Search Career Advice


Browse Archives

Career Advice

Ph.Do

More Than Merit

July 31, 2009

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Academia is a very particular and peculiar enterprise that requires professionalization well beyond what gets covered in the classroom. One can be brilliant and productive, but still not necessarily end up in the most desirable position, whether that concerns the optimal graduate program or the perfect job. One may work all hours of the day and yet still not be on track with finishing the dissertation in a timely fashion or have any guarantee of landing an attractive job. Even if many things go well throughout the process leading to a job, getting tenure poses numerous challenges in its own right. This is not simply because getting promoted is the result of a complex process, but also due to the fact that many inner workings of academic life are rarely discussed explicitly. It is such unspoken mysteries of academic professionalization that I will address in this column. Although there are not often overt discussions or acknowledgments of certain academic conventions, many such practices do exist, and being aware of and familiar with them as early as possible in one’s career can mean the difference between missed opportunities and exhilarating success.

The pieces I will be writing here in the Ph.Do series are built on the premise that understanding the many implicit practices of academia can be extremely valuable in navigating various stages of the system well. Rather than focusing on a particular stage of the career process (e.g., addressing graduate students or junior faculty in particular), much of the advice presented here will be applicable to people at various stages of their professional development. Since junior scholars tend to have the least experience, however, they are the ones who likely stand to gain the most from this column. By “junior scholars," I refer to a wide range of people, from students starting in their first year of graduate school to faculty at the point of hearing about the glorious news of tenure.

Few people realize that the path to tenure begins in the first year of graduate school. Yes, that is not a typo, I indeed meant to write first year of graduate school. From applying to a graduate program to receiving tenure, one is engaged in one long interrelated process. Yet few graduate students recognize just how many of their actions and decisions during their time in a Ph.D. program will have relatively direct effects on outcomes during their junior faculty years and even beyond. The point of this column is to make those connections explicit and offer advice on how to navigate them optimally. This is not to suggest that it is too late to start thinking about these matters after one’s dissertation defense, or even a few years into one's faculty years. It is never too late to gather and act upon tips about professionalization. But the earlier one starts the more opportunities one will have to contemplate and put strategies into action.

From submitting a well-received conference abstract to making the most out of attending the annual professional meetings in one's field, from positive experiences with publishing to winning awards for one’s work, from having a good relationship with one's peers and colleagues to succeeding in a rewarding job, understanding how the system works is an important component of success. In contrast, ignoring the many unwritten rules of the enterprise is bound to pose significant challenges, lead to missed opportunities and result in lots of frustration along the way. The point is not to dismiss the importance of hard work and original contributions, as those are essential, of course. Rather, what is crucial to understand is that academic success is not based solely on such achievements.

Too often I have had people ask me for advice on how to approach a situation too late in the process. For example, the year you are on the job market is not the right time to start wondering about how to make yourself a competitive candidate. Similarly, the year you are coming up for tenure is too late for plans that will help maximize your chances of a successful tenure and promotion review. The relevant strategies often take years of investment and work, so it is rare that they can be willed into existence last-minute. To give just one example, having a group of colleagues – both locally and afar – who support you and your work and truly care about how you do is imperative for several reasons at many important steps of the academic career ladder (e.g., while working on your dissertation, going on the job market or under consideration for promotion). Trying to build this type of support network, however, is not going to happen overnight. Rather, it is important to cultivate good relationships with peers as well as senior scholars at your own institution and elsewhere continuously.

This may sound trivial, but I see students ignoring this point and missing opportunities to cultivate good relationships all the time. Of course, knowing what one should do is not the same as being able to do it well. In the pieces of this column, I will start by pointing out areas in which thinking, planning and acting ahead can be beneficial (as you will learn, that would include most aspects of academia) and then I will proceed by offering concrete suggestions on how to approach, pursue, implement and achieve them.

I am starting this column with lots of topics in mind for pieces ahead. That said, I also welcome suggestions and requests in the comments below or on email. Although I cannot promise to address specific questions in my writing – nor will I be able to respond to queries individually, I am afraid – I will do my best to incorporate responses into future pieces.

