Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Adjunct Survival

August 3, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The adjunct life is full of hard choices: Will my semesters of service pay off with an offer for a more secure position? Will my classes pay enough to justify my commute? Will the six nameplates on my cubby-hole/office door flag me for instant student disrespect? In the adjunct world, decisions are precious because they are few. You often live from class offer to class offer, semester to semester, taking what you can get. You apply to lots of colleges hoping that a few will have work for you.

There are times, in the adjunct “career” when one may be compelled to teach in unnatural teaching situations. Because department schedules are often not set until the week before the semester starts, it is difficult, if not an outright gamble, to arrange the perfect teaching schedule — “perfect” stretching into a very wide semantic spectrum.

I had the (un)fortunate experience to receive offers, one Winter semester, from all four colleges to which I had applied. Not having any steady work, I told myself to “make hay while the day was good” or some such from the Grandfather/advice voice in my head, and I accepted all 10 sections. I had no idea what I was getting myself into.

It should go without saying that before you accept a class section, you have done the math and figured out if you are able to meet the minimal time requirements (prep, in class, grading) to successfully teach it. I did not perform this task. I jumped right in, thinking that the extra money would really be nifty, especially with the relatively lax summer class schedule to follow. Perhaps I could go crazy and purchase some health insurance for my spouse and daughter. I could go all out.

There is a definite point when you realize that you have seriously over-committed yourself. Upon reaching this point, you need to make some brutally serious choices about what you will and will not do, and institute rigid, unbending schedules. In order to help yourself out, I recommend that you organize your daily/weekly schedule so that you have a set time for each class. That is, your in-class time will be dictated (hopefully you have not overlapped on-ground commitments — if so, you have become a bad episode of the Brady Bunch), so follow suit with your out-of-class time. Create a folder for each class with the class roster or seating chart, the class syllabus and copies of the assignments. These are especially helpful when you need a quick refresher as to which class you are focusing on at the moment. When juggling more than 3-4 classes, don’t rely on memory alone.

I also found it helpful to create a master schedule, color-coded by institution and class. This way I could anticipate heavy grading times and work to smooth those out — move up an assignment here, delay one there, grade, grade, grade right here, etc. I spent a complete couple of days in the creation of the master schedule, but I was able, even with 10 classes (4 of which were 6 weeks long, meeting daily online) to “smooth out” the demanding spots of my schedule.

You should also use online technology to your advantage. Six of my classes that semester were completely online and for the remaining four I had the option of adding an online component. I jumped at that chance. Even though I was working two platforms (BlackBoard and WebCT before they merged), I was able to “front-load” the materials, scheduling the materials, assignments and quizzes, to appear according to the specific class schedule (the 6 week classes had a new folder-set available for them each week, the 15 week classes were spaced out every two to three weeks).

By front-loading, I was also able to “copy” one class set for other sections of the same class. That is, by loading all of my Comp I materials into section 1, I was then able to copy the entire class (assignments, quizzes, grading rubric, etc.) to the five other sections. I saved a tremendous amount of time doing this. In effect, I had only three distinct classes to set up. I then copied those three master classes to the remaining sections. The students were added, and we were off. My time was then spent interacting with the material, the students and the assignments. I didn’t have to make physical printouts to take to class, I didn’t grade reading quizzes nor worry about answering student questions about what their grades were. All of this was handled by the online software.

As a corollary to this, I accepted all submissions online. I didn’t accept printed out submissions at all. If there was a paper due, I had the students submit their paper online through the class Web site. I graded online using a generic word processing program (RTF-formatted files work in virtually all of the word processing applications) and posted the submissions back through the appropriate grade book. Even if I presented a pop-quiz in my on-ground classes — handy to pulse for compliance to the reading requirements for the day — I would present the quiz online. The results were instantly added to the grade book, the feedback immediate, and the software did the work. I had few papers to keep track of, and I could work on a class from anywhere there was internet access. Also by setting up the grade book through both BlackBoard and WebCT, I was able to, at the end of the class, enter only two or three grades per student (participation, etc.) and let the software compile the final grade — extremely handy when you have exactly four days to complete the final grades for 250 students.

One final tip, when adjuncting on an overloaded schedule, is to always be working. That winter semester was my harvest time, my time for 12-14 hour days, for working weekends and for squeezing every last amount of work out of each day that I could.

When faced with an impossible schedule, organize, prioritize, automate and grade at every stolen moment. And keep in mind that summer, with its lull in classes, will eventually come.

