News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 15, 2006
When officials in higher education hype a public outreach campaign as being edgy and entertaining, there’s plenty of reason for skepticism.
“There’s no question that perhaps higher education is a little stodgy,” said Roy Spence, president of GSD&M, a Texas-based company that produced television spots intending to show the practical relevance of colleges and universities. “We used humor to disarm and engage. That is the first round of reaching the masses.”
The campaign, sponsored in large part by the American Council on Education, the main umbrella group for higher education, includes radio public service announcements, news media advertisements and television spots that will debut Thursday during the NCAA men’s basketball tournament.
In one 30-second segment, a police dispatcher informs a frantic homeowner who is being burglarized that “our local community college had its budget cut, so we’re a little short on police for the moment.” She then asks if the woman knows jujitsu as an alternative method of protection.
The announcement ends with a statistic: “83% of first responders are trained in community colleges,” and a mission statement: “America’s colleges and universities: We teach the people who solve the problems and change the world.”
The other television spots feature laughably clueless medical professionals and a shipping staffer who attempts to send a package by attaching it to a pigeon. The unambiguous message: Higher education serves an important societal role by providing a knowledgeable work force capable of innovation.
“It’s no secret that those who go to college have higher incomes and get better jobs. The public understands this,” said Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the American Council on Education. “The public doesn’t always recognize [the other] outcomes as fast or clearly as we’d like.”
Hundreds of colleges and universities will participate in the campaign, called “Solutions For Our Future,” by promoting the message on their campuses. The University of Texas System is putting together a 13-part television series on how higher education is improving life that will air as 30-minute segments.
Hartle said the intention is for audiences to understand the public benefits of higher education, not just the private, individual ones. The campaign is not intended to address particular state or federal legislation, he said.
The television spots will be shown on CBS, ESPN and Fox stations. The most visibility will undoubtedly come from the more than 20 public service announcements that will appear during the NCAA basketball championships — a dozen coming during the highly viewed men’s tournament.
The NCAA has donated this air time. “We see this campaign as critically important to raising the profile of needs of higher education,” said Myles Brand, the NCAA’s president. “An educated populace is key to making a democracy work.”
The campaign is a response to drops in both state and federal appropriations to higher education, intense criticism about rising tuition and increased international competitiveness in academe.
The campaign was crafted based in large part on data from an American Council on Education-sponsored survey of 1,000 registered voters. It shows that while more than eight in 10 surveyed said that investing in higher education today will help solve future problems, only 33 percent saw colleges as the primary source of innovation (business and industry garnered 43 percent of the vote).
That statistic was the catalyst for a campaign centered on the role higher education plays in providing solutions.
Nancy Cantor, chancellor of Syracuse University and chairwoman of ACE’s board of directors, said the media campaign will help “dispel the notion that colleges are up on a hill” and don’t provide any services to the common American.
Spence said market research showed that humor was the best way to go in the television spots. But not everything in the campaign comes down to laughs: A forthcoming advertisement in The Wall Street Journal is heavy on statistics. Hartle said all the material is intended to draw viewers and readers to the “Solutions” Web site, which provides more information on the campaign.
Charlene Nunley, president of Montgomery College, in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, said the message is an important one for the public to hear. “Community colleges prepare our police officers, our doctors, our teachers, our scientists,” she said.
Nunley, who is a member of the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education, said the combination of the commission and the public outreach campaign will help foster a “broad discussion” of higher education’s role in society.
To gauge the effectiveness of the campaign, the American Council on Education is planning to sponsor another higher education survey in about 18 months, Hartle said. The council has budgeted $1.5 million to the campaign over the next three years. Additional funding has come from individual institutions and business partners.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Say, R. A. Shaw,
are you a faculty person volunteering for a pay cut, or to teach a few more classes for free?
Just checking...
Thane Doss, at 11:20 am EST on March 15, 2006
I’m afraid that this effort will prove to be a collasal waste of money, and I’m concerned that the last laugh will prove to be on the ACE for having funded such a campaign in the first place.
