Search News


Browse Archives

News

The King and Yale University Press

February 3, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Thailand takes lèse-majesté seriously -- as Yale University Press is finding out.

The Thai government has blocked access in the country to the Yale University Press Web site because it includes information about a forthcoming, critical biography of Thailand's king. The King Never Smiles: A Biography of Thailand's Bhumibol Adulyadej is described in Yale publicity materials as the story of "how a king widely seen as beneficent and apolitical could in fact be so deeply political, autocratic, and even brutal." The author is Paul Handley, a journalist who spent much of his life reporting from Asia, including 13 years in Thailand.

The book is due out this summer -- in a year in which Thailand will be celebrating the 60th year of the king's reign. The book acknowledges his popularity with the Thai people, but -- according to the press -- "portrays an anti-democratic monarch who, together with allies in big business and the murderous, corrupt Thai military, has protected a centuries-old, barely modified feudal dynasty."

An official at the Thai Embassy in Washington said that reports about the Yale Press Web site being blocked were "just hearsay." The official, who would talk only on the condition that he not be identified, said he was not familiar with the forthcoming biography.

He said it would be impossible for him to respond to any question involving a book with criticism of the king. "All Thais revere the king and there is a law that he may not be criticized," he said. "You can't criticize the king because there is nothing to criticize him about."

In Thailand, the assistant minister of information and communication technology, Kanawat Wasinsangworn, confirmed for the Associated Press that the Yale Press Web site had been blocked "following a request from the Royal Police Bureau, which deems the book is insulting to the king."

The Yale University Press released a statement Thursday in which it said that "the author stands behind this book 100 percent, as does the press." The statement described the book as "dispassionate in tone and temperament" and said that it had been "thoroughly vetted both by leading scholars in the field and by the Yale University Press Faculty Committee."

The book is significant, the statement said, because it "recasts post-1932 Thai political history to include the monarchy's role (which has been skirted and omitted by every other modern history of the country)."

The title of the book, about the king not smiling "refers, simply, to the Buddhist concept of uppeka, or equanimity, in the projection of the king's image."

John Kulka, senior editor at the press, said that the Thai government had not contacted Yale about the biography and that he did not think it was possible that anyone in the Thai government could have seen a draft of the book. Kulka said Yale did not have any plans to try to get the Thais to change their minds. "Thailand has its own laws," he said. "Who is Yale University Press to dictate to the Thai government? We're about publishing books."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The King and Yale University Press

  • Posted by Su Teera on June 28, 2007 at 6:35pm EDT
  • His majesty the King bhumibol is one of the greatest persons I have ever known and I am pround to have witnessed his work for all Thais and I am really glad that Thai people express love and devotion back to him in every occasion we can. Love live the King.

    I read the book. Most of stories are not proven and it is clear that the author's knowledge is only about the rumours. And I would like to insist here again that foriegners, especially westerners, cannot understand this subject because of fundamental beliefs of western world. If you really want to understand this. Go to Thailand, stay there for at least a year and go visit all the royal project sites, attend all ceremony, interact with Thai people, study Thai history.

    If you just get out of the plane and ask the questions about the King and make a conclusion. Then, it's the same result as you get from this book.

    By the way, I am Thai , brough up in Thailand and I am now living and working in USA.

  • Posted by Supranee T. on March 14, 2008 at 4:05pm EDT
  • Do not misunderstand the Thai. I am a Thai living aboard and I have read all the books about my beloved King. Most of the criticism are biased. I am 38 years old and I have seen the King since I was born. I proudly say I owe my life to the King. He is the hero of my life, my inspiration. The reason is simple because he has proved his intention by giving helps, encourages and supports the ideas or works of anyone in Thailand versus benefits to his own. He provides choices to solve issues in Thailand, numerous solutions has been used in other countries right now, which has been used in Thailand for more than a decade.

    With his virtue, he can order anyone to do anything without legal power why? Because the Thai trusts him. Because of his work in the past. However, he never uses the power to interfere the Thai society except the time of crisis. When he did that, the world recognizes and wonders why the Thai revere him that much.

    I do not disagree that the King is a human but his virtue cannot be disputed. Please learn his life&work before you judge him. By simply read this book, you cannot judge him. It is very biased. Don't you think! Personally, I don't care how the world would see my King but I am glad if you want to learn more about the King. His life is such an inspiration.

    Another reason, I agree to ban this book in Thailand. All the money goes to where ?.. The writer, who has done very bad job on researching the King's life and we the Thai buy this book and feel bad when reading it and etc.. I am the one who never buy this kind of book but read it at the book store and have to say.. this book disappoint me. It is just a collection of rumours or facts the Thai already knows.

  • Posted by Roger Dickson , How many URL's? to be blocked on February 13, 2006 at 4:25am EST
  • Thailand already blocks quite a number of URL's from within the country - most of these are pornography displaying Thai women but are not limited to that.

    Now they have blocked YUP will they also block Amazon (I suspect Amazon will self censor), this site, any site that sells the book or reviews it?

    When first published Stevenson's, "The Revolutionary King" was available in Thailand bit now no more - it had full co-operation with the King and full access. There are suspicions it was removed from sale due to the myriad of mistakes in the book.

