News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
May 30, 2006
Enrolling students in college really doesn’t do anyone much good if they fail and drop out. When those students are low-income and/or minority students, the loss is particularly distressing to educators at community colleges that reach out to such students. Those are the ideas behind a growing movement in community colleges to find ways to help students — even those with very poor high school preparation — succeed.
In several intense sessions Monday at the annual meeting of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development, attendees traded promising ideas for doing so, and talked about the importance of staying focused on these issues. NISOD, which is part of the Community College Leadership Program at the University of Texas at Austin, is one of the largest gatherings in the year of community college faculty members and administrators — and probably the largest gathering focused on teaching issues.
One of the ideas presented at the meeting, in Austin, demonstrated how a focused intervention program could have an impact on the academic success of black freshmen. The program — created at Pellissippi State Technical and Community College, in Knoxville, Tenn. — identifies students about to graduate from high school who plan to enroll at the college, and works with them to improve skills in a way that is having a notable impact on retention.
Leigh Anne Touzeau, director of admissions and records at Pellissippi State, said the need for a new approach was evident from data: 32 percent of new black students and only 11 percent of new white students are identified as having math skills that are so deficient that they will need three courses of remedial math just to be ready for an introductory college course. Another 27 percent of black students need two courses, compared to 23 percent of white students. (In contrast, 51 percent of white students need no remedial math, which is true of only 28 percent of black students.) Students who have to take a lot of remedial courses have poor graduation rates, so the lopsided statistics on remediation carry over to everything the college cares about in terms of educating a diverse group of students, Touzeau said.
The program Pellissippi State created identifies black students who will need remediation based first on their ACT scores and then on other diagnostic tests. During the May of their senior years in high school, the students are offered a spot in the program, through which they are taken to the main campus of the community college and receive 17.5 hours of intense instruction in areas where their skills are weak, 3 hours of personal tutoring, 2 hours of instruction in college survival skills, and a total of 5.5 hours of testing (at the beginning and end of the program). All of the instruction takes place over a two-week period, a few hours a day, and plenty of free pizza is provided, along with some social events at which the students could meet students from their neighborhoods who were succeeding at the college.
The results of the program have been striking in the two years since it was created: Of the participants, 85 percent gained at least one level — meaning avoiding the need to take at least one remedial course they would have otherwise needed — and 28 percent gained two levels. Of the developmental courses the students did take when they enrolled, the passage rate was 66 percent, compared to a normal passage rate for black students of 55 percent. And the fall to spring retention rate for the students is 76 percent, compared to 58 percent average for black freshmen. The college is now preparing to expand the program beyond black students to all who could benefit from it.
Touzeau said it was especially encouraging to see that many of the students could — in a relatively short time period — make real progress. She said that while many students were way behind in math, it was sometimes only a few concepts that were preventing a rapid advance in knowledge. By doing in-depth diagnostic testing and then focusing on those concepts, the college could have a big impact, she said. “A lot of this is the personal tutoring,” she said. Not only is the education more effective, but a real message is sent to the student. “We’re saying that if you look at people at individuals, they can succeed. People are used to getting pushed aside in large classes and not getting the help that they need.”
While no other colleges represented in the audience in Austin had tried the Pellissippi State approach, the idea was met with considerable enthusiasm, and several people cited programs under consideration or recently started that share some of the same philosophical approach.
Justin M. Oliver, a mathematics instructor at Paul D. Camp Community College, in Virginia, said that his institution is finding that students who take remedial courses in math do better in introductory college math than do the students who pass the placement tests to avoid remediation. Oliver said he thought this was because the remedial program teaches students how to learn and focuses on the transition to college, along with providing rigorous instruction. “Instead of putting them right in the fire, they get some help first,” he said.
At Midlands Technical College, in South Carolina, many educators were concerned about low retention rates, especially among black students. So the college decided to do a “retrospective transcript analysis” and it looked at students who did graduate and tried to identify patterns in their college experiences, according to Dorcas A. Kitchings, director of assessment, research and planning. The college found that of students who had taken a course in their first year on how to study and succeed in college, the average time to an associate degree was 4.7 years. For students who didn’t take that course, the average time to degree was 7 years.
As Kitchings spoke, several in the audience talked about how they had seen similar positive impacts from teaching students how to learn. Kitchings said that her college is currently in the middle of an “active discussion” on whether to require the course. She said she can see lots of reasons to do so, but said many faculty members worry about adding course requirements, especially when they feel stretched to cover necessary ground in the limited time they have with students. Again, other audience members said that the same debates were going on at their campuses.
A general sense at the meeting was that whatever drawbacks may exist to starting more assertive intervention programs, community colleges need to try them. While officials expressed pride in their “open access” traditions, several spoke of the need to push students in directions that would help them succeed.
Cuyahoga Community College, in Ohio, is about to start block scheduling with about 100 students identified on placement tests as being among the most poorly prepared. The students will take three courses together, including a study skills course. Phyllis Dukes, an associate professor of counseling at the college, said she saw a similar motivation behind that effort and those being discussed elsewhere at the NISOD meeting: just assuming that poorly prepared students can succeed by themselves doesn’t work.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Is it really the content of these intervention courses that is doing the work here, or is it simply the fact that these students are getting some individual attention that no one had ever given them before? I once saw a community college website where the sole photograph on the “student services” page was one student standing alone at a computer kiosk that looked like an automatic teller machine. It would be hard to imagine a colder or more inhumane picture of how students were regarded at that institution.
