Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Academic Career Confidential

That Shocking Time of Year

June 3, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Every year at about this time I find myself humming, “It’s May; it’s May,” a song from the musical Camelot. This year I took a closer look at the lyrics. I had missed the second half of a couplet mid-song: “The month of great dismay.” For the many people on the job market who are still in limbo, that line has probably become a too-familiar refrain. Now that you’ve reached May without a job, what are your options?

A few candidates will still be hired. Colleagues on search committees at two different colleges mentioned lately that though their searches seemed doomed in February, they are now being revived. In addition, some departments will hire temporary staff at the last minute. Their deans will scrape together funds to cover courses intended for the faculty members they would have hired if budgets hadn’t been unexpectedly cut.

If you don’t have a job yet, what can you do? If you are offered a temporary position, will you take it? Should you take it?

Temporary positions range from perfectly respectable to absolutely indecent. The nomenclature is bewildering and meaningful only in local contexts. A position might be labeled adjunct X, temporary X, or visiting X while the X might stand in for instructor, lecturer, professor, or staff, among other options. Don’t assume “visiting professor” trumps “lecturer” either. Sometimes a department can offer a three-year renewable lectureship while a visiting assistant professorship is limited to a one-year term. The emphatic redundancy of titles can be painfully revealing. “Part-time Temporary Adjunct Lecturer” kind of says it all.

In the best case, a department will offer a full-time position with a living wage, benefits, and a reasonable teaching load -- although reasonable is unlikely to mean two courses per term. Temporary employees are usually hired solely to teach. That means a department has little incentive to support their research. The rare department provides minimal support for professional development, usually travel funds to help you attend a conference or two. However, given that colleges and universities are now cutting travel budgets even for tenured faculty, all of those small but morale-boosting funds may disappear. You probably will not be asked to attend meetings or serve on committees. Not having service obligations saves time, and you’ll need to cash in every extra minute. On the other hand, you are also excluded from governance and decision-making, which is a large price to pay.

Anyone considering a short-term position should gauge just how temporary it is. Moving and even commuting are expensive and stressful. A position that is guaranteed for two to three years offers short-term security, the opportunity to get to know colleagues well enough to request letters of recommendation, and time to look for a permanent position. If the teaching preparation and grading are not overwhelming, you can use the extra year or two to turn dissertation chapters or languishing conference papers into articles. With each publication, you will be moving forward rather than spinning your wheels.

Unfortunately, temporary positions are more likely to be swamps than speedways. In too many cases, “temporary” translates into $2,000 or less per course and no commitment to you. No benefits. No future. Now, there are moments in one’s life when teaching that course might look like the best option (or the only option). What if you need one more year to finish your dissertation and you’re out of aid? In that case, piecing together several courses might be the best way to accomplish a goal that’s within your reach. (As my last column suggests, I would do whatever I could to avoid going into debt.)

Just remember that for temporary teaching to serve you well even in the short term, you’ll need to be a very disciplined writer. Graduate school doesn’t train students to work efficiently. To finish a project under these conditions, you’ll have to train yourself to read a crucial article here and write two pages there in short, steady work periods throughout the day — even if it is a day when you are meeting two or three classes. The good news is that this kind of research and writing practice will be ideal preparation if you want to be a publishing scholar as well as a scholar-teacher.

But what if you don’t get a job next year or the next? For those of us who have to work to support ourselves, most temporary positions should only ever be just that. If I found myself mired in devalued, virtually unpaid, constantly fluctuating teaching positions, I would be ready to take risks and make changes.

If you come to that decision, what you can do?

In my department, we’ve begun mulling over that question. This spring the graduate director and I decided to invite a professional from the university placement center to our “preview of coming placement season” meeting. After I described the academic job search, I turned the floor over to him. As he nervously passed around a handout that matched the training humanities graduate students receive with the “skills” required for non-academic positions, the students shrank into their seats. I quietly berated myself for not preparing students better for his visit. What I floated as Plan B for Bouncing Back deflated, on the students’ horizon, into Plan F for Failure.

For most of us, the prospect of giving up a long sought career would be wrenching, frightening, and, worst of all, humiliating. Such are the lessons faculty teach graduate students and assistant professors, however inadvertently. But is scraping by with random courses, work that probably ends up averaging less than minimum wage if you count all the hours involved, more rewarding than retreat? More of a “success”? I don’t think so.

I wish with all my heart that everyone could find rewarding and secure positions. However, higher education is working against us. A recent Inside Higher Ed article discussed the findings of a new American Federation of Teachers study, "American Academic: The State of the Higher Education Workforce 1997-2007."

