Search News


Browse Archives

News

Busted for a Bogus Paper

March 31, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As Nate Kushner tells the story, it all started because he listed "eating Hindu sculpture" as one of his hobbies when he created an online profile for himself some years ago.

Laura K. Krishna, a college student whose real name he isn't using, sent him an instant message Easter weekend -- based solely on that joke hobby -- in which she offered to pay him to write a paper on something Hindu. Kushner says he decided to do so and to make the paper an obvious fraud, with the idea that he would eventually reveal the paper's bogus origins to the student's institution and to those who read the blog that runs on the Web site of his comedy group, A Week of Kindness.

And that's why that blog has become home the last few days to fierce debates about academic integrity, plagiarism, online ethics and more -- with the debate spreading to other Web sites as well. Some believe that Kushner is creating a hoax, with various commenters noting his background in comedy and that April 1 is just around the corner. But in an interview Wednesday, he denied that, and there is some evidence that Laura is real.

While Kushner's Web site briefly named her institution, he took down those references -- at the request of the institution, he says -- and he won't reveal the college now. But other Web sites have identified the institution as Lewis University, a Roman Catholic institution southwest of Chicago. And when a Lewis spokeswoman was asked about the incident, she cited federal laws that relate to student privacy. And those laws apply only to a college's actual students.

Kushner's Web site includes the text of his IM exchanges with Laura on subject matter, pay and his qualifications, and also includes the paper itself, which mixes real Hindu terms, pop culture references, material plagiarized from online sources, and just plain silliness. Some lines:

  • "Your actions in each lifetime affect your karma, and if a Shudra watches dharma and greg, it will have a positive effect on his karma."
  • "The second class is the Kshatriya, the warrior class, who acted as the protectors of the peace. I made a doody. Vaishya, the producing class, work as business people providing economic stability to the society."
  • "The principle of Varnasrama Vindaloo Dharma, also known as Yachti, or caste, is one of the most fundamental aspects of Hinduism."

Then Kushner describes how Laura turned in the paper, was confronted by a dean who had been pointed to some of the material on the Web site, and how she cried to him about how he was creating problems for her. At this point, Kushner agreed to remove references to Laura's real name and institution from the Web site, and to issue a request (which he repeats several times) that people stop trying to call her and her university.

Comments on Kushner's Web site range widely. Some praise him for striking a blow for academic honesty. Others accuse him of playing mind games with an immature student.

One critic wrote: "I think your action is even more reprehensible than hers. She may have felt under great time pressure and needed help, even if she did go about finding it in the wrong way. If you had wanted to make some kind of moral statement and teach her a point about plagiarism, you could have done so without torturing her. Her motive may have been need -- your motive was cruelty and ego."

And a supporter wrote: "I work at a university library and plagiarism is my biggest pet peeve. I hope this student learns her lesson ... a lesson ... anything at all from this."

Laura Kiran, director of public relations at Lewis, issued the following statement: "Lewis University has clear policies and procedures in place regarding academic integrity and appropriate student conduct. The university will take such actions as it deems appropriate under those policies. Federal laws relating to student privacy preclude our making any comment regarding the particulars of the situation."

As for Kushner, he is trying to move on -- and to help out his comedy group. His last post on the topic is titled: "Stop calling Laura. Come to our shows."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Busted for a Bogus Paper

  • Posted by Dr. Kim at St. Claire on March 21, 2006 at 4:00am EST
  • Well, she's in school to learn - and hopefully she learned NOT TO STEAL AND LIE AND CHEAT. If that is all she takes away from her time in University, it will be more than some CEO's...

  • hmmm ...
  • Posted by dewey on March 31, 2005 at 9:38am EST
  • I wonder if the writer might give us a better sense of the odds that this is a hoax. Seems awfully close to April Fool's Day, doesn't it?

    And the entire drama is slowly revealed on a comedy site?

    Something ain't right.

