Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Pink Slips

The letters went out Friday, via certified mail, to all full-time professors at Grand Canyon University. In a twist on the old college acceptance letters, many of the recipients got the thick envelopes, which included contracts for the coming year (with signing bonuses included).

Related stories

Seventeen other full-time faculty members got thin envelopes — single page letters informing them that because “this has a been a year of challenge and change for Grand Canyon University, difficult decisions” must be made. “One area of correction,” the letter continued, “is the number of full and part time faculty on campus. It is in this context that I regret to inform you that you will not receive a contract.”

At least five of the instructors who were let go had tenure, even though they and other instructors at the college say that administrators had assured them repeatedly since a group of private investors bought the financially ailing Christian college in January 2004 that the institution would honor their tenured status.

In a e-mail message distributed around the campus, Grand Canyon’s CEO, Brent Richardson, attributed the layoffs to a “reduction and redirection in certain academic departments, positions and programs.” He called the actions “an expected and necessary part of the restructuring of GCU and the first change that impacts faculty in the way staff and even students have been impacted,” noting previous cutbacks in staff positions and scholarship adjustments for students.

University officials declined to respond to telephone calls and e-mail messages seeking further comment on the situation, which was first reported Monday by The Chronicle of Higher Education.

The actions by Grand Canyon have drawn the interest of the university’s accreditor, the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, and of the American Association of University Professors.

Steven D. Crow, executive director of North Central’s Higher Learning Commission, said that Grand Canyon officials did not tell the accrediting group in advance about its actions, and that North Central was “following up” on it with Grand Canyon administrators.

B. Robert Kreiser, associate secretary of the AAUP, said that the faculty group had asked professors at Grand Canyon to send the association documents about the situation for a possible investigation. He added: “The information available to the AAUP thus far raises concerns about issues of tenure and academic due process.”

Grand Canyon, which was founded in 1949, faced intensifying financial pressures until, in December 2003, it was several million dollars in debt and could not meet its payroll, says Robert C. Andringa, executive director of the Council of Christian Colleges and Universities, who says he has kept a close watch on Grand Canyon because it is the first for-profit Christian institution. In January 2004, the university’s trustees struck a deal in which a group of investors would absorb its debt and commit to pouring funds into building the institution.

In the intervening 16 months, university officials say they have spent more than $8 million, increased overall enrollments, especially in online programs, from 1,800 to 8,000, and hired more than 100 faculty and staff members to expand its online offerings.

While they don’t dispute those accomplishments, professors at Grand Canyon say the achievements have come at a significant cost to the working environment and resulted in the abandonment of some important academic principles. Several professors interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing, among other things, a clause in the new contracts that warns employees not to share any potentially critical information about the university with people outside it.

The professors say that the university abandoned the representative faculty council that existed before the sale of the institution and, in October, presented a new faculty handbook — prepared without meaningful input from professors — in which the institution introduced “term tenure,” at three- and five-year lengths. That was one of several open meetings, the professors say, at which administrators verbally committed to continuing “to respect tenure for those who have it.” “They told us we would be grandfathered in,” said one full time professor.

But another professor notes that administrators also stated that nothing was binding unless it was put in writing — and the promise of tenure never was.

Despite those and other signs that the institution was distancing itself from tenure, the actions last week still stunned and dismayed many professors at Grand Canyon.

They were troubled in part by concerns about who was let go. If the institution truly needed to lay off professors for strategic or financial reasons, they said, it would have made sense to have dismissed the newest professors, or the weakest, or those in vulnerable or expendable disciplines. But the list of those laid off last week included longtime and generally well-regarded instructors in core disciplines like business and religion, and several of them were former deans who had at times questioned management decisions.

Faculty members also balked at how the dismissals were carried out. Some professors discovered that they were on the way out only when they found their campus e-mail accounts had been disabled. And the dismissals came, one professor pointed out, at the tail end of the college hiring season, which could make it difficult for those who lost their jobs to get other ones.

One faculty member noted that the layoff letters “hold open the possibility that the university would rehire [the full-time professors] as adjuncts or let them teach online. Because of the timing, they seem to be hoping that people will have to crawl back” and take adjunct positions at Grand Canyon.

This professor added: “The whole scenario of how the layoffs were carried out indicates a lack of respect for the environment of higher education.”

