Search News


Browse Archives

News

New Dawn or the Perfect Storm?

October 25, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Those stumbling out of James Hilton's rapid-fire speech at last week's Educause meeting might have been forgiven if they weren't sure whether to return to their campuses absolutely terrified or terrifically excited about the explosion of technological innovation in higher education.

Hilton, associate provost for academic, information and instructional technology affairs at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, described a landscape in which "disruptive forces" are radically altering the state of publishing, threatening to diminish the role of libraries, and rendering obsolete traditional methods of delivering information. Those forces threaten to relegate colleges to the periphery of society, he suggested.

But the technological advances are also creating enormous opportunities for colleges and universities to become key players in democratizing the collection and sharing of knowledge, Lipton said, offering "hope amid the disruption.”

“We are seeing a redefinition on the scale of the rise of research universities after World War II,” he said. “I’m not talking tweaked, not tuned -- fundamentally redefined.”

Hilton, who warned the audience that his favorite student evaluation had suggested that he could improve his teaching if he would only “breathe occasionally,” framed his torrent of a talk with two images: one of a rising sun, and the other of the bestseller “The Perfect Storm.” “It’s difficult to predict which of these” better describe the situation facing higher education, he said.

The “pain side, the depressing, challenging side” of his speech focused on the changes being wrought to the knowledge economy by digitization, and the challenges they present to scholars and administrators:

  • The iPod-led revolution in the distribution – and, not unimportantly, in the pricing – of music (and now video) through “unbundling.”
  • Intensification of the legal wrangling over copyright issues, in which, Hilton asserted, the Jeffersonian ideal of copyright as a way to promote learning has been replaced by a world in which “you’ve now got students asking professors to sign NDA’s so they don’t steal their ideas.”
  • The shift from producers of content “pushing” their material out to consumers wanting to “pull” the information they desire.
  • The “ubiquitous access” of content of all kinds thanks in large part to Google (yes, thanks, Hilton insists to those Google foes out there), whose goal is to “organize and make searchable all the information in the world.”

The great risk to colleges and universities, Hilton warned, is that they view themselves as providers of information rather than knowledge. While higher education has “profited from the fact that we’re seen as gateways to information,” the ease with which people are now and will increasingly be able to get information from other sources makes that an insufficient role for colleges to play, he said. “To the extent higher education is seen as being about access to information,” as opposed to imparting knowledge and teaching people how to think, “we’re doing something wrong.”
In a climate that could give keep higher education officials up at night, though, Hilton, an unabashed fan of technology, finds promise amid the problems, that “hope amid the disruption.”

He heralds the creation, for instance, of digital repositories of data and images have transformed research and resulted in large scale experimentation in which innovators are “aggressively pursuing ways of archiving and publishing information.”

Hilton applauds the “mass digitization” of information, which has a “broad and democratizing impact” on the sharing of knowledge. And he welcomes the growth of open source technologies like Sakai, the course management system that Michigan and other universities have developed.

These technologies have the potential to transform higher education positively rather than negatively, Hilton suggested, positioning higher education for an era of intense collaboration among researchers, improved learning, and full engagement with society.

In case anyone at this meeting of technology fans had any doubts about how Hilton ultimately views the intersection of technology and higher education, he closed his talk with the sunrise image, which was popular with his audience.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on New Dawn or the Perfect Storm?

  • The Power has shifted...
  • Posted by Bill , Asst. Professor ("retired") on October 25, 2005 at 9:29am EDT
  • A couple of comments and a suggestion from a silent generation observer:
    1. The Power of the 'all-knowing' professor is gone and belongs to the learner;
    2. The six-sided box called a classroom in which we used to capture "students" and hold them until we wanted to release them is gone;

    The "tipping point" for access to universal knowledge has been breached. A final suggestion:
    What if we can our language and substitute:
    1. Learning for "Education"
    2. Learner for "Student"
    3. Learning Facilitator for "Teacher"
    4. Learning Process for so-called "Higher Education".

    Can we then re-focus our role in the development of the future?

    One final note: Tenure is now irrelevant.