  • FEAR
  • Posted by Thai Watcher on May 20, 2006 at 2:10pm EDT
  • I have been in this land for a long time and seen it move along the tracks of the asian fear-based rollercoaster. Sadly, until Thais learn to speak out, they will be susceptible to this kind of censorhip and lack of personal freedom. Fear choices are disasterous...growth choices will set you free........do wats rite in the greate interest of you and your land Thais! Love to you all. Let's hope your king also supports you....and not supresses your many talents!

  • Posted by dan on June 15, 2006 at 12:05pm EDT
  • i did click on amazon.com to find the book and book review at 10:50 local time in bangkok, on 15 june 06. it was't blocked at all.

  • We Love Our King as Our Father
  • Posted by vorachet punpoovong on July 17, 2006 at 5:25am EDT
  • Our country can pass the worst time in history because we have the King Bhumibol. Forieners can not understand and know the greatest gift the King give us.

  • I respect my King
  • Posted by Craig , Craig on July 17, 2006 at 5:25am EDT
  • I can mention that all of Thai People approximately 60 million people respect our king and we can even give our lives for him. We were taught to love him from his responsibilities and from family. The King, however, does the best in order for developing countries, proving water for argriculturals, and giving free educations to children. My King never wants the war for oil and etc. You, the autor of this book, has no right no critic our king as he has no right information. I know, this may be the best way to promote himself if he wrote something about my King. It is promoted as "Talk of the Town" Now, you will know why all of Thai people are wearing yellow shirts becasue this is they way to present to the world that Thai people love and respect our King.

  • Posted by taklom on July 18, 2006 at 8:00pm EDT
  • I do not have a copy of this book. Only read the review from some blogs. There is one thing that I am sure of is that NO westerners can truely understand Thai's respect to our king. The author of this book sees Thais from his standpoint which is totally different from our standpoint. No wonder the author comes to this conclusion which extremely irritates Thais.

  • Posted by A different point of view on August 1, 2006 at 9:30pm EDT
  • It's interesting to see that Thai people really do have a big fuss about this book and apparently take this issue personally.

    To me, this is a great book which offers another aspect of how the Thai monarchy can be viewed and examined. I don't think Handley personally offended the king in his book.

    This particular view portrayed in the book, however, is shown to be very unpopular and widely unaccepted by the Thais. This doesn't come as a surprise.

    As Handley already made it clear that Thai people have been "brain washed" with a certain ideology of their king and royal family. So the only best rebuttle they can come up with as far as this book is concerned is that the author (or foreigners for that matter) do not understand the Thais, not to mention some crude comments from some die-hard royalists, or the Thai way of thinking. Well, this rebuttle in fact is true if we take a broader look at this country. Foreigners will not understand that kind of thought and (no)reasoning as long as they have not been brain washed by a similar mechanism.

  • Posted by Tom on September 6, 2006 at 12:20pm EDT
  • In my opinion, being foreigner or Thai should not make any different in reading books no matter what the subject is all about, as long as a person know how to balance their thoughts. Thai’s way or British or American way is just a superficial layer of behaviour that only divides people and should not at all be counted when making comments. After reading the book, I have to confess that I do enjoy reading it, but I will never take the matter in the book seriously. At the beginning, the writer does show that he did quite a lot of research and making a lot of interesting comments. But when the story starts to unfold, it seems like he does enjoying himself with series of conspiracy theories (which is of course fun to read!).

    The only remark I have is the explanation of the book, according to Handley, he describe the book as “A Biography of Thailand's Bhumibol Adulyadej”. Which I see it as a kind of journalist tactic to capture the crowd. The further I read, the more I feel like he’s talking about the monarchy as a kind of ‘institutional’ and not entirely related to the king himself. Names after names of military figures or court counselors were mentioned, but not the king. In which I see it as a little bit unfair to the man himself to be responsible to all the conspiracy acts that are listed in the book.

    To be honest, the king and his family are also human, sharing the same agony in life as we all do. Consider tremendous things he has done for Thailand, (without value it to any particular capitalism or any other standard) I think it is already enough you can ask from a man in one life time, don’t you think?

  • Proof is in the reading
  • Posted by hpboothe on September 12, 2006 at 7:25am EDT
  • Ironically, the more Thai people complain about the book with no rationale beyond "only Thais understand", the more they proove Handley's thesis that the Thai King has created a nation of blind ignorant sheep. How can Thais ever understand how their own view of the King and the palace has been systematically created through manipulation and media control? I'd say only a non-Thai can really have an objective view. For the vast majority of non-Thais, they have no interest or care about the Thai King, so to claim that Handley wrote what he did for personal fame and fortune is laughable. For those of us non-Thais who are interested in the reality of the situation (which most Thais have no interest in, secure in their own delusions), the book is a fascinating read. Even if not 100% accurate, it points out quite clearly that what Thais are told officially is quite different from what actually happens - master jazz musician, engineering genius, rain-maker, brilliant author, etc. etc. - can anyone really be all these things? Yet the Thais completely believe their King is all these things. Blind ignorant sheep. But happy though!
    hpb