News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 23, 2006
Foreign applications to graduate schools in the United States have increased 11 percent in the last year, marking a substantial — if incomplete — rebound from recent declines, according to data being released today by the Council of Graduate Schools.
The increase follows a two-year cumulative decline of 32 percent in such applications, which are particularly important to graduate schools in engineering and the sciences. The increases this year crossed disciplinary boundaries and were particularly strong from China (up 21 percent) and India (up 23 percent), the two countries that are the sources of the greatest number of international applications.
The data on graduate schools arrive at a time when international education issues continue to capture the attention of many educators and lawmakers. The leaders of six major higher education associations sent a letter this week to the U.S. secretaries of state and education, outlining steps that could be taken to build on the recent summit meeting on international education between college presidents and administration officials. And two groups that focus on international education issued a statement Wednesday with suggestions for policies that lawmakers and colleges to consider.
The mood among all the groups concerned with educational exchanges is considerably more upbeat than it was a few years ago, and there is a sense that many in Washington want to help colleges attract more foreign students and encourage American students to have a more global perspective. But those issuing the statements and reports stress that there is considerably more that needs to be done, and many say that the problems extend beyond visa snafus to broader questions involving money, the curriculum, and immigration policy.
More Graduate Applications
The survey on graduate applications is built around percentages, not actual numbers of applicants. Graduate schools are at different stages in their admissions cycle and so they were asked for comparisons between this year’s figures and those of comparable periods in previous years.
“There’s no question but that we are seeing broad gains,” Debra W. Stewart, president of the Council of Graduate Schools, said in an interview, but she added that the data also indicate that most institutions were well behind where they were in 2003.
Percentage Change in International Graduate Applications From Previous Year
|
2003-4 |
2004-5 |
2005-6 |
|
|
Total |
-28% |
-5% |
+11% |
|
By County/Region |
|||
|
—China |
-45% |
-15% |
+21% |
|
—India |
-28% |
-5% |
+23% |
|
—Korea |
-14% |
+1% |
+3% |
|
—Middle East |
+4% |
+7% |
+4% |
|
By Field of Study |
|||
|
—Business |
-24% |
0% |
+7% |
|
—Education |
-21% |
-3% |
+3% |
|
—Engineering |
-36% |
-7% |
+17% |
|
—Humanities and Arts |
-17% |
0% |
+4% |
|
—Life Sciences |
-24% |
-2% |
+16% |
|
—Physical Sciences |
-22% |
-2% |
+10% |
|
—Social Sciences |
-20% |
-2% |
+10% |
Richard Wheeler, dean of the Graduate College at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, said that the national data were very close to what he was seeing at his campus. He also said that there was a direct relationship between the figures for Chinese applicants and those in engineering and the physical sciences, the fields many from China enter.
Wheeler said that the drops in previous years were “precipitous,” making the recovery this year extremely important. Between 35 and 40 percent of graduate students at Illinois are from outside the United States, but the proportion is well over half in many science and technology fields.
Stewart of the Council of Graduate Schools attributed the upturn in applications to actions of both the federal government and the graduate schools. U.S. officials have responded to complaints about difficulties of foreign students in getting visas and have worked hard to smooth out the process and to publicize abroad that American leaders want foreign students to enroll. For instance, she noted the announcement in January by the Departments of Homeland Security and State of a relaxation of some visa rules for foreign students.
At the same time, she said, graduate schools have increased their recruitment efforts. This is especially important, she said, because other countries are going after the same students American institutions want to enroll. She noted, for example, a major effort in Germany to improve the quality of its graduate schools and new fellowships Italy is offering to foreign graduate students. She said that as a result of efforts like these, it is becoming more difficult for American universities to recruit European students.
Looking ahead, she said that it may be time to rethink immigration policies as part of efforts to attract the best foreign students. For instance, students applying for visas are currently asked about their future plans and it is known that anyone who answers anything but that they plan to return home will be rejected. Stewart said that she backed legislation that would make it possible for students to express interest in pursuing a Ph.D. in certain fields and staying in the United States to work in those fields.
