Search News


Browse Archives

News

Mentally Untenured

June 8, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Tenure couldn’t protect one professor coping with a mental illness crisis at Pasadena City College in California.

Yves Magloe, an instructor of English as a second language for six years prior to last fall, says that he tried the best he could to continue teaching classes at the community college after he began experiencing manic delusions as a result of his bipolar disorder, which was first diagnosed in 2000. But, after his medications failed him last October, it became an insurmountable task.

“I felt that my students were carrying guns,” he recalls. “I really felt that my dean was part of a CIA plot. I didn’t feel safe anywhere.” He soon quit taking his medications altogether. His speech became slow, he had no short-term memory, and he couldn’t figure out how to pay his bills. The native of Togo, Africa, who had worked three jobs to put himself through graduate school, also started missing his classes.

Under normal circumstances, as a tenured professor, Magloe could have taken his accumulated sick leave and signed some paperwork that would allow him to take an extended leave of absence. However, he couldn’t do that properly, he says, because he was “so scared of being on campus.” He recalls talking to his dean last fall and felt that the matter was resolved to the best of his ability.

Magloe then left for Togo to be with family members, who prayed for him day and night. He couldn’t check his e-mail until mid-December, when he found a terrifying message. It indicated that the college had processed his resignation on November 18. It said that he had committed “abandonment,” one way that tenured professors can be dismissed by the institution. He returned to the U.S. intending to resolve the situation -- still suffering from delusions -- but ended up being hospitalized for a month earlier this year.

“I thought the heavens were falling on me,” recalls Magloe.

A spokesman with Pasadena City College said Wednesday that officials could not comment on Magloe's case because it involves a personnel matter.

On Wednesday evening, a bevy of faculty members and officials with the California Teachers Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association, had plenty to say about Magloe’s situation, and urged the college's Board of Trustees to reinstate him immediately. Several made impassioned pleas regarding what they called a lack of due process afforded to Magloe. Others said that a shortage of administrative compassion for the professor highlighted a double standard when it comes to mental disorders versus physical illnesses.

“I have no doubt that there is a bias against faculty members with mental illnesses,” says Brock Klein, an associate professor of English, who spoke at the trustee meeting, and has been advocating for months on behalf of Magloe. “If he’d have been hit by a car and was in a coma in the hospital, there would have been no way for him to sign the paper work.” Brock and others presented the board with a petition signed by over 150 faculty members and students who believe that Magloe should be rehired immediately.

Magloe said firmly Wednesday afternoon that he did not resign. “They’ve had plenty of opportunities to correct this,” he added. “They can rescind their decision.”

After hearing so many faculty members express their support for him during the meeting, he said, "I really feel moved. It melts my heart that everyone is supporting me--it's really touching morally."

“I am furious both as a faculty member and as someone who has a history of mental illness,” says Hugo Schwyzer, a tenured professor of history at Pasadena City College, who has been hospitalized three times in the past for severe bouts with depression. “It was unreasonable to expect him to deal with this burden himself."  He wrote about Magloe's situation this week on his personal blog in a post titled, " Stand up for Yves Magloe: a note on mental illness and discrimination."

Until he learned of Magloe’s case, Schwyzer said he hadn’t felt the need to speak out on mental health issues. “This is a wonderful example of why tenure is important,” he says. “It allows me to disclose what’s embarrassing without being fired. I can be an advocate without the risk.”

Claudia Center, a lawyer with the Employment Law Center in California, says that Magloe likely has a strong argument for reinstatement. “If he needed a leave of absence and everyone was clear that he had a mental illness, he should have been put on leave,” she says.

Center notes that courts in California have found that the presence of a policy that allows for leave indicates that an employee should be able to take it, whether he or she signs paperwork or not. Unless there was some other form of misconduct going on, which Magloe says there was not, Center believes that he would have a solid argument in court if the board fails to reinstate him.