Piss Poor Prof is the pseudonym of the blogger Burnt-Out Adjunct. His adjuncting numbers: 11 years, 9 institutions, almost 100 classes, 3 platforms, every conceivable course structure (lecture, online, hybrid, etc.), thousands of students. In retrospect, he says with reference to the schedule discussed in this essay, one should not willingly sign up for such an arduous schedule without serious consideration to the opportunity costs: to oneself, one’s family and to one’s students.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Adjunct Survival

  • Adjunct Survival
  • Posted by Sally , CIS - Adjunct at City College on August 3, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • I have a full time day job, but when I didn't I did two colleges and three classes between the two and that alone burned me out over time. I ran into several adjuncts who had to travel distances between colleges. They didn't have benefits and after a while decided it wasn't worth it. I still run into adjuncts who want a full time job so they can get off the adjunct track. I work full time days and adjunct at night and/or weekends. If it wasn't for the economy and a low-wage position, I wouldn't teach.

  • feedback
  • Posted by Peggy , Dean, General Education at Lancaster General College of Nursing & Health Sciences on August 3, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • Kudos for your remarkable organizational skills! What you did in planning and implementing your classes shows a sound use of instructional technology that I think any regular or adjunct faculty member could benefit from replicating. My question, though, is how was the student feedback that semester? Were there any specific areas of concern on the students' end and how could you have addressed them?

  • Colour coded schedule, please!
  • Posted by Iris , Director, Center for English and Foreign Languages,Bangalore at Dayanand Sagar Institutions on August 3, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • hi Harassed Prof!
    Great to hear you juggling times and classes , online too and grading schedules and institutions !
    I am Director of a Language Institute, within a conglomeration of colleges, and am finding myself juggling courses with difference in timings etc and yet have to keep an eye on staff work-load and staff work-timings.Some staff are part-timers and some courses are for outsiders...I have to arrange travel for those who travel during the day schedules.
    But I would love to see your color coded-schedule if I may?
    My email: iriselina@hotmail.com
    Ever so grateful to have it.Planning for others is equally difficult.Thanks.

  • Posted by DS on August 3, 2009 at 8:45am EDT
  • Perhaps an equally enriching article would inform us of how to successfully balance 10 simultaneous marriages, or how to drive three cars at the same time? I fail to see the value of this article, at least on the terms it presents itself. It is a sad commentary on an extreme case of an over-worked adjunct, but the writer seems a little deluded by his or her conviction that s/he is offering pragmatic advice. It is simply absurd to couch the piece as a "how to." The only advice the writer should be giving after attempting to teach so many courses in one semester is the following: "Don't ever try this." Whatever one's economic necessity, it is mad, as well as highly unethical, to attempt to teach so many courses at one time. I shudder to think of all those students who doubtless had little or no meaningful contact with or feedback from their professor over the semester. It is striking that the writer is preoccupied only with his/her efficiency in administering all those courses, with no apparent concern for the students. It would be more important to focus on what the students got out of the experience: I suspect they would say that it was very little.

  • Posted by John on August 3, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Thanks for this. I will be passing it on to the many high schools students I've told to avoid applying to colleges that US News and World Report describes as having more than 10% part-time faculty. Not only are you not getting enough money for your time and effort (and I applaud your effort, while I find it unethical that you teach college), the students are paying way too much money for an over-worked, burdened, burnt-out instructor.

  • Sounds useful to me...
  • Posted by Paula on August 3, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • sounds to me like the author off-loaded all the clerical work into the program and focused time on the interactive aspects...no argument with that! We could all benefit from that level of planning and organization...

    I am not sure what you meant by "copying one class set for other sections of the class." Could you spell out in detail some of your organization via Blackboard/WebCT for those of us who see the advantages of the software but struggle with implementation, perhaps in a future article?

    Thanks for sharing your approach.

  • Some adjuncts have no choice
  • Posted by LSG on August 3, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • John,

    Before I became an adjunct 7 years ago, I was overworked and burnt out in my corporate job. I love teaching, and, after spending 60 hour weeks directing marketing departments for 18 years, the only way to get experience and my foot in the door as a teacher was the adjunct track.

    I teach 5-7 courses a semester (plus 2-3 in the summer) among 2 different colleges and still make considerably less oney than a full-timer teaching 7-10 courses a year (I also serve on committees, hold office hours, help with Freshman orientation, and so on--all without compensation). While I can say I am exhausted many days, I also can say I'm not burnt out. I am just disappointed with a system that makes it necessary for adjuncts to have to teach a 7-10 course semester to survive financially.

