Search News


Browse Archives

News

A Holocaust Denier Resurfaces

February 8, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A new generation of Northwestern University students is learning what many of their predecessors found out during their time in Evanston: A tenured member of the faculty is also a prominent Holocaust denier.

Arthur R. Butz, an associate professor of electrical engineering and computer science, has been sharing his views about the Holocaust since the 1976, when he published The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, shortly after he received tenure. Northwestern observers say that he tends to make a splash with his views every few years. Since students are by their nature transient, and weren't around for previous debates over Butz, many were shocked when Butz's views again became known this week.

The Chicago Tribune (free registration required) reported that Butz had come to the aid of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has been under fire for his assertions that the Holocaust is a myth. In recent interviews with the Iranian press, the Tribune reported that Butz said of the Iranian president and his views on the Holocaust: "I congratulate him on becoming the first head of state to speak out clearly on these issues and regret only that it was not a Western head of state."

Many Northwestern students were shocked by the report, which was circulated widely online at the university, prompting considerable discussion -- among Jewish students especially -- of how to protest Butz.

Stuart Loren, a sophomore who is a history major, organized a petition to demand that Northwestern bar Butz from using the university's computer network to spread his views. "It's ridiculous that a Northwestern professor can give credibility to these views and has a Northwestern Web site to do so," Loren said.

"Butz is entitled to have his opinions," Loren said, "but the university needs to make it clear that those opinions are ethically contrary to what the university stands for."

Some students have discussed asking the university to fire Butz. Loren said that "realistically," students aren't pushing for such a move.

For years now, the university has had a policy that applies only to Butz: If he teaches a course that is required for graduation or any degree program, another section of that course must be offered at the same time, so no student ever has to enroll in one of his classes. However, Northwestern officials and students who are furious about Butz's statement confirm that there are no reports that he has ever shared his views on the Holocaust during class time.

While Butz does have use of Northwestern's system to post his views, the Holocaust is not mentioned on his main departmental or personal pages. Butz did not respond to phone or e-mail messages seeking an interview.

On Monday, Northwestern's president, Henry S. Bienen, issued a statement denouncing Butz, but affirming his right to free expression. Bienen called Butz's most recent statement "a contemptible insult to all decent and feeling people" and said that Butz's views "are an embarrassment to Northwestern."

But Bienen noted that Butz has never discussed the Holocaust in class and has made clear that he does not speak on the university's behalf. "Like all faculty members, he is entitled to express his personal views, including on his personal Web pages," Bienen wrote. "We cannot take action based on the content of what Butz says regarding the Holocaust -- however odious it may be -- without undermining the vital principle of intellectual freedom."

Adam Simon, executive director of Hillel at Northwestern, said that many students were quite upset to learn about Butz. Hillel organized a forum scheduled for last night at which students could talk about their feelings -- and what an appropriate response would be to Butz's statements. "Students are concerned. They want to know that this is a safe space for Jewish life, which it is, but they want to be reassured of that," Simon said.

Simon said that he did not favor trying to have Butz fired. "There is freedom of speech and he hasn't broken any laws or university rules," Simon said.

What's important, he added, is that students "own a voice" in deciding what to do, Simon added. He said that he's pleased that students are already talking about various ideas, such as sponsoring new academic lectures about genocide or finding ways to get involved with preventing genocide today. "This can be about lessons we have learned" beyond just the history of the Holocaust, he said.

One thing that Hillel will not do, Simon said, is just sponsor events to say that the Holocaust happened. That approach would legitimize Butz and not accomplish much of anything, he said. "If the headline on all of this is just 'Jews say Holocaust happened,' then we will have done something wrong," he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Holocaust Denier Resurfaces

  • Posted by SP on February 8, 2006 at 7:45am EST
  • Perhaps his HoD, Dean, or other managers reading this could report anonymously whether a) the offending book has been checked for accuracy? If it contains numerous assumptions, misleading statements, and errors, [which it must do] can this be grounds for a rigorous post-tenure inquiry? b) why on earth is material that breaches rules of free speech and hate crimes in several countries (notably Germany - the publisher of his book was deported from there) allowed on a Uni website? People are sacked for less in sensible systems without tenure c) Retirement must be close, right? Couldn't you make him a non-negotiable offer to accept an indefinite posting in a a study abroad program...... in Israel? See how he goes over there.
    Protests on campus are sure to be big in the next few days - bring them on.

