Search News


Browse Archives

News

Paying for College: Paper or Plastic?

June 7, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

American Express might consider setting its next commercial at Georgia State University. The company could surely capitalize on the news that one of its main competitors, Visa, has lost its market share at the downtown Atlanta institution.

Beginning this fall, parents and students there will no longer be able to use Visa to pay for tuition and fees. Instead, they can go online and pay with MasterCard, American Express or Discover through a third-party vendor that charges the payee a 2.75 percent service fee per transaction.

For Georgia State, the move came down to finances. Ron Henry, the university's provost and vice president of academic affairs, said increased enrollment, budget cuts and rising annual fees from Visa and other credit card companies fueled the move. He estimates that four years ago, Georgia State incurred losses of about $300,000 per year because of credit card charges. Now, that cost is about $750,000 annually, Henry said. 

Georgia State is the latest college in the Peach State to respond to the cost of allowing students and parents to use plastics. In 2004, Georgia Tech adopted a policy of no longer accepting any type of credit card as payment for tuition, fees, meal plans or housing. Emory University has long prohibited credit card payments, and the University of Georgia last year also went to a third-party system that excludes Visa. (The company, which could not be reached for comment, has declined to participate in the third-party arrangement.)

Henry acknowledged in a letter to students that “Visa has been the preferred method of credit card payment for students.” But he said in an interview that it came down to prioritizing how money should be spent. “We’ve been absorbing this cost all along, and more students and parents are correctly taking advantage of the system,” Henry said. “We were in a position of having to reduce administrative expenses or else risk having to shut down programs."

Matt Hamill, senior vice president for advocacy and issue analysis at the National Association of College and University Business Officers, said the question of who should incur the cost of using credit cards is a continuing issue in higher education. “If 2 percent of tuition payments are spent paying the bank, you have to look at how that credit card arrangement serves the interests of students and families,” he said.

As another payment alternative, Georgia State has announced a free, 24-hour-a-day, electronic check payment system, which is also used at Georgia Tech.

Joel Hercik, associate vice president for financial services at Georgia Tech, said the university saved about $1 million in the first year after switching to a no-credit card policy. “The credit card fees we were paying to the providers got to be too much -- we were having some severe budget problems,” he said. "We'd rather not lay off people or reduce academic programming."

Hercik said he has received few complaints about the new system, and that the Web check system has become the primary method of payment. The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia named Georgia Tech's payment system a "best practice," which motivated Georgia State to follow suit.

James Boyle, president of College Parents of America, said that while his organization advises parents against paying for college with credit cards because of hidden costs, the practice is viable for those who are fiscally responsible. 

“Disallowing [credit card use] isn’t a very parent-friendly policy," Boyle said. “Providing the greatest flexibility in payment options is the best way a college can operate."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Paying for College: Paper or Plastic?

  • Posted by Inquiring Mind on June 7, 2006 at 10:45am EDT
  • Does Georgia State get any kickbacks from this credit card vendor?

  • Costs?
  • Posted by Confused on June 7, 2006 at 11:50am EDT
  • Maybe I missed it, or maybe I'm just not savvy about the process, but I'm confused as to how the use of credit cards by students/parents costs institutions money. Shouldn't it be costing the payer money, rather than the payee?

  • Re: COSTS?
  • Posted by Chris on June 7, 2006 at 1:20pm EDT
  • Credit card companies take 2-3% of every transaction. This is why some merchants (such as gas stations) have different prices for credit and cash purchases. It's also the reason Discover and other cash back cards can afford to pay you for making purchases, they're essentially giving you a share of their cut. Of course, this all adds up and for an institution like Georga Tech that's taking in tens of millions a year in tuition, it isn't surprising that it's over a million dollars.

  • Posted by Student on June 7, 2006 at 1:20pm EDT
  • Many universities recently did the same thing in not allowing VISA credit cards. The reason is that in order to accept a credit card the merchant is forbidden from charging a higher rate.

    So as a student paying with a credit card, the 1000 dollars that I was paying, 2.--% went to the credit card company. The university was forbidden from passing that charge directly onto you for a while. Now, either the university chooses to ignore the law or got around it somehow.

    To think about it, go into the grocery buy milk and eggs. Does it cost you more if you buy it with a credit card versus a check or cash? Nope.

