Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Getting the Boss Fired

January 14, 2009
(Also appears in Confessions of a Community College Dean)

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A returning correspondent writes:

Here's the situation: I worked as a TA for an intro level survey course for a truly awful adjunct. She was condescending, vague about my role inside and outside the classroom, unclear about how strict/lenient grading should be, and frequently imposed impractical deadlines. With the students in the class, she was vague about expectations, a truly harsh grader, thematically all over the place, and in particular, refused to explain to the students what she meant by "good writing" (probably just wasn't capable of, is more like it). She also was terrible about answering student emails/keeping the students informed about changes to the syllabus. All in all, pretty much your standard nightmare with a PhD.

As her TA, I struggled pretty much daily with what my role both in- and outside of the classroom. My suggestions for how to improve the class (like a suggestion for a session on improving student writing, which I even volunteered to organize and run outside of class time) were met with hostility and disgust. I helped the students best I could, but a lot of the time, there wasn't much I could do (since it was unclear what this woman even wanted from her students, outside of a textbook recitation of facts, etc)...

So, my question is actually two-fold:

1)What do you (and your readers) feel a TA's role, both inside and outside the classroom, should be? How/ should a professor communicate responsibilities with their TA?
and
2) How can you get a truly awful adjunct fired without making a god-awful mess of things for yourself? Our department is kind of all over the place in terms of knowing who to talk to about anything, but someone needs to know truly how awful this woman is. I'm afraid, however, that this will just look like bitching on my part. I know that this professor is a serious gossip hound, and she talks about EVERYBODY, including her TA's, and I know for a fact that she's had some not-so-nice things to say about me. I don't think she should be removed for my sake; I KNOW that there are hundreds of other smart, qualified people that would happily take a position at our institution.

There's a lot here, but I'll focus on what I consider the key point. (I won't really address #1, since we don't have TA's at the cc level. I'll leave that one for folks who work with TA's on a regular basis.)

It's not your job to get her fired.

Let's assume that everything you write is correct, and that she's a terrible teacher and supervisor. Not criminal, and not in violation of any of the basic canons of behavior (sleeping with students, accepting money for grades), but just a really lousy teacher.

Mere badness – as opposed to violation of law or canons of ethical behavior – falls under the category of 'professional judgment.' The professional judgment in question belongs to the hiring manager, typically a department chair. It does not belong to you.

To the extent that you can inform that judgment with relevant and verifiable facts, presented calmly, that may or may not be worthwhile, depending on personalities and local culture. But if you go on a crusade to get her fired, you will be perceived – rightly or wrongly – as part of the problem.

One of the really frustrating lessons I've had to learn in administration is that you never want to get into a point-by-point argument with a crazy person. They don't fight fair, and you'll get dragged into their mud. The way to handle them is to take the high road, stick to facts, and to trust that, over time, their nuttiness will discredit them. (If the entire culture of the college is nutty, you're probably best off finding another place to work.)

If you fight a gossip-monger by gossip-mongering, it's hard to imagine a positive outcome. At best, maybe you battle to a draw, reducing your own credibility to her level. At worst, you lose, since she has more practice at that game. Don't do it.

And that's without even addressing the cost of the battle in terms of both time and emotional energy. Both are finite, and both could be better spent doing almost anything else. You'd be much better off focusing on things you can actually control. For example, if it helps you sleep at night, you could go to the chair to deny her allegations, and merely take a classy and conspicuous silence regarding her. I'm not usually a fan of this approach – it's hard to defend yourself without sounding defensive – but it can make sense in some cases. Then learn what you can from the experience and move on.

(For the record, my advice would be very different if she were doing something clearly illegal or immoral. In those cases, I see an ethical obligation to blow the whistle. But that's not this case.)

If it's any consolation, it's possible to learn from lousy mentors and bosses, just as it's possible to learn from good ones. Reflect carefully on all that you've seen and experienced. To the extent that you can translate visceral responses into conscious ideas, you may be able to make yourself a more effective instructor.

Good luck. This isn't a pretty situation, but it doesn't have to get any uglier.

Wise and worldly readers – any thoughts on this one?

Have a question? Ask the Administrator at deandad (at) gmail (dot) com.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Ask the Administrator: Getting the Boss Fired

  • Posted by CB on January 15, 2009 at 5:00am EST
  • The attitude and tone of the questioner struck me as even more unprofessional than the purported behaviors of the instructor. The letter was venomous, sexist, and the level of anger completely out of proportion to the supposed offenses of being vague, disorganized, and resistant to change/suggestion - qualities that describe a good number of academics (or even people for that matter.) I'm not saying these aren't areas for improvement in anyone, but that there appears to be something personal far beyond the issues mentioned to inspire such ire from the TA. If the TA approached the instructor with even a hint of this attitude (or worse, let the students become aware), I can see why she wasn't keen on following the TA's suggestions.

