News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Dec. 8, 2005
A choice by a self-proclaimed student supporter of some Nazi ideas to wear a “Blood & Honour” armband both on and off the Bellarmine University campus this semester has led to fierce debate over freedom of expression at the Roman Catholic institution in Louisville. Administrators have created a committee to study what to do, while professors and students cope with what some are calling blatant intimidation left unchecked — and that others see as free expression.
Meanwhile, Andrei Chira, a freshman, continues to wear the armband, which he says is part of standing up for what he believes in.
Chira said Wednesday that the band – which depicts a symbol similar to a swastika — is his way of showing support for National Socialism. Believers in the “Blood & Honour” philosophy have traditionally been associated with “white pride and white power,” according to the Web site of the American National Socialist Party.
However, Chira said that racial and ethnic issues are not the reason he wears the band and that he doesn’t support anti-Semitism and racism. Rather, he ascribes to the philosophy that it’s important to “think about what you believe in,” and he said he favors the concept of nationalism over party affiliation.
Chira grew up in Irvine, California after his family moved there from Romania when he was 4. In high school, he said, he often wore pins that proclaimed his support for National Socialism.
As more people took notice of his band and realized what it stood for, he’s been told by some students and professors that one can’t half support the positions of a group.
“Yes, you can,” said Chira, noting that he’s good friends with his Jewish residential adviser and has black friends. “Are all Democrats against the war? Are all Republicans for the war?” he asked.
Chira’s girlfriend, Jaye Popplewell, also a freshman at the university, said Wednesday that, while she considers herself a “heeb hippie” (though she’s not Jewish) on the opposite end of the spectrum than Chira, she supports her boyfriend’s choice of expression. “I don’t agree with it, but I will fight to the death for his right to wear it,” she said of the armband. Several student protesters held a “Sit In for Free Speech” on Monday outside of administrators’ offices in an effort to pre-empt any attempts by the university to make Chira remove the band.
While Chira believes strongly in his ideas, he said that he’d take off the band if asked to do so by administrators. He said he would never consider leaving the college over this issue because he believes that the private institution can make its own rules.
Questions about Chira’s motivations linger, however. When the student first started wearing the band earlier in September, Laura Ward, former president of the Bellarmine University Democrats, says she heard a student ask him why he was wearing it.
“His response was, ‘Well, I’m a Nazi,’ reflected Ward via e-mail Wednesday. “Now Andrei says that he is in fact a supporter of the American National Socialists, and not a Nazi or a white-supremacist. I have not spoken with Andrei himself, so I am hesitant to say whether or not I believe that this is true.
“What I do know is this: The American National Socialist party has 25 points, point four of which states, ‘Only members of the nation may be citizens of the state. Only those of pure White blood, whatever their creed, may be members of the nation. Non-citizens may live in America only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens. Accordingly, no Jew or homosexual may be a member of the nation.’ I find this point offensive and discriminatory, and there are other points that I find equally derogatory.”
Chira admitted that earlier in the semester he had called himself a Nazi, but has changed his mind about that label, saying he “realize[s] that it is pejorative.”
Fred Rhodes, the university’s vice president for student affairs, released a statement indicating that the institution “fully supports and embraces freedom of expression.”
“Bellarmine is committed to the principle of free speech — even when, as is the case with some of the issues we are addressing now — that speech or expression is contrary to the values this institution holds most dear,” said Rhodes. “We believe the best way to defeat abhorrent expressions and concepts such as these is to expose them in the open market place of ideas.”
“At the same time,” said Rhodes, “Bellarmine University is fully committed to the safety of everyone at the university. No member of the campus community should be threatened, intimidated or harassed by another.”
In response to that statement, Joshua Golding, chairman of the university’s philosophy department, sent an e-mail to faculty members and students at the school, encouraging them to pressure the administration to ask that the student remove the band.
”The public wearing of a neo-Nazi symbol is definitely ‘intimidating’ to many persons on this campus,” he wrote. “Any person who wears such a symbol is in effect saying the following: ‘I know that this symbol is associated with a group that has unrepentantly perpetrated hatred and denigration of certain minority groups, as well as engaged in murder and torture of innocent people, and I AM PROUD to be associated with this group!’”
He added, “Our tolerance of ‘diversity’ does not need to include those who openly identify themselves with racist hate groups. On the contrary, the college is obligated to ask such persons to either keep hateful views to themselves, or to leave.”
In response to such views, Joseph J. McGowan, the president of the university, issued a statement that said “some among us appear not to understand the necessity and importance of free speech in an open and conversational university — and the unique opportunity that only this free speech provides for destroying the viability of hateful, exclusionary ideas.”