First, although the millions being spent are an enormous sum for the ACE, they are chump change in the world of advertising — especially for campaigns of a kind that are aimed at changing public perceptions. This won’t make a dent, expecially squeezed in between the beer, car, and other commercial fare typical of advertising on the NCAA basketball tournament broadcasts.
And if the ACE is trying to persuade the public about the enormous value to the nation of the research and discovery produced by higher education, why begin the campaign about police trained at community colleges? It’s a non sequitor. I can understand wanting to play to the security concerns of Americans, but lord knows there are examples that would far better serve the goals of enhanced public awareness than this.
RAH, at 2:55 pm EST on March 15, 2006
” .. are you a faculty person volunteering for a pay cut .. “
Say, genius .. some of us donate 5% of our time to the working poor .. rather than snark about why being we weren’t the one selected out of 400 applicants for a TT job.
What do you do?
BTW, on employment in hard times: during the Depression, many state universities had a payless paydays or two. But generally, there were no mass layoffs. Probably different today, with the high cost structure.
R.A. Shaw, at 4:50 pm EST on March 15, 2006
“The campaign, sponsored in large part by the American Council on Education ... will debut Thursday during the NCAA men’s basketball tournament.”
How is this for irony? The ACE chose to start delivery of its message during the NCAA tournament, which is viewed by most viewers as one or more of the following opportunities:
- to make some serious money by participating in office or other betting pools - to bitch and moan that your team was quickly dispatched by one of the elite “sports schools” that always get the best “student-athletes - to vent your frustration towards the same “student-athletes,” most of whom will never graduate, but will move on to earn millions of dollars playing a schoolyard game - to get together with friends, get drunk, cheer for the team you chose in the pool, and get drunker - to blast the big-name colleges and universities for the huge amounts of tuition dollars spent on athletic scholarships and sports programs that benefit very few of their students - to check out all of the bodacious cheerleaders and “dancers” that accompany the pool of 64 - to remind parents that their kids’ tuition costs would be less if the NCAA and the elite “sports schools” poured their hearts and souls into lobbying Congress for more financial aid for the vast majority of today’s college students, who are not “student-athletes” - to decry the NCAA for earning billions of dollars in TV and marketing revenue, but not sharing it with the colleges that really need the money for ACADEMIC purposes- to win the betting pool so I can pay for my kids’ college tuition.
Do you really think that anyone who actually pays attention to the commercials will take them seriously? I think the humorous approach will backfire.
Current Dean, Former Athlete, at 8:35 pm EST on March 15, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Position Summary: This cooks position is located in our Butler Wilson Dining hall. The successful candidate ... see job
General Purpose
Participate fully as a member of a Clinical Research team. Responsible for coordinating clinical ... see job
Job Summary ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY invites applications for a tenure-track Assistant Professor of Network ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Eastern Kentucky University, located in Richmond, Madison County, Kentucky near the Heart of the Bluegrass, is a ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
School of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Storage, Networking and Visualization ... see job
Appalachian State University, Distinguished Professorship in the Thomas W. Reese Graphic Arts and Imaging Technology program ... see job
School of Humanities Department of English Literary Journalism Degree Program Position: Assistant Professor, Tenure-Track ... see job
This posting is on ongoing pool for Nutrition. The department is currently seeking to fill vacancies for the Spring 2008 ... see job
Big picture — look at Medicaid/Medicare
Dang. The Ivory Tower denigrates “mere hucksterism” — then joins the party big-time. Bugs Bunny, Loony Tunes, et al., never had it so good.
My friends at USA Today ("The Nation’s Newspaper") recently attempted to track the growth in federal entitlements (e.g., medicine, education).
http://www.usatoday.com/news/wash...006-03-13-federal-entitlements_x.htm
They basically posited that GWB, with help from 9/11 and Katrina, is out-spending the old Great Society crowd. Even the Limbaugh crowd is worried about GWB’s fiscal stewardship, especially Medicaid/Medicare (M/M).
Is a dollar spent on M/M, not a dollar spent on education? Could the Pope not be Catholic?
Further — still waiting for higher-ed leaders to commit to cost-containment. Millions of Americans are living on less — what about HE? Excuses just won’t make it, anymore.
R.A. Shaw, at 9:05 am EST on March 15, 2006