    I am still trying for a full-time position (I earned a terminal degree this year), but with my state cutting funds to higher education, it seems unlikely anytime soon, especially in the humanities. Please don't paint us all with the same brush. For example, there are more adjuncts with terminal degrees in one of the colleges where I teach than full timers.

    It is patently unfair that those of us who took an alternate road to the academy are penalized for it, even if we are better, more committed educators than many full timers. But that's life. If some of us hold out hope for a better situation (decent salary and benefits) it doesn't make us bad people or bad at our jobs. All faculty and staff should stand up for adjuncts (to help reduce the adjunct ranks by lobbying our institutions to hire more adjuncts to full-time positions), for that benefits us all. That's the type of institution I'd want my children to attend.

  • Posted by "highly unethical" ! on August 3, 2009 at 11:30am EDT
  • @DS:

    "What is the robbing of a bank compared to the founding of a bank?"

  • Posted by WTF on August 3, 2009 at 12:30pm EDT
  • This author has essentially plagiarized himself by offering this "article" with material (perhaps even the same verbiage) that appeared on his own blog a while ago.

    In fact, this author hasn't offered one single new idea not already available on his blog.

    Like DS above, I wondered why the author failed to tell readers DO NOT DO THIS! But then I spotted that message buried in his bio.

    I would offer a different perspective to supplement that idea though: How about all of you admins out there get off your duff and start finding ways to appropriately compensate your faculty? How about you limit enrollments? How about you NOT offer that extra class...or overload that section...and just let the students take courses that have instructors who are appropriately paid?

    I can dream, can't I?

  • How Muh Longer?
  • Posted by Dana Hillebrand , English at Several Community Colleges on August 3, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • The article illustrates the insanity of the entire confirugation of CA's community college system and the adjuncts who teach in it. In "teaching" ten classes author is severely depriving students of any semblane of a "quality" education. As an adjunct for almost fifteen years in several community colleges, I know the temptation to take on as many classes as possible because you never know when chosing a class in one CC over another, the one you chose will not get cancelled due to low enrollment or bumping. But it is instructors such as this one, who grade and prep for free while apparentl being OK not affording health insurance, car payments, or even rent, that ensure that things will never improve on a statewide or national level for adjuncts: there are just too many--even more now due to budget cuts--who will put up with exploitive, abusive, and humiliating working conditions. These give-it-everything adjuncts work alongside full-time faculty with jobs and lavish benefits for life. Most CC's have hiring freezes on full-time faculty, and "working hard" for years as an adjunct will not get you that full-time job, especially if you are over 45. National and state unions call for equal pay for equal work for adjuncts, but the truth is that if adjjuncts were paid pro rata, community colleges would not be the stepping-stone bargain they are for low-income students who cannot afford private or public college tuition. And so the CC system becomes dependent upon a huge, huge oversupply of teachers "willing" to work in abusive condition, "willing" to leverage their sense of professionalism against ability to devote the proper time to their students and to their profession. Since adjuncts currently teaching in CC's are not wanting to leave the profession--an action that would eventually create a shortage and drive up adjunct pay--we need to work on the supply end. Would-be community college teachers entering grad school MUST MUST MUST be warned that all that work and years of paying back college loans will lead to a dead end job as an adjunct, a pitiable condition that leads to anti-professional machinations on how to teach ten classes in one semester

     

     

  • Dodging rocks
  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof , www.burntoutadjunct.wordpress.com on August 3, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • I try to resist responding to my articles, although I will admit to reading them, almost in real time. I will, though, this time, provide some quick rebuffs.

    I am interested in the level of aggression this post has engendered. I have, in the course of a dozen or so comments, been charged with being unethical, unprofessional and a plagiarist.

    I did not address how to budget/manage student interaction in this article, focusing on presenting some logistical considerations to ease the time-management burden. I also did not comment on how to best integrate automatic grading assignments into a course for the best and most effective teachable outcome. These considerations were also involved in my over-burdened semester described above. Where, then, is the lapse in ethics or professionalism?

    I also wrote this piece without reference to previous posts, mine or otherwise. I write on the same general subject a lot. There will be overlap. Thanks for being a fan.

  • Piss Poor just wanted to 'share'
  • Posted by DFS on August 3, 2009 at 3:00pm EDT
  • Great job! This is what happens to those of us who have obtained what we needed to do what we want to do, yet then encounter academia as it presently is.

