Search News


Browse Archives

News

Faculty Frets About Declining Student Quality

September 13, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Community college faculty members are far likelier than those at four-year institutions to believe that their students are underprepared for college work. But professors at two-year institutions are more satisfied with their jobs than are their peers at four-year colleges, according to a survey of faculty attitudes by a research center at the University of California at Los Angeles.

"The American College Teacher," a report on a survey conducted every three years by UCLA's Higher Education Research Institute, offers a portrait of the full-time professoriate (part-timers are not surveyed) on a range of workplace and personal issues, including their views of their jobs, their institutions and their students. The survey contains a wealth of data on professors' duties, job satisfaction and sources of stress, among many other factors. 

One of the most closely analyzed nuggets of data -- especially by commentators outside academe -- is on professors' political views. This year's report suggests that commentators who complain about the leftward lurch of the professoriate are not imagining it: 51.9 percent of the 40,670 professors surveyed described themselves as far left or liberal, while just 19.5 percent said they were conservative or far right. 

This continues a steady shift, with the biggest change over time coming not from a reduction in the number of conservative professors but (like the national political landscape generally) from a shrinkage of the political center: In 2004-5, only 29 percent of respondents described themselves as middle of the road, down from about 40 percent in 1989-90. (It's also clear, though, that overgeneralization can be dangerous. More than a quarter of professors at two-year colleges and non-Roman Catholic religious institutions defined themselves as conservative.)

Moving on to less sexy but perhaps more meaningful findings, the survey asked for the first time whether professors were satisfied with the quality of their students. Just under half of all instructors -- 49.6 percent -- said they were. In addition, only 35.5 percent of all professors said they believed that faculty members at their own institution felt that students were well-prepared academically, although that number has actually increased from 28 percent in 1998.

Fewer than two in five faculty members at two-year institutions said they were satisfied with the quality of their students, compared to 75.1 percent of professors at private universities, 51.7 percent at public universities, and 55.9 percent at private four-year colleges. And only 21.5 percent of community college professors said their students were well-prepared academically, compared to nearly 45 percent at four-year private colleges and 36.5 percent at public universities.

But two-year college instructors seemed, by and large, to like working at institutions that embraced the mission of serving underprepared students. More than four in five community college professors said they believed that their institutions take "responsibility for educating underprepared students" (compared to about three in five instructors at other colleges).

In addition, two-year-college instructors were more likely than those at four-year colleges to say that their "values are congruent with the dominant institutional values" where they worked, and 81.5 percent of them said they were either very satisfied or satisfied with their jobs, compared to 76.8 percent of four-year college professors. They were also more likely than four-year college professors (by a margin of 73 to 67 percent) to say they experienced joy in their work "to a great extent."

In another measure of professors' job satisfaction, the survey asked respondents: "If you were to begin your career again, would you still want to be a college professor?" Two-year and four-year professors answered that question similarly, as about 85 percent of each said definitely or probably yes -- but male instructors were more likely than their female counterparts to definitely want to do it all again, by a margin of 57 percent to 52 percent.

That may be because women were likelier than men to say that they felt stress in the last two years from a broad array of institutional and personal factors, as shown in the following table:

Proportion of Male and Female Professors Citing Stress From Various Factors

Factor % of Men Citing as Cause of Stress % of Women Citing as Cause of Stress
Managing household responsibilities 68.0% 81.8%
Child care 29.4 29.6
Review/promotion process 40.3 50.8
Subtle discrimination 17.9 34.2
Teaching load 61.6 70.8
Lack of personal time 68.5 81.9
Keeping up with technology 54.0 64.2
Being part of 2-career couple 31.0 41.6
Self-imposed expectations 75.0 84.4

Among other highlights of the UCLA survey:

  • Given a list of items and asked which were "high" or "highest" priorities at their institutions, professors' top answer was promoting the intellectual development of students, at 83 percent. But while such things as developing students' leadership and increasing the representation of women and minority group members lagged, next on the list were enhancing the institution's national image and increasing or sustaining its prestige.
  • Three in five faculty members said they believed strongly or somewhat that "tenure is essential to attract the best minds to academe. About a third said it was an "outmoded concept."
  • Nearly a quarter of instructors said college officials have the right to ban people with extreme views from speaking on the campus.
  • Thirty percent said colleges should be concerned with facilitating undergraduates' spiritual development.
  • Nine of 10 professors said they believed a racially and ethnically diverse student body enhances the educational experience of all students; about a quarter say that promoting diversity leads to the "admission of too many underprepared students."
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Faculty Frets About Declining Student Quality

  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on September 13, 2005 at 1:57pm EDT
  • That sounds about right. I am still waiting for someone to start asking us adjuncts what we think on such matters, but I have time.

    Now I shall sit back and wait for the flame bait to kick in about the liberal-conservative part of the survey.

  • I wonder what the ajuncts will say . . .
  • Posted by Phil Ray Jack , Faculty Union President at Green River Community College on September 13, 2005 at 2:41pm EDT
  • Mr. Lederman casual reference to the fact that part-time faculty were not included in the survey is a little disturbing. Unfortunately, it seems we are too often left out of the equation in spite of the fact that we teach half, if not more, of the students being studied and, on most two-year college campuses, outnumber the full-time faculty two-to-one.

    I wonder what kind of an impact we might have had on the findings.

    Maybe I'm too impatient (or naive), but I wonder what it would take to conduct a similar survey of adjuncts.

  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on September 13, 2005 at 9:52pm EDT
  • I want to return to Washington state at some point. Hire me, and I will make the project work. We adjuncts must look for all the work we can, too.