  • Extremists-R-Us
  • Posted by Jack-Trades on February 8, 2006 at 8:41am EST
  • Isn't this the same campus that Matt Hale liked to visit, and where the Unabomber sent his first package? It's sort of a magnet for the lunatic fringe, wouldn't you say? Maybe they should just run with it and develop an Extremist Studies Dept.--Holocaust deniers, White Supremacists, Fascists, and Fundamentalists all in one place (outside of Montana, that is)--none of them actually "teaching" their views of course, just granting them the legitimacy of a tenured professorship at a top American university. Then we'd have some of that right-wing "diversity" that some people crave so desperately.

  • Posted by Comm Prof on February 8, 2006 at 9:30am EST
  • The protections of the First Amendment extend even to the insane and, as Oliver Wendell Holmes reminded us about 80 years ago, to the "thought we hate."

  • Holocaust Denial of Left as Well as Right
  • Posted by Mitchell Langbert , Associate Professor at Brooklyn College on February 8, 2006 at 10:10am EST
  • Several of my relatives were killed in the holocaust, including my great-grandparents. I also have friends who were victims of Mao's cultural revolution. I also have students whose relatives were murdered by Stalin.

    Northwestern University deserves high praise for respecting the free speech rights of the appropriately-named Professor Butz. One of the reasons the United States excels Europe and other nations with respect to develop is the greater degree of freedom here, in the realm of speech as well as the economic realm.

    It intrigues me that the left-liberals who dominate our universities cry about free speech when there is suppression of the left, but then advocate parallel kinds of ssuppression when it applies to non-leftists. One of my Brooklyn College colleagues rants endlessly about McCarthy, who was censured nearly 60 years ago, but was indifferent to his colleague who was nearly denied tenure on personal and political grounds.

    What is remarkable about Professor Butts is not that there is one eccentric holocaust denier at Northwestern, but that there are thousands of eccentric left wing holocaust deniers around the country's campuses who (a) deny that Stalin murdered tens of millions; (b) who deny that Mao murdered tens of millions; (c) who deny that Pol Pot murdered more than a million; and (d) who deny that these egregious crimes are associated with left wing doctrines of state control of the economy and centralized economic planning.

    Hence, the real story here is that the bulk of holocaust denial on campus is not reported at all. Professor Butts's anti-Semitism is a much smaller story.

  • Private v. public
  • Posted by A.D. on February 8, 2006 at 10:10am EST
  • " .. The protections of the First Amendment extend even to the insane .."

    Yes -- and thank (insert deity), Northwestern is a private institution, not owned by the taxpayers, who already have enough problems. Anyone interested in hoisting more problems on the taxpayers -- you can increase your own taxes and legal budget, first. Thank you.

  • Let the fool howl away...
  • Posted by Scott on February 8, 2006 at 10:21am EST
  • I think that Northwestern is taking just the right response to the issue - condemning his words while defending his right to speak them.
    The First Amendment doesn't just apply to those opinions that we agree with (a lesson that BOTH political parties and a sitting president) might bear in mind.

    Butz seems to resurface every few years, a bit like a nasty chronic infection. His opinions may be contemptible and spark outrage. And he SHOULD catch some grief for them. But until such time as he breaks University rules, then let the fool howl away. He might make a useful example of how expertise in one field does not carry over into another...

  • Arthur Butz Holocost Revisionism
  • Posted by Craig Rambo on February 8, 2006 at 10:21am EST
  • I find it disappointing that a University would rightly condemn a professor that fakes the facts in research and then publishes it but supports an assistant professor under the guise of "free speech" who creates an uproar with a so called "opinion" that is published totally in conflict with the "facts". Where is the demand for credibility within the educational community? The University should justly remove a professor that purposely publishes inaccurate facts on an issue well known to the world. The result is a slap at the credibility of the University.

    Freedom of speech is a foundation of our society. However, most of us are getting sick and tired of politically correct double standards. How about the University having the guts to stand up for what is factual and right and get rid of the guy. Set a standard for accuracy and quality! Butz should be able to speak freely but it does not mean the University has to employ an incompetent assistant professor.

