News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
May 25, 2005
With President Bush promising a veto, it may have been little more than a protest vote. But the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday approved a bill that would significantly expand federal funding of research on embryonic stem cells.
After more than three hours of impassioned yet (mostly) civil debate, 50 Republicans joined 187 Democrats and the House’s lone independent in support of H.R. 810, which would allow the National Institutes of Health to finance research involving embryos from in vitro fertilization that would otherwise be discarded. The 238 to 194 vote would not be enough to override President Bush’s veto.
Since August 2001, when the president issued an executive order, federally sponsored research has been limited to several dozen lines of embryonic stem cells that already existed at that time, although private and state research efforts have grown. The president objected then — as he did at an emotional news conference in advance of Tuesday’s vote with families with children born from donated embryos — that using embryos for research purposes requires the “destruction of human life.”
“This bill would take us across a critical ethical line by creating new incentives for the ongoing destruction of emerging human life,” Bush said Tuesday. “Crossing this line would be a great mistake.”
Opponents of H.R. 810 advanced similar arguments during the floor debate over the measure; several displayed photographs of embryos in an effort to humanize them, and one played a recording of a fetal heartbeat.
Proponents of the measure and of the research engaged in some political gamesmanship of their own, using posters of children with diseases like diabetes that they argue embryonic stem cell research has the potential to eradicate.
Ultimately, that promise led dozens of Republicans — many of whom sought in their comments to burnish their anti-abortion credentials even as they parted company with party leaders on this issue — to support the bill. “For America to stand back because of a moral principle and not allow this scientific research to proceed is unconscionable,” said Rep. Charles Bass (R-N.H.).
Supporters of embryonic stem cell research in the Senate, where backing is thought to be stronger, said they would act quickly to pass their own legislation in the wake of the House vote.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Howard Community College is building a pool of applicants for adjunct faculty positions in Continuing Education in the areas ... see job
Central Michigan University seeks qualified part-time temporary instructors to teach the following courses: Courses: PHL 345 ... see job
Professor and Department Head of Curriculum, Instruction and Special Education. The Department of Curriculum, Instruction and ... see job
Requisition Number: 2962 Number of Positions: 1 Full or Part-Time: Full Time; 12 Month Professional; Grant Funded Wage: ... see job
Job Description: The School of Business is creating a pool of qualified part-time lecturers in a variety of ... see job
Kenyon College seeks an Assistant Professor of Mathematics specializing in Applied Mathematics. see job
College of Arts and Sciences Part –Time, Adjunct Faculty Kaplan University is a thriving division of Kaplan, Inc., a ... see job
The successful candidate will possess the knowledge and skills to teach Gerontology, Research, and Statistical courses at the ... see job
The King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) is being built in Saudi Arabia as an international, ... see job
Stem cell research
The Republican Party has become the “anti-science party.” Beginning with Ronald Reagan and his ban on the use of fetal tissue and the cancellation of the super collider by the Newt Gingrich gang combined with Bush’s ban on Federal funds for stem cell research, our two party system has become “pro-science” vs “anti-science” and the success of that latter does not speak well for our leadership in science and technology.
Robert F. Miller, 3M Cross Chair in Visual Neuroscience at University of Minnesota, at 9:21 am EDT on May 27, 2005