Search News


Browse Archives

News

Dissent vs. Vandalism

April 19, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Northern Kentucky University has suspended a tenured literature professor, immediately removing her from teaching four courses, because of her role in the destruction of an anti-abortion display on campus.

Sally Jacobsen was in her last semester before retirement when she decided last week to take a stand against a large display of crosses and a sign that said "Cemetery of the Innocents." The display has been set up by a new anti-abortion student group, responding to the creation of a faculty group at Northern Kentucky that backed abortion rights.

While Jacobsen is no longer talking to reporters, she told The Cincinnati Enquirer on Friday that she had invited students in one of her courses "to express their freedom-of-speech rights to destroy the display if they wished to." Jacobsen called the display a "slap in the face" to woman contemplating abortion. (On Tuesday night, she apparently changed her view about the situation, and apologized in an interview with a local television station. "I deeply regret my impulsive action," Jacobsen said, adding that she wanted the university "to be able to defuse the firestorm of attention around this.")

Jacobsen wouldn't tell The Enquirer if she had participated in the destruction of the display, but the student newspaper at Northern Kentucky, The Northerner, shot photographs of her in what appears to be an active role taking down a sign that was part of the display.

Since those photographs appeared, anti-abortion groups have been having a field day -- and the university has had considerable discussion about free speech and dissent. Faculty leaders -- including the organizer of a group of professors who favor abortion rights -- have condemned the vandalizing of the display. And some say that Jacobsen's actions were not only wrong, but hide the reality that it is professors who favor abortion rights who need to guard their words and actions in Kentucky.

In just days, Jacobsen was removed from her courses. She had previously announced plans to retire at the end of the semester.

In a statement, President James C. Votruba said it was important to view Jacobsen in the context of her entire 27-year career at the university. But he also said that her "lapse of judgment was severe."

Votruba also said he was pleased that many of those who condemned the vandalism disagreed with the point of the display -- and he said that this respect for the views of others was in the best spirit of a university. "At their best, universities are not places of comfortable conformity," he said. "They are places where ideas collide as students and faculty search for deeper understandings and perspectives."

The Faculty Senate also issued a statement defending free expression. "Advocating provocative and controversial positions is in the highest tradition of academia," the statement said. But it added: "Those having strong opinions on one side of an issue must recognize that others may have equally strong opinions that are contrary to theirs, and that those hold differing opinions have the same right of expression."

Bill Oliver, a chemistry professor who is president of the Faculty Senate, said that faculty members thought it important to speak out quickly in the wake of the vandalism of the display. "We didn't think it should all fall on the administration's shoulders," he said.

Another group that spoke out was Educators for Reproductive Freedom, a new group of professors who favor abortion rights and sex education that goes beyond the abstinence-only approach favored in the region. It was the creation of this group that prompted the anti-abortion display to be set up, but the abortion-rights supporters strongly back free speech and condemn the vandalism, said Nancy Slonneger Hancock, one of the organizers and an associate professor of philosophy. Hancock added that Jacobsen had never participated in any of the group's events.

Hancock said that part of the damage done by Jacobsen's action was to suggest that free expression is limited for those who oppose abortion. In the part of Kentucky where the university is located, the opposite is true, Hancock said.

While she praised the university's president as a strong support of faculty rights to free speech, she said that professors like her who move from other parts of the country quickly learn some hard lessons. When you drive with old Kerry or Gore bumper stickers on your car, she said, other drivers cut you off or shout obscenities. Other members of her group, who moved to town with abortion rights bumper stickers, have had their tires slashed. And when word got out about the faculty group's meetings -- to date, just two brown bag lunch sessions -- anti-abortion students picketed, thrusting fetus pictures in people's faces.

"It's a very hostile environment," she said. "If anyone's free speech is being stifled, it's not the pro-lifers."

Anti-abortion groups at the university and in the local area did not respond to e-mail or voicemail messages Tuesday.

While Hancock said she disagreed with Jacobsen's action, she said she agreed that a response was in order to the display of crosses -- but one that did not infringe on anyone's freedom of expression. Hancock's group had planned to wait until the display was taken down on schedule, and then to set up an information table with pamphlets on reproductive rights, abortion laws in Kentucky, and other relevant materials.

The display table goes up today.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Dissent vs. Vandalism

  • Charters, please
  • Posted by Art D. , Trustee at Private college on April 19, 2006 at 7:25am EDT
  • The arrogance and chutzpah of the tenured class involving "free speech for me, but not thee" continues. Even after their latest hero was caught red-handed by photographers, destroying others' free speech artifacts, the chattering tenured try to assume a moral high ground by claiming "worse has been done to us." What arrogance!

