BlogU

  • In Praise of Carrots

    By Oronte October 23, 2007 1:15 am

    Thoreau said “some must work in fields if only for the sake of tropes and expression, to serve a parable-maker one day.” Call it reactionary (Rory will, though he’ll recant privately) to regret the loss of old tropes, but I often see young writers whose work suffers because they have no metaphors with which to think.

    Many haven’t had much direct contact with the natural world. They’ve never seen a snake eat another snake, or a grackle pull strips of red muscle from the wren under its foot. They’ve never raised a crop through a tedious season, or been forced to keep swimming because to stop would mean death.

    Protected by technologies, they’ve never known inescapable cold or heat; supported by affluence, they’ve never known real hunger or thirst. Many have only worked fast food or retail, occupations short on specialized processes and tools. They ride in cars sealed against breeze (who can take a 75 mile-per-hour breeze?) and road noise; they run on treadmills in the corner of a gym, iPods turned up loud so they can’t hear their own panting, or the thump of blood.

    Last week in writing workshop I had three students like this. The first had written a story about kids fooling around near a “mansion.” There were few details—a problem in itself—but what was there was false. I felt it, because the neighborhood didn’t sound right for a mansion, whatever that might mean. During Socratic questioning, I revealed that the writer meant, simply, a Victorian house, though he’d never heard the term. How big was it? I asked. How old? Was it frame or brick? Did it have gingerbread?

    He didn’t understand. I explained how my neighborhood was a mix of various styles, built over 150 years. I did a bit on post-and-beam versus balloon frames in our area, and how the former required craftsmanship that the latter didn’t, which meant expense back then to build it and, paradoxically, less demand for it now, and…ah, yes, we do need to continue class. I suggested he at least walk around Inner Station to try to find the words he’d need to describe the neighborhood he had in mind. Fictional characters, like the living, have a hard time living in abstractions.

    The second student desperately needed the details for two characters cooking a meal together. “I don’t how people make food,” he said, looking surprised and rueful at his own admission. “Come to my house and I’ll show you how to cook a meal,” I said. The class laughed because they thought I was playing the fool. I often play the fool, but I meant it. Cooking has taught me more ways to think about writing than all the how-to books combined.

    The third student had (what I consider) a problem in his writing common to many young men in my classes—a fetish for cartoonish, melodramatic violence. It boasted a pornography of rich details about shattering the kneecaps of a guy stretched across a table, yet didn’t consider human pain as a topic, let alone take up the emotions involved in revenge. As I do sometimes when I get frustrated with this tendency, I recounted how young men in love with the idea of violence stood in lines around the block to enlist for the Great War. In London, Paris, Berlin, no one wanted to miss the grand adventure. It would be a lark, and they’d be home in a few months with tales to tell their children someday. Several million dead later—nearly a generation of potential leaders, scientists, artists, teachers, parents, wiped out—those young men didn’t regard it merrily. And I didn’t say this, but I cannot imagine anyone who’s known pain—anyone human, that is—writing lovingly about torture. Our bodies are our first metaphors.

    Everybody in the academy wants to talk about The Other. Want to talk about Hegel. Want to talk about Sartre. I want to talk about the carrot.

    I don’t mean those slick little buggers the size of my pinky fingers, those carrots bred for the lathe that planes them smooth and skinless. They’re oversweet and tender, and I eat them by the pound while I’m blogging. I made the mistake recently of putting them in a stew, where they blanched and grew spongy.

    I mean real carrots, which teach you about hierarchies of force, most of them beyond your control. A real carrot—I’m eating one now—is shocking. It’s what it is: A texture all its own, flavor that’s not-quite-earth and not-quite-woods, with the strong aroma of anise. Like a real tomato, so hard to find in stores now, it’s food for those who want to taste life.

    This is probably why our society has been sold on the idea of paying a 5000% markup on bottles of water. Most of them taste like something, from Nestle’s Ice Mountain with its aftertaste of vomit, to Aquafina, which tastes like it was pumped from a cold well through cast iron (and actually makes me nostalgic).

    This is what we know, so it’s how we think.

Advertisement

Comments on In Praise of Carrots

  • Spot On
  • Posted by Dinty at Ohio University on October 23, 2007 at 10:25am EDT
  • So true, so true. You've nailed it my friend.

