Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Politics for Deans

August 28, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In a recent CNN.com commentary, Tom Johnson described 13 strategies that President Lyndon Johnson would have employed in order to achieve House and Senate support for a health care bill. Those who lived through or have studied LBJ’s presidential administration will recall that until he became mired in the application and expansion of the Vietnam War, his administration represented an almost consummate application of political skill that resulted in passage of some of America’s most far-reaching legislation.

Too often academic deans — especially new academic deans — forget the organizational behavior admonition that leaders must attend to politics. Tom Johnson’s presentation of the LBJ list provides us with some practical direction.

1. Tom Johnson writes that LBJ would have kept on his desk a list of every member of Congress. If a politically-skilled U.S. President benefits from maintaining his own list of members of Congress, available at the ready, then, academic deans are well advised to do so as well. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #1: Maintain a list — an actual written list, not something you keep in your head — that gives you at-hand information on every member of your faculty. Include personal details that will help you when it’s time to interact with them. You need to know how proud Professor Jones is of her new book and how Professor Smith never tires of showing pictures of his grandchildren; and you need to have a system that helps you remember the difference between the two. Update your list frequently.

2. LBJ was direct in asking members of Congress for support. “He would,” says Johnson, “be on the telephone with members (and their key staffers) constantly: ‘Your president really needs your vote on this bill.’” Except for those things that are in their own enlightened self-interest, most people expect to be asked for their support. Even when it comes at some personal cost, many are willing to provide support because someone important to them has asked for it. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #2: Talk frequently with people whose support you need. Tell them you need their support, that it is important to you personally as well as organizationally.

3. “All politics is personal” the saying goes, and LBJ attended to that principle. Johnson noted that LBJ would maintain a list of every special request every member wanted — from White House tours to appointments to federal jobs and commissions. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #3: Keep a list of things that you know individual faculty want. Check it from time-to-time to see whether you can deliver something from the wish list.

4. “Yup,” as a good Texan would say, “All politics is personal.” LBJ would make a phone call or have a personal visit with every member -- individually or in a group. Charts, graphs, coffee. They would get the "Johnson Treatment" as nobody else could give it. Virtually everyone likes to be treated in a personal manner; it makes us feel important. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #4: Visit the office of every faculty member as frequently as you can … have a plan that appears your visits are spontaneous (or at least periodic), but actually do it regularly and systematically.

5. Not every issue is “all-or-nothing.” Johnson claims that LBJ would have been willing to horse-trade with every member of Congress. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #5: Sometimes, it’s useful to simply ask a faculty member, “What would it take to get your support for this?”

6. LBJ would have called on influential others in his quest to generate legislative support. Especially in professional programs where faculty oftentimes interact with a variety of higher-profile external, it is sometimes useful to have external personnel on-board and ready to influence a desired change. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #6: It can be useful to know the names of external personnel with whom individual faculty members interact. Sometimes those personnel can be used to influence the thinking of individual faculty members. Some faculty member who might ignore a dean would never ignore an National Science Foundation program officer, for example.

7. As President, LBJ had an array of tools and services at his disposal that he often used to his political advantage. He would, for example, have speeches written for members for the Congressional Record and hometown newspapers. Obviously we can’t ghost write articles for faculty members. But, we can recognize the power of name-in-print. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #7: Refer to individual faculty members in things that you write; recognize their accomplishments in print and in your talks. Also, ensure that your institution’s public relations office is aware of achievements and that they issue press releases. The PR office may say, “but, the papers won’t print them.” It doesn’t matter; if handled correctly, the faculty member will appreciate that the release was written and distributed.

8. Johnson notes that LBJ would use up White House liquor having nightcaps with the leaders and key members of BOTH parties, and that these leaders and key members would take home cufflinks, watches, signed photos, and perhaps even a pledge to come raise money for their next election. The key here is the courting of support with “leaders and key members.” Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #8: Devote some time regularly to interacting with department chairs and chairs of key committees/groups in a setting other than formal meetings. Invite them to your office for refreshments on a regular basis. Find some regular time each year (other than Christmas — when gift giving/receiving is often either overwhelming or personally offensive) and give small tokens of appreciation to those with whom you work most closely and upon whom you count for support.

