculty-majority.html

  • Show Me Da Application!
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on June 16, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • I’m just a bit over 70, but I am not even close to wanting to pack it in.

    I have a Ph.D. in statistics, but before completing that degree I (1) completed all of the course work for a Ph.D. in mathematics, passed the preliminary exams, and even started my research for a dissertation and (2) completed all of the course work for a Ph.D. in education research and evaluation, passed the preliminary exams, and couldn’t find an advisor who was interested in anything that interested me. My point is that it’s pretty damned easy to get a Ph.D., especially if you’re not encumbered – what a terrible choice of words – with the responsibilities – another terrible choice of words – of family life.

    Anyway, I have been thinking lately about taking a job as an adjunct (math, statistics, operations management, quality sciences ... that kind of stuff). Although I’ve had a few offers, I have heard “Oh my, you are waaaaay too qualified for our position” so many times it would make your head spin. I have done the mathematics, however, and have concluded that many adjuncts are making in the neighborhood of $4,000 per course ... times (let’s say) three courses per semester ... minus some expenses ... plus (you guessed it) no benefits at all ... equals less than $25,000 per academic year. That’s about one-fifth what I was making at my last position and – and this is really interesting — just the slightest bit more than I could make as a TA in a Ph.D. program (where my tuition and fees would be paid). As a full-time graduate student I’d get student benefits (probably the use of the university hospital or clinic ... and certainly the athletic facilities ... and God knows what else). And since academics are so remarkably proficient at looking the other way in the presence of those around them who are being exploited, I could probably pick up an extra buck here and there doing odd jobs around the Department.

    In other words, my friends, I will make almost as much as a Ph.D. student as does your typical adjunct professor. And the sense that I’m getting from this discussion is that, as a Ph.D. student, I’ll command a Hell of a lot more respect around the Department than the adjunct professors get ... many of whom, by the way, differ from their tenured “colleagues” only by the grace of God.

    And like I say, Ph.D. programs are easy (and often downright fun), and what do I care if I get mine in a discipline that is over-producing Ph.D.s as it is. When I get one, I won’t be looking for a job anyway ... I’ll be looking around for my next Ph.D. program.

    Will this work? You bet. Some years ago someone did a little research regarding the Political Science Department at the University of Michigan where the Ph.D. students took more than eleven years beyond their bachelors’ degrees, on the average, to finish up. The Department couldn’t beat them away with a club. And why? ... well a great many had cushy jobs at the Institute for Social Research, the Population Studies Center, and the like ... and they really liked living in Ann Arbor. Finishing up was pretty far down on their list of priorities.

    So, if you don’t mind, “Show me da application!”

  • Posted by English Prof on June 16, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • Right out of grad school, I spent a number of years adjuncting. Over the years, I taught at five different schools, stringing together the all too familiar schedule of 4-6 classes between 2-3 schools at a time. After years teaching adjunct at one specific school, I finally interviewed and was hired for a 1 year temporary position. (It was renewable only one more year). After that, I interviewed for an open position with no luck. How true that adjuncting for years at a school won't help if you want to get a permanent position!

    My advice: if you want to adjunct, do so. It's great experience (albeit not great pay). Use the adjunct work as a stepping stone to get hired into a school that you haven't taught at previously. That's what I did, and thankfully, I'm now out of the adjunct abyss.

  • Adjunct unions
  • Posted by Former Adjunct on June 16, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Clearly, it varies from state to state, but here's one example: in Massachusetts paying dues to the MTA union is mandatory for all adjuncts, but in '04-'06 anyway, pleas for help from adjuncts were sadly, understandingly, compassionately, sorrowfully answered with 'we're really sorry, we just can't help you, the problem is just too big.'

    Occasionally, people would bring up adjunct strikes, then others would bring up the problem of already being in a position of drowning financially and strike meaning losing not only urgently required income but promise of future income - this would be followed by a discussion about how strike would harm the students more than the school since there's an inexhaustible supply of scabs and systemic acceptance of the current model etc. ad infinitum with all the other obvious barriers.

    I hope union activism is changing now that adjunct exploitation is more on the public radar than it was a few years ago.

  • Posted by Perry on June 16, 2009 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Tenure track faculty differ from adjuncts by their research, not by the grace of God. There is a way to work your way onto the tenure track, but it is not by teaching. You must publish your dissertation and continue to do research so that you can generate a steady rate of publication. If you do that, and keep applying for assistant professor jobs, you will get hired tenure track eventually. Where depends on fit, not job status. I worked as an adjunct but I continued also working on my research. I didn't take more than 3 adjunct courses per semester, so that I would have time to do other work. Yes, that is a financial sacrifice, but no more so than attending grad school was. I was eventually hired tenure track and am now tenured. If you don't publish, you will never get out of the adjunct pool. It doesn't matter how good your teaching is. It doesn't matter that a job will involve primarily teaching. If you haven't published anything, you cannot teach that process to students and are thus not qualified for the job. I do not understand why so many adjuncts fail to understand this. Even at teaching universities, faculty must generate opportunities for students to participate in research, and they must guide independent student projects and teach research methods courses and model critical thinking about the literature in class. This is part of the job. If you publish nothing whatsoever beyond your dissertation, you are not qualified for the job, and that is why most adjuncts never cross over to tenure track.

  • gotta get experience somewhere
  • Posted by bradley bleck , English Insructor at Spokane Falls CC on June 16, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • I'm presently serving on a hiring committee for an annualized position (which means full-time pay and work, but not tenure track and only for a limited time, maybe just one year). We were swamped with applications, many with little to no experience, and our minimum was just one year of full-time equivalent work. I would have liked to have seen it higher, but to do so would have excluded some of our adjuncts from the mix.