“A lot of employers just shut down when there’s a mental health issue with one of their employees,” says Center. “Part of what disability work laws say is that you have to keep talking.”

Magloe says he is ready to sue the college for reinstatement -- but not for damages -- if the trustees do not give him his job back. “I’m not confrontational by nature,” he says of his decision not to request damages. “It’s a place where I like working. I want them to know that I come in peace, although their behavior really slowed down my recovery.”

His medications have been adjusted and he’s finished participation in an out-patient treatment program. He’s surviving financially thanks to a collection taken up by his former colleagues, as well as from support from friends.

“I feel so much better,” says Magloe. “But I’m missing my work. A big part of my life does not exist.”

It's expected that the Board of Trustees will make a decision in the coming days about Magloe's job status.

 

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Mentally Untenured

  • Posted by Beth Ann on May 22, 2008 at 3:50pm EDT
  • Professor Grimsley,

    Thank you so much for being willing to share your story. I was diagnosed with bipolar about a year ago, and am pursuing a PhD. No one knows; I'm afraid of the stigma of speaking out, until I'm tenured somewhere.

    I have searched in vain, until now, for a professor who is out with bipolar--it makes such a difference to know that someone out there has done this. I'm sure your willingness to share is a great gift to your students.

  • highly qualified, yet underemployed
  • Posted by Stephanie Fischetti , Former Adjunct, English Dept at University of South Florida on September 3, 2009 at 1:00pm EDT
  • I was diagnosed with schizo-affective disorder in 1994. I graduated from UNC-Chapel Hill with a BA in English (GPA 3.48) in 1995. I completed my MA in English literature (GPA 4.0) in 1999. I worked in editing and publishing, and taught as an Adjunct (uninsured) in higher education until 2006. My students did well, and some of them won awards. However, whenever I was hospitalized, needed documentation of my income from an employer in order to get medication, or my confidentiality was broken by a therapist, I was allowed to finish the semester, but my contract was not renewed. My last teaching job culminated with an admission to a PhD program at The University of South Florida, an inability to afford my medication on the adjunct salary ($500.00 a month for medicine), and a confrontation from my supervisors who demanded disclosure of my diagnosis. I resigned my position, did not enroll in the PhD program, and have been underemployed ever since. Because I have so much time on my hands and am bored with keeping house, I have decided to go into fund raising (I am a Certified Grant Writer) and activist freelance writing to end employment discrimation against those with mental illness. Those who discriminate will find that their ability to do so and get away with it will diminish greatly when those people they discriminate against go into the field of activism.

  • Bi-Polar Disorder
  • Posted by Edward Hershey on June 8, 2006 at 11:45am EDT
  • Isn't there also this little matter of the Americans with Disabilities Act?

  • View from the school's perspective
  • Posted by Prof. Twocents on June 8, 2006 at 12:15pm EDT
  • From what I can gather from this article (which is not as clear as I would hope on the timeline), the situation unfolded like this from the institution's perspective:

    Late October, professor leaves the country in the middle of the semster apparently without any explanation.

    A few weeks later, institution assumes professor has quit.

    December, professor comes back and objects to being released despite his manifest inability to perform his job.

    The ADA requires institutions to give "reasonable" accomodations so that people can perform their tasks. What reasonable accomodations can you give to someone with active hallucinations that prevented them from even going onto campus? (Assuming they even knew about his illness)

    The situation is tragic, but I do not see how the school is the bad guy here if the professor cannot perform his job. That's why some people pay disability premiums, for these type of situations. The best thing this professor can do is focus on getting better, then reapply for a position.

  • As A Tenured Professor With Bipolar Disorder . . .
  • Posted by Mark Grimsley , Professor at Ohio State University on June 8, 2006 at 1:20pm EDT
  • I obviously found this article of great interest. I can't yet judge whether Pasadena City College willfully discharged Mr. Magloe because of his affective disorder or whether it did so in good faith because it thought he had simply abandoned his position. Mr. Magloe says that he worked things out with his dean before departing for Togo, but misunderstandings can occur even between two people who are perfectly lucid, which Mr. Magloe, in the nature of the case, was not. Now that the College has taken what strikes me as a very unfortunate step, I certainly hope that it will reverse its decision.

