Search News


Browse Archives

News

Numbers to Live By

February 28, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Many students -- even A students -- used to consider one great thing about being accepted to college that they would never have to study math again. That possibility is disappearing at a growing number of institutions.

Some colleges are refusing to let a student cross the stage without some math on the brain, even if the student is a literature major who came in with a 5 on the Advanced Placement calculus exam.

Plenty of colleges have a math general education requirement, but even some students who take math courses have trouble with “quantitative literacy,” or applying their knowledge of numbers to things they encounter outside of class. The movement for quantitative literacy, a theme identified by the Association of American Colleges and Universities in its 10-year campaign to redefine and promote liberal education, is afoot.

“It’s a small movement, but it’s a movement,” said Lynn Arthur Steen, professor of mathematics at St. Olaf College, in Minnesota, and a former president of the Mathematical Association of America.

One of the first things students have to do upon setting foot on campus at Wellesley College is to take a quantitative reasoning assessment. Some questions, judging from past exams, are basic algebra, while others test a student’s ability to apply numerical concepts. One question from a past exam gives the New Jersey hate crime rate -- 13 crimes per 100,000 residents -- as cited in a New York Times article, and asks how many hate crimes were committed in New Jersey in 1994 if the population was 8 million.

“The test is looking for students who are weak,” said Corrine Taylor, director of Wellesley’s quantitative reasoning program, which began in 1997. Taylor and other experts agreed that life in the 21st century is awash in numbers that people need to understand not only for their professions, but also to be competent citizens.

If students fail the test at Wellesley, which about 6 to 8 percent of students do each year, Taylor said, they have to take an intro to quantitative reasoning course. For those who make the grade, they can go straight to a “quantitative overlay” course, such as Statistical Analysis of Education Issues. Those who failed will join them following a basic skills course. As part of the push to bring quantitative thinking to every department, Wellesley has begun a quantitative reasoning speaker series, thanks to a donation from a math major alumna who, Taylor said, “wished she’d been taught math in an applied way.” One speaker, a quilter, Jinny Beyer, who talked about the mathematics of quilting tessalations. “She demystified [M.C.] Escher for us,” Taylor said.

Judith Moran, director of the Math Center at Trinity College in Connecticut, “started life,” she said, as an art major. Now, like several of the faculty members questioned, Moran said she wants all students to be able to assess numbers in The New York Times. Trinity students also get their quantitative feet held to the fire on day one, with quantitative literacy assessment. Students who fail any part of the exam, “logical relationships,” for example, have to take a course that will help them “wake up and smell the quantitative roses around them,” Moran said. If a student aces the quantitative literacy test, they’re done with the requirement. But Moran is pushing to make sure quantitative roses spring up beneath their feet no matter what department they enter.

For example, she worked with Dario Del Puppo, director of Italian programs at Trinity, so he can talk math with students studying Dante. When Dante, at the end of Paradise, is confronted with the vision of God, he tells readers that he cannot possibly explain the image, no more than a geometer can square a circle. “Squaring the circle is one problem from ancient Greece that has been proven undoable,” Moran said. “It’s a perfect analogy to impossibility. If someone doesn’t know math that Dante thought his readers would know, they miss out.”  

In another case, Moran, working with Latin American history students, examined figures in scholarly works given as the number of Hispaniola natives wiped out after first contact with Europeans. The numbers, she said, “are remarkably varied. One of the estimates would give much of Mexico higher population density at that time than England. There’s hundreds of papers written, and yet the math underpinnings, if not spurious, are at least questionable.”

Steen said that even advanced calculus students need to have applied math concepts worked into their courses. “If you look at a typical calculus book, you have a sophisticated body of mathematics, but the problems are really simple,” he said. “You can’t look in the book for a formula for avian flu.” Steen said he thinks that growing recognition that traditional math courses don’t equip students with “what they need as citizens,” and the rise of computers which have made data easy to gather and disseminate are driving the quantitative reasoning push. Institutions, sensing the need, are getting creative about working QR in.

Carleton College requires students to submit a writing portfolio for evaluation at the end of the sophomore year. Now the college has started examining those same portfolios for quantitative reasoning where numerical concepts apply. For example, professors might look to see whether a student uses numerical arguments when doing so would clearly bolster an argument. Macalester College is running a pilot program -- Quantitative Methods for Public Policy -- that organizes groups of courses from different departments around a particular theme that incorporates quantitative reasoning. A recent theme: “Policies Affecting the Immigrant Experience in Minnesota.”