The situation at Grand Canyon is likely to attract significant attention because the institution is one of several financially ailing nonprofit colleges that have been taken over or targeted for purchase in the past year or so by for-profit entities or investors. Given the intense worries in some quarters of traditional higher education about the potential influence of the profit motive, critics are sure to be on the lookout for signs of ill motives.

But Lara K. Couturier, a higher education consultant who was interim principal investigator at Brown University’s Futures Project, a research center that closed in March, warned against a knee-jerk reaction. “There could be a tendency among some people to make this a poster child for all the evil things that can happen when a for-profit steps in, but I’d caution people from jumping to conclusions,” said Couturier, who noted that she was not intimately familiar with the situation at Grand Canyon.

“Had the institution remained a nonprofit but just brought in new leadership, they might have had to make similar hard choices. One thing that higher ed as an enterprise hasn’t done a good job at is doing serious cost-benefit analysis and making hard decisions, and that’s one thing that for-profits do: impose stricter business practices on higher education.”

Doug Lederman

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

I don “t know how can the new operators of Grand Canyon be expected to continue operations — business as usual style — when the previous operators were running the school at a loss. As unfortunate as it is for some, it is inevitable that serious changes must be made when converting a school the size of Grand Canyon from a financially ailing operation to a vibrant, sucessful one. We should recognize the courage it takes for the new owner-operators to move the school ahead, and on to safer ground.

Michael Jean Nystrom-SchutSan Jose, Costa Rica

Michael Jean Nystrom-Schut, at 3:50 pm EDT on May 18, 2005

To Whom It May Concern:

Unfortunately I have no idea where this email will end up. My hope is that it is copied to every faculty and staff person at Grand Canyon University. I suppose I hope that because the Grand Canyon University I knew and from which I graduated valued its students to the extent that an alumnus’ letter would be taken seriously and with appreciation. I fear that is no longer the case.

My name is JonMark Shillington. I graduated from GCU in December 2002, summa cum laude with a BA in Christian Education and Theatre/Drama. I entered GCU as a National Merit Scholar excited about the possibilities of a Christian liberal arts education and thrilled about the connections I had already made with then-current students and faculty. I am now a student at George W. Truett Theological Seminary at Baylor University in Waco, Texas. I have been thoroughly satisfied with the way my undergraduate education prepared me for graduate work and studies. Unfortunately, I am now embarrassed to tell people from where that undergraduate education came.

If I do mention the name Grand Canyon University to people that I know, I always include a ā€œfootnoteā€ along the lines ofā€¦ā€I went there beforeā€¦ā€

Before the school was pursuing profit and prestige over quality education for its students. Before faculty members who have literally shaped the lives of hundreds and thousands of young men and women were told that their contributions were no longer valuable much less necessary. Before empty promises were made to tenured professors whose genuine love for teaching called them to and kept them in an institution void of glamour, decadence or even tremendous reputation.

I went to Grand Canyon University when it faced undeniable financial difficulties. Difficulties that almost led to closure…but difficulties that did not prevent the faculty and students from pursuing education with dignity. Those that knew of Grand Canyon were few in number, but those that knew of Grand Canyon respected its educational offerings and appreciated its faith-based approach to higher education. Those that knew of Grand Canyon no longer recognize it.

I now have new motivation for completing my master’s degree. When that degree is earned, I can claim Baylor University and George W. Truett Theological Seminary as my primary places of education. I will be able to separate myself from what Grand Canyon University has become, and it will be a day of great rejoicing. I plan on entering vocational ministry. I will never make a great deal of money, but I believed in Grand Canyon University and always planned on being a contributor. I now have nowhere to send that money. The university I attended, grew in and graduated from no longer exists. The professors that shaped my future have been deemed worthless by educational mad-scientists, and I will not support an institution that now stands for such disrespect and blatant lack of professionalism. Perhaps it is good business, but it is pitiful education.

Again…this email will most likely be tossed aside or disregarded as emotional propaganda, but know that it stands for the new legacy of Grand Canyon University. A legacy of embarrassment and shame. A legacy cut off from its history. A legacy that has very few willing to claim it.