    At the same time, realistically it will have to do so with considerable deliberation in order to avoid a pretty hefty lawsuit. I know--because many years ago a (non-academic) employer fired me when I was initially diagnosed with bipolar disorder--than in Ohio the condition is considered a legal disability and to terminate me on those grounds violated my civil rights. If that was true 20 years ago in Ohio, I can only imagine what legal situation obtains in present-day California.

    Rather than discuss the legal/ethical issues further, however, it might be more constructive for me to state that in my own Department of History at The Ohio State University I have been "out of the closet" concerning the bipolar disorder since I joined it in 1992. Initially the condition was pretty mild, but in 1997 (about the same time my tenure kicked in) I had a severe hypomanic episode that very nearly landed me in the hospital. At that point I wrote out a memo to the Department Chair and several colleagues, outlining the symptoms of the disorder and spelling out what procedures to follow if they became concerned about me. This proved invaluable two years later when I had an actual manic episode and had to be hospitalized. Nobody was confused. One colleague drove me to the Emergency Room. A number visited me in the hospital. After my discharge a couple of weeks later, the Department Chair suggested that I take the next quarter off with sick leave, although strictly speaking I had, in the medical term, recompensated.

    I guess I have a couple of points to make here. First, on balance I have found it far more helpful, both personally and professionally, to be forthcoming about the disorder rather than to treat it as something to be hidden away. Second, it is in the interest of the academic community--and for that matter--the larger community as well--to foster an environment in which people feel that they can indeed be straightforward about the illness.

    PS to Prof. Twocents: To the extent that you imply that someone with bipolar disorder cannot function effectively as a professor, you are dead wrong. I have the vita to prove it, and I know for a fact that many others do, too. I have every hope and expectation that Mr. Magloe, with the help of his psychiatrist, therapist, family and friends, can overcome what is essentially a problem of biochemistry.

  • Amen, Prof. Grimsley.
  • Posted by Hugo Schwyzer at Pasadena City College on June 8, 2006 at 3:25pm EDT
  • Thanks, Professor Grimsley. This is one of those "come out" moments, isn't it? It's not just that Yves Magloe deserves support, it's that those of us who do struggle with various mental disorders (while teaching effectively and succesfully) need to correct the misperception that this kind of illness is likely to disqualify us from doing first-rate work.

  • What about the students? Remember them?
  • Posted by Publius on June 8, 2006 at 3:25pm EDT
  • While I feel for Mr. Magloe, it sounds like he's not capable to serving students. And students, I hope I don't need to remind folks, are a fairly important reason for the existence of colleges and the hiring of faculty. So, tenure or not, he's not "owed" a professorship. He should find another line of work.

  • Students? Who they?
  • Posted by L.L. on June 8, 2006 at 5:15pm EDT
  • " .. While I feel for Mr. Magloe, it sounds like he’s not capable to serving students .."

    Unbelievable! Someone who actually wrote on behalf of students! Instead of the "we're entitled to everything and anything" faculty crowd.

    Fields such as English and History are heavily oversupplied with PhDs and MAs. In the real world, student fees would reflect the gross oversupply.

    Instead, student loan levels keep rising faster than inflation. What's wrong with this picture? How long, until students, parents, and lenders revolt from this insane paradigm?

