Search News


Browse Archives

News

Rose-Colored Vision

January 17, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A performance of The Vagina Monologues is usually associated with a celebration of feminism and a desire to stop violence against women. And on dozens of campuses, a return from winter break means organizing performances for February and March. But as a result of an idea from student directors and producers of this year's production at the University of Michigan to focus on "women of color," that message has become much more murky.

This fall, four students -- Lauren Whitehead, Jillian Steinhauer, Molly Raynor and Kelly Sheard -- wanted to accomplish something deeper with their production than they felt had been done in past years. Their idea was to cast every role in the play with a minority woman, in an effort to rectify what some view as racial biases of the show. One reference to race in the script is a monologue based on an interview with "A Southern Woman of Color." Some professors who have read the main script and optional parts of the play say that Arab, Asian-American and Native American women fare particularly poorly in the play -- being presented "from a reductive and troublingly narrow perspective." 

"This play is very problematic," said Maria Cotera, a professor of Latino and women's studies, who has been advising the students. "Basically, the implied center of the monologue is white women's experiences with sexuality and violence. And then you have all these 'diversifying' pictures that are sort of marked and cast for black or other minority women.  Those are the figures that are meant to bring in diversity, but the fact is, the central figures are white women."

Megan Sweeney, a professor of English and Afroamerican and African Studies, also has reservations. "The script itself tends to flatten and conflate a wide variety of women's experiences into a homogenizing portrait of women's victimization," she said. "In doing so, moreover, the script inadvertently contributes to a colonialist 'othering' of non-Western women and a silencing of these women by corralling historically, culturally, politically, and economically distinct situations of violence into one overarching portrait of non-Western women's pain."

Some students have said they would have preferred that the university stop performing the play, rather than prolonging what they call "a disservice" to minority and foreign women. Students at the university have been putting on the performance without much controversy for the past several years, raising many more dollars than controversies.  As a result of ticket sales, thousands of dollars have gone toward supporting Ann Arbor safe houses and other organizations that aid abused women in the area.

According to organizers of V-Day -- the organization that disseminates Eve Ensler's script to students who wish to perform the play -- the production has raised approximately $30 million to date, nationwide. But, as several students at the University of Michigan have learned this year, rights to use the script come with strict guidelines -- guidelines that some professors and students say make it next to impossible to bring "women of color" issues to the forefront.

In November, Whitehead, co-director of the show this school year, made a statement to The Michigan Daily that got her and fellow organizers into trouble with the national V-Day organization. "We can't change the words of the script, but we can change the way the words are presented," she was quoted as saying. "The script is flawed in its attempt to give all women a voice because it seems to give certain women certain voices. I often wonder why angry vaginas can't be white and happy vaginas can't be Asian." The statement was viewed as a plan by Michigan organizers to bar white women from parts in the production.

As a result of Whitehead's statement, the national V-Day organization threatened to pull the script -- in turn, ending the funds that would be distributed at area women's shelters -- unless white women were also allowed to be a part of the production. According to students, several white women were already involved in the production, in helping raise funds and create the show.

"[W]e applaud the efforts of the organizers to proactively engage a diverse group of students who may not have been deeply involved in previous V-Day benefit productions of The Vagina Monologues on campus," Shael Norris, a V-Day campus director said in a recent statement.  "However, we feel obligated to clarify that it is not in the spirit of V-Day to engage some women to the exclusion of others, and that V-Day will not endorse a production of The Vagina Monologues that does. The materials that V-Day provides to its approved organizers specifically directs organizers to incorporate as diverse a cast as possible with consideration to race, age, disability and size. Everyone that expresses interest is to be included, whether on stage or off.
 
"We also reject the notion ... that the script is inherently racist," said Norris. " The Vagina Monologues is a play based on Eve Ensler's interviews with over 200 real women. The vast majority of the monologues are composites of the interviews with women of various ages, races and creeds, and the script intentionally refuses to instruct directors to cast any particular role as a particular race."
 
Cotera, for one, finds the actions of V-Day organizers to be troubling. "The national V-Day committee is very, very sensitive about publicity being brought to the play that criticizes it," she said. "It seems that their wish to control and shape the appearance of the play tops their concerns for women," she added. "Plus, they object vociferously to any objections that the play is racially flawed -- and they will punish the [student] producers if they think that critiques are emanating from them."

V-Day organizers were not the only ones who took offense with the idea of limiting the play's parts  to "women of color." The student directors and producers received countless e-mails from students labeling their plan as a "reverse discrimination" tactic. 

Jeffrey Kelly, an engineering student at the university, recently posed a couple of questions on a heated Live Journal discussion regarding the plan. "Why does the minority community in this university feel the need to be so confrontational?" he asked. "You never hear about anything constructive. It's always a rally in the Diag featuring vulgar middle schoolers or a play not open to white participants. Where are all of the positive events?"

When contacted on Friday, Kelly elaborated, saying, "Suppose in response, I formed a student group that was only open to white students. There would be an outrage on campus from minority groups.  Yet these same groups practice the policies that they attack when they form a group for 'women of color' only."