So why write this? What purpose could it possibly serve? Hopefully, it gives someone the realization that they cannot operate unchecked. True, the new Grand Canyon business will not be directly monetarily affected by this letter or even by my sentiments, and as a for-profit institution, the support of alumni will become decreasingly important. However, the ā€œleadersā€ of GCU are not operating in a vacuum, and I believe it is important that such a fact is known. Whether weighty or not I, as an alumnus of GCU have a voice, and I refuse to sit passively and not make use of it.

If this letter does land on the desks of any professors, know that you are appreciated. Know that your work, even in the most oppressive of circumstances is tremendously important, that your students appreciate you and that your efforts at educating those students have been gloriously fruitful. Know that the prayers of the alumni are with those of you that also remember when your colleagues were respected for their educational experience and expertise rather than for their willingness to politic.

Regretfully,

JonMark Shillington

BA Theatre, Christian Education December 2002

Grand Canyon University “Before”

JonMark Shillington, An Alumnus’ Reflection, at 4:12 pm EDT on May 18, 2005

GCU response to Doug Lederman’s article “Pink Slips”

Dear Editor:

Thank you for your coverage of the rapid multitude of changes in America’s higher education. In the midst of these challenges for all stakeholders, the difficult yet wonderful turnaround of Grand Canyon University (GCU) continues. Our leadership strives daily to honor the rich traditions of academia established over our 56 year history of Judeo-Christian faith-based education.

We realize that Mr. Doug Lederman’s article ā€œPink Slipsā€ (INSIDE HIGHER ED, May 18) was written very quickly due to deadlines. We believe your readers deserve to know some of the background to that article.

GCU’s Unique Situation: • GCU was scheduled to close due to financial distress in 2004, without advance notice to the stakeholder community (faculty, students, staff, alumni, nearby community). • A small group of owner/operators with a 30-year history in education have invested approximately $38 million so far to save GCU.• We have discovered that saving GCU requires more than pouring in new capital — it also requires aligning program offerings to fit the academic market and maintaining financial ratios set by federal and state regulatory expectations. These important variables helped to shape our recent decisions.

The Facts: • Two staff reorganizations and student scholarship adjustments preceded our recent contract decisions. In the first 18 months of the successful turnaround, this is the first time that faculty have been affected in any manner, shape or form in the series of difficult decisions. • A total of 17 full-time faculty (5 tenured) did not receive a new contract. • The elimination of positions was based on student enrollment and program needs.• Although these recent personnel decisions have gained immediate attention, the University has implemented a new performance management program that provides for merit increases and other incentives for its faculty and staff.

The Reality: • After 15 months of agonizing strategy, prayer, and careful consultation with credible academic experts, GCU had to give priority to the well-being of the entire university community. • In short, the Inside Higher Ed article appears to feed the fear that for-profit management by its very nature threatens faculty. The complex situation at GCU belies such a rush to judgment.

Naturally our hearts go out to anyone whose job is eliminated in our competitive work place. We hope we are discovering new economic models that will allow academic institutions to survive and continue to prepare people for life and work. Thank you for allowing us to add to the initial story.

Sincerely,

Brent RichardsonChief Executive Officer

Cynthia A. Russell, DNSc, RN Chief Academic Officer & On Campus Provost

Faith A. Weese, Chief Public Relations Officer at Grand Canyon University, at 5:53 pm EDT on May 18, 2005

Pink Slips

Your words were eloquent Mr. Richardson, or whoever added the last comment pleading the case of the management team at GCU. However, I find them absolutely impossible to believe. Tell me, why would someone interested in the well-being of the professors choose to change their locks and computer log-in information instead of giving them the decency of a face-to-face confrontation? I am a graduate from GCU, and I never expected to regret that fact. However, I knew the GCU that Mr. Shillington spoke of. I feel that I got out just in time, as the changes were just beginning to take place. I am not opposed to change, and I realize that positive change needed to occur; however, I am not impressed with any institution that appears to value paper more than people. I am involved in the lives of hundreds of high school students as a youth leader and prospective teacher, and I assure you that I will not be encouraging any of them to attend this new Grand Canyon University. It’s quite sad, really; I had hoped to be a proud alumna. Stephanie Gramm GCU Graduate, December 2004Bachelor of Science, Music Education

Stephanie Gramm, at 4:39 am EDT on May 19, 2005

GCU Embarassment

Like many others, I am—or rather was—a proud GCU alumni. The education I received was excellent. It has carried me through a Masters program in which I studied theatre abroad in England, through several paied theatrical positions in the Valley, and now to a career in teaching theatre. Professionals in the theatrical and educational world have applauded the comprehensiveness, quality and high work-ethic of Canyon grads.

