Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Check It Out by Checking It Off

April 3, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Ah the essay exam! Few things strike more fear into student hearts than being charged with the task of demonstrating that they can assemble concepts, facts, and analysis into a coherent narrative. In future columns I’ll explore ways to reduce student anxiety over writing, but first things first — let’s address professor dread. After all, once the essay is done the student hand-wringing ends and yours begins.

Let’s put aside romantic notions that each of us is Mr. Chips, that every essay is a joy to read, and that our only life goal is to toil selflessly so that all students maximize their potential. You could do take that approach — for the year or two before you broke down like a knock-off Rolex. It would be better for both you and your students to develop a system to grade essays quickly, efficiently, and effectively.

Assuming you know how to design good essay questions, give serious consideration to assigning shorter ones for all your classes that are general education requirements, most of those that are introductory-level, and even electives open to students who have not taken the writing seminar specific to the major (generally the junior year in most schools). The reason for this is obvious: You cannot assume that all students have the skills to write a decent essay. Keep the essays short — four to six pages is plenty — to preserve your sanity. A few essays really will send you into paroxysms of Mr. Chips-like joy, but the vast majority will fall into the falling categories: competent, pedestrian, minimally proficient, and “Linear-A hasn’t yet been translated.” I’ve taught at colleges whose test scores would be the envy of most, and a few in which students would struggle to spell “S.A.T.” The one thing all have in common is that their faculties complain about poor student writing skills. If students struggle to produce four pages of readable prose, why on earth would you want to read 20 pages?

It is your responsibility to help students develop writing skills, though the key word in this sentence is “help.” One of the things Mr. Chips got woefully wrong was thinking that everything was his responsibility. Professors can unwittingly do too much for students; we are analogous to the enabler to the alcoholic.

More often, though, we’re worse — we take so long to return essays that we’re just the lousy SOB who sat on the papers all semester and handed them back when it was too late to do anything about the low grade slapped on the top. Before you assign an essay three things need to be in place:

1. Your expectations need to be spelled out in detail.

2. Students need to know your grading criteria.

3. You need a plan to return the papers promptly.

My advice on expectations is akin to that of writing a syllabus: Spell out what you want. If students can only use a particular style sheet, tell them which one. If you require them to use primary sources, say how many. Don’t assume that they’ll know that a title page, bibliography, and endnotes don’t count towards the four page minimum, that they’ll stop at the end of six, that they’ll double-space, or that they’ll use a 12-point font. If you want them to use examples, say so. If a thesis statement is required, tell them. [See appendix for example.]

After you’ve done that, become a minimalist. Develop a grading checklist and either post it to your course Web site or physically hand a copy to each student. Tell them that it is their responsibility to read it and to raise any questions they have regarding it. If you hand hold like Mr. Chips you actually do students a disservice. Maybe a few students don’t know what the word “syntax” means or can’t tell MLA from APA; it’s time they learn.

The checklist is your ticket to efficiency and speed. I used to be one of those profs who wrote reams on student papers. They’d give me the equivalent of a grocery list and I’d return it with War and Peace written in the margins. There are several things wrong with this approach. First, it just takes too long. So too does writing the same thing on each student paper. The key to a good checklist [see appendix] is to list things germane to most essays and tick the ones that apply to individual papers. I don’t correct spelling, grammar, typos, fragments, or syntax errors for students; I merely circle and/or note them and it’s their job to figure out what was wrong. For many students this inspires them to master writing rules they’ve long ignored.

Second, writing too much disheartens most students. Maybe you wanted to know about every nuance of a debate, desired ways to rethink a point, and longed for a suggested reading list. You weren’t typical; most students just want the grade and a reason for it. I still write marginalia, but my final comments seldom run more than a few sentences that strike to the heart of what was good and what was lacking.

Third, if you’re not Mr. Chips you’re not The Miracle Worker either. Assume for a moment you’re one of the weak students who can’t write well. You hand in your best effort and it comes back with comments lengthier than your submission. It documents dozens of things you’ve done wrong. What would you do with this information? Where would you start? Why not just give up? When you encounter a hopeless essay the most merciful thing you can do is give it the grade it deserves, but the nicest thing is to go sparingly on critique. List just two or three things the student needs to work on immediately. Let’s be blunt: If the student doesn’t correct the basics first, the rest is moot.

Finally, immediate feedback is better than extensive feedback. You’ll hate me for this, but with the exception of long research papers there’s little excuse for not getting essays graded and returned within a week. (If you have teaching assistants, impress this upon them as well.) The checklist and limiting comment allows me routinely to turn around 60 papers in a week. You can too. Best of all — they’re done and you can get on to the important task of helping students who want your assistance and will take the self-empowering responsibility of seeking it.

