In which a veteran of cultural studies seminars in the 1990s moves into academic administration and finds himself a married suburban father of two. Foucault, plus lawn care.
1. Need goes unmet for extended period.
2. Unmet need strikes someone with connections.
3. New aid program proposed. Much fanfare.
4. "Christmas tree" amendments added, costs understated, bill passed, hosannas all around.
5. A year of implementation glitches, but spirits remain high.
6. Word gets out - more people than anticipated take advantage of the program.
7. Cost overruns.
8. Idiotic (possibly apocryphal) abuse case gets high public profile.
9. Means test proposed. Committees formed. Abuses investigated.
10. New rules - means testing, reporting requirements, eligibility tightened.
11. New staff to implement new rules.
12. Faculty complain about administrative bloat, citing new staff.
13. New rules cause misunderstandings, bureaucratic errors. Complaints soar.
14. Participation drops. Costs remain high, due to overhead for stricter reporting requirements.
15. Unmet needs increase. Citing ineffectiveness, funding for program withers.
16. Staff hiring freeze, cuts by attrition. Staff union protests mismanagement.
17. Unmet need strikes someone with connections.
18. New program proposed. Much fanfare.
19. Repeat as necessary.