All this to say that the quality of such an education lies in its professors. I am therefdore shocked that the new management has let professors of such high claiber go in such an unprofessional manner—without ceremony and without respect. The professors let go were among the most influential, inspiring, creative, passionate and qualified individuals I have ever encountered. I cannot imagine life at Canyon without them.

I have no problem with the management at Canyon being for-profit. I am glad to see the university getting back on its financial feet. However, I do have a problem when the for-profit agenda circumvents the standards of quality, excellence, respect and decency towards professors who have poured their heart and soul into their students and impaced so many lives. It is embarassing to be assosicated with such upheval and unprofessionalism.

The respect I hold for my department will hold me loyal for a time, but the more I hear about these embarassing situations, the more I want to distance myself from the university, and I will be extremely wary of recommending GCU to any of my students. Like many others, I have begun to speak of canyon with the disclaimer, “I went there before...”

If staff must be “downsized” or “reshaped"—whatever flowery terms the university attaches to appauling actions—at the very least they should (1) consider that a university is only as excellent as its staff and (2) show the proper respect for those who have built the reputation for excellenct the current administration is currently standing on and taking for granted. The administration owes a debt of gratitude and an apology to those, especially tenured, they have so disgracefully let go. Education at Canyon will not be as rich because of this loss. Respectfully,Stephanie Stone

Stephanie, at 11:31 am EDT on May 19, 2005

Do Unto Others

I am a graduate of Grand Canyon University (B.S. 1986). I too remember the glory days when the faculty at GCU was respected and prayed for by their administration... when making money was NOT the key focus but seeing lives changed.

The details I am reading about on how the current GCU administration chose to inform faculty of “changes” makes me livid. (I just found out about this today) What type of people get together and decide to handle affairs in such an unprofessional manner? Its NOT just business, its unethical.

I worked for a large Fortune 500 company for over a decade and as a manager we had to let good people go because of the “bottom line".. that IS business sometimes. However, even in a company of over 70K employees, we were required to meet ONE on ONE with EACH employee leaving. Even in a cut-throat environment, the HUMAN thing to do was to cushion the blow face to face then give specific reasons, in a PERSONAL setting, as to why they were identified to leave. This is called respect and it was critical for the reputation of the company.

In contast: the current administration of GCU could not provide that basic level of professionalism? Give me a break! Changing locks on offices and de-activating accounts without any notice? In the corporate world, this treatment is reserved for those employees who stole or made threats against the company.... I doubt any of the out-going faculty members fit that category. From simply a human perspective: What was the administration thinking?? (Don’t even get me started on breaking stated promises of keeping the tenured faculty then just sending them a letter to inform them they had no jobs- at the end of May no less).

This is embarrassing for GCU and a huge black eye to all the alumni who worked along with outstanding professors over the DECADES to build a caring and well-respected school.

Tina Woodard (Herman), Sr. Instructional Designer, at 2:09 pm EDT on May 19, 2005

Pink Slips

Sitting in the recent graduation ceremony of Grand Canyon University, I vividly remember hearing repeatedly from Mr. Richardson and Dr. Clifford that Grand Canyon University is a “university with a heart". However, after the most current actions by the management company of letting go of some of the most influential faculty, I question where this “heart” is. As an alumna, I also echo the reactions in previous comments. I am embarrased to claim Grand Canyon University as my Alma Mater.

I am very familiar with the circumstances that led Grand Canyon to almost closing and thus the management company’s interest and role in restructuring. I agree that in any situation as such, change is inevitable and necessary. However, the WAY that these changes have been made is inconsistent with the values previously taught through the education at GCU. That which I received was Christ-centered and Christ-honoring. If we are to be the light of Christ, let me ask you- Is this a good example of how Christ would handle a situation? I believe not. If for one moment you could step aside and put yourself in the shoes of one of these qualified faculty members, would you not want to be treated with dignity? It IS “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” isn’t it?

