Search News


Browse Archives

News

Border Tensions

December 9, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A conflict among the College Republicans at New Mexico State University has escalated to charges of a purge of Hispanic students from the group, and is now drawing the attention of Latino faculty members at the university.

In addition, one Hispanic student who says she was kicked out of the Republican group because of her views on immigration asserts that she is being pressured to recant her criticism of how she was treated.

The conflict dates to mid-November, when the Republicans discussed endorsing the idea of using "minuteman" patrols on the border with Mexico to keep out illegal immigrants. Hispanic students say that when they objected, they were forced out of the group.

On Thursday, one of the students who was asked to leave said that she was pressured to defend the group and lie about intimidation she faced after being impeached from her position overseeing the  group's finances. Latinos on the campus said that they were angry about the expulsion of that student and another Hispanic student -- they said in violation of university rules -- and by reports that they had been subject to racial harassment previously.

One Hispanic student in the group said she faced disparaging complaints about people of Mexican decent and often heard racist Mexican jokes in her presence. The student also indicated Thursday that she was chastised for not supporting minutemen border patrols.

“I was starting to feel hurt, and a little confused, I mean are we not all attending the same university, working similar jobs, and in the same organization?!” the student noted in her blog.  “I was a little hurt, but like an idiot I did nothing, but just cry and then think that I was overreacting to the whole thing.

“They asked me if my grandfather and my father made honest livings in this country that was so nice to not send them back,” she wrote. “I was crushed, these were once people who I hung out with, and who I worked side by side with on political campaigns.”

Leaders of the Republican group deny the allegations, though their efforts to defend themselves have led to a new controversy.

Grant Olson, president of the College Republicans, arranged a joint telephone conversation on Thursday afternoon with one of the Latino students who was kicked out. During the conversation with Inside Higher Ed, the student made statements contrary to those posted in her blog. She indicated that she had not been kicked out or mistreated.

However, soon after the phone conversation ended, the student called back, and had a vastly different story to tell, saying that Olson and the group's faculty adviser had pressured her to say that nothing had happened.

The student said that members who kicked her out promised to make her life miserable if she didn’t go along with the plan to “clean up everything.” “I lied [during the speaker phone conversation] because I didn’t want them to pressure me anymore,” she said.

Gregory Butler, a professor of government at the university who advises the group, said he didn't know about the Latino students being ousted from the group, and he strongly denied that anyone had pressured them to say anything. “I didn’t say anything about making this go away. I called to find out the facts," he said.

Olson added during the conference call that the organization appreciated disagreement because “we want to encourage free and open debate…. We want to understand why people believe what they believe.”

Laura Gutierrez Spencer, director of ethnic programs at the university, said that faculty members have become concerned after receiving a letter about the incidents from a recent alumnus of the university, who has publicized the conflict online.

“Other ethnic directors and I are very concerned,” she said.“ We are hoping that the dean’s office will investigate this situation.” She said she was outraged by reports that the Latino student had been pressured to alter her story. “This is absolutely untenable,” she said.

An associate dean is expected to meet with faculty members regarding the situation today.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Border Tensions

  • New Mexico State University College Republicans (article)
  • Posted by Sandrea Gonzales on December 9, 2005 at 11:45am EST
  • The shared responsibility for situations like this continue to point back to an administration and a president who are consistently ignorant and unsupportive of Peoples of Color living in this country. By their actions and words, they have given permission to the growth of racism and incidents like this one at New Mexico State University. The administration at NMSU must be held accountable for the actions of its students. It is imperative that this incident be thoroughly investigated.

  • what did the administration do wrong ?
  • Posted by Larry on December 9, 2005 at 12:09pm EST
  • Sandrea Gonzales, What did the administration do wrong? They admit Hispanics. There are Hispanics on the faculty. My guess is that a good chunk of the student body is Hispanic. If the Republicans want to be racist, what is wrong with that? Believe it or not, in the US, people have a right to be racist.

    I find it funny that a student would admit to crying or allowing themselves to be pressured into saying one thing. If you do these things, you probably shouldn’t be in college.

    PS: I am not a racist, and I am personally against racism. Therefore, I am a good person.

  • Posted by Joe on December 9, 2005 at 1:08pm EST
  • As far as I can tell, the administration has done nothing wrong in this case. Where they may go wrong is if they don't do something about it, but it appears that they are.

    The racism charges are interesting and important, but what is clear is that they impeached the students in a way that violated university rules.

    As to the comment that the student shouldn't be in college if she is capable of being coerced -- I don't think that that's fair. People can be intimidated, and it looks as though she was.

    Whether someone cries or not has no bearing on their capacities as a college student.

    And yes, people have the right to be racist. It's when they act on that racism that there's a serious problem.

