Search News


Browse Archives

News

Making Room for Baby

January 30, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In an effort to increase the number of women pursuing advanced degrees, Stanford University has adopted a new policy that administrators say “is designed to partially ameliorate the intrinsic conflict between the ‘biological’ and the ‘research’ and ‘training’ clocks for women graduate students.”

The university’s new Childbirth Policy allows all female graduate students “anticipating or experiencing” a birth who are registered, matriculated students to:

  • Be eligible for an “Academic Accommodation Period” of up to two academic quarters before and after childbirth, during which the student may postpone course assignments, examinations, and other academic requirements.
  • Be eligible for full-time enrollment during this period and to retain access to Stanford facilities, health insurance, and university housing.
  • Be granted an automatic one-quarter extension of university and departmental requirements and academic milestones, with the possibility of up to three quarters by petition under unusual circumstances.

Under the policy, students supported by fellowships, teaching assistantships, and/or research assistantships will be excused from their regular teaching assistant or resident assistant duties for a period of six weeks, during which they will continue to receive support.

A student cannot receive a stipend or salary if she didn’t receive one previously, but she is still eligible for the “Academic Accommodation Period” and the one-quarter extension of academic milestones.

“We have to make it easier for women to combine having a family with getting an educational experience,” said Gail Mahood, the university’s associate dean for graduate policy. Now in her mid-50s, Mahood said that many women from her generation decided to postpone having children until after graduate school, and, in some case, after they achieved tenure only to find that they could no longer have children or had to undergo lengthy fertilization treatments.

Administrators believe that Massachusetts Institute of Technology is the only other institution to be providing comprehensive childbirth support to female graduate students.  MIT’s plan was used as a prototype for Stanford’s new policy.

Of the approximately 5,500 graduate students currently enrolled at the university about one-third are female. Mahood said that the university expects about 30 females to participate in the plan each year at a cost of “less than $100,000.” No similar plans are expected to be enacted for male graduate students. “We’re responding to distinct differences in biology,” said Mahood.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Making Room for Baby

  • re: childbirth policies
  • Posted by Untenured Observer on January 30, 2006 at 9:31am EST
  • I commend any institution that changes its policy for childbearing women. The policies at Stanford (and MIT) are particularly pleasing because they are automatic—there will be no pressure on women to defer an optional benefit. I only wish that non-tenured faculty women could have similar benefits, like stopping the tenure clock for a year after childbirth. At most institutions, women have the option of stopping the clock, but many are hesitant to do so, fearing that their colleagues will judge them when tenure time rolls around.

    I gave birth to twins in graduate school. I lost my benefits and had to start repaying my student loan. It was a difficult time, to be sure. I made it through because I had an extremely my supportive partner who was committed to my career. Yet although it was difficult, I still think having children in grad school is preferable to having them on the tenure track.

  • About time.
  • Posted by S , Lecturer at Texas on January 30, 2006 at 1:36pm EST
  • Thank God. Everywhere needs to do this. In the humanities, doctorates often take ten years, by which time women (who, I think, make up the majority of humanities grad students) are hovering on the edge of infertility. Their dissertation directors, who are usually male, rarely think about it.

  • Posted by jcl , grad student on January 30, 2006 at 1:51pm EST
  • Hmmm. No easing of deadlines for new fathers after childbirth? That seems a little regressive. I'm also wary of their use of the term "biological clock."

  • Posted by EH , Ph.D. on January 31, 2006 at 4:30am EST
  • Oh, please! I'm all for parity but it is a basic biological fact that women do indeed have a "clock" they must beat when it comes to years of fertility. Men do not have the same biological pressures. I had to choose between a career in academia and childbirth. It was clear that I could not do both as a woman and a scholar. Men I studied alongside had children because their wives' pregnancies did not impact whether or not a professor thought they could continue as a TA. They didn't lose funding because they had to miss classes. Because of the pressures to produce research, rather than babies, I chose academia in a male-dominated field. Now, I struggle with fertility treatments in an effort to have a family. Kudos to Stanford for making family a priority!

  • Posted by LG , MSN, PhD student on January 31, 2006 at 5:16pm EST
  • I hope they plan to include families who are adopting as well. It seems discriminatory to exclude fathers, particulalry those who's wives plan to return to work/school soon after giving birth (such as myself) and expect their spouse to share the burden of a new child equally.

  • Posted by Larry on February 1, 2006 at 1:25pm EST
  • Indeed, this policy seems to really hurt men or others that want to adopt. Women, by virtue of the fact that they have working wombs are now given a chance to NOT work, whereas people who would adopt (or men that would take care of kids) must continue to work.

    But, it seems that adopt is considered a luxury that the people with good jobs in the middle class undertake, whereas giving birth is considered a fundamental right that all women (regardless of their wealth or obligations) can and mus do.

  • Posted by lm on February 2, 2006 at 10:55am EST
  • This is the way to the future. There are no female role models in the sciences. All are either unmarried, divorced or dysfunctional in some other way. I want to have several kids and a career but I find it difficult to imagine. May be things like this program will help.

  • It's the labor, ***!
  • Posted by Vika Zafrin at Brown University on February 16, 2006 at 5:15pm EST
  • Catching up on my IHE reading...

    Larry, I would propose that the HUGELY PHYSICALLY TAXING and sometimes dangeours nature of pregnancy and childbirth may have something to do with a genuine need of recovery time. You can't possibly be discounting the physical toll this takes on a person?

    That said, I think paternal and adoptive-parent leaves should be enacted as soon as possible, and moreover be equal in duration to maternal leaves. But that's dictated by my desire to see our quality of life increase, not by a belief that the physical demands are distributed equally. So please spare me the "by virtue of having working wombs" bit. It's not only irrelevant but offensive.

  • Posted by AR on February 21, 2006 at 11:00am EST
  • Cheers to Stanford (and MIT) for taking long-overdue steps to recognize that people want to be people outside of their careers.

    Next, we must recognize that restricting family leave to childbearing women contributes to the same restrictive gender roles we are working so hard to overcome. Fathers and parents in non-traditional families have the same rights and responsibilities regarding child-rearing; to give them no option to be a participating parent reinforces that it's only a woman's job.

    Acknowledging that mothers deserve to be able to balance life and work is a great first step -- now let's let everyone else play with junior too.

  • Kudos, and let's see more
  • Posted by Miriam Peskowitz , Author, The Truth behind the Mommy Wars on March 1, 2006 at 8:30pm EST
  • Thanks for covering this, it's really important. Academe is really behind the corporate world in terms of making room for family life, both for graduate students and for professors.

    Let's see more universities adopt family policies that extend this one. Currently FMLA is twelve weeks, let's see Stanford extend it's covered leave period to match this. Let's see them make it gender neutral and extend it to fathers too, if they haven't already, so that female students as a category won't be informally discriminated against, or accused of having "privileges" not available to men.

    And if they don't already have it, let's see Stanford offer heavily subsidized, high quality childcare to all students and faculty who need it. Only then will students be covered during their children's infancy, and afterward too.

    I offer this in the spirit of congratulations, and of visions for an even better future.