Using a National Science Foundation grant, Len Vacher, a geology professor at the University of South Florida, is leading the “Spreadsheets Across the Curriculum” project. That endeavor invites professors from community colleges and research universities to work on developing courses that have students solving applied math problems with spreadsheets.

According to Education Department statistics –--provided by Clifford Adelman, a researcher with the department’s Office of Vocational and Adult Education -- though some of the interdisciplinary quantitative reasoning programs are new and novel, students from all disciplines have been ramping up their math for years. A national survey of about 800,000 people from the high school class of 1982 who went on to get bachelor’s by 1993, 60 percent of business students took more than 4 credits of college level math, as did 52 percent of biosciences students, and 16 percent of humanities students. In a more recent survey -- about 920,000 people from the high school class of 1992 who got bachelor’s degrees by 2000 --  the definition of “college level math” changed a bit, but Adelman said there was certainly an increase. That survey had 84 percent of business students, 82 percent of biosciences students, and 31 percent of humanities students taking more than 4 math credits.

Even some of the nation’s top math students aren’t exempted from math in college anymore. Following a 2003 report from the Committee on Yale College Education, Yale University, starting in fall 2005, began requiring even students who score a 5 on the Advanced Placement calculus exam to take math. “The best high school writer still has a way to go to become the writer he or she could be. Further, when the development of these powers stops with high school, the result can be a going backward, not a standing still. Students who do not use their math ... skills in college commonly lose abilities they once had and can graduate knowing less than when they arrived,” the report reads.

The University of Pennsylvania also put an end to AP exemption. “College education is different from high school education,” said Dennis DeTurck, dean of Penn’s College of Arts and Sciences. “Studying math with a mathematician goes beyond sort of the basic facts and formulas and equations.”

The wave of quantitative literacy may wash in a New York Times readership full of statistical acumen, but there’s still some work to be done, perhaps on the other side of the grey lady. According to Steen, “journalism is another place where there’s a lot of need.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Numbers to Live By

  • Hey ... I’m On That Bandwagon
  • Posted by RWH on February 28, 2006 at 9:55am EST
  • Let’s see if I’ve got this straight. We’re supposed to be applauding Wellesley and Trinity – omigod Wellesley of all places – for having cleverly disguised remedial mathematics courses for students who shouldn’t have been admitted to college in the first place (at least not without a year or so at their local community colleges).

    I can do that. Go Wellesley!!!

    And “Spreadsheets Across The Curriculum?” Man, I love that. I have always thought that understanding and using mathematics was only a spreadsheet away.

    Needless to say, Clifford Adelman is correct, “the definition of ‘college level math’ changed a bit” between 1982 and 2000. Perhaps Inside Higher Ed should get a bunch of real mathematicians to provide their input regarding the nature of those changes.

    I’d like to sign off right here, but I can’t resist commenting on Dennis DeTurck, dean of Penn’s College of Arts and Sciences, comment, “Studying math with a mathematician goes beyond sort of the basic facts and formulas and equations [that a student gets in AP courses].” It's obvious this guy hasn’t been in a high school math class since he was a high school student himself. The variances of the quality of mathematics instruction at both high schools and universities is significant ... with lots of outstanding and plenty of inept teachers in both sets. But, there are a great many high school teachers of mathematics that a randomly selected university student would trade for her prof in an instant.

    My son – a senior in engineering at the University of Michigan -- is looking over my shoulder as I type this ... and is insisting that I add the fact that he has never quit going to the meetings of a high school math class and studied the material on his own because he was unable to understand his teacher’s English. You get the implication. Oops ... not politically correct!

  • Posted by Larry on February 28, 2006 at 1:40pm EST
  • I think that RWH is on to something. There is something profoundly anti-intellectual about not requiring that all people (even the girls) admitted to colleges be able to pass a college-level calculus course. If they can't do this, they need to quit. A college that lets someone graduate without doing this, is admitting that they don't care who they admit, and is nothing more than a diploma mill. Unfortunately, many professors outside the sciences were able to get around taking courses that challenged them, because they knew the importance of easy coures and high GPAs.

    Anyway, I have made a mental note that the schools mentioned in this article don't have high standards, and let idiots get diplomas. (Though I knew this before about other "elite" schools.)

  • Posted by owen on February 28, 2006 at 5:00pm EST
  • Would there also be something profoundly anti intellectual about college students who can't write a poem, or paint a watercolor or play a musical instrument? It seems there'e just more and more expectations for students, where will it end?

  • "even the girls"?
  • Posted by Physics Grad Students on February 28, 2006 at 6:10pm EST
  • Larry,

    While I agree that there is something profoundly anti-intellectual about the lack of math requirements, I am going to completely ignore the topic and hone in on your parenthetical remark.

