BlogU

  • Scathing Online Schoolmarm

    By SOS April 17, 2008 12:11 pm

    A professor at the University of Colorado sends SOS the following intriguing letter a freshman there wrote to the campus newspaper. As always, SOS will comment throughout.

    "As my first year of college draws to a close, I realize that I have learned nothing academic from these hallowed halls at the University of Colorado. [SOS likes the absolutism of this. You want to keep reading because the claim is so strong. Absolutely nothing... SOS is less sure about the sarcasm of hallowed halls. And she definitely thinks dropping a few words would tighten this first sentence and make it even more riveting: I realize that can go, as can at the University of Colorado.]

    I am spending $8,000 per semester to have instructors teach me things that I already know. I am given assignments that take hours of my life to complete and leave me wondering what I was supposed to have gained. [Vast generalizations, but it's okay, because we're still at the very beginning of this. She'll need to offer details pretty quickly, though.]

    My esteemed professors [ Again, the sarcasm on esteemed is probably not a good idea. You don't want your emotions to dominate; you want the reader thinking not about your feelings but about the substance of your claims.] gab about their personal lives, their vendettas, drop names of people in their field all while leading tedious discussions and teaching us to be overly critical and judgmental of ideas presented by others. [ Drop the awkward judgmental of ideas presented by others. By others is too vague, and the passive formulation weak. Remember that you want to end all of your sentences with your strongest word -- this sentence peters out. Notice too that the phrase is redundant, overly critical already having gotten across the idea. As for professors who gab about their personal lives -- I agree that this is almost always cynical time-wasting.]

    In one of my classes, we read articles and classmate-written papers and are instructed to "tear them apart." [ SOS will assume this is the student's English comp class, where it's routine to take an editorial eye to your fellow students' efforts... The writer doesn't need quotation marks around tear them apart . And this phrase introduces what SOS would argue are flaws in the writer's arguments. Throughout the letter, she takes umbrage at the idea that the cultivation of a strongly critical intellectual disposition is a valuable thing -- indeed, that this sort of disposition might mark a college-educated person. Yet it is indeed the dispassionate ability to judge the worthiness of ideas, prose styles, and a range of other cultural expressions that - among other attributes - distinguishes people who've studied at universities. Some freshman instructors might overdo the shock therapy here, figuring they're getting students who've known little other than runny self esteem in their earlier school years. But the effort to turn nice non-judgmental folk into less nice, more incisive types is central to universities.] I feel a student is only rewarded when they offer up a witty biting criticism rather than a clearly presented idea or even a compliment. [ The deadly I feel identifies a writer more emotional than intellectual. Drop it like a hot potato.]

    We learn to say what is wrong with something but rarely are we asked how to make it right. In college, the classroom is full of those sharing problem after problem, those who are too shy to speak their opinions at all, and those like me who are just waiting for the learning to start and are left wanting more. [ These, er, thoses are vague in their reference. Make it clear that you're talking about students. And what sort of problem? Personal? If so, she's right to complain. As for those too shy to speak their opinions -- so what? In every class SOS has ever taught there are a few people too shy to contribute to the discussion. Not a problem. Or is the writer suggesting that these students are shy because the cruelty of the professor and other students shuts her up? This is certainly a problem. The student is too sensitive.]

    But my education hasn't been a total bust; I've learned how to stretch two pages of information into a 10-page paper [ Are CU professors asking this student to write papers that merely convey information? SOS doubts it. She suspects that the professors are looking for an elaborated argument which incorporates information. This would call for more than two pages.] , where the best parties are on a Thursday night, how to use Facebook in lecture [No surprise there. UD's been talking non-stop about the scandal of laptops in the classroom. Note that the University of Chicago law school is the latest place to ban them .] and just how small one person can write on the one note card allowed in the exam room. Perhaps I am just an idealistic youth [ idealistic youth is awkward; a cliche. Avoid repeating the word just.] who thought I would learn something more from my liberal arts education at CU. I can't help being disappointed at what exactly college has turned out to be. [SOS likes the restless sense this student expresses that she's not getting a higher education. SOS suspects the student is to some extent right about this. But the writer hasn't, in her letter, clarified the real basis of her disappointment. If all she wants from college is a pleasant setting in which nice people hand her information, she could get an online degree from a for-profit school and save some of that eight thousand. Mainly what she's complaining about are efforts on the part of CU's faculty to induct her into a world of sharp polemic, deeper thought, and higher standards. She may well be right that the professors she's so far gotten haven't done a good job of ushering her in, but she herself hasn't done a very good job, in this letter, in saying that... One final thought: Part of the reason she's fallen short here is that education is a slow process. It may well be that for a few semesters you don't at all grasp what the payoff is, if you know what I mean... Four-year colleges with meaningful curricula are trying to build something in students, and it may be that the foundational early years don't look like much. Patience.]"

