BlogU

  • When the Boss is Awful

    By Dean Dad May 20, 2009 4:39 am

    In response to yesterday's post, several commenters asked variations on "well, okay, but what if the dean is a jackass? What then?"

    It's a fair question.

    My first response would be that designating somebody an asshat should be a 'residual' explanation; in other words, don't resort to that until all other reasonable explanations have failed. In my observation, it's too frequently the first assumption rather than the last one. But yes, sometimes it's true. Some people gravitate towards these roles for all the wrong reasons, and they play out their psychodramas in ways that poison the organization. And one inarguable downside of tenure is exceptionally low mobility for non-superstars, so it's hard to just walk. Given a low-turnover environment, a petty tyrant can hang on for years, with his victims effectively trapped.

    Although lousy bosses come in a bewildering variety of flavors, the most common ones I've come across in academia have been the Raging Narcissist and the Church Lady.

    The Raging Narcissist -- usually male, but not always -- thinks that it's all about him. Although they're sometimes selfish, their real calling card is an inability to tell where they end and other people begin. That's why they can be incredibly invasive, and yet easily wounded. If everything is either 'by' them or 'to' them, then bad outcomes must be the result of bad people doing bad things to them. These guys will turn on you in a moment if they feel betrayed, which is their usual reaction to disappointment. Generally, they're incredibly dangerous, and to be avoided whenever possible.

    If you're lucky, the raging narcissist can be appeased or distracted. If not, then the choices boil down to 'walk' or 'war.' The most effective weapon against these folks is usually their own indifference to official policies and equal treatment. Since they think in terms of 'friends and enemies', rather than, say, 'reciprocity,' they usually indulge in some pretty blatant favoritism. As soon as that crosses a protected class, you've got them.

    The Church Lady -- usually female, but not always -- is the micromanaging control freak who mistakes 'means' for 'ends' without even knowing it. They live and die by administrivia, and love nothing more than holding grudges for years on end. They can usually be spotted by their use of the word 'integrity' to oppose any change, ever. They derive actual glee from being able to say "gotcha!," and they live in terror that someone will do it to them.

    Church ladies can be useful support staff, since they're detail-oriented in the extreme, but they should never be entrusted with power. I've seen well-meaning church ladies utterly crush the people who report to them, through the sheer weight of micromanagement and blame. They're deathly afraid of the loss of control, and underlings with ability represent threats to their control.

    I've had slightly better luck in dealing with the church ladies than with the raging narcissists, because I've discovered -- entirely by accident, but still -- that in most cases, nothing bad happens after the 'gotcha!' When you react to a 'gotcha!' with 'yup, my bad. I'll fix it,' they almost physically deflate. There's simply no follow-through, since their worlds are almost entirely imaginary. My nearly-foolproof method for handling these is to call their bluffs early and often. It drives them nuts, but that's because it works. (In fairness, this strategy may work more easily for men. Church ladies are often weirdly deferential to men who don't take them very seriously. I'll leave the reasons to the psychologists.) Once you've called their bluff a few times, and realized that the sky won't fall, they quickly move from scary to just annoying.

    Of course, each lousy boss brings a fresh flavor of suckitude to the world. Wise and worldly readers -- what types of lousy deans or bosses have you had?

Advertisement

Comments on When the Boss is Awful

  • Raging Narcissist
  • Posted on May 20, 2009 at 8:30am EDT
  • Our favorite local raging (=toxic) narcissist dean was empowered not only through personal excellence at bullying game playing, but also by uniform passivity by senior faculty (understandably intimidated by outrageous ganging up by the administrative team of 4 who appeared at every meeting), and by see-nothing upper administration who believed the dean had ties with an equally narcissistic State Governor. Some of us were able to flee (to other colleges), but most were trapped for 8 years of hell until 3 years of job searches finally let Attila land a job in a university that had not done its search-committee homework. Most frightening: the key dynamics have not changed and the whole nightmare is subject to repetition with the next dean. Lesson: take action early and hard, and don't stop fighting while there is still life.

