News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 9, 2005
The American Sociological Association has become the latest group to take on Harvard’s president — releasing a statement Tuesday stating that there “is substantial research that provides clear and compelling evidence that women, like men, flourish in science, just as in other occupational pursuits, when they are given the opportunity and a supportive environment.”
Lawrence H. Summers, Harvard’s president, set off a huge debate in January when he speculated on the reasons for the scarcity of women in senior positions in science. He has since apologized for his statements, which suggested that gender differences rather than discrimination accounted for the gender gap.
Summers and his supporters have called for more research on these issues. The sociologists’ statement said that it was designed to answer the Harvard president’s suggestion that “there is no overwhelming body of serious scholarship that informs this topic.”
In fact, the statement says that “the most compelling patterns shown by research are that people’s abilities, as measured by job outcomes, are shaped by and interact with social influences.
“For example, objectively assessed math and scientific ability differences between males and females have changed substantially over the past three decades. In the United States they have become non-significant and in some other countries, the United Kingdom, for example, girls’ performance exceeds that of boys at all levels of schooling,” the sociologists said. “That gender differences in these abilities have shifted so substantially over such a short period of time makes it impossible for biological changes to have been influential. This period, however, was one in which girls’ access to school courses, counselor encouragement, career opportunities, and role models changed (and improved) significantly — but not their biology.”
The statement concludes with a suggested reading list on the topic.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Summers was very clear in the speech that started this sorry affair that he was talking about the “tails” of the distribution of mathematical ability. Interesting how the sociologists, who we might expect to understand statistics, ignore this in their statement. Perhaps they are too well aware of substantial evidence that males are over-represented at the extremes of distribution for quite a number of variable traits.
Bob Koepp, at 10:22 am EST on March 9, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Join a vibrant campus community whose excellence is reflected in its diversity and student success. West Chester University ... see job
Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is an inclusive, dynamic, and innovative Ivy League university and New ... see job
Join a vibrant campus community whose excellence is reflected in its diversity and student success. West Chester ... see job
Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
Job Description: Baseball Techniques Instructor for students who plan to transfer to a four year institution ... see job
Decision Sciences & Management Information Systems: Assistant/Associate Professor to teach undergraduate and graduate ... see job
American University is an independent liberal-arts university located in Washington, DC with 12,000 students. The faculty are ... see job
Adirondack Community College (ACC) is a comprehensive community college and member of the State University of New York (SUNY) ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Summers turns to Fall
When an entire academic group turns to issue a statement then you know how politicised the issue has become...Gosh. Sociologists believe that we are formed by our nurture. What a surpirse! Defending one’s turf is perhaps also an embedded cluturally given response.
fred lapides, at 7:57 am EST on March 9, 2005