It disappoints me greatly that I no longer want to encourage others to attend GCU. I even returned to GCU for my graduate work. At that time, I was proud to be associated with the university. I am concerned for the future of Grand Canyon and I pray that changes will be made that glorify God.

Karyn Sheets

Bachelor of Science, Elementary Education (1998)

Masters of Arts in Teaching (2001)

Karyn Sheets, Educator, at 4:34 am EDT on May 20, 2005

GCU Left Behind

I have created a blog for past/present students, parents, etc. to utilize during this ordeal.

www.gculeftbehind.blogspot.com

Carla Sandine, Current Senior Political Science Major at Grand Canyon University, at 2:23 pm EDT on May 20, 2005

Another Alumnus Shares the Same Embarrassment

As a Grand Canyon University alumni, I’m grateful current management was able to keep GCU’s doors opens and classes running despite the close call to shut down the school, however hope that they could restore the campus has diminished. All told, 17 faculty members were let go over this past weekend, and what management fails to recognize is that they are not losing mere faculty. These teachers were people who had invested their heart and soul into the campus, giving more than they got in return. Their departure includes Maxie Burch, and I doubt one student who sat through his History of Christianity class, or any other for that matter, remained untouched by his influence. Maxie was the type of teacher who knew students personally, who cared just as much about the heart of his students as he did their minds. This cut at Canyon also took with it, Mark Shelley, a sociology professor who was one of the key influences on my college career. Like Maxie, Mark had an effect on his students that went past the confines of a classroom. He was a mentor and continues on as a friend. Most saddening is that teachers were let go without thinking of the repercussions that will be sure to follow. When people of such magnitude are gone, the management severs ties not only to its current students, but to its past. With the departure of these faculty members my loyalty to the University is gone, because what is there left to be loyal to? GCU gave me a rich education to be proud of; one that I was sure would stand the test of time. However, my fear is that these cuts, taken at the very heart of the University, will leave them with nothing to stand on and eventually crumble. What will I have to be proud of then? The answer is nothing, and sadly I join the others in embarrassment of their once honorable alma mater.

JuliAnna Camp, at 2:23 pm EDT on May 20, 2005

Pink Slips

As most other alumni would agree, the one aspect that bothers me the most about everything that has gone on at GCU recently is the way in which the professors have been treated. I graduated three years ago and have stayed in touch with several faculty members since then, and it breaks my heart to see everything they have had to endure. Any one of them could easily be making more money at a larger, more prestigious institution, but they CHOSE to go to GCU because they believed in it. They were dedicated to providing students with a Christian education, all the while investing in our lives and encouraging us along the way. They have devoted their lives to the school for years, only to be made to feel as if they were worth nothing. I don’t blame a single fired faculty member for not accepting the school’s ā€œofferā€ to come back as an adjunct professor…why on earth would someone voluntarily come back to the same institution which treated them so poorly for a part-time position with very little pay and a high probability that the same situation will happen again in the near future? I guarantee that these professors have the student’s best interests at heart, but they also have to make a living, and they need to do so at a place where they will be given the respect they so greatly deserve. The disrespectful manner in which the administration notified faculty members of their firing is incomprehensible and inexcusable. As for Mr. Richardson claiming to be committed to ā€œJudeo-Christian faith-based educationā€ and to the ā€œwell-being of the entire university community,ā€ you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who agrees that the firing of every faculty member of the College of Christian Studies goes along with either of those supposed goals. Any student who has had the privilege of taking a Bible class from and getting to know Dr. Maxie Burch knows what an incredible loss he will be to the university. I would also strongly argue the idea that the elimination of the College of Science, whose professors were so incredibly instrumental in my education and career path, was done so for the well-being of the students.

I would agree with many of the other alumni who have said that we are now embarrassed by our alma mater and have no intentions of supporting the school in any way in the future. It has been suggested by some that because of this, we really must not love the university, and our loyalties to the school have been questioned. However the thing that made me so proud to have graduated from Canyon was the faculty. They are the ones who made GCU such a respected place to receive an education. They were the most important factor in making my education what it was, and they are the people who influenced and shaped my life and helped me to go as far as I have. Without them, there isn’t much left. The Canyon I graduated from is unrecognizable to me now, from the administration itself and its lack of respect for its faculty, to the now non-existent College of Science, right down to the awful and tasteless pink, purple and green buildings that now adorn the campus. That is why I can no longer be proud of and support the institution itself. My pride, loyalty, respect and love will always be for the professors. I hate the fact that I now have to make a separate distinction between the university and its faculty, but unfortunately that is what the situation has come to.