    Best,

    Dewey

  • Posted by historyburp on March 31, 2005 at 9:39am EST
  • I come down on the side of the webowner. F**k Laura! Her college almost certainly has an ethics and honesty policy, feeling "under pressure" is not an excuse for buying a paper. There's help at most colleges, in the library, in a writing center, even from the professors (I am one, so I'm not blowing smoke here--we will help, particularly at the smaller institutions that "Laura" seems to be at). Laura might be "immature" but plagiarism isn't hard to understand!

  • Posted by mara on March 31, 2005 at 1:23pm EST
  • I think the sentence "And those laws apply only to a college’s actual students" does a pretty good job of giving a sense of the odds it's not a hoax.

  • immature?
  • Posted by Shahah on March 31, 2005 at 8:41pm EST
  • i have little pity for Laura, and take umbrage at ppl who say the blogger was being cruel and taking advantage of an "immature" young person. she is a *university-level* student, folks -- on the dean's list -- no excuses for this unscrupulous buying off other ppl to think for her, and then not even reading it!

  • somethings left out
  • Posted by rick , left out on April 1, 2005 at 4:36am EST
  • FOr one, laura had, from the very begining, intended not to pay for the paper.

    One post haveing related his work as a professor pointed out that this couldn't have been her first time; partly due to the feigned ignorance, her lie to Nate and then, when TOTALY caught, she lies to her Dean.
    It would have been nice of this article had had at least another paragraph with a stance on the subject; considering the subject matter.

  • Chuck the Student
  • Posted by Rob Weir on April 1, 2005 at 10:57am EST
  • I have zero sympathy for this student (assuming this is true and not either a prank or an urban legend). She should be expelled from her college immediately. If not, the dean should be fired for Ethical Gutlessness.

    Immature student? Bah! Try sneaky little thief who got busted.

  • The whole story is so stupid
  • Posted by Amateur7 on April 2, 2005 at 5:57am EST
  • For an April's fool day, the story is boring and stupid. For a real life drama, the now famous Nate Kushner turned out to be quite an idiot, when his purpose was to show his wit.

    Isn't it ironic that the guy went as far as to plagiarize himself, selling a paper for the girl to turn in, both illegal actions, to teach her a lesson?

    What a foolish idiot. Stories with people as stupid as these two shouldn't make any headlines. There's no morality or ethical lesson here, it's sheer stupidity.

  • Re: The whole story is so stupid
  • Posted by JustWondering on April 3, 2005 at 6:04am EDT
  • Amateur7, I'm not quite sure what you mean. Are you saying that plagiarizing and selling a paper are both illegal?
    You do realize that neither is illegal (although it might be represensible). The only culprit in this story is the plagiarist because plagiarism is strictly prohibited per school policy - as is usually the rule in academia, but certainly not in the "regular" world...

  • but why is it wrong?
  • Posted by jamie at u of winnipeg on April 5, 2005 at 5:50am EDT
  • I worry that we spend so much time telling students why they cannot do something and we never make it clear why we cannot "cheat" on a paper. I am not saying that anyone ought to "cheat" but that we are missing the issue when we say that the student is in the wrong or the right. Insted, we have to look at the culture that is producing this problem. This includes accademic pressure, rules that have little to no relivance to "new" accademics, and schools that admit students who do not have the skills to be good university students.

    Why is it that we are unwilling to open a discussion on the ethics of cheating? What actually happens if we find out that we do not value "non-cheating" as much as we think we do.

  • Posted by chuck , It's true on April 5, 2005 at 5:47pm EDT
  • The story about Laura is most definitely true. My Girlfriend was an English Professor there at Lewis and has gotten the whole story from her good friend that is Laura's teacher.

  • Posted by Andrea on April 22, 2005 at 4:51am EDT
  • I go to Lewis, and academic honesty is really stressed. I honestly just think it was stupid of her to ask anyone to do a paper for her. Someone always finds out.