News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Dec. 19, 2005
A column in Duquesne University’s student newspaper in March set off months of debate over whether the Roman Catholic university in Pittsburgh could recognize a group for gay students — something the student columnist said was needed, but not allowed. On Friday, in something of a compromise, the university recognized a gay straight alliance for the first time, but also stipulated rules that, among other things, bar it from protests or petitions against positions of the university or church teachings.
The announcement linked the decision to Duquesne’s philosophy. “The university’s core principles include treating all members of its community with dignity, compassion and respect,” the statement said. “Duquesne fosters a supportive environment where the needs of all students — including those historically marginalized by society — are served.”
The new policy was recommended by a panel appointed in September by Charles Dougherty, president of the university, and led by the Rev. Tim Hickey, executive director of mission and identity at the university. The new group will be allowed to create forums “for support and discussion regarding issues related to sexual orientation within the Catholic tradition,” to promote social equity, to sponsor educational programs, and to form “a safe and supportive environment for interested members.”
But the new group was also specifically barred from certain activities: “Activities that do not adhere to Catholic Church teachings will not be permitted. Sponsorship or support of programs that involve public protests, petitions or activities and events that conflict with university policy or that which the executive director for mission and identity determines to be positions or behavior that are inconsistent with the Spiritan mission and Catholic identity of Duquesne University are prohibited.”
Duquesne’s statement also stressed that the university was “not an endorsement of sexual activity, but rather, an effort to help prevent discrimination based on sexual orientation.”
Bishop Donald Wuerl of Pittsburgh was not involved in making the decision, but was kept informed about the development of the policy, and “indicated his support” for its “general direction,” the university statement said.
While there has been strong student support for recognizing the group, there has also been opposition. In October, a student who believes that recognizing a gay group would violate the university’s Catholic faith was found to have called gay people “subhuman” on a non-Duquesne Web site. The university ordered him to write an essay about homosexuality, and he has been refusing to do so, citing his rights to free expression.
Ryan Miner, the student, wrote recently in The Duke, the student newspaper, that the proposal for the gay straight alliance is “an attack on your faith and ideals,” and predicted that it would lead to the university soon having to recognize groups in favor of abortion rights and premarital sex.
Matthew Pratter, the student whose column in March set off the debate, could not be reached for comment. But he told The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that he was pleased and surprised by the outcome and that he thought the group could do a lot of good — even with the restrictions placed on it. “Gay people are people before they are gay, and the university is recognizing this,” he said.
Professors also rallied behind the push to recognize the group, and more than 100 signed a petition urging the administration to do so. Fred Evans, a professor of philosophy who was among those who organized the petition, said that he was “very happy” with the university’s decision to recognize the group.
The limits on its activities raise some concerns, he said, although he said a lot will depend on how those restrictions are enforced. For example, Evans said that he wasn’t sure if the new student group would be allowed, for example, to discuss and endorse gay marriage, as he said the students should be permitted to do. “You want people to speak their mind at a university campus,” he said.
Evans said that faculty members believed that it was essential to Duquesne’s reputation that it recognize the group. “You can’t be a real university without recognizing and respecting diversity,” he said.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Nice move, Duquense. Recognize the group but not allow them to say anything against the church’s teachings! I suppose that is because the teachings can’t stand up to any serious scrutiny and challenge.
Les, at 10:47 am EST on December 19, 2005
First, Dr. Ide, homosexuality is not purely genetic. The evidence for this is straightforward — not all identical twins have the same sexual preferances. (Incidentally, there are several studies into this in both the US and Denmark, and probably in some other places as well. There is some proof that the heterosexual twin is not merely “in the closet” by various brainscans and the like.)
As to the university, they might as well recognize the group — whether the students are recognized or not, they are still there. It is unlikely that they will disappear if their group is not approved.
I can, however, understand the protest clauses when alumni and the church provide funding.
Kevin, Undergraduate, at 12:24 pm EST on December 19, 2005
Kevin,
Gay students pay tuition too. We pay student activity fees too. At what point will the free speech of non-gays be attacked like this?
Karl
Karl, at 5:05 pm EST on December 19, 2005
Karl, all schools have limits on how far they will allow protests and from what corners. (The line may be crossed at some schools only when a non-ROTC building gets lit on fire, but thats just being lax, not not having a limit.) Some schools don’t approve republican clubs. Some don’t approve groups from other religions. Some don’t approve those that don’t fit with their educational goals (and not all higher educational goals are the same).
All in all, the school grounds are the legal property of the university, and they have the exclusive right to decide what they will allow to transpire on their property.
Free speech protects one from the government. It is not a factor in this discussion, as the government is not the party discussing the use of its property.
Kevin, Undergraduate, at 3:54 pm EST on December 20, 2005
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The Department of Education at the University of California, Irvine anticipates openings for Junior, Assistant, Associate and ... see job
We open doors, spark imaginations, and enlighten lives through learning. see job
Job Responsibilities: Campus coordinator in Teacher Education is expected to: advise teacher education ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Position Summary: This is a 5yr term position from date of hire. Development Information Systems provides IT ... see job
The Brenau University School of Education is seeking an Assistant/Associate Professor for a full-time, 12-month, leadership ... see job
The School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Beckman Laser Institute, located at the University of California, Irvine, is ... see job
Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job
Cazenovia College is an independent four-year coeducational college located in the lakefront historic village of Cazenovia, ... see job
Work closely with campus colleagues in maintaining the university’s server resources and planning for growth and new ... see job
Contradiction of Terms
Isn’t “Catholic university” a contradiction of terms? If a university is indeed a place where we can have free exchanges of ideas and move past commonly held mythologies, then Catholicism (or any other ism) should not be steering the ship.
Educator, at 10:47 am EST on December 19, 2005