  • credit cards explained
  • Posted by Larry on June 7, 2006 at 1:25pm EDT
  • In each credit card transaction, the intermediaries between the merchant (in this case, the college) and the purchaser's bank take a share. This cut varies by processor (see non-comprehensive comparison chart here: http://www.infomerchant.net/creditcardprocessing/cc-processors.html ). However, for non-credit card transactions, most institutions must, for accounting purposes deduct what the excepted rate of non-payment or default will be, anyway.

    I don't think it is fair to call it a “loss,” however, since the processors and banks are taking on a risk that the colleges would otherwise have to shoulder themselves. Most of the “savings” is doubtful, since an entity that doesn’t accept credit cards will have to deal with bounced checks, and additional non-payment. Obviously some processors will do so more cheaply than others, but such is the nature of competition.

  • Credit Card Use
  • Posted by Michael Robison , Director on June 7, 2006 at 1:30pm EDT
  • As the cost of college is on the rise, my question is why don't colleges offer the discounted lenders for parents like Commercebank.com/esign in MO... they discount the PLUS rate by 2.5% then you won't have parents paying 18% for using their credit card.... Go to comparestudentloans.com and look at the lenders.. for the Stafford Loans, NorthStar.org is the best for students, especially with consolidation, they give a .75% discount on the fixed rate at the beginning of repayment not after 48 months which most don't ever get!!! Offer better lenders like CommerceBank.com, but remember the additional . the savings averages $1,500 for every $10,000 borrowed.. ... CompareStudentLoans.com makes no money from the lenders, if there are better ones, just email me at michael@comparestudentloans.com and we will make the changes... I know MRU is a good alternative lender, but look at NorthStar for that one too..

  • Credit Cards
  • Posted by James , Business Analyst on June 7, 2006 at 2:40pm EDT
  • Loss may not be the proper word but card fees are a large expense item for major universities. The expense of returned checks and higher receivables for most schools is nowhere near the cost of credit cards because of the large volumes that are processed, compared to bounced checks or non payments, since most schools cancel enrollment for non payment.

  • Posted by Larry on June 7, 2006 at 4:40pm EDT
  • James, There are different views on this as an accounting matter, and I will concede that at least two courts have adopted your view. On the other hand, some will argue that the ease of use (and deferred payments by students) attracts business. For my money, I will pay for anything I can via credit card, and immediate write the bank a check, just to get frequent flier miles. Likewise, I find myself wondering whether a cancellation of enrollment really provides the school with an added benefit. It isn’t as if the school can resell the seat-hours stolen by the student that fails to pay for an independent study.

    But, indeed, the numbers are huge.

  • Check vendor
  • Posted by Ava on June 7, 2006 at 9:20pm EDT
  • Which vendor is Georgia using for thier electronic check process?

  • Advantage: planning
  • Posted by Andrew Purvis on June 7, 2006 at 9:20pm EDT
  • The greatest benefit in using credit card transactions is budgetary stability. While the intermediaries charge fees, the card, once accepted for a specified sum, provides guaranteed funds to the institution. This is money in the budget from the moment the transfer is approved, and there is no hemming and hawing or handwringing over the validity of a check.

    Sadly, this benefit, though the best out there, is not that great in the grand scheme of things.

  • Paying For College
  • Posted by Karen , Associate Professor at Morehead State University on June 9, 2006 at 5:30am EDT
  • It seems to me that private colleges, which typically are more expensive than public schools, have been ahead of the curve on this one. To finance our son's education, we have taken advantage of a third party service, endorsed by his college, in which families have the option of using credit cards, taking out direct loans, or, as we do, setting up a budget for a set number of months and pay monthly during the academic year for a relatively small fee. Payments are made to the third party which forwards our payments to the school. This last option has worked well for us for the last three years...only one more to go...hooray!

  • shame
  • Posted by Eric , DDS at UMKC on June 26, 2006 at 1:05pm EDT
  • This is nothing more than another example of educational institutions taking the easy way out and choosing what's best for the business over what's best for the student. Some students have no other option but to pay via a credit card. Those students are now forsaken for the almighty dollar. If our universities are in such a dollar crunch... why are the administrators being paid several hundreds of thousands of dollars???