Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

The Literature Review

June 10, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

From seminar paper to M.A. thesis to dissertation, the literature review provides both the foundation and the frame for your own research. Its preparation requires careful planning and a well-crafted presentation.

The purpose of the literature review

A literature review tells us what is known by sharing the results of prior studies related to your own.

A literature review places your study within a larger body of work. It shows how your study seeks to fill a gap in, or extend, our knowledge in this area. A literature review offers a benchmark for assessing your own results. In the conclusion to your study you will revisit the literature review armed with your new findings.

Organizing the literature review

A good literature review is a synthesis of prior research presented in a way that adds value to our understanding of that work. So, it’s important to organize your review in a way that is coherent, relevant to your own study, and useful to other researchers. For example, you might cluster
prior research by media type, communication situation, similar findings, key themes, respondent type, or other useful distinction.

Whatever organizing scheme you choose, it is typical to present the most important, relevant, or strongest collection of existing research first, and go from there. If not, there should be a narrative logic to the review presentation.

Another way to add value is to identify conceptual linkages among ideas and authors. Researchers often talk about the same processes — just in somewhat different ways. It’s tempting to want to include every study that appeared in the key word search of your topic. Don’t. The challenge is to find the right balance between giving the reader confidence in your familiarity with literature and focusing on what’s most relevant for the study at hand.

Writing the literature review

Your synthesis of prior research should focus on key findings or conclusions with just enough information for the reader to discern the question and approach: “In her ethnographic study of Muslim immigrants’ perception of mainstream British media, Gillespie concluded….” The exception being if the study cited is significant because of its methodology — only then would you offer more methodological detail.

Not all ideas in the literature review are used to construct your study’s conceptual framework. So, at the end of each section, tell readers what key concept, finding, definition, or theme is most critical to “carry forward” into their reading of your study.

Don’t over-quote. It slows down your narrative. Direct quotations should only appear if the author said something in a unique, powerful, or precise way (e.g., a definition) that demands repeating in its exact form. Otherwise, use your own words.

Since a good review is a coherent, value-added organization of the literature, provide the reader with clear “signposts” through the instructive use of headings, introductions, transition phrases, and summary statements.

Finally, because people reading your paper or dissertation may not be familiar with your area of research, be careful not to weigh down your literature review in field-specific jargon. It is important that you write in clear and active prose.

Nancy Rivenburgh is associate professor of communication at the University of Washington.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Literature Review

  • The question that the study seeks to answer
  • Posted by Gavin Moodie at Griffith University on June 10, 2009 at 8:00am EDT
  • Thanx for this most helpful advice. I suggest that the literature review, like every other part of a paper or thesis, be animated by the question that the study seeks to answer. So I structure a paper or thesis thus:

    1 the question that the study seeks to answer (introduction);

    2 how far current knowledge helps to answer the question (literature review);

    3 how this study sought to answer the question (method);

    4 this study's answer to the question (results);

    5 the success of the study in answering the question (discussion);

    6 issues remaining for the question (conclusion).

  • thanks for this!
  • Posted by Paula McMillen, Ph.D. , Education Librarian, Assoc. Professor UNLV Libraries on June 10, 2009 at 11:45am EDT
  • Great frame and overview of the purpose and practice of writing a lit review. I will share this with the grad students I work with individually and in my Lit Review workshops.

  • Ditto what Paula said
  • Posted by Hannah Gascho Rempel , Graduate Student Services Librarian at Oregon State University Libraries on June 10, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I have already included a link to this memo on my literature review guides website. Thanks!

  • Ditto
  • Posted by Char , Director at PSI Tutor:Mentor on June 10, 2009 at 7:45pm EDT
  • I am posting a review of the article and a link for the mentees who visit my site.

    thank you

  • No literature?
  • Posted by Dr. RingDing on June 11, 2009 at 4:45am EDT
  • An article about lit reviews that doesn't review any useful books on the subject. Hmmmm.

    Here's one:

    Chris Hart, (1999). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.

       
     

     

  • Clinical/Academic Genre
  • Posted by Thomas Lawrence Long , School of Nursing at University of Connecticut on June 11, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • The lit review is an important genre in academic nursing science and in clinical nursing practice. In addition to serving the normal lit review function by providing the foundation for further academic research, it is also used in clinical nursing as a means of establishing appropriate evidence-based practices. I've linked Rivenburgh's article to the NursingWriting blog site: http://nursingwriting.wordpress.com .

  • Naive on lit
  • Posted by Joe , Sociology at Southern U. on June 11, 2009 at 11:00pm EDT
  • Young faculty, and others, must also keep in mind that the literature review normally has to cite many of the people likely to be reviewers for publication. The publication of articles and books is often a fairly (to highly) "political" process in which existing authors look for their names and their articles and books to be cited in your research work if their work is at all relevant to your work. If you do not cite their research, some of them (by no means most, but some) will downgrade it for publication. It is naive not to tell young faculty about how political the literature review process can also be. After doing 200 articles over 45 years, I think I can speak from tons of experience here.