BlogU

  • When Professors Vanish

    By Dean Dad January 7, 2009 9:19 pm

    This is one of the parts of the job for which you're never really trained.

    Every so often, usually around this time of year, an adjunct who knows he's not coming back next semester simply vanishes. No grades turned in for the Fall class, no responses to emails or phone calls, just 'poof.' (I've never seen this happen with someone who had classes lined up for the following semester.) With no realistic prospect of continued employment, our short-term leverage for getting grades turned in is pretty weak. ("Give us the grades or...uh...just give us the grades!") Most people are professional enough that even if they don't like the pay, or the non-renewal, they still make the distinction between the students and the institution. But 'most' isn't 'all,' and the damage is real.

    Most obviously, students are denied the timely credit they've earned. Sometimes that doesn't matter, as long as the credit eventually comes through, but sometimes they need it right away. Falling below the threshold of "successful academic progress" can have consequences for financial aid, academic probation/dismissal, and employer reimbursements, among other things. Delays in posting grades also hurt students who are sending out transfer applications, since deadlines are unforgiving and receiving schools generally assume that any glitch in the application reflects on the student. And it wreaks havoc with any course in a chain of prerequisites, since nobody knows who passed and who didn't.

    In terms of getting back at the college, the extra work generated by late grades usually doesn't fall on the intended targets. The registrar's office does the on-time grades through 'batch' processing; anything late has to be done manually. Financial aid works much the same way. (Financial aid has it worse, since pots of money can be exhausted by the time the late grades are changed.) Neither office has anything to do with setting adjunct pay scales, but they're the ones that do the heavy lifting when this happens.

    The post-finals 'poof' is the worst kind. Back at my first administrative gig, I saw adjuncts walk away mid-semester. That was bad, but at least at that point it was possible to address the students as a group, find a sub, and 'look for points.' (Whenever something along these lines happens, I've taken the position that we should do our best to hold the students as harmless as possible.) After final exams, though, there's no clean and painless way to address the students as a group. At that point, too, some fairly substantial components of the final grade are typically missing -- the final exam and/or final paper or project -- so it's tough to assign any sort of reasonable value to what they can show.

    I don't make any grand claims for the kind of teacher I was, but I can honestly say that doing something like this never occurred to me. Even in the worst adjunct gigs, when I soured on entire institutions, I never left the students hanging. So when someone did, I was initially dumbstruck. It was so far past reasonable that I couldn't even piece together a coherent response.

    (Before the flaming, I'll just stipulate that I'm not talking about an organized work stoppage. I consider that a different issue. This is action by a single person.)
    If we get through January without this happening, I'll consider it a great start to the year.

Advertisement

Comments on When Professors Vanish

  • Not so shocking really
  • Posted by Dr Dad on January 8, 2009 at 8:20am EST
  • While I sympathize both with the students and the administrators in this situation it doesn't seem shocking in the least. Clearly unprofessional but then again so is situation that adjuncts find themselves, low pay and in this specific case a clear sign that the university is not committed to them after the semester. One can bemoan the fact that they signed a contract but in situations with huge power imbalances it doesn’t surprise me a bit that someone decides to walk away and leave a mess. After all, adjuncts are low-cost only in terms of salary and stuff like this is one of the costs of this model.

    Of course the way to stop this, is simply to hold a portion of the salary until final grades are in…not sure if this is possible bureaucratically.

  • Universities ignore efficiency wages
  • Posted by yuri on January 8, 2009 at 10:05am EST
  • The models assume that the work effort of employees that don't work on a "piece rate" basis isn't observable, so firms cannot tell which employees are doing good work and which employees are shirking. Economists model a rational response of firms to the problem of the unobservability of worker effort. Basically the actual wages have to equal or be greater than shirking wages. Universities definitely haven't done this: they don't pay adjuncts a high enough wage to stop shirking. According to the model, universities are the irrational actors, not the adjuncts. Another model finds that firms frequently pay efficiency wages which are higher than the normal market clearing rate, because by paying higher wages firms ensure greater work effort, greater work productivity, less turnover, fewer requirements for reeducating the labor force. Universities aren't paying efficiency wages so compared to other professions that compensate their employees well and gain the benefits of a labor force that's being paid efficiency wages, universities don't benefit from the advantages of paying efficiency wages. Universities should know better since other professions do. Health care workers are compensated extremely well, for example. University's labor problems are their own making. Other professions know better and have fewer labor problems.

  • Disappearing faculty
  • Posted by formerccpres on January 8, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • Whether adjunct or not, a person who would disappear with student grades should be reported to the police. Assuming no crime has resulted in harm to the instructor (which would be a report of a missing person), you assume the person took the grades and left on purpose. At the very least, this should constitute theft of some sort, probably felony theft if one adds up the financial consequences that the students stand to suffer. After trying hard to locate the person and failing to do so (and ruling out the missing person approach), I would not hesitate to work with our legal counsel to contact law enforcement. Also, it might be necessary to add "report student final grades as directed by the administration" to the contracts in the future, and then you also have a case of breach of contract, which you might have even without it being stipulated in the contract. With that civil claim, you might even be able to recover financial damages for the institution and for the students.

  • Posted by Just-me on January 8, 2009 at 10:15am EST
  • While it might not be worth it in terms of cost-benefit, could your institution threaten to sue them for breach of contract? Considering the issue of damages(e.g., refunds 35 students @ $500 = $17,500 -- not to mention any punitive damages), I think they would comply.

  • If adjuncts cannot use at will contracts as a protection
  • Posted by yuri on January 8, 2009 at 4:00pm EST
  • against firings, it's unlikely that a university can go to an at-will contract and get super powers. A police officer isn't going to arrest someone for a civil crime, and there isn't stolen property in unsubmitted grades. There won't be grades to repossess until the adjunct grades all the papers, allows for soft factors like participation and attendance which won't be written down anywhere, and calculates what the final grade is.

    Perhaps, you should just treat your adjuncts like rational actors instead of criminals.

  • Posted by Former adjunct on January 9, 2009 at 5:05am EST
  • Whether adjuncts are disrespected is not the issue. Certainly, adjuncts are treated poorly at many institutions, and the quality of education indeed suffers as a result. However, the instructor was told the salary and duties up front, taking the salary makes it his responsibility to discharge the duties, or (in the event of personal emergency) to provide timely notice of his change in plans and make it possible for someone else to discharge them. It is not acceptable for a paid worker to walk away from an unfulfilled duty out of spite.

  • Not acceptable but reality
  • Posted by Dr Dad on January 9, 2009 at 7:50am EST
  • ...perhaps not acceptable and as such the university is certainly within its rights NOT to hire the person again but it happens. Treat people like crap and you have to deal with the blow back