  • Posted by John DeLancey on January 15, 2009 at 6:30am EST
  • In the Air Force, the answer is easy -- do nothing (unless, as the good dean mentioned, there exists a question of criminal or immoral behavior).

    The way it works for the military officer world is thus -- if I act a fool and treat poorly those in my charge, my troops will, put simply, allow me to fail. They will not seek to destroy me, but will allow my closed-mindedness to trap me in such a manner that I cannot escape by passing the buck -- the troops just followed their orders.

    The advice-seeker did not disclose the tenured status of his or her PhD in this case, but let's assume she has not yet attained it. I would hope -- and I cannot speak intelligently to the process of granting tenure -- that the academic records of her students and the empirical evidence of behavior indicated by her colleagues would be enough to prevent a generation of students being subjected to "the crazy."

    It stinks rather badly for those who will have to build this evidence -- student and colleague alike -- but neither will fail because of her. They will only suffer.

    - John

  • Posted by Gary Davis on January 15, 2009 at 9:55am EST
  • Doesn't every teacher, including a teaching assistant, have some responsibility to see that the institution has in place a reliable system to monitor the quality of its teaching? I would tell the TA to concentrate on improving the system with the hope that a better system will one day prevent the kind of damage that this adjunct is doing.

    When ethical issues come up, don't forget to think "system." For more on the importrance of systems in ethics, see "Moral Man and Immoral Society" by Reinhold Niebuhr.

  • Really Odd Situation
  • Posted by Cheap Seats on January 15, 2009 at 10:00am EST
  • Dean Dad is certainly right to remind the TA that it isn't her or his role to get anyone fired, even a truly lousy teacher. He's also right that one can learn from the bad ones.

    The whole situation strikes me as odd. Assigning a TA to work under an adjunct is a big step away from the purpose of training TAs. This is work which is the responsibility of the regular faculty. I can think of very few cases in which doing so might be justified, the most obvious of which is that the adjunct brings some highly specialized knowledge and skills, ones which for whatever reason aren't present in the regular faculty.

    Since, however, this is a introductory survey class, it stretches credulity to think that no one on the regular faculty is capable of teaching the course and mentoring the TA.

    One suspects, on the basis of limited evidence, that the failure here starts with the department and rolls downhill. A department that slights its role in training its graduate students is likely to be one that doesn't care about teaching, students, etc.

  • Posted by ezry on January 15, 2009 at 12:00pm EST
  • It isn't the TA's responsibility to get someone fired, but is the TA's responsibility to get an education and professional development, and the department's responsibility to see that that happens. Someone in the department assigns and, at least nominally, supervises TAs -- a graduate director, a senior faculty member, the chair. If it's truly not clear to whom a TA can go with questions about the assistantship, then something in the department is really broken.

    Whether there is actually wrongdoing, disarray, or bad faith on the part of the adjunct faculty member who is instructor-of-record here, or whether this is "merely" a personality conflict nurtured by a department climate of gossip and/or disrespect, this is the kind of situation that needs to be known by a supervising third party. Exemplary as well as mediocre TAs are by definition cast in a difficult academic-political position as they negotiate authority and responsibility to/with their discipline, their studies, the faculty member they're assigned to, the students they are (partially) responsible for, and the needs/politics of the department. They should not be left in a position to have to mediate all conflicts alone.

    TAs who find themselves in a conflict need to seek assistance. It is, of course, politic to actually *seek assistance* in coping with one's own frustrating position rather than to seek to affect the status or actions of someone else. As many conflict-resolution guides suggest, focusing on I-statements ("I often feel caught in the middle when the assignment prompt is vague and students come to me seeking clarification that I can't give them") can lower everyone's stress level and help people focus on solving at least part of the problem rather than creating more rumors or exchanging accusations.

    Often in academic departments, the best that can be done is to develop coping strategies for working with colleagues who are not on one's own wavelength. It won't hurt a TA with an eye on long-term work in the profession to learn that lesson and start to practice it. Still, a third-party review may be the only way to begin to *learn* that kind of coping behavior rather than simply feeling unjustly put-upon and tempted to sulk, gossip, or lash out. Good programs provide clear, well-lit avenues for TAs to use in engaging in that learning as well as in learning their content-area and pedagogy.

  • Posted by Patricia on January 15, 2009 at 1:20pm EST
  • This is some of the best advice I've ever seen written on this subject!! I think I'll save it for when dealing with "crazies" and remember that arguing with them (my automatic response) is futile.

    One thing I would have added is for the TA to consider the option (if available) of getting assigned to a different teacher. Also, she can consider it a learning example - what not to do when she becomes an adjunct herself.

  • Arguing with a pig
  • Posted by Jacqui Ioli on April 22, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Great advice in the article. I concur with John, "Never argue with a pig, you both get dirty and the pig enjoys it." Words to live by. ;-0)