Search News


Browse Archives

News

Breakthrough for Part-Timers

November 1, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In the wee hours of Monday morning, a part-time faculty strike at the New School was averted when the university reached an agreement with negotiators for Academics Come Together, a United Auto Workers local representing nearly 2,000 part-timers. Both university officials and union members are hailing the pact as significant because it will provide benefits and job security of the sort that adjuncts nationally have not been able to achieve to date.

Gregory Tewksbury, a union negotiator, said that the agreement provides job security for part-time employees who have been with the university for 10 semesters or more. “This is a sizable improvement,” he said. “Given that this is our first contract, I feel like we did the best we could without a strike.”

The deal followed three years of often tense negotiations between the union and the university. The UAW appealed to academics and politicians throughout the process to put pressure on the New School, which has strong progressive roots, but lacks the deep pockets to match its historic idealism.

“What’s most unique about this contract is that it offers faculty continued employment not just on a course by course basis," said Julie Kushner, a UAW negotiator who has been working with faculty members since they started organizing in 2002. “If a course doesn’t run because of a curriculum change or insufficient enrollment, the university must look to replace that course for a faculty member. They have an obligation to do that under this agreement.”

Calling the agreement “a tremendous boost for part-time faculty nationally,” Kushner added that the agreement also requires the university to begin to pay some of the costs of family coverage for health care and to offer paid academic leave for adjunct faculty members who have been with the institution for specified periods of time.

“We’ve looked at a lot of part-time contracts across the nation in recent weeks and months,” said Joel Schlemowitz, president of the local chapter and an adjunct film instructor at the university. “And we believe that adjunct unions will be looking at this agreement for years to come as a milestone in the part-time labor equity movement.”

New School’s lawyer, Ned Bassen, concurred with that assessment, indicating that administrators were “delighted and proud” to have come to an agreement. “This is the first time that a private university has agreed to give job security to part-time faculty,” he said Monday evening. “It took a great deal of work and creativity.”

As of Monday evening, the official agreement had not yet been released by either the union or the university, although officials did agree to discuss the pact.

In terms of wages, the agreement calls for an across the board retroactive increase of $10 per hour for each part-timer as of September 1, according to Tewksbury. He said that there’s a large variation in the hourly pay of different part-time faculty at New School. On the low end, instructors currently receive about $25 per hour. Schlemowitz, who has taught at the New School for nine years, said that he makes about $2,400 in total pay per three-credit class he teaches each semester.

“Folks on the lowest end of pay will also automatically get [a new] minimum base salary, which is about $35 plus the $10 raise,” said Tewksbury.

Additional wage increases -- up to a maximum of $15 per hour -- would be offered based on semesters of service to the university.        

Schlemowitz noted that by the end of the contract -- which would last four years if it is ultimately agreed to by a majority of the union, as expected -- part-time faculty would receive the same percentage of contributions toward retirement as full-time faculty.   

“We are confident that we’re going to be able to demonstrate that these kinds of agreements are beneficial to both the institution and individual faculty members,” said Kushner.  “I think this is really something to build on.... I hope that we are setting standards for other institutions.”

Experts not connected to the New School or UAW agreed. "This is an amazing contract," Richard Boris, director of the National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, at the City University of New York's Hunter College, said upon reviewing highlights of the accord. "This agreement might well serve as a template for contingent faculty throughout the country."

"At the end of this day," Boris said, referring to the controversies that preceded the agreement, "this case shows that if the parties at the table have the resolve to really work together to solve an issue, it can be done."

The New School has investigated the added costs of the agreement, according to Bassen, but officials said they preferred to hold off on providing details until union members vote on whether to accept the terms of the deal.  
 
Schlemowitz said he expects that union members will vote on the agreement before Thanksgiving.  Union organizers are recommending that members ratify the proposal.