    Then come the spurious comments about how you might have, in your busy schedule, lifted what you know to be perfect verbage from you other posting. Plus, the straw man argument that you should have told higher education that they shouldn't have done this to you.

    Oh, what we would ever do without these geniuses in academia?

    The entire point of your insightful article is, if I may presume, how and why you survived doing what you had to do.

    I would like to know what institutions instead looked more fondly upon those still so focused on themselves. I think perhaps they are threatened by your acumen.

    They should be. I'll bet they're all tenure-track or presently tenured.

  • Posted by WTF on August 3, 2009 at 4:15pm EDT
  • DFS,

    Did you just suggest it's ok to cut corners if you're being underpaid?

    Doesn't that undercut the argument for quality...which is what most of us who adjuncted attempt to do despite the poor pay and working conditions?

    I know, I know, from your rhetoric you seem to not like arguments. Just lots of head-nodding, perhaps?

    It's interesting this article appeared on the same day as "Getting Out of Grading." Some odd comparisons can be drawn between the 2 strategies.

  • Don't Hate - Appreciate
  • Posted by Lil Johnny on August 3, 2009 at 5:30pm EDT
  • I am amused by the largely hostile reaction this article has received. I think many people are probably shocked to hear about individuals taking on so many courses. I am glad they are angry. They should be outraged. But they should not be angry at the author who is just trying to get by, pay rent, and achieve a career goal. This is what our system has created. This is what under-funding of our state educational institutions has led us to. Every citizen in the United States should read this article and then, for comparison, they should be told what a normal workload at a university or community college is. Perhaps then, they will agree to pay higher taxes or will donate more money to their local educational institutions.

    This person is sharing advice with other adjuncts who are very busy and taking on too much in order to pay the bills. This person is providing useful advice on how one can be more efficient through planning and working ahead (especially during the Summer when things are slower). Given the climbing enrollments and increased dependence of institutions on adjunct instructors, it seems very timely and appropriate. With nearly 50% of courses at institutions being taught by adjunct faculty, this is a real issue.

    While teaching ten courses is an extreme workload and is certainly not a "best practice," it is increasingly a reality for many adjunct instructors. In addition, it can be done reasonably well if one works from sunrise to sunset every day of the week. I know it is possible because I have nearly done it as a full-time instructor at one community college and part-time online instructor for another college. I even won faculty of the year during that time. However, sustaining that pace or workload is a recipe for mental and physical exhaustion. It will eventually lead to burnout. Thank goodness, I had a full-time position and did not have to teach 10 courses in order to survive or reach my career goals. Kudos to the author for helping drive home the reality of this situation. More should be done to support our adjunct instructors so they do not have to work so many courses in order to survive. Ideally, more full-time positions should be created. For that to happen, the funding formulas for faculty positions has to improve.

  • Cutting Corners
  • Posted by Orion , Adjunct at Multiple CC's on August 3, 2009 at 6:15pm EDT
  • WFT's comment above illustrates the damed-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't nature of adjuncting. Arguments for pro-rata pay with full-timers hinge on the arguments that "We are just as professional, even if we work in abusive conditions." To which districts and taxpayers and students reply, "Thanks for giving us such a terrific bargain" and "No one is forcing you to teach." If adjuncts say, "We have no choice but to cut corners, since are working conditions are so bad," the district says, "See! You just admitted you're not as good, so why should we pay you more?" Meanwhile, full-timers use various arguments to deny adjuncts pro-rata pay: You do NOT do all the beyond-classroom work we must do (because of having to travel long distances between campus or personal wish to get in and get out]; Your being so professional at such a low price makes it hard for us to get higher pay and helps make full-timers a dying breed; Why do you humiliate yourself for years and years working under such bad conditions; You're cutting corners proves that your are not a committed teacher, etc What a few may see as "survival strategy" while teaching ten classes many see as cutting corners because the pay is so abominable. To me, the real tragedy is that the nation's taxpayers don't seem to CARE that community college education is compromised by what could be thousands of adjuncts surviing by cutting corners; community colleges don't have the same political currency as K-12's, with the millions of voting parents. Reading this article just highlighted the hopelessness of adjuncts being paid properly enough so they don't have to teach ten classes and cut corners. The budget crisis is now making EDD survivors out of the convenient bumping cushion of extraordinarily professional long-term adjuncts in all the CC's where I teach. It's time once and for all for me and thousands of adjuncts to GET OUT of this profession, create a shortage, and make it possible to get compensated decently in the future.

  • WTF
  • Posted by DFS on August 3, 2009 at 8:45pm EDT
  • I'm not shy at all from an argument.