According to the report, tenured and tenure-track positions now make up fewer than half of all teaching positions at every type of institution, from community colleges to private liberal arts colleges. When all institutions are averaged together, tenure-track positions comprise just over a quarter of all teaching positions. A quarter. If I were on the job market right now, I would dig into Plan A, but with one in four odds, I would also be laying the ground work for Plan B.

Want to sneak a peek at Plan B? To do so, you’ll join what I’ve come to think of as an academic underground. Mark Johnson’s site Sellout: A resource for PhDs considering careers beyond the university captures the edgy anxiety many feel at the mere prospect of looking beyond academic borders. The comparatively sober Chronicle of Higher Education collects quirky, often informative articles and postings onto a page titled “Nonacademic Careers for Ph.D’s.” One especially helpful article on this site is Gabriela Montell’s 2001 piece “Where to Find Information on Nonacademic Careers.” Montell provides a wide-ranging list of sources organized by discipline. The occasional “Career Talk” columns that Julie Miller Vick and Jennifer S. Furlong write for The Chronicle are packed with concrete ideas and examples. A recent article, “Switching Sides,” includes interviews with four Ph.D.s who are working in advising. By the way, these sites frequently recommend Susan Basalla and Maggie Debelius’ So What Are You Going to Do With That? A Guide for M.A.'s and Ph.D.'s Seeking Careers Outside the Academy (Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2001). I’m also delighted to report that Inside Higher Ed is about to welcome a new columnist, Sabine Hikel, who authors an excellent blog, Leaving Academia.

The underground extends across the Internet. Alexandra Lord and Julie Taddeo have created a smart site called Beyond Academe. Though it is written by and for historians, the tools and resources are useful for those in other humanities fields as well. Another site, Mathematical Sciences Career Information: Project for Nonacademic Employment, serves scientists interested in government or private sector careers. These sites and many others impress me because they provide road maps for the emotional, psychological journey I’d have to travel to change careers along with practical advice, nuts and bolts information and answers, and inspiring examples of academics who have safely arrived at new destinations.

One forum I’ve found especially intriguing is an e-mail listserv founded by Paula Foster Chambers and supported by several groups at Duke University, including the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute. Work4Us is a collegial, informative, on-going discussion for humanities, education, and social science scholars. Entries range from appeals for reassurance to shrewd advice and all in between. Periodically the list hosts “Guest Speaker Discussions” with the real experts — scholars who have settled into nonacademic careers.

The personal is also, in this case, professional. Two of my friends from graduate school changed course when academic careers didn’t work out for them. After a couple of rough transitional years, both landed good jobs, one in educational testing and the other in nonprofit grants writing. They live in splendid cities and work with smart colleagues. They research, analyze, and write about complex issues. They know that many people benefit from the work they do. And they are the same intelligent, curious, culturally voracious, witty people as they were in graduate school.

If you are feeling discouraged by the declining academic job market, give Plan B a chance. The tune that haunts me each spring takes a giddy turn from dismay to daring. May, wrote lyricist Frederick Loewe, is also “That shocking time of year/ When tons of wicked little thoughts/ Merrily appear.” If the job market has repeatedly ended in disappointment, consider your alternatives. Instead of worrying about what your graduate mentors or your colleagues might say, take a risk. Apply above ground, but visit the underground. There are infinite ways to be miserable, but don’t let anyone convince you that there is only one way to be happy.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on That Shocking Time of Year

  • "Sellout"
  • Posted by Lee Furey at Art Institute of Atlanta on June 3, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Must one be considered a "sellout" because one needs to support children, pay bills, avoid debt, etc.? Business people are often very happy to have people with Ph.D.s (in case no one's noticed, super-smart people tend not to want to do administrative work these days, and everyone suffers), and a business job held for a year or two (or 4, in my case) need not ruin one's life. My old boss even made arrangements so that I could teach part-time for 2 of the years I ran her HR department before I found a full time job at a college.

  • defining transferable skills
  • Posted by Kim Cohen , Instructor at LCC on June 3, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • I hear too often from my fellow grad students or recent PhDs without a TT line that they can't "do anything" else. And while I agree that the transition is hard and that Humanities grads need to work to identify the skills they have developed and market those to jobs outside the academy, there are some resouces out there...

