Search News


Browse Archives

News

More Part-Time Progress

November 11, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Following in the footsteps of the part-time faculty union at New School University, the independent Adjunct Faculty Association at Nassau Community College has made what organizers call "substantial” progress on pay and labor issues. At the same time, they’re hailing successes by part-time unions as “the wave of the future,” since many colleges have become reliant on adjuncts.

Early Wednesday morning 32 union leaders representing 1,400 members, and college negotiators hammered out a strike-preventing deal with the following highlights:

  • A five-year contract for part-timers until November 2010 with 3.9 percent across the board pay increases each year.  Currently the pay scale for adjuncts ranges from about $900 to $1,445 per semester, based on education.
  • Starting in the third year of the contract, part-timers with 20 years or more service (currently about 400 teaching staff) will receive $30 per contact hour in third year, $40 per contact hour in the fourth year and  $50 per contact hour in the fifth year.
  • On the personal leave front, a new benefit allows part-timers to earn up to 3 days in a year and can accumulate to up to a maximum of 40 days.
  • Part-timers become eligible to pay full costs for health insurance coverage through any of the four existing county HMO plans.  

Union members voted unanimously on Wednesday to support the terms.

“We’re especially happy with the pay increases and the longevity agreement,” said Charles Loiacono, president of the Adjunct Faculty Association. “This contract is positive for adjuncts who are just starting out and ones that have been around for longer.

“It’s inevitable that part-time unions will keep making strides,” he added.  “With the number of adjuncts teaching at many colleges nowadays, institutions are learning that they’d have to padlock themselves if everyone went on strike.”

Part-timers, in fact, teach approximately 54 percent of the courses offered at Nassau Community College.

While some college officials played down the risk of strike, the official statement from Sean Fanelli, president of the college, was: "We're pleased that we have reached a fair and equitable agreement.... I have every reason to believe that the Board of Trustees will view the proposal favorably."

The board will vote on whether to approve the negotiated contract on November 17.

Reggie Tuggle, a spokesman for the college, also offered a positive tidbit about the Adjunct Faculty Association, indicating that the union, which has been independent since the mid-1970s, did a “good job on advocating on behalf of its membership.”

Robert Gaudino, vice president of the union, detailed that advocacy a bit further, noting that organizers purposely decided to have a large number of union members at the negotiating table in a show of solidarity. “It showed the other side that we were serious,” he said, “and the fact that we’re a democratic organization.”

Gaudino cautioned against forming unions that represent the interests of both full-time and part-time employees. “They don’t do so well,” he said. “If you want adjuncts to succeed they have to organize together.”

“These steps are all important,” Loiacono said, “because we will be building on them in the future.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on More Part-Time Progress

  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on November 11, 2005 at 8:32am EST
  • The last quote from Gaudino intrigues me. At one campus, we recently created a union, approving it, in part, on the promise that adjuncts were to be considered full partners when it came time to negotiate. So far, the union has demonstrated exceptional concern for adjunct faculty.

    I will say this for Gaudino's comment: it makes me wonder how well represented adjuncts are in joint and independent unions.

  • adjunct independence
  • Posted by gaudino , VP of Adjunct Faculty Union at Nassau Comm Col on November 11, 2005 at 2:23pm EST
  • There is no example in my experience where adjuncts being part of the full-time union get anything like a fair shake. Read the Lit.

  • Respectfully...
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on November 11, 2005 at 5:14pm EST
  • My comment, Mr. Gaudino, was intended to get feedback with some substance. What "lit" shall I read? My experience stands in direct contradiction to what you are saying here, though my union may well stand, in the end, as the exception that proves the rule.

  • Posted by Gaudino on November 12, 2005 at 8:31pm EST
  • Dear Mr. Purvis,
    The "Lit" I refer to in part is the journal called the Adjunct Advocate. You may also find multiple references to the anomosity between adjuncts and full timers in almost all the AFT higher ed. publications over the last several years.
    You may indeed have a unique circumstance but you have me at a disadvantage because I don't know where you work. Do you want to share that? I remain convinced that adjuncts will be treated as the lap dogs of higher ed by both full timers and administration.

  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on November 13, 2005 at 8:41pm EST
  • I will look into both sources, though I must say that a publication entitled "Adjunct Advocate" does not strike me as less biased than NORML or other organizations seeking specific changes.

    Regarding the AFT, however, I am rather puzzled. What you are saying is that the very organization that represents me is willing to announce publicly that it does a poor job of that representation.

    I am not sure what role the term "lap dogs of higher ed" might play other than an inflammatory one. I have, at four different schools (one private) been treated with respect and (at most) paid well for my time. No, I do not receive the same benefits as full-time faculty, but part-time employees rarely enjoy equal status with full-time employees, regardless of the job.

    I do not care to post here the names of those schools for which I work, though you—anybody reading my comments, in fact—has always had the option of contacting me directly. While I do not widely publish where I work, I do not reject private inquiry.

  • Posted by gaudino on November 13, 2005 at 9:59pm EST
  • I am glad that you are content with your situation. I find it strange that you accept the notion that the instructor next door to you, a full timer, is paid three or four times your salary for the same job.

  • Strange?
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on November 14, 2005 at 6:53am EST
  • I have no committee requirements except those I choose to accept. I have no meeting attendance requirements. I have no student advising requirements. I teach fewer classes (at a full-time load, your estimate of three to four times would be truly frightening, but I have yet to work on any campus that would even result in even double my rate).

    When our union president solicits my feedback and actively seeks methods for improving adjunct pay and benefits, I would be hard pressed, indeed, to complain. When the negotiations are at an impasse largely because of provisions that will only benefit adjuncts, I see no reason to say I am being treated unfairly.