    And it should go without saying that I did not say any such thing it's okay to cut corners if you're an overworked adjunct.

    I was merely -- perhaps obtusely -- congratulating Piss Poor Professor on conveying some of the things adjuncts must do.

    That is all I was saying, except that some of the comments against him (her?) were probably motivated by something other than empathy.

    Where did I go wrong?

  • Posted by WTF on August 4, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • As a post-script to Orion's excellent, even-handed commentary above:

    This doesn't just happen at community colleges. I and most of my peers were adjuncts at local R1s in grad school, and some of them did 5+ courses a term. The pay seems to be more to adjunct at an R1 than a CC (and anecdotally, this seems to hold nationwide) but even 5 courses, all with maximum-plus enrollment, can prove just as taxing as the 10 described here. After all, most adjunct-led courses aren't 12-person proseminars with intellectually stimulated seniors.

  • Posted by PhilosopherP , Full-time Philosophy Prof at Community College on August 4, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • I was a bit appaled at the 10 courses / one semester bit, until I got to the end.

    He's actually SEEING 4 sections. The others are on-line and it sounds like much of that work was automated.

    His total student count is 250.

    In the fall I'll have 240 students in 5 sections, all face to face.

    I'm a full-time, tenured community colleg prof. I have a pretty standard load.

    I'm also the department chair.

    If he's unethical for doing these things as a survival technique, so am I - and so are the majority of my community college colleagues. We do this heavy teaching load on top of the service and professional development expectations built into our contract.

    Frankly, the attitude of the SLAC/R1 tenured class has infuriated me for a long time. Y'all have created and permitted a situation in which adjuncts teach a lot more for significantly less money -- all the while you fight for 'social justice' elsewhere. Start with your own department and dean if you really want social justice -- oh, wait, that would cut into your research release time....

  • Painted into Corners
  • Posted by Orion , Freeway Flyer at Five CC's on August 4, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • No, cutting corners is never OK within the educational profession. The author of the article probably provided useful organizational tips in an extreme example of how underpaid adjuncts can survive having to work a 200% load while making 40K a year with few or no benefits or job security. I noticed that when I took on a fifth composition class at another college, I could not devote the necessary time to revising my syllabi, refreshing student readings, and adapting my English 100 courses to differing time slots and the needs of partiular student bodies (18-20 year olds during the day MWF vs. 35-55 year olds during an evening class) as I did before. I also became less thorough in grading essays. Englilsh composition is not the only class where the best teaching requires constant adapting and refreshing of materials. I and many, many of my adjunct colleages "cut corners." It sounds as if this author could teah much the same material for all ten classes and did not have comprehensive essay grading to do.

    In the university system, the courses PT and FT faculty teach are clearly stratified; PT lecturers teach the lower numbered courses and the FT's teach the higher numbered courses. At a community college, both PT"s and FT's teach the same remedial and semi-specialty courses; the differences in compensation--80K a year, full benefits, and a job for life vs. 30K a year, no benefits, and no job for even a year-- thus becomes all the more noticable and resentment-generating. Both the tenured and the adjunct instructor have little incentive to give their all to the job. Since teaching is a "nutruing" profession, an adjunct depriving a student of unpaid consultation is often akin to a mother depriving a child of extra attention because she is not being paid or an RN refusing extra conversation with a patient because of no extra pay. Thus the desire to be a "real professional" (but without the "professional" compensation) is forever leveraged against the ability to get properly compensated for adjuncts.

    To the poster who opined that if the public knew about adjuncts being forced to work for so much less and have to cut corners in the process, then taxpayers might be willing to pay more to support CC facutly--the situation is too awful for laughter. It may take the current president's and winkings of public support for community colleges to slowly, eventually make the public care about compromised CC education the way voting parents care about K-12's. Few can imagine two thirds of K-12 teachers being treated so abominably with districts relying on their nurturing good will to educate students properly. But the taxpaying public has not really learned to care about the quality of community college education.

    Until the public cares enough to devote even more taxes, while the economy is in the sewer, to CC's so adjuncts do not "have" to teach ten classes, the only real way to adjuncts to remedy their situation is to create a LABOR SHORTAGE, the way RN's did in the early 80's, an action which raised RN compensation significantly. Adjuncts: do your profession a real favor and GET ANOTHER JOB, like I reluctantly did. Maybe the current tidal wave of colleges "disposing" of adjuncts during this budget crisis will move more of us into other professions so that there will be far,, far fewer of us to return if and when the economy improves.

