Search News


Browse Archives

News

Expense Account Hall of Shame

October 12, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Students and faculty members (not to mention politicians and journalists) love to complain about the salaries of college presidents. At American University in recent weeks, the $633,000 salary of Benjamin Ladner -- who was ousted as president Monday night -- has been much discussed.

But Ladner's removal demonstrates that high salaries alone don't doom presidents. It's the expense accounts, and how (and on whom) they're spent, that end careers. Many of the presidents with the highest salaries stay in office year after year without any risk to their jobs. But those who spend a little too freely on themselves or their loved ones often end up out of the presidential suite -- even if those payments don't come close to the corporate-style salaries earned by some presidents these days.

"If you think about the president being the embodiment of the university, then any kind of abuse of university resources is considered a major offense," said Raymond D. Cotton, a Washington lawyer who specializes in presidential compensation in higher education.

As reports about Ladner's perquisites -- such as an engagement party for his son, and a personal chef, who sometimes needed training in Europe -- have been in the headlines, Cotton said that he's been fielding calls from board members and presidents asking about various contract provisions. Cotton said that there's another reason that perks -- not salaries -- do in presidents. "Boards approve salaries," he said, so even if some on campus think the pay is excessive, trustees have signed off on it. But while trustees may sign off on the size of an expense account, they don't pre-approve expenses, so a president who doesn't use good judgment may not find any support when the board gets together.

In losing his job Ladner joins a fraternity of ex-presidents whose tenures were marred by questions about expense accounts or presidential spending on family members or both. Inside Higher Ed introduces....

The Expense Account Hall of Shame

Institution and Ex-President Symbol of Excess What Happened
Adelphi U., Peter Diamandopoulos Million dollar Manhattan apartment New York State officials ousted the private university's board, saying it was too generous with Diamondopoulos while Adelphi's finances were shaky. The board paid for the apartment and offered Diamondopoulos the right to buy it at a huge discount. In 1997, a new board fired Diamandopoulos.
American U., Benjamin Ladner Personal chef Anonymous reports about Ladner's spending are sent to the university's board and The Washington Post in the summer of 2005. Ladner is first suspended and then fired.
Hillsdale College, George C. Roche III Alleged affair with daughter-in-law, who was on payroll Roche, who had made the college prominent in conservative circles, quit in 1999, following the suicide of his daughter-in-law, who (along with his son) was a college employee.
Stanford U., Donald Kennedy $7,000 sheets In the early 1990s, federal investigators looked at Stanford's overhead costs for U.S. research and found thousands spent on sheets, an Italian wooden commode, and an enlarged bed for the then-president. Kennedy announced his plans to resign shortly after a 1991 Congressional hearing where these expenses were mocked.
Towson U., Mark Perkins $860,000 house renovation Perkins quit as president in 2002, after less than a year on the job, amid criticism that renovations on his home cost more than the home itself. The renovations cost the university hundreds of thousands more than the budget plan.
U. of Central Florida, Steven Altman Massages while traveling on university business Altman quit as president of the University of Central Florida in 1991 amid a state investigation that he had used an escort service while traveling on university business. Altman said that he got massages to relieve stress, but had never to his knowledge used an escort service.
U. of Minnesota, Kenneth Keller $650,000 kitchen renovation Keller quit in 1988 amid an uproar over spending on his office and on Eastcliff, the president's home. The kitchen and dining room were a focal point of renovations that cost well over $1 million.
U. of Tennessee, John W. Shumaker Using university plane for personal visits. Shumaker had the university replace the presidential plane and used the new plane several times for visits with a woman who was the president of another university and with whom he had a personal relationship. While Shumaker reimbursed the university after the flights became public, he could not ride out the scandal and quit in 2003, a little more than a year after he arrived.

 

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Expense Account Hall of Shame

  • Posted by lovethisstuff on October 12, 2005 at 8:29am EDT
  • I love this stuff as it makes my life in the trenches [almost] bearable. Every time I chat with someone about how much smarter someone with a Ph.D. must be I remind them of another ex-AU president in the 1980's who was busted for making obscene phone calls to co-eds (or was it GWU?). Either way -- with power comes abuse.

  • The Sacrifice of Leading an Academic Institution
  • Posted by Donnell , Civil Engineering (Structures) Graduate at Georgia Instititute of Technology on October 12, 2005 at 8:59am EDT
  • University Presidents in general deserve some "kudos" for being brave enough to take on such responsibility.

    Some of these individuals would make millions if they choose to work as private consultants or take leadership roles at major corporations.

    However, for some reason, they thought it profitable to leave the rosy life behind and walk into the high pressure environment called tertiary education administration.

    I definitely don't condone their financial abuse but compared to what some of them would have been making had they gone into the industry I understand their plight.

    These are not average people, they are some of the highest qualified individuals in our society. In addition, they are kept to standards even higher than we keep for ourselves. It's tough to be at the top and I empathize with some of them.

    A couple hundred thousand is alot of money for the average person but compared to the salary for many top CEO's it's really not that much.