  • The "indifferent" boss...
  • Posted by Jan Bone , adjunct faculty on May 20, 2009 at 9:15am EDT
  • I'd like to add another one --not necessarily, threatening, but disturbing...the boss who leaves you alone too much. I'm an adjunct who teachers at a two-campus school, with most of the administrators 40 miles away, including--whoever that may be at any given time--the department chair. My geographic colleagues and I receivet e-mail start-of-term directives and (near to finals) paper-forms (3 per semester) for student evaluation of our teaching. We usually have one downtown meeting per year--3 hours--and that's essentially the only time I see the majority of the department. If they're Manhattan with the birght lights, I feel at times as if I'm in outer Mongolia or the Australian outback. I wish we had more contact to talk about content, pedagogy, etc. or some of the new ways of improving our teaching. Anyone have strategies they'd recommend for dealing with this situation?

  • Calling the bluff
  • Posted by Rob Carlson on May 20, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • Can you expand a little on what you do to "call their bluffs early and often?"

  • Indifferent Boss may not be
  • Posted by Sue Dawson , Dean of Academic Affairs at Allen College on May 20, 2009 at 9:45am EDT
  • As a boss, I just want to give you a perspective on the "indifference" you may feel. There are some people who are so consistently good, that they need little oversight. You are probably one of those. More "atta girls" may be helpful, but your boss may feel relieved that you are so good. If you want more contact, I would suggest reaching out. E-mail or call at a time when your boss can respond. You may be pleasantly surprised to find out the high esteem in which you are held.

  • To Jan
  • Posted by Lloyd on May 20, 2009 at 10:00am EDT
  • Jan,

    This is not an answer to your question/situation but I have been in both situations under discussion. My distant situation was working for a lassie-faire manager who would not talk to me about business, Period. His attitude was I hired you, now you are here, leave me alone - I want to get to my retirement. Now I am under the Church Lady. I would rather be in your situation with distance like I had under lassie-faire than where I am now. Church Lady is just a tyrant aid she loves every minute of it.

    Lloyd

  • Posted on May 20, 2009 at 10:45am EDT
  • @Sue Dawson
    I would add a variant to the "indifferent boss" model. There are those bosses who seem totally indifferent to any accomplishments, not even acknowledging staff achievements in even the simplest verbal way, but are anything but indifferent to nitpicking administrative details. When your interactions with your boss are few and far between, but always focused on the negative with nary a mention of your good work, the environment becomes demoralizing very quickly.

  • Nailed it
  • Posted by Sara on May 20, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • I've worked with and for both of these characters. I prefer to never work with the micromanaging insecure person. They select things they feel safe administering and leave everything else to fall apart. One in particular required that I have all email cleared through her. She also gave me a list of people it was appropriate for me to speak to on the phone. That was the two years I spent quietly in my office, making sure the real work gone done in my programs and learning how to design web pages since I had a lot of free time with such tight limits on working collaboratively. They do often fall apart under confrontation, though I have weathered a couple of insubordination write ups at the hands of that one, who was a bit more of an angry power monger than I gave her credit for. But I outlasted her. She had several heart attacks (being a micromanager to that level can cause incredible stress, particularly with 16 direct reports--there is a lot of plate spinning on that control) and left the job.

    I read a book called "Who's driving your Bus" early in my career because I was working for an angry tyrant who left me in isolation most of the time or buzzed the intercom and said "get down here now" when things didn't go his way--regardless of whether or not it was my problem or my fault. That particular book really helped me to see how personal insecurities, self-esteem issues and basic psychological disorders influence the people we work with and for, and how to deal with them. Then I read "Management of the Absurd", since it is often organizational structure and policy as much as leadership that makes our worklife seem so crazy.

    I still have post-traumatic stress when micromanaged, but have found ways to deal. I guess my point is to continue to work and figuring out what type of goofiness you are dealing with. If you can't figure it out and find yourself chewing your hair at 3 in the morning unable to sleep, it's time to dust off the resume, or take a good look at the health of your supervisor.

     

     

  • combined suckitude!
  • Posted by Bruce Baldwin , PR director at FRC on May 20, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I had the unique pleasure of working for the narcissist church lady for many years!

    She perfectly combined the worst qualities of both. It did often help to call her bluff, but at the same time she NEVER forgot and she took every disarreement as a personal affront! In her mind an opinion from an employee that didn't agree with hers equaled a personal insult and an extreme lack of loyalty, even if expressed provately.

    She would pull up issues from 10 years past that had no relation to current issues when she was upset (weekly occurence) and there was just no way to get past it.