  • Posted by Patrician on June 8, 2006 at 5:15pm EDT
  • So now "...students, I hope I don’t need to remind folks, are a fairly important reason for the existence of colleges and the hiring of faculty." Notice the tone of that statement--as if the writer is so certain of the truth of his/her remarks that he/she may be forgiven for being sarcastic. But this is NOT true. Students are privileged to learn from those who have dedicated their lives to research. Students are not the reason for the hiring of faculty and certainly not for the existence fo the college! The students are supposed to be grateful for the opportunity to participate in the advancement of civilization, which a "college" should pursue. Of course, schools that "just teach" second-hand information and do no research, like "McUniversities" churning out diplomas (one billion served!) exist--but they're a disgrace-- right? Please tell me that this is still understood to be true! If it isn't, then somebody should remind everybody!

  • RememberingThe Students
  • Posted by Mark Grimsley , Professor at Ohio State University on June 8, 2006 at 6:25pm EDT
  • During my 1999 hospitalization, a 21-year old woman was admitted after she attempted suicide. She was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Her mother was devastated; it sounded as if her daughter's life was over. As the woman -- I'll call her Anne -- recompensated, she was told of her diagnosis and she too wondered what it meant for her future.

    It happened that Anne learned that I had bipolar disorder, so she asked me about my experience with it and we had a number of conversations. By then I had reached a point where I could get passes for several hours; I stopped at a bookstore and bought her two of the most useful works I knew of on the subject.

    Anne was an OSU student. The following spring she took a course from me, purely and simply so that she could look, day in and day out, at an adult with bipolar disorder. She found it gave her hope.

    This quarter I taught a large lecture course in which attendance was mandatory. Another young woman -- I'll call her Susan -- came to me to explain that due to an illness she would be missing some classes. She volunteered, needlessly, that the illness was bipolar disorder and started to explain what it was. I told her I had bipolar disorder myself and already knew. Like Anne, Susan had just been diagnosed. Like Anne, she had a mother who was worried for her daughter's future. I suggested that Susan could and should register with our university's Office of Disability Services. I walked her down to the psychiatric facility where she was entering a day program -- which was why she'd be missing class and how I happened to meet her mother. Since then Susan and I have had several conversations about bipolar disorder.

    It happens that this quarter I've had my own struggles with the disorder and on one day was so anxious I felt dizzy, unable to drive to campus, and thus had to cancel class. At the beginning of the next class I apologized to my students for the inconvenience and explained the reason for my absence, partly because I wanted my students to know that a high functioning adult could have bipolar disorder, which is my usual reason for being so forthcoming on the matter; but in this instance mainly because Susan was back in the lecture hall and I wanted her to see that I could tell 170 of her peers that I had the same disorder that she did and they could take it in stride. She told me later she found it encouraging.

    That much I expected. I did not expect that another student in the class -- I'll call her Kim -- also found it encouraging because she too had bipolar disorder. After checking with both Susan and Kim to confirm that it was OK, I put them in touch with each other for mutual support. (And although I've changed the names I also got their permission before telling their stories.)

    Incidentally, both Susan and Kim are "A" students. So, come to think of it, was Anne. I'm not sure that matters, except to underscore that many people are quite capable of coping with the disorder if given half a chance.

  • What's the point then?
  • Posted by JBM on June 8, 2006 at 8:45pm EDT
  • "Students are not the reason for the hiring of faculty and certainly not for the existence fo the college!"

    If educating students is not the reason for colleges and college faculty, what is?

  • Mentally untenured
  • Posted by g lancaster on June 8, 2006 at 9:05pm EDT
  • I went through 7 years of university education including law school without being diagnosed as bipolar. When 20 years later I did get the correct diagnosis, it was a huge relief. I could finally understand the terrible mood swings, the inability to get up some days, the crazy manias and others symptoms. Any disclosure that will help students and professors or other sufferors in general get as much help as needed is obviously good.
    Mental illness has to be treated the same as any other illness. There is simply no justification for the discrimination.

  • Bipolar
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on June 9, 2006 at 5:30am EDT
  • "I have no doubt that there is a bias against faculty members with mental illnesses" - no, just one against people who aren't doing their jobs.