  • Good Time Management
  • Posted by Physics Prof on August 5, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • I'm with PhilosopherP on this one. Too many readers bought the hype rather than the facts.

    Almost every one of the time management suggestions in this article are ones that I use as a tenured professor at a CC, and many of my colleagues do the same. You have to, when you have a 5/5 load that might include an overload class or two plus overseeing a group of adjuncts and service that has to get done.

    Why create a Bb shell more than once? I sure don't. Use technology to your benefit. And I have color coded my weekly and master semester schedule (which shows exams and all other major items I have to worry about) and the folders I use for each class (including exams and homework) ever since color was invented. My first concern is that my grading load is spread out across the weeks of the semester. That is essential.

  • Adjunct Memoirs
  • Posted on August 6, 2009 at 5:30am EDT
  • As an adjunct,

    I taught 23 classes in a given year and published a book and have received very good evals.

    Now with the recession in full bloom, it will be markedly less and I am

    using the time to reevaluate my career goals. However, I never

    bought the argument that full time professors are any better even if they have more time to prep. Bottom line is either you have

    an interest in teaching or not and you will figure out a way to connect with the students. On the other hand, that may not happen.

    A lot professors are monotone or use the podium for political purposes.

    Some full time people and adjuncts probably dont belong in the field, but like everything else

    academia is extremely imperfect. But if you get through that and you can teach with enthusiasm and get the points across,

    teach as many as you need to.

  • Posted by Teaching Thousands Per Semester on August 30, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • It's easy for some of these posters to criticize when they have so much time because of the reduced load you are providing by teaching ten courses per semester.

    I teach thousands of students per year in huge lecture halls. I love my students, but I can't stand that they don't receive smaller classes. People may hold contempt for people like us, but all I can really say is that our uber organizational skills and willingness to be with freshmen and non-majors makes us better people and makes the lifestyles of the reduced-loaded profs. possible. I think the real problem here is that the posters don't seem to realize that we are handed courses with specific structures and enrollment counts that we cannot change. It is you so-called "concerned" and ostensibly "caring" profs who set up these insanely large classes. If you supposedly care so much, then why don't you teach the classes yourselves instead of farming them out to adjuncts? Oh, right, you're too important, or your time is too valuable, or you need to be with people who comprehend and appreciate your greatness-uh-research. Right.

    Ok. Well, you critics might say that you are so concerned, but it's people, such as the author and I, that are in the trench feeding the troops and bandaging the wounds, so our actions verify that we actually give a damn.

  • Saint Currency
  • Posted by Dana , Ad-junked at 5 CA CC's on August 31, 2009 at 2:30pm EDT
  • Of course you can make a good argument that adjuncts "care" more than reduced load professors because they give students so much of their time for so little monetary compensation. It's curious how female-dominated, nurturing professions (nurse, mother, teacher) acquire the glow of sainthood in part because the labor is performed without decent monetary compensation. Demanding money replaces the "saint currency" and many adjuncts who "love" teaching and would never deprive "innocent" students of their best teaching because of niggling pay live off the vapors of saint currency or become bitter and burned out.

    In broke California, many community colleges are "dumping" devoted adjuncts by some 20-40% as they slash classes. In many districts long-term, highly evaluated adjuncts weren't even notified they had no classes for this fall. CA ed code defines professional, part-time faculty, many with Ph.D's, as peremanently "temporary" and "at will." Meaning, the department chair can "not rehire" them without explanation and don't even have to notify them.

    As a result, many CA adjuncts are finally getting the message that saint currency does not pay the rent (or the dentist or the car repair-person), that full-time jobs are non-existent here,, and that maybe leaving teaching for another career is the wisest choice. Only, there aren't any other jobs now to pursue. Many adjuncts are forced to live on EDD until either the economy improves, they can move in with family or friends, or they find a place they can park their new car-home at night.

    It's certainly unconscionable that some professors receive full compensation, benefits, and a job for life teach alongside adjuncts who teach the same classes (in community colleges) who are treated no better than day laborers on the corner. Adjuncts such as the one who came up with how to juggle 10 classes with organizational strategies that by themselves could prove helpful to all faculty and those who maintain they "love, love, love" teaching and will continue to do so for abysmal compensation end up perpetuating the low pay cycle--probably forever.

    The day can't come soon enough when most adjuncts make the painful--but necessary--decsion to sever the angelic umbilical cord and trade in their thinly translucent saint dollars and seriously demand real money (like the nurturing RN's finally did in the early 80's).