To promote a study of hate speech and conduct and to better understand Chira’s views, McGowan has created a task force, which is to submit its findings and recommendations to him. The group includes the provost and the vice president for student affairs, the chairs of the faculty and the staff councils, the director of human resources and the president of the student government association. The group is expected to meet for the first time within the next two weeks.
“I personally do not care what is going on in [Chira’s] head,” Golding said via e-mail regarding the decision to create the task force. “To me that’s irrelevant. The symbol he wears is a neo-Nazi symbol.
“I note (with irony) that the student wearing the neo-Nazi symbol has not been asked to serve on the task force,” said Golding. “I wonder why? Shouldn’t he have a chance to express his view there, too?”
Chira said Wednesday that a password-protected bulletin board, accessible to Bellarmine students and faculty, has been created by the university officials, as a place to discuss the issues raised by his armband. He said that he thinks it’s a “definitely a step in the right direction” since hundreds of students are now posting about freedom of expression issues on campus.
Still, he wouldn’t want this debate talked about back home in Irvine. “My dad would kick my ass if he knew all this was happening,” said Chira.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Some utterances are unacceptable even in the sheltered workshop arena of tertiary education. Those who profess to follow a ‘psuedo religion’ that promotes racial ethnic, religious and sexual orientation biases and prejudices cannot be a participating member of any university community.
Henry Collier, Honorary Fellow at University of Wollongong, at 9:00 am EST on December 8, 2005
The administration at Bellarmine will tell the boy to remove the band. Within days, the ACLU will be on the case screaming for his FARs (First Admendment Rights). Whatever.
The sad thing is that when a Jew or a Christian starts sporting a Davidic Star or Cross arm band on some ultra liberal university campus, no one will stand up for him or her.
Fred, at 9:37 am EST on December 8, 2005
Fred, Rest assured if anyone was ever prohibited from wearing a cross or a star, people would be standing up for them just as much as they are (or should be) standing up for this gentleman. Indeed, to me, there is absolutely no difference between the three. Indeed, to most people who take free expression seriously there is no difference. If people can’t, explain, in a non-violent manner why Nazi ideology is wrong, and convince people why it is wrong, then perhaps they need to ask themselves why they seek to suppress certain ideas (sort of like Hitler did.)
Larry, at 9:49 am EST on December 8, 2005
Did anyone catch that he was born in Romania? The very group he supports should hate him because he is considered a foreigner acccording to their viewpoint. This “kid” is truly lost.
Jeff, at 10:11 am EST on December 8, 2005
Jeff, Maybe he is being ironic. If you disagree with him, why don’t you get a blog and explain why Romanians should disagree with Nazis. (If you post it in Romanian, I will give you bonus points.)
While I appreciate that you think he is “lost,” I could probably say the same for many other people. Are you “lost” if you go to business school, join a political party, vote for Ross Perot, or get tattoo. At least, upon request, I can tell you why I didn’t do any of those things. It is all perspective.
Larry, at 10:15 am EST on December 8, 2005
It’s interesting to note the similarities between the problem this student faces and the one that got Sami Al-Arian, the University of Southern Florida professor accused (and acquitted just yesterday) of abetting Palestinian “terrorists"/"freedom fighters,” fired. In both cases, an individual espoused hate speech and the university community was torn between a very American libertarian belief that all expressions should be allowed and a more European stance (see France and Germany for laws on hate speech) that certain views cannot be allowed to be expressed because they are dangerous to the community.
GradStudent, at 11:24 am EST on December 8, 2005
When I was growing up, the skinheads that passed through my hometown on the way to the Aryan Nations compound in Hayden Lake, ID made clear to everyone that the neo-nazi symbols they worshipped were not political expressions but implicit threats of violence. The display of these symbols (along with nooses hanging from trees and burning crosses, etc.) is necessarily more complicated than your average free-speech issue.
That said, I have to agree with Larry’s first post here: whatever his political beliefs, this kid picked a pretty reliable way to get some attention.
dan, at 2:21 pm EST on December 8, 2005
Dan, What is an implicit threat of violence ? Were they threatening any individual people ? Do you think that a generalized declaration of hatred of a race can create a “clear and present danger” within the meaning of first amendment jurisprudence?
Anyway, this kid has got people talking, which, to some extent is a good thing.
Larry, at 3:10 pm EST on December 8, 2005
Perhaps this young man’s armband wearing is just self-advertisemnt and posturing. Anyone with a sense of theatrics can knows it is easier these days to get attention through iconoclasm aimed at the left: It plays well with those obsessed with the cultural left’s percieved victory in the campus culture wars, and it certainly raises the hackles of those in need of right-wing whipping boys.
Perhaps the armband wearing is nothing more than the well-calculated yanking of parental chains: His Romanian father may well kick his ass, perhaps having grown up under one nightmare dictatorship while hearing about the 1930s Romanian fascist movement — The Legion of the Archangel Michael/Totul Pentru Tara (Everything for the Fatherland)and their paramilitary Iron Guards. These folks were about as “blood and soil” as you can get and they probably had some pretty cool armbands.