Should men be allowed in the play? "From a strictly ideological viewpoint, I suppose the answer is yes, but on the other hand, men do not have vaginas, do not know what it is like to have a vagina, and will -- for most men -- never know what it is like to have a vagina," said Kelly. "Therefore, if a man were denied a part in the Vagina Monologues, while I would not be impressed with the group for denying someone membership, I would understand why they felt he didn't belong."

In response to the V-Day threat to pull the production, which is currently scheduled for February 19, the students made their rules much more fluid. They let white women audition to perform, and bent the traditional meaning of "women of color" to also include "women who may identify as white ethnics," such as Italian or Jewish women.

Cotera says that if the production ends up having a majority "women of color," it will "reorientate the production" in a way she finds useful. Students have been reluctant to give a breakdown of the racial make-up of the cast because there is still concern that the play could be cancelled by the national V-Day committee.

Added Sweeney, "[U]nlearning white privilege necessarily causes discomfort, so the discomfort that some white women may feel in having their own experiences decentered, or in being pushed to relate to representations of women that do not immediately reflect their own senses of identity as women, can be an important step toward achieving the greater well-being of all women."
                      

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Rose-Colored Vision

  • Why Universities Need Closer Supervision
  • Posted by Chuck on January 17, 2006 at 2:19pm EST
  • When looking for more compelling and depressing evidence of academic degradation it's hard to beat Prof. Megan Sweeney, as cited here.

    The last thing a PC zealot like her wants or could stand would be a stand-up public debate in which her racist insinuations would be debunked and mocked.

    For now, we should be thankful that an angry, obsessed, one-dimensional woman like her exists as an anti-role model of what we should never allow ourselves to become.

    For all her pious, self-righteous talk and race and privilege, I wonder how she would respond to a casting suggestion that, say, Tom Cruise play the part of Jackie Robinson or that Demi Moore play Coretta Scott King in respective films?

    Fear not, her reply would be as hackneyed and convoluted as her inane and witless comments in this article.

  • Posted by Larry on January 17, 2006 at 3:29pm EST
  • Chuck, Why does this mean that people require supervision? The VM is a silly girly-thing to do. No better than a sorority or some other stupid thing. It gives girls a way to think that they are doing something without dealing with the less disagreeable elements of life. Sure, it would be nice to eliminate the VM, and the whining that goes with it, but there are so many other wastes of time at universities, it wouldn’t be fair to pick on the VM. Also, your comments about what she “would” do are speculative, so it is hard to argue with them, because I don’t know what she *would* do, either.

  • Why Universities Need Closer Supervision, part 2
  • Posted by Chuck on January 18, 2006 at 10:57am EST
  • I’d like to be there when you tell a group of college women (not “girls”) why the whole VM witlessness is a “stupid thing” and a waste of time that would be “nice to eliminate.”

    The illiterate hoo-haa and vile anti-male sexism that permeates the VM and its cult-like adherents are a perfect example of the waste of time, money and effort that universities condone and support, as you do, as just having fun. Sorry mate, I don’t see it that way at all.

    Just do the flip test - when hearing or reading the VM, replace the word “vagina” with “penis” or use slangy terms for male genitalia instead of slangy terms for the female ones. Then ask yourself what whiny, angst-ridden college girls would do when they heard that?

    Who cares what’s speculative anyhow in this case? We are talking about just another example of how universities sanction mindless blather as if it were “higher education. “ get a grip!

    I laugh heartily at the feminists’ pretentiousness and shake my head in amazement at people who take this trash so seriously. I sure don’t.

  • Excellent piece
  • Posted by Michael Greenspan on January 18, 2006 at 10:57am EST
  • Congratulations to Mr. Capriccioso on a very entertaining article. After much thought, I've decided I agree with engineering student Jeffrey Kelly: men don't have vaginas.

  • Posted by Bemused on January 18, 2006 at 10:57am EST
  • In doing so, moreover, the script inadvertently contributes to a colonialist ‘othering’ of non-Western women and a silencing of these women

