Search News


Browse Archives

News

High Schools and High College Costs

November 3, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Where and how to reduce costs in higher education? A smattering of ideas -- some more complicated than others -- were offered up by several educators and policy makers at Wednesday's "National Summit to Develop Solutions to Rising College Costs," hosted by the Lumina Foundation. The high cost involved offering college remedial courses is one area that many officials said could be alleviated with better high school education and increased partnerships among postsecondary and secondary educators.

While Lumina's president and CEO, Martha Lamkin, noted that no "silver bullet" exists in reducing the prices that colleges charge to students, improving the academic outcomes of secondary education plays a key role in the foundation's efforts to lower college expenses for institutions and individuals alike.

According to several speakers at the event, more than one-third of college students need remediation -- especially in math -- when they enter college."Deficits in basic skills cost businesses, colleges and underprepared high school graduates up to $16 billion annually in lost productivity and remedial costs," Kristin D. Conklin, a program director in the Educational Division of the National Governors Association's Center for Best Practices, wrote in the "Course Corrections" essay book Lumina prepared for the event. "Redesigning American high schools can improve students' readiness for college and thus reduce remediation costs and the per-student cost of providing a college credential or degree."

Additionally, the fact that half of all students fail to graduate within six years means that they're taking out more loans to pay for their increased time attending institutions of higher education, according to several summit participants.

Tom Luce, an assistant secretary for planning, evaluation and policy development at the U.S. Department of Education, reminded the audience that the federal government is looking for ways to expand the No Child Left Behind Act to include accountability for high schools. He predicted that in coming years, "accountability is going to increase" for both secondary and postsecondary institutions.

In an afternoon panel discussion focused on college costs associated with poor secondary education, Michael Cohen, president of Achieve, Inc., a nonprofit focused on helping states raise academic standards, said that college instructors are the harshest critics of public high schools. Based on recent Achieve studies, he noted that only 18 percent of college professors believe that most of their students come to college extremely or very well prepared, with just 3 percent saying "extremely well."

To improve on this situation, Cohen said that college officials need to be much more "transparent" and tell high school teachers and principals what is expected of their students. "The high school system will have a hard time improving standards unless this happens," he said.

Robert C. Dickeson, Lumina's senior vice president for policy and organizational learning, who moderated the event, said that he didn't want an overall impression of the summit to be that high school educators were being "picked on," saying that those in higher education need to work hard to understand the challenges that elementary and secondary teachers face.

"I think secondary teachers already feel like they have a lot of pressure on them," Cohen said in an interview after his discussion. "I'm not sure that they need any more. But there are ways to lay the case out that have a tone of understanding, rather than finger pointing."

Several more college cost issues were highlighted during the summit:

  • William E. (Brit) Kirwan, chancellor of the University System of Maryland, spoke at length about his institution's "Effectiveness and Efficiency Effort." Last year, the university produced $65 million, he said, by avoiding and cutting costs, generating non-tuition revenue, and reallocating resources strategically. The system increased faculty teaching requirements by 10 percent over all, formed systemwide technology partnerships, and consolidated financial aid and admissions divisions within the system.
  • Madeleine F. Green, director of the Center for Institutional and International Initiatives at the American Council on Education, provided an overview of the global college cost-saving picture. She noted that several foreign universities have diversified their sources of revenue, and that other countries have been more deliberate about setting cost saving policies.
  • David Longanecker, director of the Western Interstate Commission on Higher Education, said that institutions of higher education should be in a competition not to reduce costs, but to increase benefits to the individual student.
  • The keynote speaker, Thomas Friedman, author of The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century, indicated that Asian universities are trying to figure out how to capture the independent and creative spirit of many American universities.  "We're focusing too much on the route," he said. "Our task will be to invent the future."

The Lumina policy brief, "Collision Course: Rising College Costs Threaten America's Future and Require Shared Solutions," is available on the foundation's Web site.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on High Schools and High College Costs

  • Posted by Sandra Dove Lowther on November 3, 2005 at 1:03pm EST
  • My opinion on the lack of prepared is based on how we teach at the high school level. Not enough time is spent in covering the fundamentals of the subject, for example, the basic principles of a math concept. Students are introduced to calculators to early in their studies, thus there is a heavy reliance on these instruments. Do not get me wrong, calculators should be used, but its introduction should come after the students understand the rudiments of concept or theory. Fractions, many college level students are clueless. This is just one reason for Math remediation.