Let the lad have his say, or react?
Will making an issue of the armband do anything but fan the flames? The statements of this young man make him sound resaonable: Surely, espousing only the less objectionable of a set of radical beliefs can’t be all that bad. The more his treatment seems overly reactive and one-sided, the more exposure these beliefs gain and the more they inch toward respectability. Why create instantly publicized issues when many young people may simply grow out this kind of behavior?
However, educators should indeed worry that Nazi-related armband-wearing may indeed speak of some fundamental anger on the right at the cultural left’s perceived power in controlling the terms of the campus “hate speech” debate: Campus groups some perceive as exlusionary get funding and approval according to certain definitions of who is oppressed. Certain kinds of dress are tolerated, although some would associate them with fundamentalist groups that oppress and condone violence against women, homosexuals, and non-believers. The list goes on and on; the terms of the debate are easily twisted.
What can schools do to defuse the issue?
Either tolerate all symbols because exposing and discussing what they represent in the light of day may be the best cure for “hateful” beliefs, or....
When in doubt, make a policy!
Why not permit moderate expression of even the most immoderate views? Allow any expression of belief as long as it was in the form a discrete and tasteful lapel pin. Would this be any different from fairly common expressions of group identity through jewelry, body piercings, or accessories?
Of course, to make this work, schools might have to require uniform dress codes in order to prevent students from expressing their beliefs through parading around campus as brownshirts, Maoists, religious radicals, religious traditionalists, UFO crew volunteers, or nature worshippers.
Karl
Mark Cunningham, at 4:36 am EST on December 9, 2005
This kid desperately wants attention and he’s getting it. Actually, he’s provoking a good discussion. Personally, I suspect that at some point he probably stopped believing in it (maybe when he stopped calling himself a nazi?) At this point its simply teenage stubornness.
Sure, he’s an idiot, but probably not irredemiably so.
Dan, at 4:36 am EST on December 9, 2005
On the one hand, maybe it’s better that he wears the damn thing like a warning label.
But seriously, public displays of nazi symbols are equivalent to burning a cross: they are both threats to specific ethnic groups, and, therefor, subject to some regulation. While it may be difficult to draw the line, it is clear to me that schools DO have a responsibility to protect their students from racists. I also think that this student needs to come up with some much deeper thinking on this subject if he claims to be pro-Nazi but not anti-Semitic. He seems to be extremely confused about the meaning of these terms.
Adam Holland, at 3:22 pm EST on December 9, 2005
Adam, How is burning a cross alone a specific threat to an ethic group. (In fact the Supreme Court has held – in VA v. Black — that burning a cross alone, cannot be considered a threat to anyone without some specific showing of intent.) Moreover, a generalized threat to an ethnic group doesn’t mean anything. I think you just want to prevent people from finding about ideas that you disagree with because they make you uncomfortable.
Larry, at 10:39 pm EST on December 9, 2005
Yes, Nazis on campus, cross-burning, swastika wearing, all make me uncomfortable (maybe they should have that effect on you as well). But that isn’t why I want to ban them. I believe that innocent students should be allowed to go about there business free from threats of racial violence, whether overt or not. If some student wishes to assert his right to attend Klan rallies, or Bund rallies, or skinhead hoedowns of whatever wacky denomination, then fine...let them make that case. But let other students study without fear of intimidation by racists. That sort of deliberate intimidation is where free speech rights end.
Adam Holland, at 8:15 pm EST on February 8, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
PART-TIME TEMPORARY FACULTY FOR SOCIOLOGY COURSES Central Michigan University seeks qualified part-time temporary instructors ... see job
This posting is on ongoing pool for Oceanography. The department is currently seeking to fill vacancies for the Spring 2008 ... see job
Situated on rolling hillsides in southern Pennsylvania, Cheyney University, established in 1837, the oldest institution of ... see job
School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics Child Development Center Division Position: Assistant Adjunct Professor This ... see job
Job Description: The Director of Title V Project: Accelerated Content-based English (A.C.E.) is responsible for providing the ... see job
General Purpose
Reporting to the Executive Director of Facilities Operations Infrastructure, and with broad ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Hillsborough Community College is a public, comprehensive multi-campus, state-supported community college located in the ... see job
Loyola College in Maryland Assistant Professor, Fine Arts, American Kod?ly specialist LOYOLA COLLEGE IN MARYLAND seeks a ... see job
the ol’ armband troll
He got all you guys going, that is for sure. He would probably put the armband away and pierce his nipples if people stopped paying attention.
Larry, at 7:15 am EST on December 8, 2005