9. LBJ didn’t miss an opportunity to connect personally. Need support for an important bill? Johnson reports, “He would be sending gifts to children and grandchildren of members [of Congress].” Almost everyone likes to be known for their outside-of-work persona as well as being an employee or colleague. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #9: First, figure out the extent to which individual faculty are comfortable with your familiarity of their personal life; make a note of this in your file (see the first item on this list), then make sure you use the information to demonstrate your sincere interest in each person with whom you work.

10. LBJ would have been public about his commitment to an important bill. He would walk around the South Lawn with reporters telling them why this was important to their own families. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #10: It’s important to communicate the important things to faculty, but it’s equally important to communicate them to the far broader range of personnel as well; secretaries and other classified staff (building custodians and engineers), professional personnel from other units, vendors, students, parents, alumni each represent a potential support group. If, for example you want to reform the curriculum, think about why the changes might appeal to a particular group — and remember that that the arguments that will sway them may not be those that swayed you.

11. Johnson described that LBJ would send every aide in the White House to see every member of the House and Senate. He matched aides to members of Congress. Affinity is a powerful connector. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #11: Identify faculty by affinity groups (e.g., by specialty discipline, or by the institution where they received their education, or by the region where they live), and identify ways to connect with them through their affinity.

12. LBJ used every source of influence he could imagine. He would call media executives Kay Graham, Frank Stanton, Robert Kintner, and the heads of every network. He would go to pray at six different churches. He would do newspaper, radio and TV interviews -- especially with Merriman Smith, Hugh Sidney, Sid Davis, Forrest Boyd, Ray Scherer, Helen Thomas, Marianne Means, Walter Cronkite, Phil Potter, Bob Novak. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #12: Think consciously about and systematically use external personnel to advance your positions. Do not limit yourself to those who you consider your greatest supports, but rise to the challenge of convincing your challengers of the value of your positions. If the history department loves your idea, and the physics department hates it, you need to invest time and energy with physics.

13. Need it be repeated? LBJ recognized that politics is personal. Johnson says, “He would threaten, cajole, flirt, flatter, hug — and get the health care bill passed. Academic Dean’s Political Strategy #13: Use every interpersonal skill you have to convince others of the compelling logic of your position.

Dan L. King is vice president for academic affairs of the Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology and executive director of the American Association of University Administrators.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Politics for Deans

  • Hollow Victory
  • Posted by Math Instructor at Community College on August 28, 2009 at 7:15am EDT
  • There's something missing from this strategy list, and it is the content of the change/bill/agreement you're trying to get through. If your idea is a load of crap, giving people gifts will not help it. If everyone hates the new curriculum change for very good reasons, knowing their names is useless. The list needs another point, which involves getting input from your constituents so you can better do what is best for all.

    I find the idea of my dean being a manipulative politician rather than a partner in the education of our students frightening. Accurate, but frightening.

  • Couldn't Disagree More
  • Posted by Dean Dad on August 28, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • LBJ had to drop out of the election in 1968. I prefer a more successful model.

    Yes, it's important to communicate with both faculty and the college community generally. But the whole 'maintain a list, give presents, court people personally, make excuses to drop by their offices, and praise at every opportunity' approach fails on several levels. First, it rewards suck-ups, rather than achievers. Let it be known that the dean likes to hang out, and hangers-out will appear. If you think you're the only one doing the manipulating, I've got a bridge to sell you.

    Second, it inevitably -- almost by design -- leads to favoritism. (If it doesn't, expect charges of betrayal.) In a litigious world, you just can't do that and expect to survive. The grievances will fly fast and furious, and that ain't pretty.

    Third, it mistakes the person for the mission. I'm increasingly convinced that people in positions of authority should be sworn to an oath that "it's not about me." Make it about you, and you start to misdirect internal energy. I have seen this. Repeatedly.

    A good administrator has to have a zen-like sense of detachment about the career. If I don't try to control it too much, I'll be okay. Trying to control everything will lead to burnout, political disaster, and misguided priorities.

    Finally, this approach is profoundly demoralizing to the hardworking people who prefer not to play politics. Again, I have seen this repeatedly.

    Yes, communication is important, but it has to be in the service of something positive. While I'm sure this article was well-intended, it hit me as both counterproductive and, frankly, creepy.

