News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
June 20, 2006
Over the latter quarter of the 20th century, the medical establishment generally took the view that the United States was on track to have a glut of doctors, and medical schools largely responded throughout the 1980s and 1990s with flat enrollments. In the last few years, however, some researchers and public policy makers have argued that the strategy may have worked a little too well, and that because some of the expected changes in American medicine haven’t unfolded in the predicted ways, the country now actually faces a physician shortfall over the next decade.
Citing those reports, the Association of American Medical Colleges on Monday called for a 30 percent increase in the enrollments of medical schools in the United States, both through expanding the size of existing schools and creating new ones. Just last year, the medical college group urged a 15 percent increase in enrollments, but its officials said that mounting new evidence assembled by its Center for Workforce Studies had persuaded officials that a larger rise was needed.
“Given the extensive time it takes to educate and train tomorrow’s doctors, efforts to increase enrollment must get underway as soon as possible to ensure that the health care needs of the nation in 2015 and beyond are met,” said Jordan J. Cohen, president of the AAMC. The group’s proposal would result in 5,000 new M.D. students annually.
Health care researchers like David C. Goodman, a professor of pediatrics at Dartmouth Medical College, challenge the notion that the country faces an undersupply of doctors, and argue instead that a redistribution of where the doctors are and what they do could not only meet Americans’ medical needs but improve the quality of their care. “A proposal like this would add costs to the system without evidence that this is going to help patients,” says Goodman, who compares the proposed enrollment increase unfavorably to other spending, such as greater health insurance or investing in quality initiatives, that directly improves care.
Ed Salsberg, the AAMC assistant vice president who directs its workforce studies center, acknowledges that skeptics may ask health care planners like him, “You were wrong before, why should we believe you now?” But he says several demographic and other factors contributed to the association’s decision to recommend bigger enrollment increases.
First, the assumption that changes in managed health care would greatly diminish demand from patients — an assumption that underscored the projections of the physician oversupply in the 1980s and 1990s — has largely failed to materialize. Second, the American population continues to increase and age, such that “by the time these doctors will be out in field, the baby boomers will be 70.” Third, about 250,000 of the nation’s 750,000 or so doctors are age 55 or older, expected to retire by 2020.
Underlying the medical college association’s statement is the assumption that while doctors educated at “osteopathic schools and schools outside the U.S.” will “continue to contribute importantly to meeting the health care needs of the United States,” physicians trained at traditional medical schools accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education should make up “the vast majority of licensed physicians” in the country. So while the AAMC statement looks to traditional medical colleges in the United States to fill most of the perceived void, it offers recommendations
As a result, it recommends that:
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
It’s great that the medical college association is recommending a 30 % increase in medical school admissions, but what do they suggest for financial aid for these medical students? My daughter is just entering undergraduate school and aspires to become a doctor. When she is ready to apply she will already be indebt for $80,000. Some scholarships and grants would sure help to meet this goal. So as with the cost of licensing, insuraning and employing these new doctors and their impact on the future healthcare system, “show me the money”
Paul Roden, Training Manager at La Salle University, at 9:17 am EDT on June 20, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Position Summary: The Institutions for Fragile States projects seeks a Communications Specialist to handle ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Chatham University invites applicants for a faculty position in Accounting starting in fall 2009. This is a 9-month, ... see job
Posting Description: University of Colorado Denver Instructor Physician Assistant/Nurse Practitioner ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job
Job Responsibilities: Applications are currently being accepted for two permanent ten-month Chemistry ... see job
Responsibilities will include working as a reference/circulation library assistand and will include evening and weekend ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Show me the money
Today’s U.S. medical system already consumes more GNP than its peers. Every new certified MD can script more than $1 million in additional costs (as well as drag along the medical-malpractice bar and medical-insurance companies).
Holy good night — where is the additional money coming from? Higher ed? Social Security?
When I lived in Oregon, the state rigorously prioritized treatments. When are Messrs. Bush and Kennedy going reveal theirs?
H.J., at 8:25 am EDT on June 20, 2006