Standard vs. Emerging Campus EdTech Project Models
January 29, 2012 - 6:10pm
|Standard Campus EdTech Project Model||
Emerging Campus EdTech Project Model
|Projects should follow allocation of resources.||Resources will often follow the initiation of projects.|
|High cost of project failure.||High cost of not failing enough.|
|A bias towards risk avoidance.||A bias towards speed.|
|Risk of staff burnout supporting too many projects.||Risk of staff burnout if too few opportunities of for innovation and creativity.|
|Risk of supporting too many campus platforms.||Risk of stagnating around too few campus platforms.|
|People working on the project know the most about its critical path, risks, and possible outcomes.||People working outside of your institution, who have already been down the project path, possess the most crucial information.|
|Project teams should be made up of campus experts.||Project teams should be made up of campus stakeholders.|
|Project documentations should be complete and written by technical/project experts.||Project documentation should be iterative, constantly being revised, and be able to be authored and edited by all project stakeholders.|
|Project results should be shared with other institutions at conferences following completion.||Project status should be publicly shared with everyone on an ongoing basis through the web and social media.|
North Adams, MA
The College of Wooster is an independent residential liberal arts college offering a rigorous and comprehensive education to students with the capacit...
Semester at Sea: Teaching and Living on a Shipboard Campus Thank you for your interest in Semester at Sea— the world's leading program in global compa...