  • Huntly
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on December 9, 2005 at 4:12pm EST
  • Huntly, as a Cuban American I think you should go talk to some of the first wave of Cubans who fled Castro about who has their interests at heart and why they vote Republican with such regularity. It may be an eye-opener.

    The idea that the party that abandoned the Patriots at the Bay of Pigs and told doctors and lawyer that they should go on welfare so they don't compete with their New England ivy counterparts is now the party that trumpets economic opportunity by advocating closing the border to trade and putting some of the hardest workers in America on welfare and excluded from English schools in "barrios" (sometimes roughly translated at ghetto - the word meant the same in pre-modern spanish) so they can keep their "quaint" culture.

    In a culture that, contrary to many, many stereotypes often is quite supportive of education and honest hard work the though of telling them they need affirmative action as the solution to their problems in life is likewise insulting - and I have heard exactly that from Cubans, Mexicans and Central Americans alike (in person, not in journals) just within my brief and rather sheltered life.

    As to the club, while I disagree with some of their modes and methods, they are supposed to also have the same rights of free speech and free assembly that allow so many other campus groups to thrive. I would hope you would extend them the same courtesy whether or not you agree with their decisions.

  • Posted by Elly , Counselor at SUNY Brockport on December 9, 2005 at 4:54pm EST
  • I agree with Joe in that you can be racist if you wish, however, acting on that racism is the real issue here. Everyone has a right to free speech and act however they wish (within the confines of the law), but aside from all these laws and liberal thoughts of freedom to do whatever the heck we want, there has to be some sort of basic human decency. It is infuriating that people still believe that it is okay to insult another person and treat them as if they were inferior based on the color of their skin or their last name, and even worst political ideologies which have proven not to have our best interest at heart (whether democratic, republic, or whatever). It is very sad that despite everything that is happening right at home, we are so still so separated and prejudiced.
    I hope that someday, we can all have the clarity we so desperately need (including myself) to see we are humans and should not be defined by color, nationality, religious belief, or political views...but it seems were are far from there.

  • Alan
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on December 13, 2005 at 5:48pm EST
  • Alan, you may wish to talk to some of the Cuban Americans who are first and second generation exiles from Cuba to understand their perspective. You might also want to step outside the class struggle thinking for a moment.

    As to the charges of racism, the group has definate policy stands - they decided to support the minutemen and closed borders. The idea is of debatable validity, however, once a student group takes a position, they can take reasonable measures to assure that their members also support it. You will find few College NAACP chapters with people who disagree with Brown v. Board of Education, for instance, and that is in part because it is within their rights to toss out the dissenters and trolls, to use the internet term who choose to continue to belong to a group whose goals they do not share.

  • article
  • Posted by Reader on December 15, 2005 at 12:24pm EST
  • Kevin,

    You may want to talk to first and second generation Cubans who came to this country seeking a better life AND oppose the 'ideals' of the Republican party. Believe it or not, not every Cuban who came to this country agrees or supports the Diaz-Balarts or Ros-Lethinen's of the Republican party. I agree with what you say that others should step out of the box and consider the arguments of the other side. Your argument would be much more legitimate if you did the same.

  • Have and do
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on December 15, 2005 at 12:57pm EST
  • I have and I do note the arguements of the other side. The debate is perhaps not as clear cut as it may be made out to be, but I have conversed with a good number of those who came here and I understand why their position is predominately what it is.

  • missing the point
  • Posted by Jeremiah , student at UNM on December 16, 2005 at 4:39pm EST
  • This entire issue stems from a difference in ideology, not skin color. While I will not defend the aledged comments made towards these students, The idea of impeaching them based on a difference in ideology is completely legitimate. Don't forget that these officers were elected to those positions by fellow College Republicans. If there were any organizational trend towards covert or overt racism do you think they would elect these students in the first place? If all three stood against what the group had addopted as official policy, it stands to reason that they could be removed from the group. As for which party has the best interests of minorities at heart, it's obviously Republicans. Their's is the party that recognizes the strength and ability of HUMAN KIND to succeed on their own merits. Minorities do not need handouts and free passes just to get ahead. To affirm otherwise is to imply that they are inherently weaker, which is racism in its most fundamental form. Affirmative action robs succesful minorities of the their due credit and respect. It creates a general suspicion that they did not "earn" their accolades. This is a terrible injustice. Minorities even do it to eachother. Judge Miguel Estrada and Alberto Gonzales, who deserve the highest of praise and admiration because of their many successes and accomplishments, are labeled as "yes men" or token minorities in a Republican administration. This is saying to hispanics that they can only succeed if a)Democrats help them do it or b) they "sell out" to republicans. That is as racist as it gets.