After the long night of negotiations, Tewksbury, for one, was happy not to have to be outside with a picket sign in hand. Instead, he could revel in multiple congratulations from faculty members and students. “It was a Halloween gift to get this agreement hammered out,” he said. “And by the time we’re eating turkey, I’m confident that the contract will be a reality.” 

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Breakthrough for Part-Timers

  • Posted by Debra Nails , Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University on November 1, 2005 at 7:40am EST
  • This is a promising development with much to celebrate. A significant part of ensuring continued employment, however, is due-process protection against arbitrary dismissal. Let us hope that protection is a part of the contract before promoting it as a model.

  • Posted by Jane Buck on November 1, 2005 at 7:53am EST
  • I concur with Dabra Nails' comment regarding due process and the protection it provides for academic freedom.

    And congratulations to all who hammered out this agreement.

  • Posted by Andrew on November 1, 2005 at 8:41am EST
  • "Gregory Tewksbury, a union negotiator, said that the agreement provides job security for part-time employees who have been with the university for 10 semesters or more."

    Am I being too cynical or would that simply mean that most institutions would simply let adjuncts go after nine semesters? I could see the stated rationale being that “We need faculty who are staying ‘current’ in their respective academic disciplines. Our tenure-track faculty are conducting research, going to conferences, etc… so they aren’t a problem. However adjuncts teaching here a number of years have been out of graduate school for a bit and aren’t participating in those activities. Ergo we need to insure a fresh flow of personnel into these positions. Of course, we can make exceptions under ‘extraordinary circumstances’ (e.g., the specialization is scarce, it is someone’s spouse or some arbitrary reason).” Or is my soul just so dark that I ought to go straight into administration?

  • Posted by Cary Nelson , Professor at University of Illinois on November 1, 2005 at 9:34am EST
  • Until the contract is released we cannot know its details, but it is clearly a major victory, especially in New York, where a large labor pool has made it easy for many institutions to exploit contingent faculty. There is, for example, a tremendous difference--especially for part-timers, who are often isolated and unappreciated--between having a contract and not having one. It adds dignity and solidarity to the job experience. And subsequent contract negotiations can build on previous ones. After interviewing part-timers across the country, I found tremendous difference in job satisfaction and general well being between those who did and did not have a union contract. No surprise there, of course, with contracts providing guaranteed raises, health care, and retirement contributions. But what struck me most was the psychological benefit of collective bargaining.

    Cary Nelson

  • Sadly, John K. Wilson, the figures are real
  • Posted by nonplussed at big city U on November 1, 2005 at 10:54am EST
  • Sad, but true. Adjuncts at all the universities I am familiar with (and I have had the joy of adjuncting at 3, familiar with many more) are paid only for classroom hours taught (and only in some extremely progressive places, for one office hour). So a course that meets for 15 weeks and 3 hours a week will mean the adjunct gets 45 hours of pay. Typically, people are amazed to hear I get $50 an hour to teach, but they are the same people that think full-time professors only "work" 9 hours a week (ie the 9 hours they're in front of a classroom). In reality, of course, adjuncts have to do all the prep, grading, planning, and meeting with students outside of class time that full-timers do. But we do it without pay. After you factor in the 10 _other_ hours I am really doing for that course, $150 doesn't look quite as great. (And it looks worse after I pay for my out-of-pocket health insurance!)

  • Posted by Mike at Somewhere in the South on November 1, 2005 at 11:33am EST
  • "Until the contract is released we cannot know its details, but it is clearly a major victory, especially in New York, where a large labor pool has made it easy for many institutions to exploit contingent faculty. There is, for example, a tremendous difference—especially for part-timers, who are often isolated and unappreciated—between having a contract and not having one. It adds dignity and solidarity to the job experience. And subsequent contract negotiations can build on previous ones."

    How is it that contingent faculty are exploited? Does anyone MAKE them teach? Are they truly as productive as full time faculty?

    Further, perhaps we should reevaluate the value of lifetime employment contracts in higher education - their high cost may explain why part-timers and adjuncts are so attractive to schools. Further, a little healthy competition for jobs could do the professoriate some good.

