News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Nov. 11, 2005
Republican leaders in the House of Representatives on Thursday abandoned a planned vote on a budget measure that would cut $14.3 billion from the federal student loan programs, after acknowledging that they lacked the votes to pass it.
College and student groups, which oppose the plan because it would add to students’ college costs and use savings from the loan programs for purposes other than higher education, had ratcheted up their lobbying efforts and their rhetoric in recent days and, with many other interest groups that would be affected by the cuts, seem to have had some impact in dissuading moderate Republicans from supporting the plan.
House leaders, though, said they planned to bring the budget package back to the chamber floor next week. “I think we’ll have the votes next week,” the House Majority Leader, Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), told reporters after five hours of lobbying apparently failed to turn up the necessary votes, even after they made several major concessions (on things such as drilling for oil in Alaska).
The House bill is part of Congress’s “budget reconciliation” process, in which it seeks to cut spending on mandatory federal programs to produce savings to cut the deficit and, this year, cut taxes, too. The House measure would slash about $51 billion over all, cutting from food stamps, Medicaid and other programs in addition to the loan cuts.
While the “savings” derived from the student loan programs would come largely, student groups have charged Congress with trying to balance the federal budget on the backs of students at a time of rising tuition prices and loan debt, and several lawmakers noted that they’d heard from students or college officials concerned about the cuts.
Student groups like the United States Student Association and the State PIRGs’ Higher Education Project, and the Student Aid Alliance, which is made up of college associations, have hit home with their campaign to “Stop the Raid on Student Aid,” although Republican leaders have accused them of exaggerating the impact on students.
On Thursday, the groups expressed relief, for now. “Members of Congress today deserve credit for turning their backs — albeit temporarily — on one of the most misguided and misplaced budgets ever brought before the Congress,” said Luke Swarthout, of the State PIRG’s Higher Education Project. “Congress now has an opportunity to help students out of this deep financial hole by reinvesting the excess subsidies in the student loan programs into aid for students. However, to help students and families out of the hole, Congress must permanently bury this reconciliation bill.”
The legislative picture is very complicated, in part because legislation to extend the Higher Education Act, the law that governs most federal college programs, has been bound up in the budget reconciliation process (as, for that matter, has the annual appropriations process through which Congress allocates funds for student aid, biomedical and other research, and other programs important to colleges). The Senate has gone so far as to incorporate its version of the Higher Ed Act legislation into its budget reconciliation bill, but the House has not.
The Senate is intent on concluding its formal work for the year at the end of next week, which means that if budget reconciliation remains stalled in the House, and probably even if the budget measure passes next week, the chances of Congress’s passing the Higher Education Act reauthorization this year have been reduced to just about nil.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
How does this legislation take money away from our students? The $14+ billion in savings comes in the form of reduced fees and interest that is paid to the lenders in the program. Thinking on another level, if a loan origination fee is reduced (by as much as 1%) our students will get to keep more of their loan money to pay for the cost of attending the college or university of their choice. Although many will correctly argue that the savings should be reinvested into other forms of federal student aid, the arguments against this legislation are misleading us by claiming our students are having money taken away from them. In actuality, they will receive more money. This is a good piece of legislation for our students, and it helps reduce the government deficit.
Randy Freebourn, VP, Business Affairs at Saint Joseph’s College, at 2:30 pm EST on November 11, 2005
You should know that they are also raising the interest rate on student loans to 6.8% and the parent loan rate to 7.9%. That will impact currently enrolled students as well as those who are repaying loans. That is clearly not a savings. Most Financial Aid officials I have heard speak on this are of the opinion that the effort to reduce subsidies to loan companies will eventually be passed on to the students...
Matt Moreau, at 11:38 am EST on November 13, 2005
This bill also changes the ability to obtain fixed interest rate federal consolidation loans. For those of us with large loan burdens who can benefit from locking in a lower interest rate for the 20+ years we might spend paying back our loans,a change to a variable interest rate could increase our payback amounts by thousands of dollars. It’s corrupt to imagine that the government will be using this money to pay for other programs....the cost of education is already approaching disgusting levels and the legislators are compounding the problem by profiting from poor students who need loans. Why is it that they need to fund other programs with money paid by some of the poorest Americans?
Stefan Gaston, at 2:23 pm EST on November 13, 2005
Why is it that when the Government wants to cut the deficit the most poor people are the ones getting affected? Probably will be more logical to cut back their salaries and I bet that will help out somewhat lowering the deficit of this country! Better use of the resources in this country and prevention of waste, fraud, and abuse will considerably lower the deficit!!!
Alicia T. Ferrer, Program Specialist at NDU, at 1:19 pm EST on November 15, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Job Summary The individual will assist in the successful implementation of the programmatic activities and ... see job
Appalachian College Association Berea, Kentucky Vice President for Academic Programs The Appalachian College Association, one ... see job
Columbus State Community College invests in employee development by providing numerous resources, partnerships, training and ... see job
South Texas College Job Announcement # 2010 – 3010 Position pending Board approval of FY10 Budget Please note that only ... see job
Posting Description: The Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation is looking for a full-time or ... see job
SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR Hofstra University seeks a Systems Administrator responsible for all operational aspects of the ... see job
Prince George’s Community College is a learning-centered, comprehensive, two year college located in the Washington, DC ... see job
The University is located in Southwest Florida midway between Naples and Fort Myers. The 760-acre campus is situated in one ... see job
Georgia Gwinnett College, the 35th member of the University System of Georgia, is a premier 21st century four-year liberal ... see job
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
Cutting student loans
Are they crazy????This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard of our law makers doing. I actually thought I was dreaming when I heard this on the news this AM but realize it is a nightmare not a dream. My daughter is currently enrolled in college as a sophmore do they not realize that without her loans she would will not be going to school????She is majoring in elementary education—what happens to the students she would be teaching????
Dottie Cornell, at 11:36 am EST on November 11, 2005