Search News


Browse Archives

News

Closing the High School-College Gap

February 23, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

States are making meaningful progress toward better connecting the standards and requirements of their public high school systems with the expectations and needs of local colleges and employers -- but they have far to go, according to a new report.

"Closing the Expectations Gap 2006," a report by Achieve, a nonprofit education group created by governors and business leaders, seeks to quantify how much progress officials in the 50 states have made in aligning their secondary and postsecondary systems since the National Governors Association's 2005 National Education Summit on High Schools.

The report finds a mixed picture. As of December 2005, only five states -- California, Indiana, Nebraska, New York and Wyoming -- said they had fully aligned the academic standards of their high schools with the demands of colleges and employers, and had higher education and business leaders in the state validate that alignment. (That is three states more than said they had done so before the summit, though Achieve noted that it had not reviewed the standards in Nebraska, New York or Wyoming to attest to their quality or rigor.) Another 30 states reported that they were working to align their standards, the report said.

Achieve identified what it called "significant" progress in states' requiring high school students to complete a curriculum that adequately prepares them for college and work. Since the summit, Achieve found, six states -- Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Oklahoma and South Dakota -- had enacted graduation requirements that included four years of rigorous English and mathematics at least through Algebra 2. They joined Arkansas and Texas, which had already done so by the time of the summit. Twelve other states reported planning to put such requirements in place, and seven others had raised their graduation requirements since the summit, but not to the level recommended by Achieve.

Relatively little progress had been made by the states in instituting high school assessment tests that are "rigorous enough to signal whether students are ready for college-level work," which, Achieve asserts, tends to lead colleges to "ignore the results of those tests and instead administer their own admissions and placement tests," sending a "mixed set of messages to students, parents and teachers." In six states, Achieve reported, statewide high school tests are also used for college admissions and placement, while eight states have tied college scholarships or financial aid to student performance on high school assessments. (On these measures, the report did not provide numbers from before the summit for comparative purposes.)

The Achieve report also found that relatively few states have successfully put in place longitudinal data systems that would allow policy makers to track their residents as they move throughout their educational system, from elementary through higher education, which is crucial, it says, to "the ability of states to hold high schools accountable for improving student transitions to college and work."

Three states, the report said, have such a data system in place now: Florida, Louisiana and Texas. Thirty others are in the process of building them.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Closing the High School-College Gap

  • The gap is huge and will take years to address
  • Posted by phree , Dr. on February 23, 2006 at 10:20am EST
  • As someone who teaches at the local state college level, I think the above initiative is great. However, anyone who teaches freshmen and sophomores has to realize that high schools are doing a pathetic job of preparing students to communicate effectively at the college level. 80% of my freshmen cannot write a short paper that is remotely coherent, even with guidance. Many cannot master sentences. Since we cannot teach literacy in 15 weeks or less, community and state colleges are regularly graduating students who cannot read or write at a college level.

    Some of my students have been honest enough to admit that cheating your way through college via various technological tricks and old-fasioned paper buying is now the norm. I believe them and think our system is failing to serve non-ivy league students with any measure of integrity. (Frankly, I'm not sure the same trend isn't also present at the "better" schools too. ) Students pay big money for college and we pass them along much like the high schools we criticise.

  • Posted by Michael , Librarian at High School on February 23, 2006 at 12:10pm EST
  • Getting students to learn to importance of topic development, planning their time, research skills, and how to use information once they have located it, is a major task at the high school level. Combining these skills into the curriculum usually meets resistence from teaching faculty. If further collaborations could be made between faculty and librarians at all levels of education, the gap could be reduced.

  • Closing the High School College Gap
  • Posted by Brian at Stanford Upward Bound on February 23, 2006 at 12:15pm EST
  • On paper, California may have indeed aligned some of its high school content standards with the college requirements for admissions. With so much pressure being put on high schools to improve test scores and graduation rates, the emphasis on achievement in high school isn't necessarily in preparation for higher ed or improved job placement, but on recieving a diploma of some sort. With the continuing high remediation rates in our state colleges (CSU's and UC's), it's obvious California and a lot of other states have a long way to go towards actually preparing students for engagement in a changing and challenging world.

  • Preparation for High School
  • Posted by Susan Coia Gailey , Preparation for High School on February 24, 2006 at 3:35pm EST
  • Has anyone considered the shape students are in when they enter high school?

  • Posted by Norman stahk on February 26, 2006 at 3:50pm EST
  • Perhaps it is time to ask some very hard questions about teaching and content in higher education. The bottom line is that there is an inverse quality of pedagogy in this country. The best teaching is at the preschool level, and the quality goes down the hill as the grade level goes up the ladder. By the time students hit the freshman or the sophomore level the quality of teaching is pitiful. Furthermore, such is particularly true as you go up the ladder in the Carnegie classifications.

    There should be little wonder that our profession is being expected to follow the public schools in an accountability movement. The only question should be is why didn't we have to do so back when it began in the 1970's.

    It is time for better alignment but that alignment can not come with higher education faculty simply blaming the pedagogy and the content from the lower grades. What is necessary is true partnership (yes, that is a term that has little true meaning today.) where there is a give and take in what we can learn from each other.