  • Stalin supporters on American campus?
  • Posted by lnp3 at Columbia University on February 8, 2006 at 10:40am EST
  • To my knowledge, the only professor who would deny that Stalin killed millions of his own countryman is Grover Furr over at Montclair State, who was identified by redbaiter David Horowitz in his "most dangerous 100" list. Now, it is true that many professors used to hold these views but they were driven out of the academy by Horowitz's idol Joe McCarthy. Of course, there are many professors who deny that a holocaust took place against American Indians. I was shocked to discover a while back that HNN published an article that originally appeared in Commentary magazine that made this case. You can read it here:

    http://hnn.us/articles/7302.html

  • Deja vu all over again?
  • Posted by Tom McCool on February 8, 2006 at 11:50am EST
  • Arther Butz and Ward Churchill. Both with polarizing opinions and, oddly, both evoke similar imagery. Yet Churchill commands huge speaking fees and is wined and dined as a darling of "academic freedom of speech." I guess there are two sides to that coin.

  • Work with donors and trustees
  • Posted by Gypsy Boots on February 8, 2006 at 1:11pm EST
  • While it is not realistic to try to get a tenured professor fired for opinions he expresses outside of class, it is certainly permissible to make sure that an institutions's trustees and donors know about his or her activities. A mailing to donors and trustees would be money well-spent by Hillel.

    Perhaps Professor Butz was given tenure when a different administration was in charge and due diligence wasn't as strict. It wouldn't be right to hold the present administration responsible. And you can't predict what people will do once they get tenure, if they've managed to keep their true views concealed.

    But the time the current administration would spend soothing outraged trustees and/or donors would be a powerful incentive to make sure that no one like that was granted tenure again. That's democracy and civic participation in a free society.

  • churchill a darling?
  • Posted by bs detector on February 8, 2006 at 1:11pm EST
  • hardly, just in a very small circle. not sure about any huge speaking fees, perhaps you have something to back that up?

    in fact, from what i've quickly found, his usual fee is around $5,000, not huge by any means in the campus speaking arena.

    this blogger claims to have spoken to chruchill's agency and found that his bookings aren't that strong.

    http://haloscan.com/tb/marathonpundit/113877097135631097

  • Response to LNP3, Louis Proyect
  • Posted by Mitchell Langbert on February 8, 2006 at 3:14pm EST
  • Louis, are you saying that there should be an expose of Furr as there has been of Butz? Also, do you really think that he is the only one in all of American academia?

    PS--Noam Chomsky on Pol Pot atrocities (Who needs Stalinists?):

    "Since that time figures of all sorts have been bandied about. In January 1979, the Far Eastern Economic Review (the main business journal covering Asia, now part of the Dow Jones system) claimed that the population of Cambodia had risen to 8.2 million under the Khmer Rouge (that would be an increase of about 1 million). The next year they said it had fallen to 4 million. The actual figure, by census count, was about 6.7 million. The CIA, in its demographic study in 1980, claims that Pol Pot killed 50-100,000 people and attributes most deaths to the Vietnamese invasion, also denying flatly the atrocities of 1978, which were by far the worst (that's the source of the famous piles of skulls, etc...."

  • Response to Langbert & Proyect
  • Posted by Grover Furr on February 8, 2006 at 6:55pm EST
  • We have the best of all possible reasons to "deny that Stalin murdered tens of millions"; that "Mao murdered tens of millions", that "Pol Pot murdered more than a million". These statements are simply false. They cannot be supported by the evidence.

    How does Langbert "know" these things? He doesn't! He is _making them up_ -- or, perhaps, _copying_ them from others who have made them up.

    Here as elsewhere Right-Wingers like Langbert simply promote their own form of "political correctness", meaning: "echo _our_ prejudices, and hang the evidence, or WE will call YOU 'Holocaust deniers' like Butz."

    They are not interested in the truth, as demonstrated by the best evidence; they want to push their own exploitative, reactionary, and irrational fixed ideas, as Langbert does here.

    What infuriates Right-Wingers about Chomsky is the thoroughness of his research.

    Suppose Chomsky _had_ made an error 30 years ago about the Khmer Rouge, it would prove -- what? That he, like everybody else, makes mistakes? In fact the statement by Chomsky quoted by Langbert is carefully researched, well-reasoned, and eminently responsible. Read it for yourself, at http://www.zmag.org/forums/chomcambodforum.htm

    My own research in recent years has been about the "Stalin" period in the USSR, as revealed by documents from the formerly secret Soviet archives. (See, for example, http://eserver.org/clogic/2005/2005.html )

    These materials show anybody who puts evidence first and political bias second that the history of the Soviet Union must be completely rewritten. The version we have all learned is wrong, whether that version was the Trotskyist, the Cold-War, the Khrushchevite, or some mixture of these.