    UPenn has a interesting site with great examples on translating a line on a CV into a set of skills for a resume...

    http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:UKm8XN8q0ssJ:www.vpul.upenn.edu/careerservices/gradstud/Identifying_Transferable_Skills.ppt+transferable+skills+humanities+phd+list&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

    Also here is a sample list of transferable skills that many grads come away with at the end of their program (pdf link):

    http://career.ucsd.edu/sa/GPrepareforNonAcademicJobMarket.shtml

    I'm also committed when and if I need to formally make the "transition," to purchase the services of a career coach who has experience in helping people move out of the academy.

    Definitely food for thought. Another thoughtful piece, Teresa.

  • "Considering a Change"
  • Posted on June 3, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Thank you, Teresa, for the insightful and reassuring article and the wonderful list of resources.

    I've joined the "Work4Us" forum at Duke, and I have a very practical question. Perhaps there are other subscribers to Duke's email discussion list who might be able to help me with a problem that I'm having.

    I have joined by providing my email address and have been assigned a temporary password. I've been prompted to change the password, but there does not seem to be any way to do this. Their "Preferences" link takes you to a page where you can add a new email address and password. I've tried inputting both the temporary password on this page or suggesting a new one, but neither of these attempts have been successful.

    When I logged in as a new user, I was greeted with a message stating that if I do not change my password, I will have to create a new account. Also, the "help" options for this site don't seem to be very helpful on this particular topic.

    If anyone reading this who also belongs to the Duke mailing list has some suggestions, they would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Also, once again, thank you, Teresa, for the inspiring article. Your words and suggestions are very encouraging to those of us who are considering a change.

    Best regards,
    Part-Time Faculty with Few Prospects

  • additional resources
  • Posted by Teresa Mangum , English Dept at U of Iowa on June 4, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Here are a few additional resources suggested by a reader.  Many thanks.

    ...for administrators I'd like to suggest Daryl Ogden's *Profession* essay about his revamp of GA Tech's Brittain Fellowship program for just this sort of transition. This one too is new-millennium vintage, and the program was subsequently gutted. But I know so many who benefited from Daryl's work in this way (himself included!) that I think it's well worth checking out . . . .

  • question about website
  • Posted by Teresa Mangum , English at U of Iowa on June 4, 2009 at 2:00pm EDT
  • For help with the wrk4us website, the front page of the site lists the founder, email this address: wrk4us-request@duke.edu Hope that helps.

  • Book mentioned not helpful
  • Posted by Gabrielle P. on July 26, 2009 at 7:00am EDT
  • Greetings all from a newly minted PhD in Italian literature! (Just FYI: I recently left a 1 year contracted lecturer position with a 5 course per semester teaching load in Kentucky, yes, FIVE!!! AT ONCE!!! with an average of 30 students per class! And no TAs!! This was the only full-time job I could get in 2 years of looking with my Ivy League PhD. Oh, and Kentucky had absolutely no employment my significant other could find so we had to live in different states...Thus, when promises regarding a lighter teaching load were broken and I was offered the same contract again, because somehow I managed to get good performance reviews & student evaluations, I decided to move on... )

    I recently read Susan Basalla and Maggie Debelius’ So What Are You Going to Do With That? A Guide for M.A.'s and Ph.D.'s Seeking Careers Outside the Academy (Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2001)... but I did not find it helpful at all. Basically, it's a collection of anecdotes of people who've successfully transitioned out of academia--from the late 1990s to 2000 or so, obviously in more friendly economic times. Besides the inevitable discordant note that the book's sunnier timeframe strikes, my major complaint is that there's nothing really concrete (unless you are VERY inexperienced at getting a job, and I mean, VERY)-- just a lot of optimism and encouraging yet vague statements about the positive side of post-academic life. This may serve a purpose, but again, given the current gloom & doom, it does not seem very useful to me!
    For example, this would have been a much stronger and more helpful book if it had had lists of "if you studied A, then you've probably got skill set B to present to potential employers" rather than the comparatively watered-down tips such as "don't send out your academic CV, actually craft a resume like those that non-academic HR people are used to seeing." Given the abundance of job-seeking information on the Internet, a book from 2001 is bound to seem somewhat dated... and naturally, the dearth of Internet-related information dated this book.

    (Oh, .. and PLEASE for the love of your god/goddess/etc., DON'T focus on the hard sciences where many people leave academia and whose "expat" PhDs in say, engineering, computer science or chemistry have a simpler case to make regarding skills and knowledge to non-academic employers, but the poor struggling liberal arts/humanities types who know a lot about literature! You may be trying to reach a wider audience, but, sheesh, throw us liberal arts types a bone!)