    Regards, Donnell Duncan, Founder and President, The Cracked Door, "If the Door is Cracked, the Door is Open"

  • The UCF example doesn't fit...
  • Posted by Rob Sheinkopf , Director of Enrollment Management at Illinois Math and Science Academy on October 12, 2005 at 10:04am EDT
  • Citing the Central Florida president as an example for the "Expense Account Hall of Shame" is unfortunate, showing you obviously haven't collected enough good examples to make for an interesting article. This one was a stretch. Additionally, conducting a little more research would have revealed there were far more political reasons than this flimsy accusation for Altman's departure. I was on staff at UCF back then and he was a president who accomplished a great deal in his unfortunate short tenure, but sensational stories such as this whether true or not, whether substantiated or exaggerated, make for good press. And, sadly, they are repeated and embellished over the years far more than his considered accomplishments.

  • Posted by Ann Duffield , Founding Partner on October 12, 2005 at 11:17am EDT
  • I don't condone the behavior of a few presidents in higher education, but based on our practice's experience with both new and experienced presidents of higher education, I do recommend that boards at all institutions carefully review their presidents' expense accounts in light of the roles and responsibilities they're currently expected to fulfil. With average presidential tenure standing at about 5 years and 10% of all presidents of colleges and universities in their first year, there is obviously trouble at the top. Presidents today have to satisfy so many constituencies (boards, faculty, students, donors, legislators, alumni, community leaders, etc. etc.) that it's a wonder that there are still people willing to step up to that challenge. I am certain that presidents' expense accounts pale in comparison to both the juggling acts these individuals perform during their tenures and also the cost of lost productivity, fundraising and search fees (to mention a few) that institutions pay during presidential transitions.

  • Posted by JT on October 12, 2005 at 12:02pm EDT
  • With apologies to Mr. Donnell, these are gross misappropriations of the powers of office. I don't feel that "making a sacrifice" by taking a position in tertiary academic administration absolves anyone of such fraud, even in the slightest. If they feel they are poorly compensated, perhaps choose another line of work instead of burn the institution's funds on extravagant creature comforts.

  • Posted by Alexande on October 12, 2005 at 12:46pm EDT
  • meanwhile at the University of California the staff employees have not recieved raises in 3 years no merit increases and make 20% less then clerical workers across the state. Administration salaries are up 25% in the same period. Crony politics has also invaded the University hierarchy

  • Posted by Eric Karas on October 12, 2005 at 12:47pm EDT
  • And we are the ones that are stuck with student loans for the rest of our lives? This kind of information should make schools thoroughly justify tuition rate increases...

  • Posted by john on October 12, 2005 at 1:28pm EDT
  • It would be interesting to see where these people are now. They've probably landed a similar position in an institution in a different part of the country.

  • Tuition vs, Compensation
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on October 12, 2005 at 1:29pm EDT
  • While I agree with the sentiment that schools have to defend tuition increases better, students need to understand just how quickly these numbers grow before they attribute those increases to compensation packages.

    As a member of student government at Bellevue Community College in the late 80s and early 90s, I was one voice in the student budget, which was based on Services and Activities Fees. We had an annual budget in excess of $650,000, which equated to just a little over $40 per matriculated student over the course of a year. Tuition increases far outstrip those figures, however, so we need to look elsewhere for he bulk of the expense.

    Faculty certainly weren't earning the extra (the State of Washington publishes all state salaries by employee name each year, and I checked people I knew). Costs were rising. The growth of technology was explosive. Building projects were perpetually in process somewhere, and though they come from a different source in the state's budget, the state's budget is fed by such things as tuition.

    Despite all of that, however, I sometimes wonder whether or not students understand a simple two-part truth: Do they know how lucky they are to pay so little for something that is not a right? In California, I have watched community college tuition rise from $11 to $28 per unit, bringing with it a fusillade of complaints from students. Yes, as a percentage increase it is terrible. However, compared to other community college tuition nationwide, it is still eminently affordable (my alma mater charges $78.80 per unit right now—$250.50 for non-residents).

  • Posted by krazus , $10K grad party for son at University of Georgia on October 12, 2005 at 1:59pm EDT
  • UGA's Michael Adams caught it from the press for throwing a $10K graduation party for his son and buddies from law school. All on the University tab.

  • whiney tangential asides
  • Posted by Smedley Bushmills on October 12, 2005 at 1:59pm EDT
  • Off topic? Yes. But I didn't start it...

    "[The anachronistic and sexist term, “Coed” has long outlived its usefulness ... It’s akin to referring to athletic teams as “Lady (nickname),” or referring to a “woman lawyer” or “female doctor.”

    Please. Enough with the politically correct pedantry.

    The telephne directory is virtually infested with adverts extolling "women owned and operated" businesses. This, it seems is viewed as a virtue in certain, sexist-sow circles.

    Furthermore, (en)Title(ment) IX is a veritable monument to a petulant distinction between and men on campus.

    Perhaps there is no reason to persist in this distinction on campuses like Mills College, for example, where women can (purportedly) benefit from the nurturing security of an all-female environment. Such an arrangement excluding women typically provokes lawsuits and raucous demonstrations.

    Indeed, the co-ed is, by law, the co-equal of the male on campus. That's the way the women want it, and so it is.