I will end on a positive note. The fact that you are reading this is already a step in the right direction. Reading advice pieces only takes a few minutes, yet considering the points conveyed in them can really give you a leg up in the process. It will also help put things into perspective as you come to realize that you are not the only one confused, caught off guard or frustrated by a particular situation. Reading such short pieces regularly will not distract from your academic work, rather, it will give you preparation and ammunition to handle issues that are bound to come up. It will also help you identify how to be proactive about approaching situations in a thoughtful way that will serve you well in the future.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on More Than Merit

  • Good start!
  • Posted by Jenn Lena on July 31, 2009 at 7:45am EDT
  • Congrats on the first column! Looking forward to following along.

  • Posted by Almost There on July 31, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • This is a terrific idea, and I look forward to reading your column. I often describe the pre-tenure years to outsiders as the equivalent of a five-year political campaign. Obama has nothing on us. It takes foresight, tenacity, stamina, professionalism - and above all, the willingness to learn how to be a good colleague -- to earn tenure.

  • Career stages broadly conceptualized?
  • Posted by DrRingDing on July 31, 2009 at 10:30am EDT
  • I hope this series will avoid the narrow conceptualization of most writing on the preparation and socialization of future and junior faculty that is limited to full-time, residential Ph.D. students at elite, highly selective institutions. There's been enough scholarship on that 6% of the higher education universe, and it's time to address issues for the other 94%: part-time Ph.D. and Ed.D. students who work full-time, commute to campus, and aspire to positions of increasing leadership responsibility in their less prestigious employing institutions with no intent of ever conducting a national job search.

    I'm a tenured faculty member in a less prestigious institution, and the departure rate of junior faculty is horrendous. I'd estimate that it's 10 times the national average, and I attribute it to junior faculty who have no clue how to function as a faculty member beyond what they observed in their terminal degree programs.

  • Looking Forward
  • Posted by Christopher D. Sessums , Post Doctoral Associate at University of Florida College of Education on July 31, 2009 at 11:15am EDT
  • I am looking forward to following this column and the comments. Should be fun!

    I read a column in the Chronicle many years ago from a junior faculty member that talked about several unwritten rules she stumbled across in academia. One them struck me as odd at the time, but since then I've come to clearly understand what she meant. Specifically, the author shared the importance of deciding who you ate lunch with in your department and what impact that could have on your career.

    Isn't that amazing? I'm still struck by the relevance of how such a small act can have a such a major impact on how you are perceived by your colleagues.

    So, please do share what you've learned. Every detail is important to us all.

  • Great communicative service
  • Posted by John D'Ignazio , doctoral student/Information Studies at Syracuse University on July 31, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Thanks for this provocative and necessary service to those of us grappling with entering this difficult but rewarding career. Having worked as a journalist, I have recognized the connection between tenured professors and legislators, calling the former "politicians of idea space." I'll look forward to this series of commentary.

  • Great news!
  • Posted by John Palfrey on July 31, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Delighted to see this column and eager to follow it!

  • Posted by Delaney Kirk , Associate Professor of Management at University of South Florida on July 31, 2009 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Great advice here-wish I had known this while in my Ph.D. program 20+ years ago! Thanks for sharing.

  • how to prepare
  • Posted by Janna , SCE/Office of Academic and Professional Development at Eastern Illinois University on July 31, 2009 at 1:00pm EDT
  • Great article, right on target for conversations we have been having as of late regarding preparation of students for grad school application. Janna

  • Academic professionalization
  • Posted by R.S.Shrivastava , Professor(Retd) at JNV University, Jodhpur, India on July 31, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • An interesting series of articles to read. I would like to compare notes from the academic world back in India !

  • Interdisciplinary work
  • Posted by Andrés Monroy-Hernández , PhD student, Media Lab at MIT on July 31, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • This is great! I'm really looking forward to reading this. I would love to see advice that is generalizable to different disciplines or, even better, applicable to the perhaps small but growing number of scholars doing interdisciplinary work. For example, a discussion on the perceived value of publications in journals vs conferences, or on the value of doing work with direct impact on the non-academic world. Thanks Eszter.

