BlogU

  • Ask the Administrator: Union Work as CV Stain?

    By Dean Dad January 7, 2009 4:41 am

    A slightly nervous correspondent writes:

    I'm a grad student in a humanities discipline at a public university, and I'm set to graduate with my MA in Spring 09. I had planned to graduate Fall 08, but it didn't work out that way. My ambition is a tenure-track position at one of the many fine community colleges in this area. I came up from community college myself, and I am a true believer in the CC mission. But because my degree won't be posted until May, I am stuck for a job until Summer 09 at the earliest, and I need some money coming in. I worked the last three semesters as a TA, and as a TA, I was represented by the UAW. I've been moderately active with the union, and now they've offered me a job as an organizer. The money is better than I'd get working at private ESL or test-prep schools, which seem to be pretty much my only other options right now, and I'd like to help get exploited grad students into the union. Here's the thing: my dad was a union organizer (non-academic), and he suffered some pretty serious retribution in his workplace, including being denied promotions and advancement opportunities. I wouldn't be handling grievances or anything like that, just getting people signed up, running elections, etc., but I'm concerned that if I get labeled as an activist or an organizer, I won't be able to get a tenure-track position. So I guess my questions are these: Are my fears founded? If so, would I have to reveal my union work during the interview process? If I don't reveal this work and I am hired, would that come back to bite me? I feel like I don't have enough information to make this decision. All advice is appreciated, and I'd like to remain anonymous.

    My first thought is that both regional and local variables will come into play.

    Where I am now, I can't imagine union work being held against you. If anything, in some departments, it might help you get past the department's search committee. But I also know that there are parts of the country in which labor activism would raise eyebrows, if not hackles. (I'm not entirely sure what a 'hackle' is, but I know it's not supposed to be raised.)

    That said, there are also dramatic variations among institutions in the same region, and even among administrators within a single institution. The blue state/red state divide may give you a pretty good sense of the aggregate, but in any given case, it's not much help. I'd venture a guess that it would be most toxic at colleges that were battling unionization drives at the time. (Many years ago, when trying to escape Proprietary U, I had an interview for a deanship at a small private university. When I asked another dean there whether the faculty were unionized, he responded "not yet." That spoke volumes.) Oddly enough, I've noticed that colleges without unions get all worked up about them, but colleges with unions tend to accept them as facts of life. Having managed in a collective-bargaining environment for some time now, I can attest that contracts bind both sides, and that once you figure that out, a lot of the fear goes away.

    In terms of what you reveal, you're free to leave things off the initial cv, but at most public institutions, there's also a standard 'job application' form that every applicant has to submit that includes questions about your last several jobs, in chronological order. Failure to disclose something on that, if it were found out, would be grounds for revocation of an offer, or for termination if it were discovered later. ('Failure to disclose' comes in handy when you find out that someone neglected to mention a criminal conviction. At that point, you don't have to establish direct relevance, or even evasive intent; all you have to do is show failure to disclose.) If you take the job, I think you'd have to be willing to disclose it and take the risks that come with that.

    On a different note, your predicament calls to mind a persistent and terrible structural flaw in many graduate programs: the funding runs out before you're a viable candidate anyplace else. I've never fully understood why that happens with such frequency, but it does. Perhaps my colleagues at graduate programs could enlighten us.

    In any event, best of luck on your search.

    Wise and worldly readers -- have you seen any effect from disclosing union activism in your job searches? Alternately, from the hiring side, have you seen the issue arise? How did it play out?

    Have a question? Ask the Administrator at deandad (at) gmail (dot) com.

Advertisement

Comments on Ask the Administrator: Union Work as CV Stain?

  • Same questions but opposite...
  • Posted by Xyanthe Neider on January 7, 2009 at 5:35pm EST
  • I've had the same questions in reverse. I have actively raised awareness across my campus with other organizers against unionizing. We recieved pretty good media coverage because we chose to be public and transparent with our work (as opposed to the secretive union organizers - for the UAW, which I still wonder why or what expertise qualifies them to represent academic employees rather than automobile, aerospace, and agricultural implement workers...) At any rate, my colleagues and I are working on a publishable article for a journal and I have wondered how this might be recieved by those who might hire me and those who may be my colleagues. How might this work jeopardize my future scholarly career?

    From my vantage point, this issues seems to be more in favor of unions and unionizing than the other way. Reviews of the academic literature is heavily in favor of unionizing (as if the privilege of pursuing graduate studies instantly places one in an oppressed group - sorry, a little sarcasm there.) Realizing that there is tension and contradiction in all aspects of life and at times there are regulations that prevent particular aspects of my thoughts, identity, ideas, or convictions from coming out I have chosen to be open and honest about my resistance to the unionization movement. Perhaps I am naive but I put faith in individuals ability to be professional and realize that the work we do as a student or a person in transition between jobs may conflict with the role we may have at another time in our lives. That said, whether I endorse or oppose unions and unionizing individually, as a future faculty member I would be prohibited from openly supporting one side or the other to university employees unless I was a member of the group for which the union represented.

    Now, with all of that said, I don't think this union issue is as clear or cut and dry as either side might make it out to be. Certainly there are times when there are few options but to unionize and people will benefit from that. What I fundamentally have issues with are the underhanded ways in which organizations such as the UAW operate to unionize campuses. One place to find a wealth of information is http://wsu-at-what-cost.pbwiki.com, there are links on this site that show how the UAW has rolled over students to put more money in their coffers. These actions are antithetical to true democracy and this particular group has shown a lack of respect for democracy in my opinion. I do believe that if a group (not those planted by UAW officials) organically decides that unionizing is a viable option then that group should be able to research the union that best represents their values and norms and proceed that way. Unfortunately, this is not the way unionization is being done. The "benefits" are also questionable on many campuses - would students/employees have been able to negotiate the same or similar benefits without a union? For my campus the answer is yes - it has been done and continues to work for us. That is the democratic process.

  • The other side of things?
  • Posted by Bob , PhD Student on January 7, 2009 at 5:35pm EST
  • What about mentioning any sort of conservative activism positions? Where I come from, that's the absolute kiss of death among faculty.