I think the alumni who have already written letters and posted comments would probably agree with me that our goal is not to stir up controversy, or hope that we can somehow change things…I don’t think any of us are that naĆÆve. My intention is to make sure that the GCU administration knows that its alumni will not stand quietly in the background while actions and decisions like the ones that have taken place in recent months are made. I also hope to convey to the current and now former GCU professors that we as alumni support and stand by you, and that you are in our thoughts and prayers daily, as are the current and future students whose educations are on the line. I have no idea what the future holds for GCU…I highly doubt that it can return to the institution it once was. In fact I’m sure of it. But I will forever be grateful to the professors who shaped my life, and am just glad I graduated when I did.

Lisa Adams

Bachelor of Science, General BiologyMay 2002

Lisa Adams, at 11:45 am EDT on May 23, 2005

Disappointed in the Restructure

Being an alum of the College of Science, I am sad to see the demise of such a wonderful science program. The shift and merge of this department into the Liberal Arts College is appalling. I understand (although do not agree) the college administrators/funding committees feeling that they cannot compete with the science departments at ASU, U of A or even NAU since these are state funded universities. However, these so called committees and councils making these decisions to downsize and integrate do not understand the quality of students put out by the GCU College of Science.

I myself received a BA in Biochemistry from GCU in 2001. Went on to receive my Master of Forensic Sciences degree and have become an active committee member and research presenter for the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. I also have Graduate Certification in Clinical Pathology. This fall, I will start my Ph.D. studies in Pathology. GCU has also put out many other wonderful scientists and medical doctors. Many of my classmates and other alumni have gone on to the Midwestern Medical (D. O.) program, Physician’s Assistant program and Pharmacy programs. Many alumni are also in other medical and science programs at other prestigious universities in the U.S. and even across the world. I know my comments focus on one department. But, the “feel,” of GCU has changed since my graduation.

I don’t feel that GCU should loose this department because they feel they cannot compete with the larger universities. There is no competition when so many alumni of this department have received such a valuable education. I don’t feel I would be as successful in my education and career endeavors if I had not attended GCU. I found irreplaceable mentors and friends in all of my professors. They know who I am, these larger universities may have “better,” equipment and facilities but lack that personal and caring touch all of the GCU professors give to each and everyone of their students. I will have nothing further to do with any alumni events, fundraiser’s or future GCU activities if the restructure of the university continues to push aside, downsize and obliterate the wonderful people who gave me such a passion for science and life during my time at GCU.

gradpath@hotmail.com, at 8:42 pm EDT on May 23, 2005

And The Walls Came Tumbling Down...

I graduated in 2002 with a B.S. degree in General Biology. My degree better prepared me for medical school than the majority of my current medical school class who went to larger, more prestigious universities. Because my professors at GCU were SO QUALIFIED, I have consistently been at the top of my class and have helped other med students learn basics that I took for granted because I learned them during undergrad. I am not bragging in any way, because it has absolutely nothing to do with me and everything to do with my professors at GCU. They cared enough to go that extra mile for their students and make sure we were overly prepared for life after undergrad.

My professors at GCU were not merely “teachers", they are also valued friends who have put so much of their lives into every one of their students, including me. It is completely ridiculous to think that getting rid of these faculty members will somehow improve GCU as an institution. What people need to know is that many graduate schools are now looking down at GCU with distain and no longer considering Canyon students as they once did. It won’t hurt my education because I am already in grad school, but I am sickened by what the current juniors and seniors have to look forward to when they apply for graduate school and are denied because their undergraduate education is seen as a second rate online college. Online classes do not look good on transcripts- I learned that the hard way by taking ONE online class during undergrad, and then having to prove to the med schools I applied to that the class was good enough to meet their standards.

