Search News


Browse Archives

News

Pitchin' a Tent

April 20, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The Web counter just keeps on ticking, reminiscent of the national debt clock near Times Square. But instead of tracking the amount of money owed by the government, a group of students have used their clock to highlight how much the war in Iraq has cost New Jersey. As of Thursday morning, the tally stood at over $12.1 billion. The counter highlights that almost 588,000 students could have been provided four-year scholarships at public universities in the state for that amount of money.

The sentiments behind the counter aren’t necessarily anti-war, say organizers of a nationwide program called Tent State University, which got its start at Rutgers (explaining the New Jersey theme). The real effort is to raise awareness of the financial toll facing many public university students and their families in today’s political and economic environment.

Campus activists from across the country -- from Rutgers to the University of Massachusetts at Amherst to the University of Michigan -- are coalescing around that message over the next couple of weeks, dotting campuses with tents that are symbolic of the sentiment that “public higher education is being displaced by privatization,” according to one of the campaign's organizer, Andrey Federov, a sophomore at Rutgers.

“A lot of campus protests tend to center on international affairs or low-wage work issues -- important causes, yes,” says Federov. “But we, as students, are also facing a lot of obstacles and sometimes that’s put on a back burner. “Many [of us] are facing steep tuition hikes and, in many cases, less financial aid support.”

In New Jersey, Federov’s home state, the state government has proposed providing $169 million less to higher education in the 2007 fiscal year than it gave in 2006. Hundreds of students on campus have pitched several tents and joined in discussions and rallies to talk about this and other relevant facts with each other, while hoping that politicians and administrators pay attention.

At the Rutgers campus, where the movement took root in 2003, students say that President Richard L. McCormick and other administrators have been supportive. In a letter to the campus on Wednesday, McCormick thanked students who are organizing in support of public education funding. “The students who are participating in the rally realize the need to speak up for their concerns, and I support their efforts,” he wrote. “Such initiative and leadership is further reason to take immense pride in our students and to advocate for a strong, well-supported state university.”

Students across the nation have already spent lots of energy this year focusing of the situation in Darfur, low-wage workers, and sweatshop labor issues, but Tent State devotees say there are much more personal pressing issues facing today’s students.

Mishy Leiblum, a senior majoring in Latin American studies at UMass Amherst, says that she personally had to enroll at the university part-time at first because the tuition was too much for her family to handle. Now that she’s a senior and attending full-time, she says, the financial burdens continue to be a challenge. She’s moved home to save on room and board and her mom has taken on a second job so that Leiblum will not be overburdened with loan debt upon graduation. 

“These are individual coping mechanisms, and not every family is able to make it,” says Leiblum. “Already so many students think they can’t attend college because financial aid dollars aren’t available. At what point are the students who are overstretched now not going to be able to attend?” Student fees have doubled at the university over the past five years, she says.

The university's chancellor, John V. Lombardi, has argued that there is a "public dependent" mentality in Massachusetts, and that students shouldn’t have the expectation that the state will be there to provide support. The hundreds of students who have participated in UMass Tent State rallies have different ideas, however.

“This is about spending priorities,” says Leiblum. “We should be building coalitions to shift the burden to politicians.”

“Students have the power to make change,” reflects Marlowe Coolican, a senior at the University of Michigan who has helped organize Tent State activities on her campus. “We’re paying a lot of money to attend school and we should have a say in how the money is being spent.” Tuition at public universities in her state has increased by 12.3 percent this year.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Pitchin' a Tent

  • Posted by C.J. Collins on April 20, 2006 at 9:55am EDT
  • Students that have enough time to go around pitching tents to complain about the cost of an education are missing the point. The cost of an education is about struggling to make ends meet, where is the next meal coming from, how to pay for the rent, utilities and oh yes, books and tuition. The alternative they should be considering is get a low paying job. Give those immigrants some competition. If they think somebody else should pay for their education, then maybe they should hit up the oil companies. After all they got all those extra billions of profits, and why are we in Iraq? You guessed it, Oil. But its not just Iraq, its the whole middle east. Maintaning a balance in an area that is unbalanced to start with is a lost cause. You cant win. But if you have to be there to keep the oil flowing and you make a few extra billions, why not share it with starving students.

