Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Change in Climate for Stem Cells?

It’s been nearly five years since President Bush’s executive order limiting federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, and some politicians are calling louder than ever for a bill that would render the order obsolete.

In May 2005, the House of Representatives passed the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, which would provide government support for research on stem cells from embryos that would otherwise be discarded by fertility clinics. Senate passage of the bill would have overridden President Bush’s order, but ethical concerns about stem cell research — some people have expressed concern that stem cells will lead to cloning, and pro-life advocates have argued that using the cells is like taking a life — stopped the bill before it even got to a vote.

In the meantime, support for the bill has gained strength in the Senate, and some advocates for the research hope that flagging approval ratings for President Bush and Congressional Republicans have opened the door a little wider for stem-cell legislation, if they seek to woo moderate voters.

On Tuesday, a bipartisan group of senators urged passage of the measure. “We are pleased that Senator [Bill] Frist backs this bill, and has said he will schedule a vote on it this spring,” Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), said of the Senate Majority Leader. “Well, spring is here.”

Hatch added that “the longer we wait … the more difficult it is to keep politics out” of the decision to vote on the bill.

Frist, who fielded a few stem cell questions at a separate venue Tuesday, seemed to suggest that politics aren’t exactly out of the picture currently. “Every time I mention [the stem cell bill],” Frist said, “then I have four or five or six or seven other bills that people want to be considered,” he added, referring to various attachments that would specify guidelines for stem cell research and technologies that it breeds.

In 2001, Bush decided that federal money could be used only for research on stem cell lines that had been or were already being generated at that time, and only if the embryo had no chance of developing as a human being.

Scientific researchers said that making federal funding more available for stem cell studies is the only way to keep the United States at the forefront of biotechnology.

“We have $3 billion in California [for embryonic stem cell research], and there’s money in other states, and private money,” said David Baltimore, president of the California Institute of Technology. But without federal support, “I think a young bright scientist will look at the situation and say, ‘I don’t know how long it will be possible to do this.’ ” Bills have come before Congress in the past that would outlaw stem cell research altogether.

Baltimore added that “it looks like the center of gravity” in Congress is changing, and “I think that will give young scientists the sense that this is something they can plan their lives around.”

Hatch, along with Sens. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and Sen Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), presented public opinion polling results Tuesday from the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research that found that 72 percent of respondents support stem cell research.

“For the life of me I can’t understand anyone who has seen children losing arms and eyes … from diabetes” who doesn’t support stem cell research, Hatch said. The embryos are “just going to be discarded as hospital waste anyway.”

Harkin added that “it’s high time to lift President Bush’s restrictions and let our top scientists go to work.”

Competitiveness with foreign researchers has been all the rage on Capitol Hill of late, and Baltimore said that stem cell research is a huge part of staying competitive. “Biotechnology is the quintessential American industry,” he said, adding that the stem cell restrictions are “a tremendous opening for people abroad. There’s no industry where we’ve been more effective at maintaining leadership.”

Some opponents of stem cell research have argued that, in allowing federally funded research on the 22 stem cell lines that were already available before Bush’s order, researchers already have the tools they need.

Scientists, however, said that of the 22 stem cell lines, only about seven are in the United States and available, and they’re in two states. Also, privately funded stem cell research has to be completely separated from any sort of federally funded research, so scientists working on stem cells with private money have to cloister themselves away from much of the rest of the research community.

Baltimore said that institutions are talking about having to build separate buildings to conduct privately funded stem cell research. And as far as ethical concerns, the best way to handle them, experts said, is not to have researchers working in isolation from the scientific community. “Visibility is the best assurance that people know what’s going on,” Baltimore said.

Additionally, the stem cell lines that can be used with federal funding were grown from cells derived from mice that may contaminate the lines with animal viruses.

The senators urged the public to bombard Frist with calls, faxes and e-mails. Frist said that he supports “stem cells, both embryonic and adult. But the embryonic stem cell research has to be done in an ethical, moral way. And I will bring up stem cells. We are working very hard to put together a package possibly — possibly — of three bills to bring to the floor. And I would expect, what I’d like to do is be able to get up-or-down votes on each of those three.”

Hatch said that he thinks the debate and vote on a stem cell bill, or package of bills, could be completed in a day and should happen this month. “We’ll be here at night,” he said.

Feinstein, though, said that “we’re going to be on immigration most likely until Memorial Day, then the seasons change.”

Frist said he expects to have the bill on the floor this summer.

David Epstein

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Stem Cell Left Wing/Right Wing Agendas

Here we go, again. Left wing and moderate republicans are pushing for embryotic stem cell research! Most of the derivations noted from the article were from countries whose respect for life has come down to no respect. I know Senator Hatch well from living in Pennsylvania and his ideas over the years. Senator Frist, another republican, was once someone I thought would be a choice as President, but this topic changed my mind about him when he changed his mind. I’m finding more doctors aspirations political office oriented than patient caring or following their hypocratical oath. Between both parties of Congress, it’s time to choose people who believe in issues and not parties. Neither one can get it right anymore!

The organization mentioned, Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, is one the people better become familiar with their agendas and who is amongst them.

Look, also, into “Snowflake” Babies organization. These embryos were frozen for many years. Infertile couples asked permission of couples, who had their number of children desired, if they would consider placing up for adoption those remaining embryos. As a result, there have been many children born into happy infertile couples lives and the infertile mother can experience pregnancy! The ones who gave up their embryos have been so excited for these couples and know the babies belong to...the infertile couples! What a win-win situation!