    It's a goose/gander thing.

  • Expense Account Hall of Shame
  • Posted by Paul Adams , Paul Adams at University of Richmond on October 12, 2005 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Part of the reason for generous benefits and expense accounts is the fact that they are tax-exempt. If presidents and chancellors had to receive all their goodies in forms of salary, they would invariably fall into higher tax brackets. This is a way, and I'm not saying its a good way, to attract and retain top administrators. Its also an example of how CEOs and other top executives really don't pay the taxes we think they do. If I was provided transportation, housing, meals, and the like, I'd be able to invest a big chunk of my salary in paying off student loans. The rish are different!

    ps -- coed still applies since there are still predominantly and exclusively male and female institutions.

  • Private sector?
  • Posted by D.C. resident on October 12, 2005 at 5:17pm EDT
  • Donnell wrote:

    "University Presidents in general deserve some 'kudos' for being brave enough to take on such responsibility. Some of these individuals would make millions if they choose to work as private consultants or take leadership roles at major corporations."

    Nonsense. Ben Ladner holds a PhD and taught philosophy and religion. Before becoming president of American U., his only previous major management experience appears to have been running a Phi Beta Kappa faculty organization. Exactly what sort of consulting or "leadership roles" is he qualified for in the private sector?

  • Posted by Enough already on October 12, 2005 at 11:29pm EDT
  • I recently left higher ed after over 20 years in the field and part of the reason was the egos of Presidents and those that surround them. Honestly, the position is really one of service to the young men and women who matriculate to the institutions. Instead, I have seen many who think that "Hail to the Chief" should be played when they enter a room. They surround themselves with like minded and soon lose touch with the vast majority of those in the trenches. These examples only varify that. Any reasonable person would realize these "perks" are not appropriate for higher education. For any who read this post, you are there to serve the institution - not to be served by it.

  • Pigs at the trough
  • Posted by Greg Wheeler, Ph.D. on October 13, 2005 at 8:47am EDT
  • This is about highly educated men (mostly), the supposed cream of Western civilization, revealing through their depraved greed and narcissism that their whole socialization process, education and ethical training, is a waste of time and a joke. While most of the behavior is not criminal, it is certainly immoral, because it reveals not the slightest concern for the calling but using their positions like a criminal. Arianna Huffington's book "Pigs at the Trough" is superb in documenting such behavior by CEOs etc. everywhere, and it is these craven unevolved alpha ape perversions that reveal our society as barely out of the jungle. Religion is not the answer, since many of these types are very sanctimonious while they molest their daughters, but its something deeper. I think we have to confront greed. Greed is NOT good. The selfish gene must be cut out of our DNA. And a good start would be to expropriate all the wealth of these beasts and put it back into the educational system they stole it from. I hope they suffer shame and degradation their whole lives, but of course, they don't even know they did anything wrong.

  • A Poster On My Wall
  • Posted by Tom McCool on October 13, 2005 at 9:02am EDT
  • Nearly all men can withstand failure...but if you really want to test a man's character, give him power.

  • American University & Expense Account Abuse
  • Posted by Mary Schaeffer , Publisher at Accounts Payable Now & Tomorrow on November 16, 2005 at 10:23am EST
  • As I got ready to write that ridiculously large check for my daughter's tuition at American University, the story of the expense account abuse was breaking. Since I regularly write about improper controls over payment issues, I found the issue especially infuriating - I know how important it is to have controls in place so this type of thing doesn't happen. I also know that it is not that difficult to implement those controls.

    I do have to give American some credit though. No attempt, at least to my knowledge, was made to hide the story. The University did carry the story on its homepage.

    Let's just hope that this doesn't happen again (HA!) and that the proper controls are put in place throughout the system to ensure that more of those ever-rising tuition dollars are not spent on frivolous items for well-paid (over paid?) educators.

    Mary Schaeffer
    ap-now.com

  • Education isn't what it used to be
  • Posted by Pat on April 10, 2006 at 11:00pm EDT
  • For all of the self promotion of alpha male gurus that abounds within educational settings as well as in business today, a short review of the "accomplishements" of generations of college educated males reveal that not only are salaries and expenses too high, but the respect for the education acquired is but a speck compared to those prior cohorts.

    Previous executives were known for giving a full measure of respect and benefit to their organizations while containing costs. The reverse is true today where most bank on using their positions to extract whatever the market will bear with respect to pay, perks, pensions (often as options) and rely upon professionals close to them for performance.

    In the 18th 19th Century, education meant scholarship and dedication, and those who graduated from top schools had lifelong doors open to them, comfortable lives, but with modest rewards. Integrity was valued, and considered the reason for such public esteem and confidence. Many today are one-shot big wheels who use the position for piracy and to catapult themselves into positions for which they are undeserving but care little about the highjacking of human resources or tangible assets they are able to command for that purpose. Ingtegrity is nearly a four letter word in such pursuits, and the best is likely to be rewarded for being the slickest.

    These self promotional narcissists have nearly ruined both education and business to the point where few are inspired by their education or their accomplishments. There money talks personality has infected the world, and the world is generally the worst for it, not the better.