Search News


Browse Archives

News

Lending a Brain

February 24, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

With scientific expertise sweeping the globe, the next generation of American scientists and engineers are going to face unprecedented competition, and college is too late to begin preparing them for it, according to the National Science Board.

The board released its "Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006" report Thursday. The report, which focused on elementary and secondary education, cast a foreboding tone. According to the report, while the scores of American students on national math assessments have risen slightly in recent years, the same cannot be said for science. According to the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics Science Study , fourth and eighth graders in the United States performed better in math and science than the international average of industrial nations, but improvement since 1995 was modest for eighth graders, and fourth graders took a slight step backward.

Even a fourth grade student who is getting his or her first exposure to science might already be left in the starting blocks, according to Jo Ann Vasquez, a National Science Board member and the lead author of the report. “[Kids] have to get science by third grade,” she said, “or that wonderment disappears.”
 
What the report means for higher ed, Vasquez added, is that colleges and universities need to portray teaching as a satisfying career possibility for science students, and reach out to teachers in K-12 rather than looking down their noses at them.

Vasquez acknowledged that, for many recent Ph.D. recipients, time spent doing anything but research is seen as time wasted. She said she hopes the culture of the academy can change enough so that teaching for a few years won’t be something fit only for the bottom of the résumé. “If we don’t [change], we’re cutting off our nose to spite our face,” Vasquez said. She urged science departments and education departments to step outside their silos to design programs that focus on prepping teachers, both to be knowledgeable and engaging, for kids as young as kindergarten.

According to the report, as of 2002, nearly one-fourth of science teachers and one-fifth of math teachers did not have certification in the field they were teaching. Vasquez said she’d like to see people with science and math graduate degrees, rather than rushing to academe, “teach for 5 to 10 years,” she said, while doing some research in the summer.

As has been the theme of recommendations to improve science education of late, Vasquez said that industry needs to get involved. She said that companies could benefit from summer researchers with graduate degrees, and that the researcher/teachers could stay abreast of current methods.

Michael Prudich, chair of the chemical engineering department at Ohio University, said that he could envision such an arrangement for a year or so for doctoral candidates who need extra financial support -- if a stipend is arranged. “But 5 to 10 years is a long time,” he added. “If you’re going to be out for 5 or 10 years, you’ll be somewhat out of date in terms of getting back in the academic research market.” As any good math student would quickly realize, 5-10 years of teaching before entering the academy could easily put scholars in their their 40s before they even get evaluated for tenure. Prudich said students with bachelor’s degrees in the sciences would be more likely candidates for long-term teaching. “People who’ve gotten a Ph.D. have made a strong decision about their career,” Prudich added. 

Shirley M. Malcom, head of education and human resources for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said that professors who mentor graduate students should simply let them know it's ok if they don't want to walk in their advisers' footsteps.

According to data from the report, certificate programs might be a good place to recruit science teachers. In 1983, 2,657 computer science certificates were awarded. That number grew to 17,138 in 2002.

Vasquez added that encouraging more women to get science degrees will help. A teaching career, she said, “is attractive to young women. They can take time to have a family,” which can be difficult on the tenure track. In the past two decades, the proportion of science and engineering degrees earned by women has grown prodigiously, reaching 45 percent in 2003, though women earned only 19 percent of engineering degrees in 2003.

Steven C. Beering, president emeritus of Purdue University and a member of the board, said that there’s an opportunity for colleges and universities work with schools and have math and science students and faculty members interact with K-12 teachers to help keep them up to date. “It’s also a wonderful recruiting tool,” Beering said.

“Once you get caught up in the business of teaching,” Beering said. “You get very excited.” Beering said Purdue has a program where faculty members teach prison inmates. At first, Beering said, there was some skepticism about whether faculty members would be interested, but now both some teachers and students are addicted. “We can’t get people out once they get in,” he said. And, surprisingly, the professors aren’t the only ones who want to stay in prison. One student who got a degree from prison, Beering said, “didn’t want to go. He loved his teachers and said he didn’t know anyone on the outside.” If only eighth graders were so well behaved.

 

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Lending a Brain

  • Encourage Biology/Chem majors -- not likely
  • Posted by William Jack , Professor at Franklin Pierce College on February 24, 2006 at 7:40am EST
  • Why should we encourage our Biology majors to go into high school science teaching when the pay is low,the prestige is very low, and the work requirements are increasing? Science students have to pay off high interest loans and also have to work much harder than students in less demanding disciplines. Rather than encouraging such dedicated students to go into teaching I encourage them to work in the private sector and thus earn a living wage and more oportunity for personal growth.

  • how about paying math and science teachers more?
  • Posted by Joel , asst prof on February 24, 2006 at 1:45pm EST
  • I'm sure teaching would be more attractive if math and science teachers were paid more. We need to abandon the notion that all K-12 teachers should be paid the same irrespective of subject matter. That's not the way it works in the university.

  • Low Pay, Low self Esteem
  • Posted by Alan Lott , Professor on February 27, 2006 at 11:02am EST
  • Well Joel, it is true that salaries vary widely based on college/department at the university level; however, I am confused as to why the university model is the one to follow? Consider that faculty in colleges of education are generally among the lowest paid on campus and are often afforded very little respect outside of their own small circle. Colleges of education are frequently found to have some of the lowest funding levels at the university and are often housed in the oldest, most dilapidated buildings on campus. It has always been interesting to me that the faculty who "teach teachers to be teachers" - thereby directly impacting not only the quality of the students who graduate high school but the quality of the students who apply to college in all fields - are among the least paid and least respected in academia. With all of these negatives, why then, you might ask, would anyone want to teach in the college of education? Well, I think part of the answer is to be found in the high concentration of college of education faculty who truly love education and are passionate about high-quality teaching. Although I certainly feel that educators in general are underpaid, you will not infuse passion into K-12 education by “buying” people into the field and, in my opinion, it is the “passion” for high-quality teaching that is missing in our K-12 schools - and in much of higher education for that matter. Passion is what drives active change. Passion is what motivates people. And yes, while it is true that money will also drive change and motivate, it is passion alone that truly drives the thirst for knowledge that defines a life-long learner and high-level academic performance. Although I have nothing but anecdotal data to back this statement up, I would guess that it is not the highest paid teachers who have embraced inquiry-based learning and most of the constructivist ideals but instead it is the passionate teacher who leads the way. Many are happy with how far education has come in the last century and where education is going and much back slapping and “Koom ba yah” is the theme song at meetings these people attend. If you are one of those people please, go and read some John Dewey and while you are reading, realize that he wrote what he did 100 years ago. In Dewey’s words you will find not only a philosophy that “modern” education could only hope to achieve in the next 100 years (given the current state of policy makers) but a passion for education that has been all but lost. Tragically, the light of John Dewey’s work does not shine brightly in the ivory towers but instead shows dimly from the dirty window of a caretaker’s shack. Fortunately, almost every university has one of these shacks and, if you look hard enough, you might find it; the sign out front reads “College of Education”. So yes, Joel, you are correct, not everyone is paid equally at the university level but will that model take us to where we really need to go?