Search News


Browse Archives

News

Duke's Ever-Evolving iPod Initiative

April 28, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Given some of its recent publicity, this might not have been the best time for Duke University to announce that it was altering a highly popular student benefit. But Duke's plan to stop giving students free iPods through its path-setting Duke Digital Initiative and to instead lend them or sell them the devices for a highly subsidized $99 has even struck most students as a logical next step in the maturation of the educational technology program. The surprising headline on an editorial in Duke's student newspaper: "A Smart Change."

Duke unveiled the Duke iPod First-Year Experience to much fanfare (and a fair bit of skepticism) in 2004, when it agreed to give the spiffy digital audio and text devices from Apple to all incoming members of the class of 2008. The "experiment," as Duke called it at the time, was designed to encourage “creative uses of technology in education and campus life,” and Duke's bold stroke prompted other institutions, including Drexel University and  to follow in its wake. But skeptics derided it as a fad and suggested that while the giveaway might enable students' music-downloading habits, it wouldn't do much to promote education.

Last spring, after a review of the program's first year, the university said it would continue the program but that instead of giving the devices to all freshmen -- whether they intended to use them for educational purposes or not -- it would hand them out to any student enrolled in a course for which Duke’s Center for Instructional Technology had approved the professors’ use of the devices. The goal was to encourage faculty members to build digital content into their 2005-6 courses, knowing that all students would have iPods.

This week, a review of the second year of the Duke Digital Initiative, as the program is now called, suggests that the changes largely worked. Forty-seven courses were approved for iPod use this spring, up from 19 in the spring of 2005, and the university gave out more iPods to students this academic year than it did to about 1,600 freshmen in 2004-5, Provost Peter Lange said in a letter to faculty members on Monday.

"The big change in the second year is that use of the iPods is driven by faculty desires," says Julian Lombardi, assistant vice president of academic services and technology support. "We had 100 faculty each semester that assigned iPods, and demand for iPods is going through the roof, as driven by the desire of faculty to engage."

While demand for the iPods has grown, Lombardi says, the funds available for the program are remaining constant. That meant that if Duke wants to continue to provide devices to everyone who wants one, and to expand the offerings of the digital initiative in other ways, it needed to find another way to "provide as great a value as possible to as many people as possible," he says.

So beginning this year, to "maintain access of this technology to any student free of charge," says Lombardi, any student in a course for which Duke has approved iPod use can borrow one of the devices free of charge for the term. And any student who wants to own instead can one for $99, about a third of the price of the audio/video iPod. Duke will keep refreshing the "loaner pool," Lombardi says.

The change will not only allow Duke to meet the growing demand for iPods, he says, but also free up funds for other purposes, such as buying microphones for each iPod so that students can record their own digital material.

That will enable some of the more creative uses of the iPod that Duke has begun to see, Lombardi says. He cites one professor who required students to fulfill one assignment by creating an audio podcast instead of a written paper. When Duke officials analyzed the results, they found that students had actually written more (in terms of drafts, scripts, etc.) than they would have for a traditional report. And because students shared their podcasts not only with the faculty member but gave them to other students to listen to, "we're finding the overall quality increase, because of the whole peer dynamic," Lombardi says.

"We're tapping into whole different kinds of dynamics that we never expected, or that weren't patently obvious."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Duke's Ever-Evolving iPod Initiative

  • Why Ipod?
  • Posted by Mr. Influence , Dr. at Ateneo de Manila on August 18, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
  • Yep, Ipods can get you cool audio courses. Maybe you can even record the professor's lecture while playing hooky. But- why stop at Ipods? The Ipod Video costs $399. An entry level HP Ipaq would go for $300. Add $40 for a bluetooth keyboard and voila- a persuasively compelling reason to take ordered notes for class!

    Upgade that with a $50 MMC card with 4GB of RAM and you can do audio courseware.

    So why Ipod? I think more folks need a PDA in this wireless educational world.

  • Maybe my math is off...
  • Posted by Carl on April 28, 2006 at 2:10pm EDT
  • If I'm not mistaken, students at Duke pay over $35,000 each year to attend. That puts it at about $140,000 for 4 years, while many students now take 5. Tell me again how they can't seem to find the money for a $300 iPod?

  • Posted by Victor on April 28, 2006 at 5:20pm EDT
  • In response to Carl's comment.
    First of all -- very few people at Duke take 5 years to graduate -- I did not know a single one in all my 4 years there. The only people I know who would have taken 5 years were athletes who red-shirted a year.

    Second -- the iPod's are still given as a free loan for all course takers, so you can't complain; have you heard of any courses that loan the textbooks out for the semester? Besides, I'd pay $99 for a new iPod in a second, (you can't even do better on eBay); but I can't since I'm an alumnus.

  • Posted by george on April 29, 2006 at 12:40pm EDT
  • If Duke students can afford $400 for strippers, they can afford $300 for an iPod.

  • Posted by Terrin on April 30, 2006 at 6:10pm EDT
  • Carl, you see people who attend Duke are generally rich. Strike that. People who attend Duke typically have rich parents. This probably means that they do not have to work to pay for their college education. Accordingly, the national trend you speak of, regarding 5 years to complete a degree, likely does not apply for typical Duke students.

    Athletes are not typical because the University pays for their tuition, but not their living expenses. Since many athletes at schools like Duke are not from the rich crowd, they actually have to work to cover the expenses, and it sometimes takes longer.

  • a few bad apples
  • Posted by Mark Morton , Instructional Program Manager at University of Waterloo on May 10, 2006 at 4:15pm EDT
  • George, I don't think it was ALL students at Duke who hired strippers.

  • Effective, efficient and all that...
  • Posted by Eric on June 2, 2006 at 12:05pm EDT
  • I don't really have any insight into the financial capabilities of the students there, but would be interested in whether widespread access to asynchronous media improved learning in programs at Duke. Nine, $99, or $399 seem too much if it doesn't improve learning and well worth it if it does (particularly over four years).