News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 4, 2005
The University of Iowa is known for its Writers’ Workshop, so it’s no surprise that the University of Iowa Press builds on that literary reputation with annual prizes for poetry and short fiction.
In recent weeks, an anonymous Web site has begun a campaign against the press, arguing that it favors entries with connections to the university. The Web site, Foetry, calls itself “the poetry watchdog” and boasts of its role “exposing the fraudulent ‘contests,’ tracking the sycophants, naming names.”
The Web site is urging poets to send letters to consumer advocates, state officials and the university’s president, and to lawyers who might help with a class action lawsuit (based on Foetry’s view that participants are duped into paying the $20 entry fee, unaware that they may have little chance of winning if they don’t have Iowa ties).
At the Iowa Press, officials are astonished to find themselves under attack by an army of poets and poetry fans — most of them anonymous.
“It’s hard to have a useful dialogue with an anonymous Web site,” said Holly Carver, director of the press. She noted that Iowa’s contests are “blind,” meaning that names, affiliations, dedications and other identifying facts are removed before judging. “It’s just a little hard to say how our contest could be more democratic than it already is.”
Actually, Foetry and its readers have plenty of ideas about that. The Web site has criticized other poetry contests — many of them sponsored by universities and their presses — for similar reasons. But the Iowa attack, perhaps because of the prominence of its writing program, has really taken off.
The 2004 winners of Iowa’s poetry contest were Megan Johnson, who has an MFA from the Writers’ Workshop, and Susan Wheeler, who has taught at Iowa. The Foetry Web site also lists many past winners with Iowa connections, and it didn’t help matters much when the Iowa Press recently announced the winners of its annual short fiction contest, who also had Iowa ties.
So for many Foetry readers, the obvious answer is for Iowa to bar its alumni and current or former employees from entering. And these readers are not shy about expressing their feelings.
“You ought to be ashamed of yourselves, to perpetrate a fraud on aspiring poets, and hide under your university umbrella to lure unsuspecting people into your web of deceit. Any respectable contest bars employees, including former employees,” wrote one, who added that he views Iowa’s award as “a fixed contest that is really just a mutual admiration society for a tiny clique.”
Another comment on the Foetry site responds to Carver’s statements about the contest being blind. “Dear Holly Carver,” the person wrote. “Removing names and acknowledgments pages isn’t enough, and you know it. If a teacher has helped to shape a friend’s poems, do you think they need a name to recognize them? You are so busted. Cold-busted.”
And yet another said: “The more I read about this stuff, the more I feel I exist in some weird parallel universe. How on earth have we gotten to this point, where people pay to have their envelopes opened by some anonymous graduate student, and all that cash then funds a judge picking his or her drinking buddy, lover, colleague or former student? It’s simply perverse.”
Carver says that there is a perfectly legitimate reason why so many people with Iowa connections with the contests: Iowa attracts great writers. “The workshop is one of the premiere writing programs in the country and over the years its graduates have gone on to become influences on their campuses, and there is a huge diaspora, a stellar one,” she says.
She said the controversy “is a real shame — it’s a shame that with the economics of poetry so marginal, something as noble as publishing good poetry has come under attack.”
So who created Foetry? In an e-mail interview, the site’s founder would say little about himself except that he’s a male academic. Asked if he had any particular grudge with Iowa or writing contests, he said that he never applied to the Writers’ Workshop and that his concern is simply with “ethical behavior.”
— scott.jaschik@insidehighered.com
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
What Foetry and the U Iowa Press have in common is a particular silence about the stuff of poetry itself. The Foetry writers insist judges are picking students lovers drinking buddies and friends (implying these are equal, and equally suspect relationships), against which Holly Carver invokes the idea of “great” writers and writing. Both sides seem to feel that their terms, “ties,” say, or greatness, are transparent commonplaces; neither so much as mentions the word “Aesthetics.” If everyone wrote exactly the same kind of poetry this silence might make sense, but as it is both sides seem oddly unrealistic about the complexities—and richnesses—which inform both art and human relationships.
Mallarme, at 9:35 am EST on March 5, 2005
Here’s a suggestion: that outfits like the University of Iowa give poetry prize money ONLY to poets connected to them. Clearly, those are the only kinds of poets they have any sort of understanding of.
—Bob Grumman
Bob Grumman, Ultimate Sage, Second-Class, at 9:40 am EST on March 9, 2005
The links the sans culottes at phoetry.com wish to expose are without discernment. They cannot distinguish between a “strong connection” and what putatively is a corrupt link. What exactly is a fair link? and are some links ok? Would we look at Robert Smithson’s sculpture differently because his pediatrician was Wm Carlos Williams? At phoetry any link is corrupt and corrupting. This is just laziness blooming behind moral outrage which has become, itself, entertaining in the sense we have been trained to enjoy by the media grid: some gossip, some filth, some scolding. Mix in some oedipal smirching thrills of rebellion and Bob’s your uncle!
arthur craven, at 9:09 am EST on March 11, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
IT Systems Integration Analyst (NIATT IT Manager) NIATT Open for Recruitment: September 9, 2008 — October 7, 2008 ... see job
A leader in academe, the University of South Carolina holds the Carnegie Foundation’s highest research designation and is ... see job
Dedicated, knowledgeable, experienced person sought for Director of Development in the Office of Institutional Advancement. see job
Job Summary: The Departments of Biological Sciences, Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Physics and ... see job
PART — TIME The incumbent provides interpreting and transliterating services to students, staff, and faculty. This includes ... see job
Faculty/Dept: Faculty of Education Reference No: 23172 Closing Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 Position Type: Permanent Full Time ... see job
Marietta College seeks candidates for a tenure track position in East Asian History see job
Drake University is a diverse learning community of more than 5,600 students, distinguished by collaborative learning among ... see job
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
Research Assistant II (Non-Lab) (Data Coordinator) see job
Unfair to poets?
Stop whining. If you’re so sure your stuff isn’t being read, why don’t you show some of it on yur website (anonymously of course) and let others decide its merit?
I can write a really great fictitious poem.
Pindar, at 6:04 am EST on March 5, 2005