Search News


Browse Archives

News

Florida Isolationism

May 25, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

He wanted to take on Fidel Castro.

He wanted to make a strong statement against the two most unpopular -isms around: terrorism and Communism.

And he wanted his constituents to be happy.

State Rep. David Rivera, a Republican who hails from a district composed largely of Cuban Americans, has spent the past several months garnering legislative support for a bill that he believed would do all those things. He not only ushered the bill through passage in the House, but he also persuaded Sen. Mike Haridopolos, also a Republican, to take similar actions in the Senate. Ultimately, the bill passed both chambers and made its way to Governor Jeb Bush’s desk on Tuesday. The governor -- against the advice of academic groups -- has said that he has every intention of signing the legislation.

The new legislation would, in part, prohibit “the use of state or nonstate funds made available to state universities to implement, organize, direct, coordinate, or administer activities related to or involving travel to a terrorist state." Countries deemed terrorist states by the U.S. include Cuba, Syria, Iran, North Korea and the Sudan. The law will go into effect on July 1.

Rivera said Tuesday that many Cuban Americans he’s spoken with are pleased, especially after recently seeing a professor and a counselor affiliated with Florida International University indicted on charges of spying for the Cuban government.

But, for several professors in the state, pleasure does not abound. Many have indicated that the end result of Rivera’s efforts will soon limit academic freedom and could pose a threat to U.S. national security.

“I think there’s likely going to be a chilling effect on academic research,” Lisandro Perez, associate professor of sociology and anthropology at Florida International University, said Wednesday. “It’s simply a mistake for researchers from this state to be shut off from these countries.” Perez has made several trips to Cuba as a result of institutional grants, studying the history of Cuban immigrants. He had planned to attend a conference in Cuba this winter, but is now uncertain if he will be able to without funding support for travel.

“This sends a signal that you can’t really engage in international studies in Florida,” said Damián Fernández, director of the Cuban Research Institute and a professor of international relations at Florida International. “I’m very concerned that Florida is going to fall behind other states. What real academic is going to come here under the impression that he or she can’t do research in Iran?”

Rivera said that no professor should have such concerns, if they are confident in their abilities to attract direct non-taxpayer funding for travel expenses. Still, many grants from non-state sources flow through universities, which would be barred under this legislation.
 
“Any professor who feels they cannot justify their research enough to receive private, direct funding is probably not worthy to teach in Florida,” said Rivera.

“That just doesn’t make any sense,” said Houman Sadri, a professor of political science at the University of Central Florida. “As a social scientist who has worked so hard not to get a label -- I have never taken private industry grants for fear of getting a label.” He has researched several foreign policy issues in Iran.

Echoing several academics' concerns, Sadri said that the legislation is “misguided in terms of American national interests in a world where we know little about our new regional (Cuba, North Korea, and Syria) and global (Iran) challengers.”

“This bill certainly makes a philosophical statement about American policy goals, but in reality it hinders our ability and means to gain inside information about our rivals in a world where information means power,” added Sadri. “How could we make prudent policies toward states that we have limited new information about?”

Sadri said that he would consider leaving Central Florida if the legislation ultimately hampered his ability to conduct further Iranian research.

Rivera said that he’s not all that concerned about academic opposition to the bill. “Legislators just don’t pay too much attention to what academics think,” he said. “I always welcome their opposition.”

The legislator added that as soon as opposition from academics mounted, his legislation instantly became more popular with average people in Florida.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Florida Isolationism

  • Posted by Larry on May 25, 2006 at 8:10am EDT
  • This is just the first chapter in a great dormant commerce clause case, to be in the 2012 Con Law casebook.

  • I am sure others will think of this...
  • Posted by Frank Montabon at Iowa State University on May 25, 2006 at 10:20am EDT
  • "Rivera said that he’s not all that concerned about academic opposition to the bill. “Legislators just don’t pay too much attention to what academics think,” he said. “I always welcome their opposition.”

    The legislator added that as soon as opposition from academics mounted, his legislation instantly became more popular with average people in Florida."

    I am reminded of the quip about Richard Hofstadter's book, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life - the amazing part of the book is not that he was able to write it, but that he was able to keep it to one volume.

  • Just what we need...
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on May 25, 2006 at 10:30am EDT
  • I am pleased that we have elected officials making statements like, "Legislators just don’t pay too much attention to what academics think." It reassures me of the actual level of education that voters may expect of such people.

  • call this what it is
  • Posted by Brian on May 25, 2006 at 10:35am EDT
  • Forget all the objections to this move by politicians based on national security and the like (which do have some merit, but sound a bit strained). Let's call this proposed legislation what it is: an effort by right wing politicians to intimidate and hamper intellectuals, ostensibly liberal intellectuals. (I mean, who else would want to study Cuba or Iran? : ) ) It is part of the larger right wing power grab in this country. The right wing does not want people to question it. It is dictatorial -- remember, it's usually dictators who ban their people from foreign travel and study.

    Yes folks, "it can happen here." The US is not immune from succumbing to fascistic tendencies. These FL politicians are drawing upon the ignorance, nationalism, religious fundamentalism, and overall resentment and anger of what is unfortunately a large group of people, perhaps a majority in FL, to deal a death blow to liberals/intellectuals. Why? Because they can -- they now have the power. For the past several years, liberals have been equated with "the enemy," and "treason." Think back to the speeches at the Republican National Convention, where speakers discussed how liberals were endangering America. Spend a few hours listening to Sean Hannity and other right wing commentators. I have heard Hannity say that liberal intellectuals were anti-God. Not so long ago, being "anti God" could get you burned at the stake by your fellow man.