    Like many, before I landed a tenure track job (two of them now) I taught part-time at a number of schools for a number of years. I also worked part-time in a bar so I could make a decent wage overall without burning out on teaching too many classes for too many schools. The situation now is probably worse than it was when I started around 1990. Budgets are slashed, tenure slots are disappearing and on and on. Anyone entering the profession now has only themselves to blame if they didn't check into their prospects before making their job/career plans and choices. A good teacher can always find a part-time gig, somewhere. Full-time with decent pay is much tougher. Throw in tenure-track and it's tougher still.

    One thing I can tell you is that most two-year colleges in Washington are unionized, so adjunct faculty qualify for health care after just two-terms of 50% teaching loads, per state law. The pay varies widely, and getting established even as an adjunct takes some doing, but as many noted, you won't get rich, at all. However, if you want to make this your career, you'll need to get some experience, and pretty much the only way for that to happen is to take part-time gigs.

  • Response to Perry
  • Posted by Steve on June 16, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Perry states that if one publishes enough research, one will get hired "eventually." Not necessarily. I have published and continue to work on large publishing projects with major publishers. None of these things has secured me a decent job offer, and I know a number of other adjuncts who will tell you the same thing. I mention these in my letters of application--and get no response. So the "grace of God" explanation is, from my experience, much closer to the truth. Another factor is age; younger applicants are far more desirable than geezers like myself. I was already too old when I finished my dissertation at the age of 44. None of my teaching evaluations or publications make up for my age.

  • Not Me Again ...
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on June 16, 2009 at 6:00pm EDT
  • I hate to intrude in this discussion ... especially inasmuch as I have never been an adjunct. That said, I have known a very large number of them, and have even employed more than my fair share of them over the years.

    Perry’s remark, “Tenure track faculty differ from adjuncts by their research, not by the grace of God” is just so uninformed or so naive – I can’t tell which – I can hardly wait to find myself on his tenure committee ... not because I want to comment on his teaching ... or judge his research ... but because I want to comment on his academic naivety.

    Granted that a very large number of adjuncts try to patch together a potpourri of “opportunities” that invariably make it difficult to find time to (1) make more than a bare-bones living, (2) be exceptional teachers (and I am always amazed that, despite the enormous amount of shit they must endure, so many adjuncts still care about their students), (3) devote themselves to their spouses, children, and other dependents, and (4) , try to come to terms with some sense of their obligations as scholars ... they still must confront the nonsense of academic true-believers like Perry.

    I don’t want to challenge Perry on the basis of his view of the “importance of research,” I merely want to let him know that a great many adjuncts produce research that is the equal of the mostly inconsequential nonsense of the tenured and tenure-track ... and with no appreciable impact on their status as adjuncts or their prospects for tenure-track positions. Indeed, the importance of the typical research paper of a tenured or tenure-track “scholar” is so inconsequential, Perry’s argument is little more than laughable.

    Perry ,thoughtful guy that he is, tells us “I didn't take more than 3 adjunct courses per semester, so that I would have time to do other work. If you don't publish, you will never get out of the adjunct pool. It doesn't matter how good your teaching is. It doesn't matter that a job will involve primarily teaching. If you haven't published anything, you cannot teach that process to students and are thus not qualified for the job.”

    Given Perry’s annual income as an adjunct (which I would estimate to be less than 6x$4,000 = $24,000 per academic year) and, given the quality and importance of the research entailed, I cry every time I think of the trade-off that new faculty members must endure.

    I offer you my congratulations, Perry, for your employment by a remarkably and sadly inconsequential entity ... twenty-first century higher education in America.

  • $4000/class?
  • Posted by exhausted adjunct on June 16, 2009 at 9:00pm EDT
  • Could someone please direct me to these $4000/class institutions? Because I'm trying to survive on $2500/class (no benefits), and it is wearing me out. I've been adjuncting for 4 years, I got my Ph.D last year, and the job market is awful, and I just don't have the energy (or funds!) for research or to to give my students and courses the attention they need. It is unfair to students, and it is unfair to adjuncts. This is a terrible system. I am good at what I do, but I would be better if I weren't so overwhelmed and exhausted. I should be on the job market, but at this point I am so discouraged and disgusted that I am looking outside of academia before I even get in. I love my work, but I am afraid that adjuncting (at the CC level and local universities and SLACs) is going to hurt my chances of getting a t-t job because of the attitude so many established academics have toward both CCs and adjuncts.

    Bradley says that "Anyone entering the profession now has only themselves to blame if they didn't check into their prospects before making their job/career plans and choices" but 7 years ago when I started my PhD, it was realistic to believe I would get a t-t job somewhere at $40,000/yr or more, especially since I did not have my heart set on an Ivy or top-tier school. Now, even adjunct jobs are harder to find, and those of us who have them are just nervous.

    There is all of this talk about the quality of education, but how can we really provide a good education when the instructors are so overwhelmed and underpaid?

  • Online Teacher
  • Posted by Tabby , Adjunct at University of Axia on June 30, 2009 at 7:45pm EDT
  • My experience is that online teaching can pay better and take less time. Sure, there's tasks (regular posts, grading, etc.). But you don't have to commute, or prepare lectures. I can log online whenever I want, at 3 am while drinking wine in my undies if I feel like it. The emotional drain is much less in the virtual world as well. I receive $2100 per nine week course but I spend SO much less time on this than I did teaching in a "real" classroom. I calculate I'm earning somewhere between $20-25/hr. Again, online adjuncting will never lead to tenure track employment but it works well as extra money.