  • frightening...and wrong
  • Posted by concerned provost on August 28, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • As a political scientist who studies the presidency and as a long-serving provost, this is not only frightening, it is simply wrong in so many respects. It equates the context of national, presidential politics with local, highly idiosyncratic, academic politics. Should an effective dean or provost be politically astute? Of course. Should she or he model Lyndon Johnson's particular brand of legislative leadership? No -- and those who take this to heart...especially the sadly transparent efforts to win support through personal manipulation...will pay a high price.

  • Fear of Deans
  • Posted by G. Tod Slone on August 28, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • The math prof's last statement in his comment is excellent and quotable: "I find the idea of my dean being a manipulative politician rather than a partner in the education of our students frightening. Accurate, but frightening." However, I wish that prof would rethink commenting anonymously. So much anonymity in academe points to a serious problem: FEAR... of the dean politicians! So much acceptance of that anonymity by academics distances us from even recognizing it as problem to the point where nobody even tries to deal with it and resolve it. Yet, clearly FEAR is a huge inhibitor of democracy.
    G. Tod Slone, Founding Editor, 1998
    The American Dissident, a Journal of Literature, Democracy & Dissidence
    A 501 c3 nonprofit organization providing a forum for vigorous debate, cornerstone of democracy,
    And for examining the dark side of the academic/literary established-order milieu
    www.theamericandissident.org
    1837 Main St.
    Concord, MA 01742

  • The amateur's view of organizational leadership
  • Posted by Jane Robbins, PhD , Leadership, Policy, and Organizations at Vanderbilt University on August 28, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • This one-way-street approach to getting things done, alive and well in higher education today despite being outmoded and ineffective, is a primary cause of organizational dysfunction, poor moral atmosphere, and the development of a culture of mediocrity in which: a) decisions and judgments are made without proper search for information, validation of facts, opinions, and the basis of recommendations, or standards for judging; b) the most personally ambitious, also often the weakest, insinutate themselves into prominence and influence easily because of the lack of the former; c) horse trading and individual deal making, one of the most damaging aspects of organizational life, are common; d) the best leave or withdraw because of a-c; and d) change and advancement is a surface, temporary, and fragile victory because of all of the above. While there are a few useful suggestions here, overall these recommendations reflect a view of leadership that is utilized only by the managerially clueless. It may work in the short term when political expedience is the goal, but is a non-starter for achieving organizational excellence and sustainable growth and performance.

  • Posted by talleyrand on August 28, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I think a lot depends on the dean's intentions. Such activities as many of these, if they are sincere and not sheer machiavellianism, are helpful ways to express concern and interest in colleagues with whom one must work to move the institution forward. They could, but need not, be ineluctably tools for manipulating people. I can readily imagine deans who are sincere making use of this material to suggest ways to express their interest.

    A dean who uses such approaches wisely and not manipulatively could make valuable strides in her corner of the world to modulate the cynicism that makes these relationships so often adversarial.

  • Leadership isn't always bad
  • Posted by Ken on August 28, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • Harry Truman is famous (at least in political science) for saying: “I sit here all day trying to persuade people to do things they ought to have sense enough to do without my persuading them…” Persuasion/leadership/manipulation is independent of the value of the proposal being pushed. Was LBJ immoral in using such techniques to push voting rights past segregationists?

    We need to separate techniques from issues. Deans and president need techniques to move ideas forward because good ideas don't automatically prevail.

    LBJ was operating with a congress where politics was highly idiosyncratic and was personality driven. He passed out electric toothbrushes in order to smooth the way for his bills so I think the challenges LBJ faced match the academic world pretty well. My experience suggests that faulty have egos and worries that need to be managed and it's not fair to blame the author for suggesting ways of dealing with the unique personality issues that we often present. To paraphrase Madison: "If faculty were angels, no administrators would be necessary."

    Finally, I'm amazed about what people read into this list. I think some people saw "LBJ" in the title and didn't focus on what the author was actually recommending. Establishing a relationship with faculty is not

  • Dean Dad is right, of course,
  • Posted by DFS on August 29, 2009 at 5:45pm EDT
  • Because the entire idea of some individual having any kind of oversight there is to provide the necessary continual focus on the mission.

    Personal politics be damned. Just what in the hell are we supposed to be here for, anyway?

    Someone has to be able to say why or why not.