    This is all getting dangerous. The next logical step after this legislation passes is legislation against paying salaries to professors who study anything that is "un-American." Soon liberals will simply be treated as The Enemy. Watch out.

  • everyone relax
  • Posted by Larry on May 25, 2006 at 11:30am EDT
  • Come on folks, that anti-academic rhetoric was just that: unsophisticated rhetoric from a state senator. Next week he will probably be doing his best to secure grant funding for a school in his district. The week after he will be trying to get his kids into the “best” schools based on “academic” reputation.

    Oh, on a deeper level, academics should be careful to differentiate between anti-intellectual attacks and attacks on their partisan interests. If a state legislature decides not to, say, fund, your new classroom building, they might just think that there are other ways to use funding.

  • anti-intellectualism in florida
  • Posted by happy to be an ex-floridian on May 25, 2006 at 12:20pm EDT
  • rivera's comments sum up nicely the thinking about academics in florida. the mainstream population there (white, latino, whatever) is very suspicious of anyone who thinks for a living. yes, you can do good work and have a life if you keep to a little bubble, but what good is that? and it doesn't help when elected government officals stigmatize you and welcome opposition from academics in order to score cheap political points. dumb rhetoric or not, it gets play in the media and only erodes public trust in teachers. it's irresponsible.

  • Posted by Thane Doss on May 25, 2006 at 12:20pm EDT
  • It's easier to demonize a state that no one knows much about. It's also easier to make bad decisions about such states based on bad, skewed, or useless information.

    Apparently the US's success was so great in gathering information concerning Iraq from "Curveball" in Germany and Ahmed Chalabi after he'd spent decades outside of Iraq that the Floridians think it should be replicated by assuring as great an absence of intellectual connection with and knowledge of nations the US isn't friendly with as possible.

    The warrior's motto is "DON'T know your enemy" isn't it?

  • Posted by Brian on May 25, 2006 at 12:50pm EDT
  • Larry,
    I would like to share your view, but I think it lacks an understanding of the wider context. There is an attack on intellectuals and academics in this country, an attack that has escalated in recent years. Have a look at the post-Sept 11 report by the group Lynn Cheney has been involved with, The American Council of Trustees and Alumni, entitled, "Defending Civilization: How Our Universities Are Failing America and What Can be Done About It" (http://www.goacta.org/publications/Reports/defciv.pdf)
    Look at the quotes they find so outrageous -- many of the quotes are normal discourse and indeed necessary discourse after 9/11. You might also question why it is that the proposed legislation that is the subject of the Chronicle article is apparently so popular with the public ...

  • Cheney not involved in report
  • Posted by Larry on May 25, 2006 at 2:00pm EDT
  • Brian, First of all, the report that you mention states the following: “Its contents belongs only to the authors. No public official—including Lynne Cheney and Sen. Joe Lieberman—has endorsed or been asked to endorse this report.” (Under Acknowledgments on p. 2). So, I think it is a bit disingenuous to say that the second lady is “involved” in any of this. There is a fairly meaningless quote at the beginning. Second of all, in Florida, a lot of political action involves Cuba. There are a lot of Cubans, and they are listened to. This is what explains why it is “so popular” with the public. Many Cubans are well-educated. They may make an apparently rational, intellectual decision that it is better to try and hurt Cuba then to help universities. Anyway, trolling the lay people for political gain is something practiced by all parties (and academics, too). Instead, academics should concentrate on 1) getting their message out; and 2) lobbying. But all is not lost. A good chunk of this legislation may be unconstitutional, anyway.

  • Posted by Brian on May 25, 2006 at 10:20pm EDT
  • Larry,
    Actually, I didn't say Lynn was involved with the report .... She was, however, involved with the group at some point. It is a group hooked in with powerful people, and it reflects their general views and aims. Don't believe every disclaimer by a politician that you read!
    That all said, it's a bad sign, and can lead to very dangerous times, when politicians pander to people's baser instincts and resentments and hatreds and insecurities and use professors as pinatas .

  • florida's isolationism?
  • Posted by Ron McFarland on June 1, 2006 at 9:10pm EDT
  • Having grown up in the Sunshine State during the 1950s & 1960s, and having for the past 36 years lived in Idaho, I believe I know something about cultutal isolation of various sorts. Now it's a pretty challenging task to outdo the Gem State (a.k.a., the Spud State) when it comes to anti-intellectualism, but it looks like these good ol' boys in the Floridy legyschoor gone and done it! If bashing those who care for the life of the mind has become popular sport among the "average" Floridian, may I suggest that he or she consider a vacation in Idaho!

    Ron

  • The Pen Is Mightier...
  • Posted by Duncan Cameron on October 28, 2006 at 7:05am EDT
  • We all agree that Mr. Rivera's thoughts and actions only harm education and academic freedom. Unfortunately he is running unchallenged in District 112. Let's change that. Vote for me as a write in candidate:

    Duncan Cameron

    Zero qualifications and an open mind. Beating today's politicians by 50%!!