    Secondly, not enough time is spent on the categories of the social science curriculum. Case in point, ask a high school student to tell you what countries the River Nile crosses, I would be very surprise if more than 40 % of today’s high school students can answer this question. Many of today’s student are not aware of political issues that happening around them on a daily basis. What they are aware of is the latest MTV crazy or flick.

    Changing the education system in this country requires a solid partnership between parents, educators, business, and their elected officials. Unless there is a consensus on what the goals and outcome of our education system should be, there will be no change; just more posturing on a problem those we already know what is wrong.

    Re the “No Child Left Behind” children need role models, parents are role models, thus, we also need to focus on the children that the system already left behind (the parents.) If parents cannot help their children outside the classroom instruction, efforts in the classroom are for naught. We should look at the structure of the curriculum in other developed country, how could we refine what they do and blend it with the wide array of resources that we have available to us.

  • High Schools & College Costs
  • Posted by Colby Sellers on November 3, 2005 at 3:12pm EST
  • We are only kidding ourselves if we think major improvements in college preparedness can be made without changing the way high schools are funded. In Illinois high schools are funded based primarily on local assessed property value. Thus, the Chicago collar communities and certain select other disticts do very well indeed. Most of the rest-not so much. Unfunded or underfunded mandates, such as No Child Left Behind, only serve to obscure the basic inequality of the American educational system.

    Colby C. Sellers, Sr.

  • Parents Left Behind
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on November 3, 2005 at 4:42pm EST
  • Of all the variables that significantly affect education outcomes, why do politicians and media pugs (er, pundits?) relentlessly AVOID discussing parental influence?

    Possibly there is little chance of squeezing more taxpayer dollars from the government orifice, few political points to be made, and it is not politically correct for the media to mention the dominant influence of positive parental influence?

    Paying teachers $1 million plus, giving all students a computer, building a library for every three families in town, etc. will have absolutely NO effect. Not if parents continue to bad mouth education, pressure school administrators for social promotions, and support athletics over academics.

    BTW - I think most business people also have a bias AGAINST teaching our citizens to think critically. They prefer zombie- drone workers in other countries, even if those foreign workers don't spend their pitiful wages on U.S. products.

    Does anyone else here see a strong negative correlation between U.S. Business and improved education?

  • One of the most ridiculous postings ever
  • Posted by Bart J. , Smart-aleck at Principal Skinner's office on November 3, 2005 at 5:50pm EST
  • "BTW — I think most business people also have a bias AGAINST teaching our citizens to think critically."

    If that is the case, why did the former CEO of IBM produce this --

    http://www.theteachingcommission.org/index.html

    The socialists and communists in academia think students and the public need them to think "critically."

    What a laugh! If they tried listening, instead of pontificating and bloviating, they'd find the public is just as critical and cynical as them. The public just works for a living, instead of constantly whining about working at Starbucks.

    Those whiners haven't figured out how to shuck-and-jive like would-be "corporate critics" Michael Moore (estimated net worth: $20 million), Noam Chomsky (estimated net worth: up to $7 million), or Howard Zinn (estimated net worth: up to $4 million).

  • High school preparation and business
  • Posted by Mike on November 4, 2005 at 7:26pm EST
  • While the CEO of IBM, a high tech company, probably has a good grasp of this issue, they are probably not representative of the US business community. When our city asked local business owners for advice on standards for high school graduation, the results were pitiful. In science, enough physics to avoid injuring yourself (levers, electrical shocks). Math skills were mostly those needed to make change.

  • business and technology
  • Posted by Mrs. V. , teacher at public high school on October 17, 2006 at 2:15pm EDT
  • I agree with a previous reader's comments about teaching the basics in high school. Most schools require students to take algebra, for instance, and have done away with practical subjects like business math, keyboarding, financial literacy. In a business math class students still learn algebra, but they can relate it to real life situations and learn useful skills that they won't forget in a day or two. A lot of school require two or three years of a foreign language, but if a student is not interested why force them to. I have seen more than a few Spanish classes turned into torture chambers for both the students and the teachers. Why?