    Why do you feel the need to add "even the girls"? I know of no college where the women and men are subject to different requirements within a given major. Perhaps this is in response to RWH’s reference to Wellesley, which I have asked about below. You could also be obtusely addressing that math and science majors are predominately male. Either way, I see no cause for the comment. The implication of your statement is that a male English major is more inclined to fulfill a math requirement. Whatever the reasons there are more men in math and science, they do not support claiming the average male student will react more favorably to a required math course. You strongly weaken your argument with these off hand remarks, whether playing off of RWH or not.

    RWH,

    I am confused about your particular reference to Wellesley. Since I have questioned Larry’s statement, I must ask whether your motive was due to it being an all women’s college. Why are you emphasizing that it is Wellesley? If it has nothing to do with the single gendered campus, I apologize, but given that Larry could defend his response as playing upon yours, I must clear this up.

  • Who Needs Math?
  • Posted by Jim , Professor at U of Jesusland on February 28, 2006 at 8:55pm EST
  • Part of the problem is that Math teachers, in my experience as an undergraduate and as a faculty member at 3 different universities (including one mentioned in the article), are really bad teachers. On the average, they seem to suffer from some advanced form of Asperger's Syndrome.

    The one part of math generally relevant to a liberal arts degree is statistics, as it applies to questions of public policy. But it would make far more sense to create general requirements in civic literacy than subject your typical high-achieving literature or history student to some tedious semester of calculus or linear algebra. How much of this drive for requirements stems from the need to prop enrollments in departments famous for bad teaching?

  • Posted by Mike on March 1, 2006 at 5:35am EST
  • Being a Math Professor I guess I should reply to Jim. Many departments use math courses as a filter. Our physiology major requires two semesters of calculus for engineering majors. I asked one of there faculty members what they used the second semester stuff for. He said they had too many students! We did not ask then to do this. I have heard of a vet school that required vector calculus! This is hard stuff. If a part of your job is weeding out students, it is hard to be Prof. Nice Guy all the time.

    We cannot find the people we need in the U.S. Close to half the new Ph.D.'s awarded in the U.S. are to foreigners. Many speak English fine, but do have accents. Student's who are not getting the material will sometimes latch on to this as an excuse.
    (Studies on this have been reported in the Chronicle of Higher Education, at least for TA's.) Sometimes students complain that they have to study the book to understand it. But, that's how college teaching goes; much more of the burden is on the learner! But, it is true that some instructors (foreign and native) are put in the classroom too soon. But, what should do? Hire Americans who do not understand math to teach it? That hasn't worked out so well in the high schools.

    What math should all college students know? First we tired forcing everyone through "College Algebra," which is a rehash of high school math. If you did well in high school math and have been away from the classroom for awhile, this might be OK as a refresher course. But for students who are really learning algebra for the first time, it is a nightmare. Two years of math in one semester!
    These students should go to a CC if they want to major in a field that requires much math.

    But, many majors do not use much math. Eventually, we wised up and created watered down core curriculum survey courses taught to hundreds of people at a time, just like our colleagues in the humanities do. Eventually, administrators figured they the high pass rates did not imply a great deal was being learned. Students in majors that did use a little math weren’t getting what they needed.

    Now there is a push to do what Jim suggests:
    Require a baby stats course. I’d through in some game theory at the end. How well this will work I do not know. If you have smaller classes, what kind of people are we going to be able to hire to cover these courses?

    As a last note, math is used in surprising places. I knew some people working in a psychology lab. Their paper was rejected because they did not take into account the rate of diffusion of a stain they used on slides of rat brains thin sections. The referee referred them to a formula in another paper. They could not even read it. They did not even use the correct units for the time variable. The formula was an infinite sum of exponential and cosine functions. That’s right, it was a Calculus II problem! I worked it out for them. For the intensely curious, here is a link to the equation:

    http://galileo.math.siu.edu/~msulliva/Michiyo/images/CDA32.gif

  • It's worse than you think
  • Posted by Willy Pass , Mathematically challenged English teacher on March 1, 2006 at 5:35am EST
  • I was every math teacher's nightmare: zero aptitude, lousy attitude. I fulfilled precisely the bare-minimum math requirements at every stage of my education. Somehow, though, I grew up knowing enough basic math to function as an employable, tax-paying citizen. Sometimes I even feel downright smart.