    As to any other alleged events -- got any evidence? And, please -- do better than these folks --

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20040318-0125-ca-collegehatecrime.html

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1536422/posts

    Only a total overhaul of higher-ed funding will eliminate this kind of ego-centric, arrogant self-entitlement. Once they have to find their own students -- their own funding -- the chattering tenured will be too busy for farcical, ridiculous displays of faux-Maoist behavior. Most are easily replaceable -- look at all the unemployed/underemployed PhDs. There are better faculty available -- much better.

  • Northern Kentucky vandalism
  • Posted by feudi pandola on April 19, 2006 at 8:20am EDT
  • I agree with Art D. Vandalism masquerading as freedom of speech deserves condemnation. It is very disturbing when tactics like this
    are used at a place of higher education. The article mentioned that another pro-abortion group plans to set up tables with brochures and information pamphlets after this pro-life display has run it's course. I applaud this group for acting in a responsible manner on this very controversial topic. I hope that Sally Jacobsen does the right thing...apologizes and then retires.

  • Property rights
  • Posted by sillyone on April 19, 2006 at 9:25am EDT
  • How ironic that in pursuit of their two arguments (unborn children represent life and therefore have rights) and (children are a woman's property right, to dispose of as she will)results in the pro property rights group destroying the other group's private property. This is rich.

  • Arrogance
  • Posted by Joseph Duemer , Professor at Clarkson University on April 19, 2006 at 9:25am EDT
  • Excuse me, Art D., but what does this story have to do with tenure? One professor acted alone in an inappropriate manner & her tenured colleagues roundly condemned her. If anything, this story is a data point on the plus side of the tenure argument.

  • Posted by Les on April 19, 2006 at 9:45am EDT
  • Sorry Art D. You really miss the mark and your comments are irrevocably unacceptable. That you have a serve as a trustee of a college is really scary. The poor professor made a mistake and is paying a big price, but the school seems to be handling it well and is not making a fascist response as you advocate.

  • So, let's eliminate tenure
  • Posted by Art D. on April 19, 2006 at 10:10am EDT
  • " .. what does this story have to do with tenure?"

    Why, yes .. the untenured are reckless, while the tenured (e.g., Furr, Zinn, Churchill, Shortell, et al.) are reticent. How obvious.

    " .. One professor acted alone .."

    See previous.

    " .. her tenured colleagues roundly condemned her .."

    While arrogantly trying to assume a moral high ground via unsubstantiated claims of abuse. As if people with Bush 2006 bumperstickers don't get abused in Berkeley.

    " .. If anything, this story is a data point on the plus side of the tenure argument.

    Well, gee .. if tenure isn't such a big thing, then let's just eliminate it and use charters, OK?

    Thanks for your support of my position, you're brilliant.

  • Fetal tissue is NOT a baby
  • Posted by Dr. Arthur Ide on April 19, 2006 at 11:00am EDT
  • And scientific studies show that neither the zygote nor the fetus experiences any pain during an abortion procedure. As for the "unborn" being a "baby" that is nonsense, as there is not fetal heartbeat that can be heard until the 20th week. The fetus has neither a brain nor nerve endings which can feel pain, plesure, sadness or joy even by the 20th week. There are no brain neurons prior to four weeks into fetal development at the earliest. It is not until the 28th week that the fetus can possibly live (briefly) outside of the woman's body. So the issue is not about "the unborn baby" and its imaginary "rights" which some equate as tantamount to those of a person living outside the womb in a viable condition. The issue is over property and the right of speech. Free speech does not permit the destruction of other free speech. The suspension of the faculty member is justified.

  • NKU, church and State
  • Posted by JB , New Faculty at formerly from KY on April 19, 2006 at 11:00am EDT
  • Jacobsen and the students involved in the protest, may have pushed too far. On the other hand, conservatives said that the abolitionists went too far too.

    What those of you who are not from Kentucky/Cincinnati don't understand is that the so-called "Christian" right is an absolutely oppressive force in the region. They vandalize the posters of liberal students groups, threaten gay student in public restrooms, misreport and misquote liberal professors in the newspapers, etc.

    In most, maybe even all of these cases the university administrations do nothing. Meanwhile good professors who obviously get fed-up are immediately suspended, reprimanded, or fired. The rate of attrition for liberal professors at NKU I think is pretty high.

    The biggest problem at NKU seems to be the inability of the administration to enforce a separation between church and state. Restrictions of the personal freedoms of women based on the idea that "life begins at conception" is a religious doctrine. A display of CROSSES in the center of campus reiterates that this is a "christian" issue, not a political one. Where does a university like NKU draw the line between religious prostletizing and near persecution of "non-christians" and actual political debate.

    NKU, long before Votruba was president, has a long history of relatively spineless interaction with the religious right, effectively stifling any possibility for any real "debate" or even respectful interaction. Universities in Kentucky, especially the small and financially strapped seem to constantly be appeasing the so called "christians" in the hopes that their budgets won't be slashed and support withdrawn. That is not a debate of ideas, it is a continual religious referendum in which the university cannot be impartial without risking its well being.