Even if Mr. Richardson does have a great plan to “fix” the school, there is no excuse for treating the professors poorly. I don’t care how good of a corporate businessman you are, if you cannot be humane and give people who have worked hard and cared about people their dignity, your “success” means nothing. I do agree that the past administration led the school into financial ruin, but this in no way reflects the professors’ abilities, nor does it imply that they are somehow less valuable. The only thing this proves is that the people who controlled the money of the institution made very poor decisions. Instead of wiping the slate clean and starting over, Richardson should have looked more closely at the talented and dedicated faculty he so quickly removed from the school. He may never realize the extent of his loss, but as alumni who had the honor of being taught by these remarkable people, we now mourn for what the future students of GCU will never have.

I’m glad that Dr. Burch and all the other ā€œnon-renewedā€ professors will no longer have to be subject to the disrespect they have endured since the new “leadership” has taken over. It’s pathetic, though, that these amazing people will receive no recognition for all of their achievements and all of the students’ lives they have touched. My life was impacted in such an incredible way by the “old GCU", and I will fight for my professors’ reputations as long as I have to because I know they would do the same for me- how many other universities can you say that about?

Nicole Nedella (Stevenson), at 4:37 am EDT on May 24, 2005

IT’S ABOUT ‘TRUST’

05.21.05

Trust...

When schools, institutions or companies and their workforces trust each other to behave with integrity, the employees feel like valued, respected members of a worthy community. They commit themselves to the firm’s future. Yet, most entities and their workforces, view each other with profound distrust. Why? Because in order for the complexities of ā€˜Trust’ to happen, employees must overwhelmingly trust the managers and their colleagues, and everyone must view the company as being fair, consistent, capable and worthy of carrying out the vision.

The quality of ā€˜Trust’ is also fragile—and can evaporate at a mere whiff of bad faith. Without people buying into the vision (as I am addressing those of whom are directly responsible and entrusted with authority), the entity will falter and die.

Finally, the merits of ā€˜Trust’ are in direct contradiction to two traditional but flawed managerial practices: First, many companies achieve efficiency by following theory ā€˜X’ (authored by D. Maegregor), which is controlling—not trusting the employees. Second, theory ā€˜X’ managers maintain their power and keep employees at arms’ length by withholding information while leading with threatening moments and flares of intimidation. To reverse the course of ā€˜Lost trust’ (by attempting Maegregor’s alternative method...theory ‘Y’) in the attempt to rebuild and repair…the tasks can be daunting and next to impossible.

The three Harvard Business Review articles in this field are: “The Enemies of Trust,” by Robert Galford and Anne Seibold Drapeau; “Trust and the Virtual Organization,” by Charles Handy; and “Fair Process: Managing in the Knowledge Economy,” by W. Chan Kim and Renee A. Mauborgne.

Once the ‘Trust’ is on the ropes, your days are numbered. The quote from Mark Twain is appropriately applied to GCU leaders, “If you don’t believe in the Bible, you may want to consider telling the truth!”

SKIPSTER

Skip Peshak, Recent grad. Christian Leadership at GCU, at 3:55 pm EDT on May 24, 2005

When I entered Grand Canyon as a freshman, I had yet to declare a major. By my second semester, I had found my passion. Philosophy. Of all things, political philosophy(not practical politics). I clearly did not choose this major because it is marketable or has wonderful potential in the real world as a career. I felt called to seek out truth and to challenge others to think critically about their lives- not just in their political choices, but in their life choices. I believe that that was the purpose of my coming to Canyon. Grand Canyon’s principle that one’s faith could be integrated into their education and vocation demands an evaluation of one’s mind and heart. Part of Canyon’s heritage is the belief that truth can be integrated into our daily lives, passion and our vocation. I had a passion to figure out this truth, to search for consistancy in my integration of this truth and after three years I was burnt out from the endeavor. Upon entering my senior year I realized that I was disillusioned with the concept of philosophy in general. The abstract world of philosophy was alluring but never seemed to make sense in the “real world". It didn’t help that when planning my future, and my next step after graduation, the options seemed so limited. I questioned my decision to major in political science. Why didn’t I choose something more marketable as a career? Why did I want to be a philosopher?A week after really struggling with my future career decisions, I entered Dr. Burch’s class, the history of early modern Europe, and we discussed several of the enlightenment thinkers. This is what I wrote down from the lecture that day..."the tradition of a liberal arts university is not to make yourself marketable or to set yourself up for a job, it is to change who you are and the way that you think for the better...” I am a different person, and I hope a better person. Professors like Linda and Tom Rawles, Dr. Reiter, Judy Johnston, and Dr. Burch- and students and staff members challenged me to value truth and to value the search for truth. God used that day in Dr. Burch’s class to restore my passion for education, to remind me of my gratitude for the questions in life that sometimes leave me disillusioned with the world, and reaffirmed that the value of my education is intrinsic. The trend in education may be moving away from this notion that an education is not just a means to an end, and this comment may do nothing to change that- But truth does not bow to ever changing trends. My education from Grand Canyon University is priceless. With the new changes I can not confidently say that anyone else attending there will be able to say the same.

