Search News


Browse Archives

News

Southern Accreditor Puts 2 on Probation

December 14, 2005

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools’ Commission on Colleges placed American InterContinental University and St. Andrews Presbyterian College on probation at its December meeting.

But in a year in which it faced a court fight over the revocation of the accreditation of Edward Waters College, the accrediting group stopped short of any such actions this time around -- which its officials insist had nothing to do with the legal challenge.

“We review every institution based on its own merit,” said Belle S. Wheelan, president of the regional accreditor. “Nobody likes to be sued, but that doesn’t stop the world from going around.” 

American InterContinental, which is owned by Career Education Corp., a leading for-profit provider of higher education, was placed on probation for 12 months for falling short of a wide range of the group’s standards, including among other things the “integrity of student academic records and accuracy in recruiting and admission practices.” In a statement last week, George Miller, the university’s chief executive officer, said, “We are committed to addressing the commission’s concerns while continuing to provide quality education to our students.” 

Southern cited St. Andrews Presbyterian, which was ranked as a 2005 “best college” by U.S. News & World Report, for continuing financial problems at the institution, Wheelan said. “A lot of small liberal arts schools have problems,” she said. “And we don’t want to revoke anyone’s accreditation.  We just expect the same standards of every institution.”

Officials at the college expressed disappointment. “This action comes at a time of unprecedented growth and success at the college,” said John Deegan, Jr., the president of St. Andrews. “In the past three years alone, St. Andrews has seen its enrollment increase by 29 percent, its Capital Campaign surpass $34 million, and more than $5 million spent on capital improvements. In a short period of time, we are confident that we will fully satisfy the accreditation standard regarding financial resources and that our sanction will be removed.”

The Southern Association removed seven institutions from probationary status: Beacon College and Chipola College in Florida, Kentucky’s Georgetown College, Lenoir-Rhyne College in North Carolina, Louisiana College, Texas College and the University of Southern Mississippi. 

Some officials believed they’d been treated gently. The president of Louisiana College, for instance, labeled the commission’s decision to end the institution’s probation after 11 months “miraculous.”

"The fact that we got off in 11 months is, in our estimation, miraculous, but the diligence that we used to attack the issues were recognized as being so appropriately handled that they found us in compliance," the president told the Associated Baptist Press Monday. "Our procedures, policies and the path we followed has proven to be the correct path." 

Even colleges that faced negative actions said the commission’s process was fair.  Trudie Kibbe Reed, president of Bethune-Cookman, one of two institutions denied the ability to have new advanced degree programs accredited, said that she didn’t have any negative feelings regarding the body’s actions.  She indicated Monday that the committee’s reason for denying accreditation to the institution’s master’s program in transformative leadership was valid.  “We did not turn in the necessary paperwork,” she said.  “But we will be given the chance to resubmit in June.”    

The accreditor also put or kept several other institutions on “probation for good cause,” which means that the commission took leniency in extending probation, when it had the authority to revoke their accreditation.

Still, Deborah Brodbeck, president of Beacon College, which was removed from probation after one year, didn’t find the committee process to be “particularly lenient at all.”  She noted that the body not only required an audit of the institution’s financial situation, but also made a campus visit to verify the status of construction of new housing at the institution.

In addition to the actions and institutions mentioned above, the commission:

  • Continued the following institution on probation: Talladega College, Talladega, Ala.
  • Denied reaffirmation, continued accreditation, and placed the following institution on probation for good cause: LeMoyne-Owen College, Memphis
  • Continued accreditation and placed the following institutions on probation for good cause: Art Institute of Dallas, Dallas; Ashland Community & Technical College, Ashland, Ky.; Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, Fla.; Lutheran Theological Southern Seminary, Columbia, S.C.
  • Continued accreditation and continued the following institutions on probation for good cause: Huntingdon College, Montgomery, Ala.; Lees-McRae College, Banner Elk, N.C.

A full list of 2005 committee actions is available on the Southern Association's Web site.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Southern Accreditor Puts 2 on Probation

  • accrediting
  • Posted by fred lapides , retired on December 14, 2005 at 5:27pm EST
  • It is perhaps a somewhat jaundieced view I hold, but my instincts tell me that most places "in trouble" get put on probation and nearly nevezr lose accrediation EXCEPT for finacial reasons. Why? Because judgements are subjectilve and can be challenged in court. Finacial problems, when serious, are objective and hence easier to dump the school when they have serious financial problems.

    Now, who accredits the accrediting agencies? Why it is the federal government, the Dept of Education, evaluating a private group! And would the Govt take away the powers granted an accrediting group? No. Why? Because then school could not get accredited. So we have a vicious circle...and the game continues.

  • HE Accreditation
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , What to replace regional accreditors with? at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on December 18, 2005 at 9:38pm EST
  • To answer Fred,
    SACS is "recognized" by the Secretary of Education once every 5 years. The DOE/OPE staff and NACIQI review complaints and non-compliance issues before rubber-stamping regional accrediting agencies. Together they form the "HE Cartel" which disgorges $70 billion dollars in federally guaranteed student loans and grants this year.
    http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/naciqi.html

    SACS is up for recognition June 2006.

    They function no differently than did the medieval university guilds, like the law faculty of University of Bologna in 1100 AD. The problem, of course, is that something as parochial and hamfisted as the medieval guild system is completely out of place today, given the trends toward greater transparency and greater accountability.
    The big question is, what will replace them?

  • Accrediting Commission Assualts
  • Posted by Joseph Lewis , Part time faculty & Classified at Compton Community College on January 31, 2006 at 4:30am EST
  • Compton Community College is going through the same thing. The ACCJC ( Accrediting Commission of Junior Colleges), a commission of WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges) has determined that no matter what the college has done to overcome it's fiscal deficits and academic program challenges, they still want to terminate Compton Communiity College's accreditation. In comparison to other colleges we have approched the concenrns of the ACCJC and have a made stellar progress. However, this is not good enough for the ACCJC. We have appealed their decision to WASC, awaiting it's decision March 1 to 3rd 2006. It is our contention that they are biased by not fairly considering the progress we have made thus far. The point of the matter is who is the Accrediting Commissions trying to impress? After years of being non-threatening, now all of a sudden, they are becoming heavy handed punitively. Who really stands to benefit from this coast to coast assault? It appears that the Southern Accrediting Commission and the Western Accrediting Commission is on the same page. Is there something underfoot going on? This reminds me of the old "ticket quota system" used by traffic cops, or profiling currently used by police to identify minorities as most likely the wrong doers. Being a designated Historical Black College, and the only African American run college in the State of California you can't help but be somewhat suspecious as to why the ACCJC is so adimate and determined to take away a 77 year legacy of a great city that has spawned so many great leaders and contributors to the US. The Late Senator Ralph C. Dills would not have stood by and let this happen. He was an alumni. Nor will the citizens of CCC service region stand by idolly and watch their school be taken over by another school district. The implications of a non-supervised atonomous agency pulling the rip cord on a institutional legacy is far reaching. Changes come from challenges, and this writer feels a change is about to come.