Personal attention from faculty and staff is the key to student success, at community colleges as well as at large universities. If the work you are doing can be replaced by a computer, then what you’re doing is probably so unimportant that it should be replaced by a computer.
The future of community college organization will lie in decentralized “house systems” that provide sustained personal and academic support throughout the institution:
http://collegiateway.org/news/2006-community-college-house-system
R.J. O’Hara, The Collegiate Way, at 1:00 pm EDT on May 30, 2006
I am starting to think that community colleges should give up on open admissions. A student who did not apply him or herself in high school is very unlikely to turn around three months after graduating. I suggest that such students be denied admission, but that people who have worked for two years since finishing high school would become eligible for admission to a community college — military service would also count. This would give them time to grow up a bit and give students still in high school an incentive to study harder.
Mike, Open Admissions, at 3:55 am EDT on May 31, 2006
Out of my short experience with CCS students i have noticed that some students simply are not grown up enough to be serious about studying, including attending classes, preparing homework, and holding on to the class, some lack basic math skills which are necessary for solving equations (even in accounting, which i teach) and generally for logical thinking, some simply do not know how to study, to organize work at home and in the class. I try to compensate for this lack of skills by reminding them basics, but i can do just so much while following my own courses.
George, instructor, at 12:05 pm EDT on June 2, 2006
Any individual who states race is insignificant to any area of life is in need of refresher courses!
Since the establishment of this country, the only persons who reportedly had no concept OF race, were the Native Americans!
As a variable, whether controlled or measured, race, age, income, educational attainment,etc., what’s TO study related TO people, if you don’t examine (measure)?
If you don’t measure, what do you know (prove)?
What a bizarre remark to find ON an educational site!
DAlani, at 5:50 am EDT on July 8, 2006
There are many reasons why a student fails to accelerate in academia. Family obligations, illness, money, and lack of motivation are just few factors that contribute to low retention rate at community collages. Therefore, as educators we are obligated to help our students overcome their obstacles and help create a path to academic success. Not an easy process; moreover, a creative educational design is almost necessary for any achievement to take place.
Motivational Interviewing might be a solution to low retention rate and inadequate academic persistence of students at community colleges. Motivational Interviewing evolved from work of Dr. Miller and Dr. Rollnick in the filed of addiction counseling. Therefore, Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a counseling approach of helping clients overcome their ambivalence. This is not a technique but a philosophy of respect and concern, along with a collection of skills. There are five principles of Motivational Interviewing: 1. Develop discrepancy, 2. Avoid argumentation, 3. Express empathy, 4. Roll with resistance, and 5. Support self-efficiency.
Development of discrepancy allows the students to see themselves, and explores where they want to be. This encourages the student to present arguments for change. This is implemented by asking the student open ended questions that focus on their behavior. For example, “What do you think you did well in class? What would you like to do differently next time?” Ask twice as many open-ended versus closed-ended questions. The educator must also be patient and avoid any argumentation with the student. Argumentation leads to resistance; moreover, there is no effective communication when resistance is high. Occasionally, strategies need to be changed or modified to avoid argumentation and keep the resistance level low. Moreover, to build an alliance with the student, educators should express empathy and enter the student’s internal world. In addition, support self-efficiency by allowing the student to be a sole decision maker.
Motivational Interviewing is a respectful approach that considers student’s resources, where the student is, and is non-judgmental. Therefore, this might be just the right key to increase academic persistence and motivation of students in community collages. Educators interested in learning Motivational Interviewing could take advantage of numerous training seminars that are offered by Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers.
Peter Jaswilko, Director of Clinical Education/Respiratory Care at Triton College, at 2:45 pm EST on February 10, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Department of Business Management
Quantitative Business Analysis
East Stroudsburg University invites ... see job
A career at Johnson County Community College is more than a job. We believe it’s important to invest in our employees and ... see job
Campus:
Job Summary:
Work Schedule: ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Relief Pharmacist Student Health Services Open for Recruitment: July 24, 2008 — Open until further notice Announcement #: ... see job
Hillsborough Community College is a public, comprehensive multi-campus, state-supported community college located in the ... see job
Everest Institute, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
Nestled in a beautiful valley in the western Southern Tier of New York State, Alfred State College has a long tradition of ... see job
Hillsborough Community College is a public, comprehensive multi-campus, state-supported community college located in the ... see job
Position Summary: The Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering (PICSciE) seeks a ... see job
Race Focus Misplaced
The obsession with race is distracting us from real issues. This article holds up white students’ preparation as the gold standard — and about half of all white students are NOT prepared for college-level work. Just because black students’ preparation is even worse, college prep is cast as an issue of racial gaps. But it seems to me that the overall student body, irrespective of race, is woefully unprepared for college. This seems to point to problems with high school teaching, college admissions, and course alignment. But rather than actually addressing those issues, we are told that the answer is to sort students by race, and hold the hands of the ones with more pigmentation.
No one should be surprised when this approach, which has been tried in various forms over the past 40 years, doesn’t make an appreciable difference on overall remediation and dropout rates.
Publius, at 11:25 am EDT on May 30, 2006