Two final notes: The essay instructions and check list I’ve attached are appropriate for the humanities; you should adapt these in ways that make sense for your discipline. In the “Additional Comments” section, force yourself to lead with a positive comment even if you have to invent one. Students are more amenable to working on problems if they feel they’re doing something right.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Check It Out by Checking It Off

  • Writing checklist
  • Posted by Cynde Route' , Adjunct English Professor at Erie Community College on April 3, 2009 at 8:15am EDT
  • I couldn't agree with you more. I always use a checklist because it makes my job easier, more objective, and it results in students correcting their work and handing it back in for a re-grade. I review the list as I'm giving the assignment so students can get a good idea of what I'm looking for. I even include "proper heading" on my list; points are either given for it or not, there are no gray areas. I attach each student's grade sheet to the paper when I hand it back. It also helps to emphasize that writing is a process.

  • Posted by Jonathan Dresner on April 3, 2009 at 9:00am EDT
  • For the checklist, I've been using a variation on this for years.

    On returning papers, while I sometimes don't succeed in a one-week turnaround, I do make a point of returning an assignment before the next similar assignment is due, so they can benefit from the feedback (and my stacks of grading don't get too big).

  • Good points
  • Posted by Steve on April 3, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • Good points, though the author seems to confuse essay exams done in class as part of a mid-term or final exam with essays done outside of class. In either case, I, as a part-time instructor of a gen-ed history class with anywhere from 40 to 60 students and no TA/GA help, do provide as much guidance as possible. I spend the better part of one class session, right after a BI session at the library on how to find materials for their 10-page research paper, on the expectations I have for that paper: what is research, what is not; formatting, writing conventions, citations, etc. I also spend time telling them how to take one of my infamous essay exams (and I send them study questions a week before the exam). In a gen-ed course, few of these non-history majors know anything about how to take an essay exam, so I have to give them a crash course on how I ask questions and what I'm looking for: sufficient examples of evidence to support an argument.

    I do point out errors in the papers--I tell my students that I'm an OC grammar cop. I also tell them that learning to write well is at least as important as learning history, and that getting a good job after college will depend in no small part on being able to write a good application letter. So the red ink flows freely from my pen on research papers to show how a sentence or paragraph could be constructed better, to reiterate for the hundredth time the difference between "their" and "there" or "where" and "were," or how to write a proper bibliographic citation.

    Unfortunately, given the large class I teach (on top of a full-time day job), it is impossible to get these exams and research papers back within a week. Maybe if my university paid me more, cut class size, or gave me some help, I could do that--but that will all happen when pigs fly.

  • Posted by Brian Gilbert on April 3, 2009 at 9:30am EDT
  • I'm borrowing an idea from a friend. I circle errors and have my students identify what the error was and how they would fix it before they get their grade on the essay.

  • To emphasize a point
  • Posted by bevo on April 3, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • I concur with the author's argument that most students simply want a grade and nothing more for their effort. I teach only upper division courses with about 15 to 20 students in each course. I grade students' essays, return them with a letter, and allow them to revise the paper in order to improve their grade.

    Only a handful will actually attempt a revision. Of those who revise the paper, three papers at most will reflect an actual revision because most students simply do not care.

    Of the 17 students in my latest essay heavy class, three bothered to see me about their essay for the entire quarter.

    Just because you think writing represents an important skills (and it does), do not think that most of your students share this view.

  • outlines vs. essays
  • Posted by random thoughts on April 3, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Here's a thought I never got to try before becoming an administrator who (sadly) no longer gets to teach:
    Give students six essay questions. Ask for one or two full essays and outlines (only) of answers for the remainder.

    Several advantages:
    * Explore students' knowledge of more issues than time would otherwise allow.
    * Encourage students to think in an organized way about answering essay questions.
    * Reduce time grading.

    I'd love to know if anyone has had experience with this approach.

  • Essay exams
  • Posted by Jeffrey Klausman on April 3, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • Many good ideas, but I'd offer a couple of different suggestions (I've been WAC coordinator for ten years and am current WPA of my college's writing program).

    If written in class, SHORT essays are better: limit students to 250 or 500 words per question but offer four to six questions and allow students to choose all but one or two.

    Marking "errors" accomplishes nothing--fifty years of research on writing has found this to be true numerous times. Even students learning to self edit their work is not encouraged by marking errors.

    Always hand out the checklist or rubric with the writing assignment--it's like a figure-skating judge and a figure skater knowing what the criteria for excellence are before the performance.

    Always have samples of excellent essays of the genre you're requesting available online. These can be on different questions from previous semesters or you can write one or two yourself. Talk about the generic features (many students don't realize, for instance, that actually answering the question directly and immediately is a good thing).

    Lastly, in-class essay exams are not the place for interpretation or deep analysis--it puts at least half the students at a distinct and unfair disadvantage. Keep in-class exams tied to the factual or sumamtive (contrast the two key language learning theories we've discussed in class?, for example, or what is modernism and how does X "fit" with this movement?).

  • Thanks
  • Posted by Alex Golub on April 3, 2009 at 2:45pm EDT
  • Just a quick note to say I've been really impressed by the quality of Rob Weir's posts, which I find useful myself and often suggest to my graduate students. Bravo.