Advertisement

Comments on Scathing Online Schoolmarm

  • Posted by The_Myth on April 17, 2008 at 8:30pm EDT
  • But Veruka wants her OOmpa-Loompa NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW!

    Why should she WAIT to get EDUCATED, which o her generation is the simple amassing of factoids and self-esteem, and not gaining expertise and training in thinking, writing, reading, and analyzing.

    This same student attitude is rampant across the country.

    Our country is doomed.

  • Posted by Mike on April 17, 2008 at 9:50pm EDT
  • I am a college sophomore and can relate to Lena Antman's letter concerning the value of her college education. I agree that it is poorly written, but I disapprove of your critical analysis. You focus more on syntax than on content; even if she improved her syntax, the letter's persuasiveness would change little: her depth is insufficient. Also, criticizing other writers' syntax is dangerous as no writer is perfect; you criticize "idealistic youth" as awkward and a cliché, yet you use an unnecessary cliché too: "Drop it like a hot potato."

    The quality I admire most is the irony: that this freshman fails in a composing a significant persuasive letter proves her argument of a disappointing education. But who is truly at fault, the student or the college, is indeterminable from the evidence.

    Mike

  • Posted by SOS on April 18, 2008 at 9:40am EDT
  • For sure I'm imperfect, Mike, but if we stopped judging things because of our own imperfections we wouldn't get anywhere at all.

    You're right that the hot potato thing is a cliche -- I used it because ... I dunno... I LIKE it. I think all writers should be allowed one cliche.

  • Posted by Dr. BH on April 28, 2008 at 12:25pm EDT
  • Why do I suspect that Little Miss I-Didn't-Learn-Anything is one of those students who resell their textbooks unopened?

  • The first year of higher ed: what's it all about?
  • Posted by George T. Karnezis on April 30, 2008 at 4:50pm EDT
  • The interlinear comments here are, generally, spot on. I must say that this student complaint is all too familiar and the saddest part is the general posture or ethos, the feeling that the author is having something inflicted on her/him and that he/she is simply powerless before whatever agents are acting upon her/him.

    Particularly vexing is this juvenile habit of using words like "judgmental" or "tear apart" as the only vocabulary available for denoting the act of critical judgment. But it may not be entirely the student's fault to view critique as largely adversarial, hostile and, alas, negative --- a habitual fault-finding. If you return to the roots of the word Critic or criticize, it's instructive to learn that a critique can also celebrate the virtues as well as the shortcomings of a particular work, argument, etc. I do fear that given our talk-show models of conversation, the idea that any critique can possibly be friendly, balanced, and in any way positive despite its judicious (not judgmental)reservations, is becoming less and less of a possibility --- and that may be because we as teachers simply miscast the act of criticism as one of mere kvetching. There is also a regrettable tendency in academia to overcompensate for some perceived gullibility in students by showering them with so much skepticism that deconstructive propensities so dominate any encounter with a new idea or line of argument, that any capacity for honest listening is considerably reduced out of fear of being "taken in" or "manipulated" --- the hermeneutics of suspicion.

    Aristotle noted long ago that in any democracy, citizens had to learn not only the arts of persuasion, but also how to be persuaded. The first of these goals is not met by the student writer, and it's clear that the second goal is one deeply appreciated as a standard to hold by the writer of the interlinear comments who, quite rightly, is ready to be persuaded of the truth of the student's claims if, and only if, they rise above the level of mere assertion --- the level, alas, at which most persuasion today, following an advertising model, thrives.

  • so drop out!
  • Posted by MD on May 2, 2008 at 8:00am EDT
  • If students who didn't want to be in class dropped out we would have much smaller class sizes, amenable to better discussion. Professors would have more time to help students who actually care if they can make a sentence. I encorage students who feel this way to leave the university. After all, they already know everything. They should do just fine. The classroom and campus would be a much better place for everyone else.

  • My God We are Petty
  • Posted by Neal Raisman on May 20, 2008 at 2:10pm EDT
  • I have just read some of the comments here and they are so petty and mean that I can not understand how any of you who made such comments can want to teach. Your comments and language seem to indicate that you have a deep dislike as well as disdain of students. You also seem to feel you are so damn smart that the students should be delighted to just be in your presence. If you who made such comments dislike students so very much to ridicule and demean them with your broad generalizations, get out of the classroom. there are many worthy people out there who want to teach and help students. Besides, if you are as valuable as you portray yourselves, we are all sure you can find another non-teaching role quite easily.