    While the analogy is imperfect, consider what a full-time employee earns compared to a temp brought in through an agency. In my experience, the ratio of pay between the two, the level of benefits, and the amount of work are less favoarble to the temp than to the adjunct. Maybe I am just lucky.

  • Current Adjunct Pay
  • Posted by Reg Shoesmith on November 14, 2005 at 9:08am EST
  • So I can better understand the improvments made, what is the current adjunct pay per credit hour (before the new contact)?

    Are adjuncts limited to a certain number of credit hours per semester?

    Were there any fringe benefits before the new contract?--after the contract?

  • Posted by gaudino on November 14, 2005 at 8:00pm EST
  • i am at a loss to understand your position. At NCC an adjunct at the top of our scale, we have four steps, will make at the end of this agreement $1759 a contact hour. There is a limit of 18 contact hours a year. This makes the top adjunct salary $31,600. A full professor at NCC makes $105,000 plus fringes worth about $35,000. $140,000 vs. $31,000 for teaching 12 contact hours more. This works out to 4.6 times the income. I realize that adjuncts are not obligated to do all the extras but the main function is to teach. Do you get 2/3 of the full time pay or even 1/2? Adjuncts are exploited and higher ed in the US would come to a halt without us.

  • Apples and ?
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on November 15, 2005 at 4:36am EST
  • How many years does that full professor have to work in order to earn the $105,000 salary? Does that apply to those who have minimum requirements, or just to those who possess a PhD?

    Are you comparing a 4th-year adjunct with an MA to a 30th-year tenured professor with a PhD?

  • Unified bargaining units
  • Posted by P.D. Lesko , Executive Editor at Adjunct Advocate on November 17, 2005 at 10:20am EST
  • The Adjunct Advocate has, indeed, published many pieces about adjunct faculty unions, including several which address the issue of unified bargaining units. With some noted exceptions, our reporting has shown that the needs and concerns of part-time faculty within unified locals are often ignored. Sometimes, this is a result of the inactivity of the part-timers themselves within their locals (not participating, for example, on the bargaining committees or standing for election to the executive boards).

    In California, after the legislature awarded $54 million dollars in equity pay to the state's 40,000 adjuncts, full-time faculty union leaders in unified bargaining units (many AFT affiliates) all over the state hurried to change their contractual language to define a full-time faculty teaching overload as an "adjunct." Thus, full-time faculty union leaders in many unified locals enabled full-time faculty members to skim nearly $20 million dollars in equity money right off the top.

    At CUNY, part-timers rose en masse and "took over" control of the unified faculty union's Executive Board. In a newspaper article published shortly thereafter, the reformers were referred to as "radicals," and the author (a full-time faculty member at the institution) fretted that "With a union like this representing CUNY faculty, the future of the institution itself could be in serious jeopardy." That was 2002. CUNY is still going strong, of course. Adjuncts there earn more and have better benefits than they ever did before.

    I congratulate Charles Loiacono and Bob Gaudino and their NCC colleagues on the new contract. Is it a rip-roaring success? Not in my personal opinion. However, it's clear evidence that part-time faculty can negotiate solid advances in pay and perks when hammering out their own contracts.

    In theory, unified bargaining units should result in the most significant bargaining power. Unfortunately, for the last 30 years, full-time faculty have been selling their part-time colleagues down the river without considering the eventual consequences. Now, full-time faculty are starting to pay (figuratively and literally) for this professional short-sightedness.

    P.D. Lesko
    Executive Editor
    Adjunct Advocate
    P.O. Box 130117
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
    www.AdjunctNation.com

  • Posted by gaudino on November 18, 2005 at 10:52am EST
  • mr. Lasko's comments are right on target. If full and part time faculty could join forces in commom effort they would be very successful but the gulf between them is still too great to corss. At NCC the adjuncts have a new contract the full timers do not. If we had joined forces and presented a deadline beyond which services would be withdrawn the institution would close and a contract with both unions would be accomplished within hours.
    I have yet to see anywhere a situation where part time people get real consideration when they are represented by full time union leaders.
    At Nassau we broke away from NYSUT in 1983 when NYSUT threatned to pull our charter and force adjuncts into the full time union.
    We have been independent and more successful since.
    Isn't it telling that some of the best adjunct contracts have been negotiated when the adjuncts are represented by the UAW or other non education unions. Sda commentary.

  • Adjuncts in Full Time Unions
  • Posted by CC Adjunct on April 22, 2007 at 7:05am EDT
  • When I first joined our faculty union as an adjunct, I was sent a questionnaire about the upcoming bargaining sessions. One of the questions asked if I would be willing to give up increases in "overload" pay in favor of increases in "base" salary. Since adjunct salaries are the same as overload pay at this institution, obviously, I was not. But for full-time faculty members, this was a loaded question. Many full-timers do not work overloads and therefore would prefer base salary increases. For those who do work overloads, it is usually because of the need for extra pay. If base salary were increased, they might need to work fewer overloads. So guess what the consensus would be.

    When I got up at a union meeting and asked whether the local would try to implement the national union's stated equity policy for adjuncts, several full-timers jumped up to explain why adjuncts did not deserve equity because we did not advise, serve on committees, etc. However, if one were to assume that at a community college, one quarter of a full-timers duties are non-teaching (no research requirement and a 5 course per semester teaching load), then we still had a long way to go to even that partial equity.

    Couple this with the fact that our "adjunct" representative is actually a full-time staff member covered by the contract who also teaches as an adjunct, and that several union officials are adjunct coordinators for their departments (essentially a management function and conflict of interest, how can anyone believe that a combined bargaining unit can benefit an adjunct?