  • New Dawn
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on October 25, 2005 at 9:46am EDT
  • I certainly hope we enter the New Dawn of advanced electronic technology as a society and not dragging universities kicking and screaming. More than that, I hope campus software becomes sufficiently reliable that people can actually use it. Best of luck.

  • Posted by DaveH , Owner at SweetHaven Publishing Services on October 25, 2005 at 10:17am EDT
  • The institutions of education and textbook publishing are being transformed much faster than the pundits can interpret it. New forms of learning, including something we might venture to call "popular education," are already taking shape. Enormous numbers of individuals from all conceivable cultural backgrounds are venturing into low-cost or free learning opportunities on the Web ... and commercial advertisers are beginning to find the large numbers and their demographics very, very interesting.

    But for the time being, traditional educators and publishers will continue their frantic efforts to fine-tune a system that is already largely illusionary. I believe history bears out the notion that large institutions very rarely adapt themselves to radical cultural change. Rather, they are simply replaced by something more vital, more relevant, more functional, more practical, and more exciting.

    I only hope the traditional institutions will find a way to mellow gracefully and continue to play a significant role in the learning processes of the future.

  • Absolutely a New Dawn
  • Posted by A Lott , assistant Professor on October 25, 2005 at 11:24am EDT
  • Why is everyone in a panic over readily accessible information? I know this will shock many but, information is not knowledge, delivering information is not teaching, and having a large collection of information in one’s head is not an education. Yes, I know, there are those of you out there who feel every college student has a right to sit in a giant lecture hall and listen to their professor read today’s “lecture” straight out of the textbook. Although this “straight from the book” scenario is common, it is tragic that education has, in many cases, digressed to this level and the “educational product” has become little more than rote information delivery. Education, however, is not about information; it is about knowledge (the dynamic interconnection of ideas), critical thinking, and an understanding of how to learn independently. The wholesale availability of information from another source is a good thing and is perhaps the very thing that will save education from itself. With “information delivery” outsourced, maybe now we can all get back to the business of providing students with the quality educational experience that they deserve.

  • A(nother) New Dawn
  • Posted by Mark L on October 25, 2005 at 5:01pm EDT
  • Will universities survive the transition to the digital age? Only time will tell.

    However, the track record is pretty good. How many corporations are as old/have survived as many environmental changes as the Universities of Paris or Oxford? Are there any US corporations that approach the age of Harvard or even the University of Michigan for that matter?

    They survived the last new dawn (ca. 1450), the American Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, and globalization up to now.

    If I were a betting person, I'd go with the universities.

  • More of the Same
  • Posted by Peter C. Herman , Prof. at SDSU on October 26, 2005 at 4:37am EDT
  • While I usually really like Insider Higher Education, there are times when I wish that at times, the reporters would be a bit more critical in their stories. For example, Educause is not exactly an unbiased source. They are a non-profit organization, to be sure, but as their website indicates, they are well-funded by companies with a deep financial stake in the future of high technology, such as Microsoft and Blackboard (both of whom are "Platinum Partners," which I presume means they have contributed a lot of money). So, of course Educause will say that the future is all computers all the time; they have a vested interest in doing so. Indeed, they are probably more accurately called a lobbying group, paid for by corporate interests, than an non-profit concerned with educational issues.

    Next, we have been hearing announcements of the demise of the "brick and mortar" university since the dot com nineties. Many said that the traditional classroom was dead, and that the Internet would eradicate, not revolutionize, but eradicate, traditional modes of teaching. However, virtually all of the online universities (remember Western Governors University?) created at this time have disappeared, and as everyone reading this column knows very well, the competition to get into traditional universities is beyond fierce.

    Finally, when James Hilton states, “To the extent higher education is seen as being about access to information,” as opposed to imparting knowledge and teaching people how to think," I don't know what in the world he is talking about. Universities have always been about teaching people how to think. At no time in the past did the university every present itself as the "gateway to information" alone. To be sure, there is a great deal of stuff out there on the Web, but the best information, the best databases, such as Lexis Nexis or, for my purposes, Early English Books Online, are very, very expensive, and available only through an institution.

    In sum, many, if not most, of the claims made by Hilton either do not stand up to scrutiny, or are clearly self-interested.