Adult Stem Cells have been more viable and have brought many discoveries since the early 1900’s. No one in the media discusses nor researches this or what was just mentioned above. We need factual news reporters and not commentators!

Let these babies live! Read everything you can on both sides of the issue. Then form an opinion even if you find out your original assumption is a faulty syllogism.

Advocate for “Snowflake Babies”

Dee Williams, Stem Cells, at 10:00 am EDT on May 17, 2006

A Different Perspective

As a “young bright scientist” majoring in Biotechnology, I in no way support embryonic stem cell research.

Beyond the fact that it is taking a life, scientists need to perfect the technology in animals first before they even consider using it on humans, as they would do with any new medicinal advance. Scientists are so eager to jump into using this technology on people that they have not proved that it works in animals. From lectures I’ve attended, I learned that in many cases, injecting an animal with embryonic stem cells caused tumors to grow instead of healing the injury or disease. And people want to do this in humans? We’re trying to fight cancer, not cause it.

Beyond all this, there are some 65 treatments or cures for various cancers, auto-immune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, blood disorders, etc., treatments and cures that all come from adult stem cells. On the other side, there are exactly zero proven treatments or cures from embryonic stem cells. We should focus on supporting what works instead of throwing money at what simply sounds good.

Stephanie, 3rd-year Biotechnology student at University of Delaware, at 11:05 am EDT on May 17, 2006

Dee,Women are born with around 9,000 ovum. Men produce hundreds of thousands of sperm in their lives. Is it your contention that every gamete which does not become an adult has been murdered?

JD, at 11:05 am EDT on May 17, 2006

JD response

Most pro-life people conside human life to begin with conception — ie with the creation of a new and unique genetic profile for that guides the development of a new human person.

I, as an atheist, support this position as do many religious people. It seems to make far and away the most sense.

Kevin, Undergraduate, at 5:20 pm EDT on May 17, 2006

Kevin,So it is more moral to flush gametes down the drain, than use them to relieve human suffering? Can conception begin outside a mother’s body? Can one’s mother be a test tube? If we learn how to clone humans from hair cells, will it become murder to cut one’s hair because we could make the hair cells grow into a human? Your argument is irrational.

JD, at 1:45 pm EDT on May 19, 2006

Embryonic stem cell research

The artificial fertilization of a human ovum outside the woman’s body with a man’s sperm creates a zygote, a fertilized egg, which divides into a number of cells to a stage called a blastocyst. The blastocyst, which is invisible to the naked eye, is placed into the reproductive tract of a woman where, and ONLY WHERE, it can develop into a human being. Only after the blastocyst is deposited in a woman’s body can the blastocyst be called a “human". Noone has ever been able to develop a human outside of a woman’s body. A blastocyst is a potential human but so are spermatozoa and ova. Both need a special condition to become human. Nature discards the unused eggs and sperm. The unused artificially formed blastocysts can also be discarded or used to cure diseases and replace damaged structures. God has enabled humans to make artifical blastocysts so those who could not otherwise grow their own babies can. Who are those whowould stand in the way of using these discarded artificial blastocysts to make a damaged human being whole to live a full life and contibute to the welfare of others? Is that not what Christianity is all about?

Unabelle R. Boggs, Ph.D., at 11:00 pm EST on January 22, 2007

Origins of stem cell research

Many of you seem unaware of the years of research on the embryology of animals which has set the stage for stem cell research in humans. When I was a graduate student in the Anatomy Department of Columbia University’s College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1954, Dr. Detwiller (who was chairman of the Anatomy Dept) transfered cells from a salamander blastocyst to an older salamander and caused a leg to grow out of the head of the host salamander which moved when the salamander opened its mouth. The donor cells from the blastocyst had to come from a special place and the blastocyst had to be a special age — younger or older would not produce the leg. The first few cells formed from a fertilized egg is able to produce a whole individual. If the first two cells are separated, identical twins develop. If the first four cells are separated, identical quadruplets develop. However, after a few more cells are formed the ability to produce a whole individual is lost, but structures can be produced such as the leg. But that ability is also soon lost. There is a progressive loss of potency to differentiate into multiple types of cells. This is why the embryonic stem cell are so important compared to amnionic or other moreadvanced stem cells.

Unabelle R. Boggs, Ph.D., at 11:00 pm EST on January 22, 2007

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Change in Climate for Stem Cells?

or search for jobs directly.

CSE and/or MSSE Teaching Specialist
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Assistant Director of Operations, Richardson Auditorium
Princeton University

Position Summary: Under the supervision of the Director of Richardson Auditorium, the Assistant Director of ... see job

Technology Marketing & Sales Manager — Sensing and Electronics
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Faculty, Speech Communication — 020701
Miami Dade College

Job Description: This faculty member teaches Speech courses including Fundamentals of Communication, Public Speaking, and ... see job

Director of Development & Communications
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

The Director will work with faculty, staff, volunteers and donors to seek funding for priorities of the Program in the ... see job

Associate/Full Professor
NC State University

Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job

Public Information Specialist (3WBD08)
Aiken Technical College

Hiring Range: $24,881 — $35,457 Pay Band: 4 State Classification: Public Information Specialist JOB DESCRIPTION: Primary ... see job

Development Officer (112029)
Northeastern University

Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job

Corporate Development Specialist
DeVry University

As one of the largest degree-granting higher education systems in North America, DeVry University provides high-quality, ... see job

Clinical Psychologist-Licensed Psychologist (Req. # 0600799)
Georgia Southern University

Regents Center for Learning Disorders. Twelve-month position involving a 75/25 split in duties between clinical and adjunct ... see job