    It's not "politically correct" to say so. It is simply true.

    Obviously, neither Langbert nor Proyect know, or care, anything about the truth. In this they are closer to Butz than they would like to think.

  • Tenure
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on February 8, 2006 at 9:05pm EST
  • Hmm... 30 years of Butz, 2 of Churchill, Chompski for far too long... and yet people wonder why some of us don't like tenure...

  • New Department
  • Posted by Gene , professor emeritus on February 9, 2006 at 4:21am EST
  • I like the idea of an Extremist Studies Department.

  • That's a remarkable claim, Dr. Langbert
  • Posted by Ted Clayton on February 9, 2006 at 4:20pm EST
  • "...there are thousands of eccentric left wing holocaust deniers around the country’s campuses who (a) deny that Stalin murdered tens of millions; (b) who deny that Mao murdered tens of millions; © who deny that Pol Pot murdered more than a million; and (d) who deny that these egregious crimes are associated with left wing doctrines of state control of the economy and centralized economic planning."

    If you could provide evidence that there are "thousands" of such people on college campuses - I would settle even for evidence that there are as many as several hundred - I would be very grateful (as would David Horowitz).

  • Posted by Thane Doss on February 10, 2006 at 4:40am EST
  • This really does seem like an academic non-issue to me. The fellow is a professor of electrical engineering and computer science. If he publishes embarrassingly badly researched material on history, that has nothing to do with why the university hired him or how he's qualified for tenure, which presumably involves research in
    electrical engineering and computer science. Demanding any academic response (beyond perhaps occasionally pointing out that this is not the field of expertise for which the university employs him) to his extracurricular activities is simply inviting the university to begin dictating requirements for all the other aspects of private life for its employees.

    If he were a historian and this book and his further commentaries relating to it were part of his tenure process, things would be different.
    Shall we start trying to remove the tenure of persons outside of math and physics who make statements that reveal misunderstanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle or Goedel's Incompleteness Theorem?

  • Posted by NU Alum, class of 1996 on February 10, 2006 at 4:40am EST
  • Regarding Butz's tenure . . . It was granted *prior* to him publishing his book. In effect, he waited and kept his opinions to himself. As soon as he had tenure . . and was in a position to not be fired . . he began to speak his mind.

    One other item to share . . While walking through the Technology building at NU while I was an undergrad, I did stumble upon his office. It was basically a cubbyhole in a stairwell. It might have moved in the 10 years since I came across it but something tells me they shoved him in a rear stairwell for a reason.

  • Response to Grover Furr
  • Posted by Mitchell Langbert on February 10, 2006 at 9:15am EST
  • Doubtless, Professor Furr, you continue to defend the scholarly passages in Lysenko's writings on evolution. Keep up the good work. I'm sure the right wingers at the Modern Language Association are proud of you.
    (Right wingers? What right winger? They were fired years ago for being McCarthyites!!@@#$!)

  • Free speech in Chicago
  • Posted by Adam Kissel on February 13, 2006 at 4:25am EST
  • While Northwestern defends a holocaust denier, two students at the University of Chicago were punished because of one offensive sentence that the first student wrote on the other's dorm room door. The second student was punished apparently because he failed to erase the offensive sentence from his door quickly enough. I would have hoped that the University of Chicago would promise to protect free expression at least as well as the Constitution does.

  • Iranian President Fool
  • Posted by T.J. on March 14, 2006 at 3:50pm EST
  • Let the Iranian president fool talk all he wants to about the holocaust. But the rest of the world knows the truth. That the holocaust did indeed happen, there is over whelming evidence that the holocaust did happen. We have nothing to prove to this insane man. All he is doing is shooting off his mouth. He is only making himself look foolish.

  • Electrical Engg. Courses
  • Posted by Prasun Choudhury , Senior research Engineer at Nokia Research Center on June 10, 2006 at 10:05am EDT
  • Without going into the debate of holocaust denial, I think being a Professor of Electrical Engg., Dr. Arthur Butz should pay more attention on the technical materials he teaches in his class. Being an alumni of Northwestern and having taken courses offered by him, its plain clear to me how liitle (if at all any) I have learned from his courses. I think the University should also monitor on what he is teaching in the class as I believe every student at NU is entitled to expect top-notch technical materials in every course they take (and not waste the hefty tuition fee without learning anything from a course). In my opinion, the class material he offers is age old and should be revised with time as most of those topics are out-of-date in fast moving areas of Electrical Engg.