  • Posted by Ellen Rosewall at University of Wisconsin-Green Bay on September 14, 2005 at 1:37pm EDT
  • I too am worried about the backlash that will inevitably come over the statistics which "prove" that colleges are the province of left-leaning propogandists, as if we are deliberately taking over the colleges to indoctrinate the next generation with our lies. The truth is probably more insidious. Contrary to the belief that liberals are just born that way and flock to the colleges because there are others like us there, the fact is that liberalism is often the product of education. The more students learn about different viewpoints and ways of living, the more likely they are to be tolerant.

  • Posted by Kathy Mennen on September 14, 2005 at 8:45pm EDT
  • Since when are liberals tolerant? A recent story in the Ann Arbor (MI) News studied University of Michigan students with conservative personal and/or political views. Most shared experiences of being shouted down or threatened by students AND FACULTY when they expressed their conservative viewpoints in class. Many were afraid to tell other students they voted conservatively, or that they are members of the Republican Party.

    I lived for 16 years in Western Michigan, which is the cultural opposite--very conservative, dominated by Christian Reform church culture. While these conservatives are not the epitome of tolerance, they valued the importance of allowing all points of view to be aired and relied on reasoning (theological or otherwise) to analyze those views. It's ironic that a conservative culture is actually more tolerant than a college town full of liberals.

  • One Comm College Prof's response
  • Posted by JMG on September 15, 2005 at 9:04am EDT
  • A friend of mine who teaches at a two-year school sent me this reply when I sent him the survey article:
    ------------------------------------------

    Must say that I had a variety of reactions.

    1. On job satisfaction, the results are hugely skewed for C.C. instructors
    by omitting survey of part-timers - they typically get paid about half the
    pro-rata rates of full-timers, and even the full-timers' pay is about 2/3 that of comparably qualified instructors in 4-year schools. I found this out first-hand when I first started teaching again in [city] at CC and at U - I got 3 times as much money at U than at CC for the exact same course. Had I not gotten the full-time position at CC, I would have done far better teaching 1 course at U than 2 courses at CC on a part-time
    basis. There is enormous recognition of this disparity among all instructors, and much discontent among part-timers, who rarely take it for more than a few years.

    2. All things considered, I'd agree that I'd rather teach on a full-time basis (even with less pay) at CC than at U. Lots of factors play into this.

    3. Also agree that our students are grossly underprepared (which means, in my case, they should never have graduated from high school). On the U side, however, I also saw many underprepared students as well, perhaps a third or so, that I really wondered about, since they supposedly graduated from h.s. with 3.4 gpa or better. The difference between preparedness at C.C. and universities is hardly surprising, since you only have to be able to cloud a mirror near your mouth for admission.

    4. After watching Michael's curriculum in jr. hi and h.s. pretty closely, it occurred to me that (after 40 years) I got a better college preparation than he did. He graduated from dipshit logger hi, with about 100 graduates, comparable with my case (dipshit farmer/hispanic hi [S Texas]). Both schools herded the best students into certain college prep classes. Why the difference? Don't really know. I'da thunk that education would improve after 40 more
    years of learning how to do it. I think the local schools do a better job, but can't really be sure.

    tooj
    -----------------------------------------

  • Finding "joy" with two-year students
  • Posted by KR , Asst. Dept. Chair, English at Texas State Technical College on September 15, 2005 at 9:53am EDT
  • I teach writing to a mostly academically underprepared group of students at a technical college. These students were not the ones shepherded into college prep courses in high school; they were the ones left to sink or swim. I find that by the time they get to me at the technical college, they have experienced enough hard knocks working for minimum wages in spirit-oppressing jobs that they really want to learn and make a more substantial place for themselves in society.

  • Posted by Alan Devenish at Westchester Community College - SUNY on September 15, 2005 at 5:41pm EDT
  • On "preparedness." I'm sure I have whined my share about students who can't write a sentence--a paragraph--an essay--a novel--a sonnet--a villanelle. But not everyone can mispend their youth reading John Keats in the library as I did. On the other hand, among my recent students is a woman returning to school (and excelling) after raising her children and whose son has now matriculated here too; a musician, ex-marine and volunteer firefighter who is discovering a belated, half-grudging penchant for literature; and in the younger set, a 19-year-old in our poetry class who went the sestina one better and wrote a "septina" on geograpic and emotional vagaries.Maybe such students and their sometimes less traveled roads towards higher education are why community college teachers such as myself find satisfaction in our jobs, acknowledging that life prepares us and our students in ways we can't always foresee.

  • To Alan, et. al.
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on September 16, 2005 at 4:39am EDT
  • I, too, see similar cases in my writing courses, whether remedial or transfer. I like to push my students, both to prepare them better than the school requires and to prove to them that they can do things they hadn't previously imagined. One way I do this is by introducing them to descriptive techniques such as synecdoche and synaesthesia right from the outset. One success—often the kind not so fully appreciated at four-year institutions—can turn a student's persepctive about education on its ear, invigorating rather than enervating him or her.

    I won't pretend that I am the greatest instructor on the planet, but I am skilled in what I do. My students' success in later courses tells me that much. I suspect that I am, in the long run, much like many of my colleagues in this regard. We teach in community colleges, enduring years of trial by fire as freeway flyers as we await the tenure-track positions that will allow us to focus still more, but we do it because community colleges serve a population on the verge of loving learning. We have out hands on the light switch in ways that many university professors may not, simply because our students aren't (ostensibly) the cream of the high school crop.