    Some years ago, I went into a music store where I did business to inquire about a case for an unusual snare drum. The details don't matter; I was interested in the diagonal measurements of drum cases. My friend behind the counter, a bloke who had a Master's degree, looked in a catalog and told me we were screwed: the catalog provided only the specs for the sides of the drum cases. The cases were square. So I did the Pythagorean deal and told the salesman the diagonal measurement. He was dumbstruck. "Wow. That's cool. Did YOU figure that out?" he asked. No; it was some Greek cat a long time ago, I explained. True story.

    Years later, a colleague in the outdoor-magazine trade was about to send an article to the art director for layout. The piece had a sidebar on the importance of learning to cast far with a fly rod. The sidebar noted that an angler who doubles his casting distance can cover twice as much water. Think about it. The caster is either the center of a circle (if he can throw the line in any direction) or the point at the skinny end of a segment of a circle (if obstructions limit his casting to an arc). Either way, we're dealing with the geometry of circle. I noted to my colleague, who had a college degree from a respected university, that the area of a circle increases as the square of the radius. He had no idea what I was talking about. I did the math, on paper, in front of him, and corrected the sidebar (written by a man with an advanced degree) before the article went to the art department. Another true story.

    I could go on.

    If you ever have time that needs killing, ask colleagues to divide 138 by 3 in their heads. Give them 15 seconds to do it. Then ask those who can do simple division in their noggins to parse a sentence. Then ask the survivors of that test to name the date of the Normandy invasion in World War II. By the end of the day, you'll feel like Newton, Einstein, Shakespeare, and Plato all rolled into one critter. But don't let it go to your head; you will be almost as smart as my grandfather, who had an eighth-grade education.

    I have no idea what's gone wrong. But I'm pretty sure that something very important and very basic has gone terribly, terribly wrong. Calculus? Hah. If someday all college graduates can do the geometry involved in building a porch, and balance a checkbook without using a calculator, and identify the parts of speech used in a sentence, and know that Queen Victoria reigned before Calvin Coolidge served as president of this great republic, we will have made immense progress. I wish to hell I was wrong.

  • Four Comments
  • Posted by RWH on March 1, 2006 at 5:40am EST
  • First, Physics Grad Students, my comment “omigod Wellesley of all places” was in reference to the fact that Wellesley College is a very “prestigious” institution and here they are teaching remedial math under the guise of God knows what.

    I have been teaching mathematics, statistics, social methodology, and management “science”-- admitting that the latter is an oxymoron – for 45 years. For the first 20 years I would guess that 90% of my better students were male. During the past 15 years, however, I would guess that 60% of my better students were female.

    My remark had nothing whatsoever to do with gender ... it had everything to do with the general decline of the mathematical knowledge of so-called educated people.

    Second, although I respect Larry’s perspective, I am not as enthusiastic as he regarding the calculus. Frankly, I’d be happy if college graduates could read any graphical display put before them, understand any descriptive statistical argument they encountered, had absolutely no difficulty whatsoever helping their tenth grade children with their mathematics homework, and occasionally used elementary mathematics or statistics to solve problems that had relevance in their lives.

    How many times have you heard a so-called educated person say “I’ve never been any good at math.” ... chuckle, chuckle ... oh me too? How many times have you heard a so-called educated person say “I’ve never been any good at reading”? Why is the first statement generally acceptable, while the latter thought to be outrageous? Indeed, I’d be pleased to meet someone at a cocktail party who even knew what the point of mathematical knowledge is. From what I gathered from David Epstein’s article, that’s not likely to happen at a cocktail party at Wellesley.

    Third, I really do feel sorry for Jim. While I will acknowledge that there are some really mediocre mathematics teachers out there, in my opinion the majority are not bad at all .. and quite a few are wonderfully exceptional.

    While I agree with Jim about the calculus, there is so much interesting, useful, and even important mathematics for “your typical high-achieving literature or history student” to learn it’s just mind-boggling.

    Fourth, answering Owen’s question would take more time than I’ve got at the moment. Nevertheless, I would say, yes, it does border on anti-intellectualism for an undergraduate to know nothing about literature (including poetry), to know nothing about art and music, to not have basic knowledge of a foreign language, to know nothing about history and government, to be ignorant of physics, chemistry, and biology, to be mathematically illiterate, etc.

    If a student wants to study engineering as an undergraduate, let her do so ... but let’s make no mistake about the fact that she is being trained, not educated. When she graduates she will be a trained engineer ... and it will be very unlikely that she is an educated person. When I see an undergraduate majoring in business I think (and please forgive the plagiarism) a mind is a terrible thing to waste.