    It seems sometimes like issues have changed somewhat, but the Civil War never really ended in Kentucky.

  • Free speech, responsibility, and accountability
  • Posted by Paulette Marty at Appalachian State University on April 19, 2006 at 11:10am EDT
  • I would like to suggest that when we exercise our right to free speech, we have a responsibility to identify ourselves fully and clearly and answer for our actions. So to Art D and the other commentators who have identified themselves with only generic information, I urge you to give your full name and affiliation if you want readers to respect your comments.

  • the Ides of April
  • Posted by sillyone on April 19, 2006 at 11:50am EDT
  • While it may be hard to find the pulsebeat of a fetus, it is not nearly as difficult as it is to find the privacy rights of prospective mothers in the Constitution. This is why Roe v. Wade was a privacy right case that is applied as a property right. The concept of children as a property right in not new. The ancient Romans allowed fathers to sell their children or put them to death. But I love your 20 week analogy - what does that make it? About three-fifths human? Not a new argument in American jurisprudence.

  • Posted by Larry on April 19, 2006 at 11:50am EDT
  • Paulette, I disagree with you. Unless someone is referring to their own perceptions, an anonymous comment can be judged on the strength of the ideas it espouses. While I tend to disregard the scholarship of people at lesser universities (because I am an elitist), if they post anonymously, I will at least try and understand what they are trying to say, and formulate a position in response. (Perhaps you would also like people to give their race and gender, too, so you can have an easier time at vetting their ideas.) I realize that many journals accept articles solely on the basis of who the writer is, but this does not aid in the discussion.

    Art, None of this story had anything to do with tenure, so I have no idea what you are talking about. Moreover, I doubt that you were a trustee of a university.

    JB, What I wonder is how students have time for political activity. Anyone that has time to make crosses is probably just goofing off and not studying. If students at NKU are known to spend time not studying, but engaging in these religious activities, all employers and graduate schools should be forewarned that they have a dubious work ethic. I am going to start asking around about this issue.

    Mr. Idle, While I am a supporter of both abortion and abortion rights, what constitutes a “baby” is a philosophical issue which can’t be resolved with studies. There are people with drivers licenses and jobs that can’t feel pain. But, most people concede that it is illegal to terminate their lives (without, at least, a jury trial).

    Sillyone, Unfortunately, not only does private property get destroyed all the time, but so does an individual’s right to do many things. (E.g. have an abortion.) We must all work together to ensure that all rights (both to abortion and private property) are preserved.

  • Ides of April
  • Posted by sillyone on April 19, 2006 at 1:25pm EDT
  • Thanks for the update of fetal tissue, Dr. Ides. Are you also an English professor? The heartbeat of a 20 week old fetus is certainly difficult to find, although nowhere near as difficult as locating the privacy rights of abortion in the Constitution. This is why Roe v. Wade was judged as privacy right but treated as a property. This is not a new concept. Ancient Roman fathers could sell their children or put them to death. I find it interesting that you should choose 20 weeks for your analogy. That would make them about three-fifths human. Not exactly a new concept in American jurisprudence.

  • Of Hobby Horses & Red Herrings
  • Posted by Joseph Duemer , Professor at Clarkson University on April 19, 2006 at 1:25pm EDT
  • I really should know better than to respond to Art D's rediculous post, but since he takes me to task above, I will only note that his responding to a civil disagreement with sneers only underlines the weakness & irrelevance of his argument. The fact is, he has no actually argument, only a hobby horse. And, my, that horse must be getting tired laden down with all those red herrings it is forced to carry around!

  • Posted by Macrina on April 19, 2006 at 7:10pm EDT
  • "As if people with Bush 2006 [sic] bumperstickers don’t get abused in Berkeley."

    They don't, because nobody has them. I lived there for more than a year and can count on one hand the number of conservative bumper stickers I saw.

    Dissent isn't safe on the extreme left or the extreme right. This is a problem with academia, and with American discourse in general.

  • Thanks for the arrogance
  • Posted by Art D. on April 19, 2006 at 7:10pm EDT
  • Dr. D., you're private, so I could care less about your productivity. Private colleges are a lot more insistent on its faculty being productive, as opposed to taxpayer-owned ones. I'm sure your dean is finding you, several useful things to do. Good luck, and keep trying.

    Dr. M., when all anonymous postings in educational pub's are eliminated, that's when you'll see everyone ID'd in these posts. It's called reality -- next to real-politik, south of Raleigh.

    Larry, that's OK. I wonder how you can be an economist and not seem to understand deadweight loss, oligopoly, and monopoly. I think I'll live.