Amanda Rossiter, at 7:35 pm EDT on May 24, 2005

I still have Faith...a copy of a leter I sent to the Mgmt Team

Dear GCU Management Team,

I just want to say that my prayers and thoughts are with you as you are dealing with the difficulty of the faculty situation. Even though I have never been in that position, I can well imagine how difficult that decision must have been. I am sad to see some of my favorite professors go, but in my heart I know that you have the best of Canyon and the best of each student and professor in mind.

Even better, I know that you have prayerfully considered this decision and are following God’s Will to create a Canyon that is glorifying to Him.

My mom told me a story once, about being scared of people’s decisions when you didn’t know them and related that to God. If I didn’t know God and know His character, some of the things that happen in this world would seem senseless and cruel, but because I know Him I know that isn’t so. Because I know the management team and I know they love God, I know they are doing what they believe is best even though I do not understand all of the reasons why.

I am not a person to idly put my trust in people, in fact I rarely trust anyone and the moment a reason comes to distrust, I do. But I trust Michael Clifford, Brent Richardson, and Faith Weese.

They have cheered my day through their love and support through fairly serious times this year. A kind word, a compliment, a smile. They did not know about my struggles, that is just the kind of people they are.

As to the people that talk about the “old” Canyon and not wanting to be an alum, I think that is a little bit unreasonable. I too attended the “old” Canyon, but am proud to be an alum of the “new” Canyon where administrators listen to you regardless of money or prestige and where positive things get done. I am a changed person because of BOTH Canyons. I am a better and stronger person because of the lessons I learned, many through the changes that the University itself went through.

I think that many of the changes have been blown out of proportion. Yes, they are difficult and sometimes hurtful, but there are worse things going on in the world. People still suffer from the effects of the tsunami, children starving, and Christians are tortured for their faith. These are the things that we should focus on changing and campaigning against, not Christian businessmen doing their job.

I think it’s time we try to change the world for Christ and spread his love to others. Fighting other Christians only tears apart the body and dissuades others from joining it.

Thank you for your time. In Christ, Jessica Hoenig Proud Alum Class of 2005 B.A. Graphic Design Summa Cum LaudeRay Maben Scholar

Jessica Diane Hoenig, at 10:52 am EDT on May 26, 2005

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Pink Slips

or search for jobs directly.

Provost
Columbus State Community College

Columbus State Community College invests in employee development by providing numerous resources, partnerships, training and ... see job

DEAN — School of Social/Behavioral Sciences & Multicultural Studies
San Diego Community College District

DEAN School of Social/Behavioral Sciences & Multicultural Studies San Diego Mesa College Job Code: CE08-45 THE POSITION ... see job

Executive Director, System Facilities Operations
Lone Star College System

Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job

Chief Operating Officer/Ambulatory Services/Hospital
University of Kentucky

The University of Kentucky is one great place to work. UK’s agenda—simple—to accelerate the movement toward academic ... see job

Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Research (VP-GSR)
American University

the Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Research (VP-GSR) bears responsibility for oversight of graduate education and ... see job

Clinical Administrator III
University of Kentucky

The University of Kentucky is one great place to work. UK’s agenda—simple—to accelerate the movement toward academic ... see job

Director, Workplace Learning Resource Center
Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District

Under the direction of the Cuyamaca College Dean of Instruction, this position will manage the operational and programmatic ... see job

Executive Director, Construction
Lone Star College System

Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job

Vice President for Faculty and Staff Resources
Rutgers University

Founded in 1766, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is located between New York City and Philadelphia and has three ... see job

Director, Institutional Research and Assessment
Lone Star College System

Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job