    Most people with various mental disorders are able to function completely fine; many people are indistinuishable unless they tell you. It doesn't appear he was fired simply for being diagnosed with the disorder, but because he was failing to fulfill his job description as a tenured faculty member.

    If one cannot fullfill their job duties, why should they be retained as an employees?

  • He was doing his job
  • Posted by Karen Carlisi on June 9, 2006 at 10:45am EDT
  • Yves was doing his job until he suffered a heart attack....oh excuse me...no I mean a catastrophic episode. I stepped in to take over his class and management of his grades and his students were completely up-to-date and knew exactly where Yves had left off. It was clear from their respect and concern for him that he had a very positive rapport and relationship with them. His syllabus was a reflection of pedagogical insight and creativity. There was no lack of attention, management, or consideration for his students. There would be no judgment on these issues if he had had a heart attack. As others have discussed, it is the ignorance about the nature of mental illness that leads to the kind of crisis we are involved in.

  • Sympathy and Reality
  • Posted by Prof. Twocents on June 9, 2006 at 1:40pm EDT
  • I congratuate Dr. Grimsley on bringing his condition under control. Also, it was very noble of Prof. Karen Carlisi to step in and teach the class (did he have only one? My guess would have been at least four) left behind.

    However, Prof. Magloe does not seem able to achieve a balance with his condition. Had the college assigned him courses for this past semester, he would have had to leave those as well for his month of hospitalization. And again someone would have had to step in and teach in midstream. In short, he would not have been able to perform his job fully earlier this year, either, and others would again have had to do it for him.

    You can debate whether the school should have fired him for abandonment. That is arguable, though I see the school's position in the case of a professor who vanishes midsemester with little or no explanation. Perhaps there could have been some procedure to put him on extended or disability leave until the matter could be more permanently decided?

    What seems (and I stress seems based on the limited information in the piece) clear from this story is that at present it would be irresponsbile to assign him any classes to teach until he shows sustained progress in the treatment of his condition.

  • Dont ask, Don't tell
  • Posted by Not Out on June 9, 2006 at 2:50pm EDT
  • I am glad to hear from repsected professors that they have been able to not only cope with mental illness, but to achieve tenure and be open with their colleagues about their medical condition. I have a mental illness, but only my spouse and immediate family are aware of this. While I have come to view my condition like any other medical/bio-chemical imbalance (perhaps no different from diabetes which affects the pancreas rather than the brain), I still think that many colleagues would take some of the attititudes expressed by some in this column -- that a professor with a brain imbalance is more like a pro-athlete with a shattered leg, than an employee who has been run over by a car.

    The problem is probably more serious and more widespread than most in academia know or would be willing to acknowledge. While diagnosis and acknowledgement of disability has become quite common amongst students today, this was not the case for many of us now already in the academy. More of us grew up with attittudes, even policies that meant you had to keep up or get out, and we were the one who coped and carried on. For many of us too, illness did not manifest itself, or did not become severe until we had already spent many years training for our careers, even taking up academic posts. I was in my first tenure-track post when I suffered an episode serious enough to prompt me to seek diagnosis and treatment.

    At the same time many of us, perhaps too many of us, fear possible repurcussions from disclosing our illness. There is still a lot of prejudices about mental illness -- that we can't function normally, that we are unreliable, that we are prone to violence, etc. If the illness involves paranoia or anxiety, disclosure becomes much more difficult still.

    The other factor is policy. Most of us probably don't even know how to begin the process of disclosure in a way that will insure and protect our rights. There is not a parallel system for faculty at most universities and student service offices are not set up to do much of anything for faculty. There are not systems to help review boards assess whether or not a professor's performance or lack there of was due to a medical condition or to a real lack of ability to teach and conduct research.

    As a result, in many university settings the attitutde seems to be "Don't ask, don't tell."

  • Posted by R2 , atty on April 20, 2007 at 6:00am EDT
  • Does anyone know what a grad student is to do when he is thrown out of school for having a bipolar episode.... can the student ever return to the same school?