  • Recommended reading!
  • Posted by Louise Roth , Associate Professor of Sociology at University of Arizona on July 31, 2009 at 2:15pm EDT
  • I'm recommending this column to our grad students, and hope that you can touch on some of the issues related to selecting a dissertation topic, choosing a committee, the connections between selecting a topic and choosing a committee, communication between grad students and their advisers, and openness to feedback through the dissertation process. I will be teaching a dissertation preparation seminar this year, and think this column could provide really useful information to orient advanced grad students.

  • Supportive Colleagues
  • Posted by Jessie Daniels , Associate Professor, Urban Public Health at Hunter College on July 31, 2009 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Sound advice, Ezster - thanks for this service. Your mention of supportive colleagues is an important one, and a crucial element that can be difficult to find in the uber-competitive atmosphere of academia. It's best, as you suggest, to start this process early and it's important to continue it through one's academic career. A lot of people make the mistake of no longer reaching out and trying to make connections after they leave grad school and get settled in their first jobs.
    .
    I hope, too, at some point you'll address the difficult issue that so many graduate students are facing now with the economic downturn, faculty layoffs and frozen hiring lines. I hear from a lot of grad students in distress these days about ever finding a job, much less getting tenure.

  • Looks promising
  • Posted by JoVE at http://jovanevery.ca on July 31, 2009 at 5:15pm EDT
  • This looks like it could be an excellent series. Though it occurs to me that ALL jobs require knowledge of unspoken practices and cultures, building good relationships, etc.

    Given that we all have differential access to this information a series like this one is a welcome addition to career advice for academics.

  • Great! Now, what to do when things go awry?
  • Posted by Regrouping , PhD graduate, ex-academia but wish to re-enter later on July 31, 2009 at 11:45pm EDT
  • I can see this will be a valuable series. As you say, "knowing what one should do is not the same as being able to do it well" -- I would love to see a discussion of what to do when one has had an entirely disastrous experience, but would like to regroup and make a fresh, successful re-entry in a different area of research?

  • Posted by Anonymous on August 1, 2009 at 9:15pm EDT
  • This column ought to be taken a few steps further. Just as few people realize the path to tenure begins in the first year of graduate school, even fewer realize it actually begins in fifth grade. Yes, that is not a typo, I indeed meant to write fifth grade. (Sixth would be a year too late, but only a crazy person would start thinking about these things before the fifth grade.) Fortunately, I am here to tell you what you'll soon wish you had known back then. Conveniently enough, the secrets of life turn out to be generally applicable and largely independent of field or personal circumstances. What a pity nobody told you earlier! I've got them all figured out and will be revealing them in future comments.

    I will end on a positive note. The fact that you are reading this is already a step in the right direction. Reading blog comments only takes a few minutes, yet considering the points conveyed in them can really give you a leg up in life.

  • Posted by JustBeginning on August 4, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • Thank you for the interesting column. I can always use any amount of advice and tips, since I am just starting out. As a part-time PhD student, I am sometimes lost in the class. I am in a hurry to get to and out of a class to get back to work or family. Any ideas or thoughts or success stories about part-time PhD students would be of great use to me.

  • great start!
  • Posted by kemo , PhD candidate DE new media at UC Berkeley on August 4, 2009 at 5:00am EDT
  • Dear Eszter

    I'm a fan of your research, so I'm looking forward to your blog! This fall, I'm starting my first full-time teaching position AND since neither of my parents were professors, your observations will be most welcomed.

  • good start
  • Posted by Kelly in Kansas , Professor at Pittsburg (KS) State University on August 4, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • As a faculty member mentoring new professors, I'm looking forward to this column helping me think about some of the unwritten guidelines that will help me provide more insight to my newest colleagues. The only criticism - I wish you'd written this column 15 years ago . . . ;-)

  • sure sounds good but
  • Posted by Curious on August 7, 2009 at 5:00pm EDT
  • Wouldn't the upcoming pointers be more reassuring to learn from a group of senior people? Who had experience at maybe more than one institution? Who had served on a campus- or college-wide P&T committee? Who had been in a department where a good number of tenure candidacies were reviewed since the time the author herself was promoted?

  • oh please.
  • Posted by Full of it on September 23, 2009 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Can you talk about why junior professors are so hostile to graduate students. For example at a lunch for a student fellowship program with an outside speaker, junior faculty ignore the students and fawn over the speaker. You have plenty experience with this, so I would be curious to hear what you have to say