  • Thank you
  • Posted by Lisa on October 23, 2007 at 4:40pm EDT
  • For a while now I've been trying to find a way to describe the understanding that one gets from varied pursuits, and the concept of 'acquiring metaphors' seems to fit it perfectly. This has helped to pull together some things I've noticed recently, so thank you!

  • Dinty Moore, Ladies and Gentlemen!
  • Posted by Oronte on October 23, 2007 at 7:50pm EDT
  • Thanks very much, Dinty. An honor to have you here.

    For the finest in creative nonfiction, see (one of) the mags that Dinty edits:

    http://www.creativenonfiction.org/brevity/index.htm

  • Posted by Oronte on October 23, 2007 at 7:50pm EDT
  • We're all searching for the unified field theory, Lisa. Good luck.

  • I remember...
  • Posted by Karen on October 24, 2007 at 4:30am EDT
  • Back in the days of Castles and Dragons (late '70s) when I was an undergraduate taking a creative writing class as a Humanities elective, I was intrigued by the backgrounds that various students brought to their writing, and the resultant products. (I was studying engineering at the time, and had come from a somewhat sheltered background myself, so maybe that's not saying much.) One classmate decided to write about a subject that I actually knew something about: streetwalker prostitutes in the city where my parents lived.

    I was dismayed at the shallowness of the knowledge she displayed about these women. I'd read about them regularly in my (liberal) hometown newspaper; I'd read about, and at a very superficial level, understood the pressures of pimps and drugs; and had at least some sense that those women were there on the street by some complex mixture of choice and compulsion. My classmate, in her writing, presented them as confident women unaffected by the pressures of the darker street elements. I protested, and was ignored by most of the class, though the author shot me dirty looks for the rest of the period.

  • Posted by Oronte on October 24, 2007 at 10:05am EDT
  • I know those dirty looks well, Karen.

  • Posted by Noah on October 24, 2007 at 1:45pm EDT
  • A co-worker of mine was sulking because his mom wouldn't buy him a plane ticket home to St. Louis to attend a funeral. I asked him why he didn't pay for it himself and he responded that he didn't have enough money for that kind of stuff. He went on break and came back with at least $100 worth of DVDs of television shows that still air regularly.

  • Posted by Oronte on October 25, 2007 at 12:25pm EDT
  • Pesky dead people. They're much easier to deal with on TV shows than in life. How many CSIs do we have now?

  • Talk
  • Posted by Aimee on October 25, 2007 at 4:30pm EDT
  • Indeed, we should talk. Although I don't know much about my family, I do know the coal miners' union and God were the two most important things.
    Aimee

  • Carrots
  • Posted by Margaret Clarke on October 25, 2007 at 9:30pm EDT
  • Excellent!!
    You have hit the nail on the head. (And how's that for a concrete mataphor.)

  • Posted by Noah on October 25, 2007 at 9:30pm EDT
  • I don't know, but I just came up with a new one: CSI Miami Dolphins. It's a group of investigators trying to solve the mystery of the Dolphins sucking so bad. Starring Joe Don Baker as the frumpy alcoholic head inspector with a heart of Goldshlogger.

  • Posted by Oronte on October 26, 2007 at 1:00pm EDT
  • CSI: Churm. What happened to my youth?

  • life
  • Posted by Will Mackin on October 28, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • Brother O,

    Was missing your McS dispatches so got my fix today on this site. Great work. BTW-I graduated ROTC in 1990 when the military was "right sizing", and was offered the chance to get out of my obligation. It was a creative writing teacher, a poet, whose argument (much like yours) convinced me to stay in the navy. Thanks a lot!

    yr pal,
    RT

  • Posted by Oronte on November 1, 2007 at 10:25pm EDT
  • Will! Good to see you in my AO, friend. And welcome home, again. What kind of a poet offered that advice? One of those bloodthirsty poets?

  • I saw this
  • Posted by Carl , Hard bastard on July 26, 2008 at 7:20am EDT
  • I wish now I'd had the balls then to write that story right. Maybe next time around.

    (I assume that my commenting on the reference won't discourage you from writing about your students post un-masking).