  • Posted by CAL on April 20, 2006 at 11:00am EDT
  • I commend the student's initiative to draw attention to the lack of funding priorities in this country for higher education, both on the federal and state level. Expansion of tent cities will assist on other campuses will assist our efforts here in Washington as we advocate for increases in Federal Student Aid yet another year. We will continue to have the Pell grant maximum award flat funded, as it has been for five years, unless the students voice loud objections to Members of Congress.

  • Tent State U. Better the Government than Us
  • Posted by Pat Leonard , Vice President for Academic Services at College of the Southwst on April 20, 2006 at 11:45am EDT
  • It is easy to see why Rutgers President Richard L. McCormick supports this student initiative. Tent State U. complements the party line that board members and senior administrators have been pushing for decades. Public institutions need more state and federal support. Yes they do. However, solely concentrating on government largesse also deflects attention from Rutgers’ et. al responsibility for containing its costs. It is better to have students demand more governmental support than to picket for internal cost containment on our campuses

  • Reappropriation
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on April 20, 2006 at 5:45pm EDT
  • Is the implication supposed to be that were we not spending money on the liberation of Iraq, we would be using it for more no-strings educational funding? Dream on.

  • Liberation?
  • Posted by Andrey Fedorov , Student at Rutgers Univeristy on April 21, 2006 at 5:25am EDT
  • Kevin: Why do you say that?

    How about student's liberation? In America, in the 21st century, a student's right to a full education is something that ought to be as sacred and protected as all of America's freedoms. Access to it ought to be based on merit, not your family income.

  • Taxpayer liberation
  • Posted by L.L. Barry on April 21, 2006 at 6:15am EDT
  • "How about student’s liberation?"

    Absent the possible reference to the Detroit Red Wings -- what about taxpayer liberation? I'd like to coach baseball -- but I'm not demanding that you to subsidize my plans.

    Students with solid career plans can find funding. Those without solid plans have to pay for it themselves. That's their issue, and no one else's. Get over it, and get real.

    More taxpayer funding of slovenly higher ed only encourages bad management (Vedder @ Ohio U., Greene @ U of Ark), in a state system already under very close review. Those who think taxpayers are going to ignore those issues are delusional.

    Finally -- using Iraq immediately alienated a large majority of taxpayers. TSU, congratulations on your PR strategy. It probably earned a *greater* decline in appropriations.

  • Why governmnet?
  • Posted by Andrey Fedorov , Studnet at Rutgers University on April 22, 2006 at 4:50pm EDT
  • Mr. Barry:

    Our society needs readily available higher education - to compete economically, to have a functioning democracy, and because it's a basic human right. This isn't baseball.

  • Posted by Olivia Rosen at Rutgers on April 23, 2006 at 7:40am EDT
  • "More taxpayer funding of slovenly higher ed only encourages bad management ... using Iraq immediately alienated a large majority of taxpayers."

    The federal government doesn't control university funding directly. Look at the counter. The Iraq war is leeching money from federal education grants that go directly to students - decreasing their debt upon graduation. Simply put, our student's wallets are (in part) where our foreign escapades are financed from. Should we really be sacraficing our system of higher education in order to "liberate" Iraq?

  • Welcome to the real world
  • Posted by L.L. Barry on April 24, 2006 at 12:30pm EDT
  • " .. it’s a basic human right .."

    Sir, where did you get that? In 20 years of listening to every excuse known to humanity, I've never heard anyone claim that.

    The reality is, you want the non-college student majority to pay for your college student lifestyle. Well, the reality is, that is not going to happen. Get used to it, and get on with your life.

    " .. Look at the counter."

    Madam, to repeat ourselves: we did, we're upset, and we're going to do everything we can to reduce federal and state spending that encourages that kind of un-real thinking.

    Heck, the new Medicare drug benefit is costing at least $100 billion/year -- why didn't you go after that? Or MDs who own Lexuses, or better yet, medical-malpractice attorneys or medical-insurance company CEOs? Where are your priorities?

  • Posted by Andrey Fedorov , Student at Rutgers University on May 1, 2006 at 5:55am EDT
  • ” .. it’s a basic human right ..”
    Sir, where did you get that?

    The Universal Decleration of Human Rights, article 26: "higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit[, not on what is in your daddy's wallet]."