Competition for foreign students is going “to focus on quality and not just quantity,” she said, and our policies need reach out to the best students.
Future Directions for International Education
The need to reach out to such students is also stressed in a letter sent this week to Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, and Margaret Spellings, the secretary of education, by the heads of six higher education associations.
“If our international economic competition is from countries such as India and China, it’s certainly time that we work out how some of the brightest people who come to study here can more easily stay,” said Peter McPherson, president of the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges and one of those who signed the letter.
“If they want to stay, we should want them to stay. The idea of limiting these excellent people is a throwback to a different era,” he said.
The letter praises recent reforms in the visa process, but urges continued vigilance on the issue. McPherson said that the Bush administration is sincere in its commitment to work on these issues, and he said that the meetings in January of university presidents with Rice, Spellings and President Bush were historic.
But he also said it was obvious that there were still problems. He noted the way the United States originally denied a visa to a prominent organic chemist from India who was invited to a scholarly meeting on the campus of the University of Florida. McPherson said that he hoped that the incident “heightened some sensitivities in the bureaucracy,” and that it was clear that academics continued to be on the alert for any breakdowns in the system.
“There is this tension between security concerns and freedom of movement of people and ideas,” he said, and colleges must continue to advocate for the latter while being aware of the former.
The letter to the secretaries was also signed by the presidents of the American Council on Education, the American Association of Community Colleges, the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, the Association of American Universities, and the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. The letter also:
On Wednesday, two international education groups released their own plan for international education. NAFSA: Association of International Educators and the Alliance for International Educational and Cultural Exchange, said in their joint statement that the turn “inward” by some Americans after the Cold War was a mistake.
The statement is consistent philosophically with what the other associations are endorsing, but goes further in its detail and ambition. The NAFSA statement calls for:
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
CJO, you just don’t get it. No Child Left Behind is only infamous among union educators and political hacks. It’s opposition is best represented by the renegade over-eaters anonymous group that showed up to protest outside of John Stossel’s office a few weeks ago.
The facts are the men are better at math and science than women. You find the reason. I personally don’t care why. Another significant fact is that women teach K-12 at a rate of almost 4-to-1 over men, a gap that is steadily growing. Unfortunately, what students get is substandard teaching of math and science as opposed to advanced critical thinking skills from the best qualified.
If your solution is to find a way to make all women better at math and science so that they can better teach in areas under-served by women, you have taken on a great chore. While you are at it, would you make the Japanese better football players and teach men nurturing skills. Hypothetically, each of these groups should be able to equal the opportunities and achievements of any other group, and they do represent the nurturing and football underclasses. In the meantime, I will count the tiles on my ceiling, an equally compelling activity.
Sillyone, at 12:40 pm EST on March 23, 2006
I have no central theme here ... but I have several comment’s about Mr. Jaschik’s article
First, I’m a big fan of students moving all over the world in conjunction with their educations.
Are there more than a few problems” Probably. A business school (in the Upper Shenandoah Valley) with which I’m familiar had/has aspirations to create outreach to China. In conjunction with that they created an “executive education” program for Chinese business people who would come to the U.S. take a few mini-courses, visit several business environments, go back to China, and put their newly acquired knowledge to work. Some time later the process would be repeated ... and repeated ... and eventually the school would carve out its niche in international education in China.
Last year, thirteen Chinese business people struggled through the visa process (the timing left something to be desired), and showed up on campus for their first two-week experience. Everything seemed to be progressing wonderfully until the thirteen were delivered to Kennedy International Airport in New York and only two boarded the plane back to China. And the rest ... well your guess is as good as anyone else’s.
Second, a great many of America’s colleges and universities have local, state, and regional missions that must be fulfilled. In addition, they want the very best students in their classes. Richard Wheeler knows if he wants outstanding students in University of Illinois graduate engineering programs, he’s going to be able to choose individuals from a pool of international students that dominate a great many of the candidates in his pool of American students. So, what’s he going to do. I’m certain it’s a balancing act that gets critics on both sides of the issue completely bent out of shape.