    I finally got relief when directed to Workaholics Anonymous by a friend. Reading the literature on their website really helped me to see that my boss had a serious addiction to work, and unless she got some help it was always going to get worse.

    At that point I was able to accept the behavior more easily and my life got better, for awhile. Eventually she got so bad that she crossed a line, just as any addict will, that left me no choice but to leave.

    I'm very glsd I did, my new boss is great and has helped me to over the cloud of self doubt that my previous boss had instilled in me.

    Leaving was the best move I ever made!

  • The Hybrid Bad Boss
  • Posted by Free at Last on May 20, 2009 at 12:45pm EDT
  • As a dean I worked for a new president who was both a raging narcissist and a blaming mircomanager. Using the approach of a dictator of a small island nation, this particular boss hired her friends, denigrated everyone else, and empowered certain lackeys to act with impunity (although she would dress them down in public as much as anyone). The mass exodus - both of the voluntary and the involuntary -- was a wonder to behold.

  • Bruce
  • Posted by Lloyd on May 20, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Bruce,

    The director here ALWAYS does this. If you point out an error she makes, within three days for sure, and usually within two days, she will find something you did "wrong" and point it out to you, usually in an email or by writing a note to you with an example of the "error."

    Have a good day. You might want to read, Mean Girls Grow Up.

    Lloyd

  • a couple more
  • Posted by Elizabeth on May 20, 2009 at 1:45pm EDT
  • How about Good Ol' Boys and Information-Deniers? I've worked with both bosses, and it's hard to work with someone who assumes you're not as good as someone else because you don't belong to a very specific small circle (you didn't graduate from the "right" school, or play football, or whatever). That's not fun, because you're always trying to prove yourself in ways that will never mean as much as "X" circle means.

    Then my personal fave--the boss who denies information to people for various reasons. One of those bosses hung on to every bit of information because she was extremely insecure, so although she was a difficult boss, at least I understood her problem. Continuous asking for better information (when is the project due, what are your budget restraints, whatever) helped because she wasn't threatened by me. The other boss was impossible, though--she was crisis-driven and because of that, created crises around her. She constantly forgot to tell people what she wanted, or when she wanted it, and then freaked because something wasn't done. She left on a trip once and her assistant came in to the office the next morning to find 113 (I kid you not--that's the real, actual number!) email messages sent overnight because of things the boss forgot. AAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!! Everyone in the dept was constantly backpedaling to take care of something that would have been easy if we'd just been informed that she needed it before she actually needed it. I am going to be SUCH a better boss when I supervise people again! :-)

  • Institutionalized Bad Bosses
  • Posted by Avid , Nascent Educator at Regional Public on May 20, 2009 at 4:00pm EDT
  • Great research by Robert I. Sutton
    http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1742

  • The "rock star"bad boss
  • Posted by Michael (or not) on May 20, 2009 at 8:45pm EDT
  • I think it's even tougher when you have a bad boss that everyone outside the "inner circle" of his or her control thinks is a rock star. There's nothing like being told multiple times a week that you are SO LUCKY to work 'with' this person when all you can do is nod and smile, knowing what an undermining, motive questioning, abusive loser you actually work FOR (never with).

    I find the 'call 'em on it early and often' works to some degree, but it's exhausting. Can't wait to move on...

  • What makes a bad boss?
  • Posted by Bert , job seeker on May 24, 2009 at 3:30pm EDT
  • Drawing on my own experience, the worst bosses combine insecurity, incompetence and ambition. This awful blend seems to produce narcissistic church ladies who are enraged by disagreement and micromismanage macrofail.

  • Thank you, thank you, thank you!
  • Posted by Still searching , decline to state at likewise on May 27, 2009 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Thanks so much for all of your comments on the Church Lady. I sensed I was working for an evil nun, but couldn't quite articulate what was so unbearable about her. And it got worse -- she got a little scared that we would all one day rise up in unity against her so she hired a management lackey so she can play Good Cop, Bad Cop. Now there are TWO monsters to deal with daily.  I keep a copy of this blog next to my resume to remind me just what I MUST avoid in my next job. If there is anyone out there who can suggest appropriate job interview questions that might reveal whether a place is plagued by other Church Ladies, I would appreciate your contribution to this string. It makes me sick that I will have to leave a University I am proud to be a part of -- my alma mater to boot!