    Owen asks “there’s just more and more expectations for students, where will it end?” Obviously, it never ends. A person who has aspirations to be educated, if he pays attention and is a little lucky can get a good start in college. But, frankly, college is just a tiny blip in the education of a person who values scholarship. Unfortunately, for many college “students” education (as opposed to training ... i.e., preparation for a job) never gets off the ground there ... and, more often than not, it dies an early death.

    To get a bachelors degree from a reputable college or university without taking intellectually challenging courses in mathematics is a scandal. Any student so doing cannot claim to be educated.

    RWH

  • Squaring the Circle
  • Posted by Paul Humke on March 1, 2006 at 6:00pm EST
  • Hey David,

    This note concerns the following quote from your article:

    “Squaring the circle is one problem from ancient Greece that has been proven undoable,” Moran said. “It’s a perfect analogy to impossibility. If someone doesn’t know math that Dante thought his readers would know, they miss out.”

    Do you know that this problem was solved in the affirmative by Miklos Laczkovich, Budapest and London about 10 years ago. Perhaps the "perfect analogy" is a bit more perfect than Moran thought. In any case, I thought you should know.

  • what math does everyone need?
  • Posted by Steve at Adelphi University on March 1, 2006 at 6:00pm EST
  • I wouldn't go so far as to require every college student to pass calculus -- not because that's an impossible goal, but because frankly most people don't need calculus in Real Life. But, as several previous posters have suggested, there are bits of math that ordinary people need in order to carry on a modern life.

    A college student should be able to handle the geometry involved in measuring a drum case, or building a porch.

    A college student should be able to read statistical claims and spot the likely sources of bias (not to mention outright bull****).

    A college student should recognize when a politician or an advertiser leaps from an implication to its converse without justification. (OK, this isn't quantitative, but it's math.)

    A college student should use the "=" sign only to indicate that two quantities are the same, not like a comma in a run-on sentence. (I recently had a student solve the equation n^2=36000000 by writing
    n^2 = sqrt(n) = 6000.)

    A college student should be able to read an equation involving elementary operations without getting scared. If the equation involves things the student doesn't know, the student should be able to isolate those, say "I need to look up what that part means," and understand the rest of the equation.

    And a college student should be able to do analogous things in history, poetry, art, music, economics, politics, physics, etc. as other posters have mentioned. But that's a separate topic....

  • What has gone wrong?
  • Posted by Casey at Texas Tech University on March 2, 2006 at 1:35pm EST
  • I'd like to give a moderately informed comment to several of the statements that we've already seen.
    As Willy suggested, there is something that has gone horribly wrong in mathematics education. Students leave high school, believed less than a century ago to be capable of educating the masses to a perfectly acceptable level, and the best and brightest are entering college, in some cases with less than sufficient aptitude with any number of elementary subjects. More and more english departments are having trouble teaching basic writing skills to college level students. More and more history and social science departments are finding students with a tragically unlaughable amount of pre-stored data. Yes, even mathematics departments are being effected. The fact that the decline in a student's mathematics ability is quantifiable merely makes it a better target for observation.
    The question of what has happened remains, however. Are teachers to blame, as Jim suggests? What about students, families, the world at large? The way I see things, the only difference I can detect between the elementary and secondary educations I received (between 1980 and 1993) and those I hear from the students I teach currently, is that many programs have abandoned the concept of knowledge for the sake of knowledge and begun to look at an "acceptable level of education." This is similar to any argument stating that we should teach only to the level of necessity.
    The way I recall my education, almost every class I took was mystifying at the time. In fact, it wasn't until I took calculus that I finally understood the point of algebra, trigonometry, geometry, and so forth. Every subject was similar in that respect. Techniques students struggled with one semester or year, suddenly become concrete when that knowledge was later applied to something where they first experience a need for the knowledge.
    Let me be clear that I am not advocating teaching calculus to every student in college, but I do think that we should be teaching at least one step beyond the level of proficiency we expect from students when they graduate. If we expect them to understand basic algebra structures, we should require calculus or some other class which utilizes those structures, if we require basic writing skills, we should require classes which force them to submit intricately detailed research papers, etc.
    I am, unfortunately, still a downy white infant in terms of legitimate teaching experience, having only taught college level mathematics for the last four years, but I am still close enough to what I went through to remember what made the education I received memorable. In some cases the instructors helped, in others I was on my own, but inevitably it came down to my own attitude and determination to soak in every piece of knowledge I could. I can absolutely guarantee that I don't remember a very high percentage of what I learned as I came up in the ranks, but I piled enough "extra" learning on top of it all so that the part I do remember now is adequate to the task at hand.