Despite all of the cries of anguish about the mathematics and science knowledge of American students (at every level), American universities are producing more Ph.D.’s in mathematics than the market can absorb. But wait, that’s not true. If Ph.D.’s in mathematics were willing to take jobs in community colleges and high schools (if only those high schools were suitable places for teaching and learning) and if they were willing and able to take jobs in China, or India, or Ireland, or Qatar, or any number of other places around the globe – and that includes jobs in and out of academe — then these universities are not producing a glut of mathematicians. Hmmm, it seems to be a glut only within an American market. So bring on those international students.
Third, there is – at least from my personal perspective – the “problem” of so many of these young Ph.D.s in mathematics staying here in the U.S., but that’s not a societal problem. I agree with Peter McPherson that “If they want to stay, we should want them to stay. The idea of limiting these excellent people is a throwback to a different era,”
In the process of job-hunting in recent years, I have waaaay more on-line visits to departments of mathematics, statistics, and statistics and management science (operations management) than you can shake a stick at. I can pick faculties like the three in the URLs below almost at random. Take a quick look at the three and tell me what they say about mathematics and science education in the United States?
http://www.engr.siu.edu/elec/faculty/faculty1.htm
http://www.math.siu.edu/people.shtml
http://admin.business.uconn.edu/p.../preview/previewPage.aspx?pageid=204
And I’m not talking about students here; I’m talking about faculty. CJO is right, if we don’t do something about the education of youngsters in America, huge and important segments of higher education in this country will be faculties of former international students teaching international students. When it comes to academic and intellectual matters, I’m an elitist snob of the worst sort. I’d much rather see the best teaching the best in American colleges and universities (even if both bests were individuals born overseas) than turn the culture over to lesser lights teaching the unprepared.
Finally, when it comes to allowing international students to stay here in the States after graduation, I have suffered through the efforts of more than a few of my best students losing their battles with the process. I’m certain they cope, but I really hate to see the U.S. lose such talented youngsters. On a few Friday afternoons over a beer I have thought we should trade students like we trade baseball players. “Look, you give us Sergey and Mikhail and we’ll give you these fifteen students and $1 million.” But I guess it wouldn’t work.
RWK, at 12:40 pm EST on March 23, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The Department of Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in collaboration with the UNC School of ... see job
BSC is one of the largest and most exciting centers for higher education in the commonwealth. Here in our idyllic setting, ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice is seeking applications for a tenure-track faculty member at the rank of ... see job
Applications and nominations are being sought for the position of Department Head and James Worth Bagley Chair in Electrical ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Posting Description: The Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Colorado at Boulder ... see job
Posting Description: We seek a highly qualified individual to join our dynamic faculty in a top ranked ... see job
I’m glad that international exchange in science and technology graduate education has become less constrained.
However, the apparent difficulties that the recent years created for U.S. graduate programs in these areas highlights the severe underlying problem of K-12 science and math education in this country. Perhaps I’m misreading into the situation as presented by this article and other, but the impression I have is that U.S. graduate programs in the sciences and technologies were hurt economically—in terms of a sudden and serious drop in numbers of foreign grad students. Perhaps they were also hit in terms of quality: was it just the loss of bodies, or was it also the lost of the best and brightest? And are we talking about “best and brightest” not just out of foreign students, but out of the entirety of the grad population—which, of course, suggests that U.S. grad students in these areas might not be the best and brightest students in U.S. grad programs?
What has the Bush administration’s education policy—including the infamous No (Every) Child Left Behind Act—done to strengthen K-12 math and science education in the U.S.? Granted, children who started school at the beginning of this administration aren’t yet in graduate school, but are we seeing **any** significant strengthening in math and science, especially compared to children in other countries?
CJO, at 8:30 am EST on March 23, 2006