    Gah, are there still people around who talk like that? It's so ... nineties.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Posted by Susan Celia Swan, V-Day , Media & Communications Advisor at V-Day on January 18, 2006 at 12:53pm EST
  • V-Day takes issue with Inside Higher Education's lack of balanced reporting and reliance on assumptions, instead of facts, when reporting on the discussions surrounding the V-Day 2006 production of “The Vagina Monologues” at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
    In particular, we want to address reporter Rob Capriccioso’s statement that "As a result of Whitehead’s statement, the national V-Day organization threatened to pull the script — in turn, ending the funds that would be distributed at area women’s shelters — unless white women were also allowed to be a part of the production."
    V-Day never discussed shutting down the play with either the organizers, professors Cotera and Sweeney, Michigan Daily reporter Carissa Miller, or Inside Higher Education reporter Rob Capriccioso. In fact, in it’s eight-year history, V-Day has never shut down a benefit production of "The Vagina Monologues."
    V-Day works closely with organizers to address any issues that do not sync with the directors notes, or the mission of ending violence against women. Much to the contrary of the assumption made, V-Day's intention was to work with the organizers - as is its policy - to find a solution.
    In addition, the timeline that Mr. Capriccioso recounts in the piece appears based on an assumption and as a result is incorrect. V-Day was already in dialogue with the student organizers when the story in the Michigan Daily appeared. In all communications – prior, during, and since the Michigan Daily article - with the organizers of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, V-Day has worked to hear the organizer’s point of view and come to a place of mutual understanding.
    In the case of Inside Higher Education, V-Day repeatedly offered Mr. Capriccioso the opportunity to speak with V-Day's Executive Director and he did not accept, choosing instead to base his story on a letter that V-Day had written in December to the Michigan Daily. While Mr. Capriccioso sought out recent comment from professors at his alma mater, he chose not to extend this courtesy to representatives from V-Day.
    The ‘strict’ V-Day guidelines that Mr. Capriccioso mentions are the same as those that would be given to any commercial or regional theatrical production of the play. The director’s notes for “The Vagina Monologues” are incredibly open and as such have enabled thousands of organizers worldwide to stage benefit productions of the play that raise critical funds without racial typecasting.
    While we engaged in a healthy dialogue with the organizers involved in the production, the professors quoted have never spoken to V-Day, and V-Day rejects their notion that “The Vagina Monologues” is inherently racist or exclusionary. The play is a literary and dramatic text. It was never the playwright’s intent to speak for all women or to address every issue.

    That being said, the play has been embraced worldwide for its ability to present women’s issues and the issue of violence against women in an artistic way.

    Based on Eve’s interviews with over 200 real women of various ages, races and creeds, the script intentionally refuses to instruct directors to cast any particular role as a particular race. In fact, the only reference to race in the script is a monologue based on an interview with “a Southern woman of color” and the director’s notes go on to state that women of all races have performed this role around the world.

    Since the play was first performed, women of all races, religions, and sizes have performed the monologues – all of the monologues. In the last eight years, tens of thousands of women, from Tulsa, OK to Islamabad, Pakistan to Nairobi, Kenya have embraced the play, performing and casting women – both actors and non-actors – in all of the roles.

    Today the movement is represented in over 80 countries and there are over 45 translations of the play. As V-Day continues to grow, Eve has written several additional monologues available to V-Day organizers to address specific issues of violence in conjunction with V-Day’s annual Spotlight Campaigns (Each year, V-Day’s Spotlight campaign highlights a specific issue or area of violence against women.). Eve has penned numerous “issue specific” monologues focusing on a variety of issues including the desecration of women's rights under the Taliban, violence towards Native American women, and “the disappeared” women of Juarez, Mexico.
    Contrary to the comments of Professors Cotera and Sweeney, these monologues do not represent a general statement or summary of the situation of all Arab, Native American, or Latin women nor were they intended to. These added monologues specifically focus on situations of terrible violence that were (and still are) occurring in these regions at the time of the V-Day annual Spotlight. Like the original monologues, these spotlight monologues were based on interviews with women from these countries and approved of by the women and groups we were spotlighting.
    Ultimately, we are pleased that the organizers found a way to present the play in keeping with V-Day's mission to end violence against women and girls. V-Day stands by its approach and understanding that violence against women affects all women.
    We look forward to the upcoming 2006 season, which will continue to raise much-needed funds and awareness on over 688 college and university campuses.

    Sincerely,
    Susan Celia Swan
    V-Day Media & Communications Advisor

  • replacing 'vagina' with 'penis'
  • Posted by Sarah Deminico on January 19, 2006 at 6:36pm EST
  • A college student last year tried replacing obvious words. Check out their website at www.rwucr.com/testaclese. The administration filed disciplinary charges against her. She and a friend were put on housing probation for the rest of the year. Message to public: vagina = good, penis = bad. You can read more of the story at http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/sommers200505020808.asp.

  • The meaning of VM
  • Posted by David on January 25, 2006 at 11:01am EST
  • I wonder how many people who object to the Vagina Monologues as a vulgar play have actually tried to pay attention to its message. Especially after reading about the students who created the Penis Monologues, I find that our campuses are not succeeding in the overall mission to develop critical thinking skills that are necessary for women and men to understand the true meaning of the Vagina Monologues, rather than automatically subscribing to the societally constructed "vulgar" meaning of some words used in the performance.

    Responding directly to the topic of this article - Having read the Vagina Monologues script and seen performances as well as the DVD, I am a male who has encouraged students to create performances in the manner they see fit as long as they adhere to the guidelines set forth by the national foundation. I hope that readers recognize that the support an institution gives to these performances is usually in-kind such as donation of the space. In the instances I am aware of, the performances are not funded with institutional monies. When a college or university "supports" the Vagina Monologues, it is because of the educational message about treatment of women by other men, women and the person themself.

    There is no reason for women and men alike to recognize the value of the Vagina Monologues and support productions on campuses and in communities.