  • Posted by thane doss on November 1, 2005 at 2:29pm EST
  • "How is it that contingent faculty are exploited? ... Are they truly as productive as full time faculty?"

    They teach the same classes, but get paid less. As far as producing person-hours of "certified-taught student-product" goes, one gets a helluva lot more bang for the buck from contingents than from full-timers.

    But I don't think making the full-timers work for starvation wages, too, is the answer. The answer has to be that people who enhance the skills of others, making them more job-ready and job-flexible, have to be considered at least as valuable as people who create "profit" by slashing jobs and wages, and then reward themselves for it. (Is a massive layoff in industry _ever_ accompanied by an announcement that the top administrators are cutting their own salaries, too?)

    Value-adding must be considered as rewardable as value-cutting.

    Thane Doss, Tokyo

  • Thane
  • Posted by JB on November 4, 2005 at 11:23am EST
  • Thane, you've got some basic misconceptions going on here. No full time faculty teach my class. I'm teaching 2-3 classes, three semesters a year. Furthermore, there are plenty of full time faculty out there, who have job security, who are virtual non-entities in their field. In my division--all part time--there are very few faculty members who are not established in their field. Often, the lesson to be learned from full time faculty is academic isolation and misinformed thinking.

  • Posted by Jenny Lee on November 11, 2005 at 4:35am EST
  • NSU's Memorandum of Understanding may be accessed here: http://www.newschooluaw.org/memorandum-of-agreement.html

    The Agreement seems very thorough and favorable to faculty. I am impressed that it addresses non-economic issues, including present day realities such as email, copyrights (FACULTY RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES) and web postings (BULLETIN BOARDS AND POSTING).

    Also impressive are the health and compensation packages, which provide compensation for extra-curricular work.

    All in all, congatulations to the Administration and PT Faculty Union at NSU for an Agreement that could constitute a gold standard for collective-bargaining agreements between universities and their adjuncts.

    Jenny

  • contracts
  • Posted by Robert Gaudino , VP Adjunct Faculty Assn at Nassau Community College on November 13, 2005 at 11:38am EST
  • I recommend to all that you secure a copy of the contract between the Adjunct Faculty Association at Nassau Community College and Nassau Community College. This CBA has been in force since 1974. It provides seniority protection as well as jurisdiction over a large part of the academic offerings at the institution.It also provides a grievance procedure. The agreement covers teaching and non-teaching faculty. Contact me at ragguy9006@aol.com to get a copy.

  • It's About Time
  • Posted by Leslie , Adjunct at New School, et al on November 16, 2005 at 12:53pm EST
  • Finding at the last minute that your class does not have enough students, boom! there goes your income that semester. OR sorry, we've decided not to offer this course again next semester with no time to offer something else. This has happened on many occasions. I have worked as an adjunct at CUNY, a large university, a small college, you name it, it's always the same. Even at CUNY's union the PSC, which hasn't had a contract for more than two years now, adjuncts are exploited to the nth degree. Therefore, this contract for New School faculty is VERY IMPORTANT, ALBEIT SO LONG OVERDUE.

    Let me also say that those who teach at the New School do not have the same workload. For example, there are courses which attract mostly non-credit students; therefore the workload is minimal in comparison to those who teach and have 15 and more for credit students. Yet they get the same rate of pay. Unfortunately, I don't believe this has been addressed.

  • Adjuncts do less work?
  • Posted by Esther on August 9, 2006 at 4:45am EDT
  • We still prep for classes, create syllabi, write lesson plans, design assessment tools, read, teach, grade tests and written assignments, counsel students, tutor on our own time and get paid a tiny fraction of what full time faculty are paid.

    Six years ago my average class size was 15. Now it is 35. With three classes, I am grading tests, written assignments, and other assignments for over 100 students compared to 45 students in years gone by.

    Adjuncts are exploited and bear the brunt of this exploitation for the sheer love of teaching.